Cited by 585Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

A randomized clinical trial of high‐intensity warfarin vs. conventional antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (WAPS)

Open access
FINAZZI, G., MARCHIOLI, R., BRANCACCIO, V., SCHINCO, P., WISLOFF, F., MUSIAL, J., BAUDO, F., BERRETTINI, M. +4 more·2005·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Background The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is uncertain. Retrospective studies show that only high-intensity oral anticoagulation [target international normalized ratio (INR) >3.0] is effective but a recent randomized clinical trial comparing high (INR range 3.0-4.0) vs. moderate (INR 2.0-3.0) intensities of anticoagulation failed to confirm this assumption.Methods We conducted a randomized trial in which 109 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and previous thrombosis were given either high-intensity warfarin (INR range 3.0-4.5, 54 patients) or standard antithrombotic therapy (warfarin, INR range 2.0-3.0 in 52 patients or aspirin alone, 100 mg day(-1) in three patients) to determine whether intensive anticoagulation is superior to standard treatment in preventing symptomatic thromboembolism without increasing the bleeding risk.Results The 109 patients enrolled in the trial were followed up for a median time of 3.6 years. Mean INR during follow-up was 3.2 (SD 0.6) in the high-intensity warfarin group and 2.5 (SD 0.3) (P < 0.0001) in the conventional treatment patients given warfarin. Recurrent thrombosis was observed in six of 54 patients (11.1%) assigned to receive high-intensity warfarin and in three of 55 patients (5.5%) assigned to receive conventional treatment [hazard ratio for the high intensity group, 1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-7.89]. Major and minor bleeding occurred in 15 patients (two major) (27.8%) assigned to receive high-intensity warfarin and eight (three major) (14.6%) assigned to receive conventional treatment (hazard ratio 2.18; 95% CI 0.92-5.15).Conclusions High-intensity warfarin was not superior to standard treatment in preventing recurrent thrombosis in patients with APS and was associated with an increased rate of minor hemorrhagic complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01340.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and first venous thrombosis, there is no additional benefit of a vitamin K antagonist target INR of 3-4 versus 2-3, based on an RCT and pooled data from five studies that included a majority with venous events.

    “Data from an RCT21 reporting exclusively on patients with venous events and pooled data from five studies that included a majority with venous events21–25 showed no additional benefit of a target INR of 3–4 vs INR of 2–3.”

    From EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pooled data from two retrospective studies and two RCTs showed no statistically significant difference in thrombosis recurrences between vitamin K antagonist target INR 3-4 and INR 2-3 (relative risk 0.46 (0.06-3.52)).

    “Pooled data from two retrospective studies and two RCTs21–24 showed that there was no statistically significant difference in thrombosis recurrences between treatment with VKA with a target INR of 3–4 and treatment with INR of 2–3 (relative risk (RR) 0.46 (0.06–3.52)).”

    From EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Study design and Results sections (page not specified) establish that WAPS is one of the randomized trials comparing high- and conventional-intensity treatment and found no statistically significant difference in recurrent thrombosis. But its pooled analysis includes only WAPS and the Crowther trial; it does not report a pooled analysis of two retrospective studies and two RCTs or the stated RR of 0.46 (0.06–3.52). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 10-year cumulative TE incidence of 24.3% compares well to the thrombotic risk observed in the WAPS study and the Euro-Phospholipid Project registry, but was lower than the value in the Piedmont cohort study and higher than that in the study by Pengo et al.

    “The 10-year cumulative TE incidence of 24.3% compares well to the thrombotic risk observed in the WAPS study [31] and the very large Euro-Phospholipid Project registry [6], but was lower than the value in the recently published Piedmont cohort study [32] and higher than that in the recently published study by Pengo et al. [30].”
  • According to the literature, most relapses in antiphospholipid syndrome occur early during follow-up and at the same site as the previous event.

    “According to the literature, most of these relapses were observed early during the study, at the same site as the previous event [2].”

    From Antithrombotic effects of hydroxychloroquine in primary antiphospholipid syndrome patients (2013) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Addendum (Table 2; page unavailable) reports recurrent thrombosis by event type and treatment group, but not when events occurred or whether they were at the site of a previous event. Searches for early recurrences and the site of previous events found no passage establishing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Khamashta MA, Cuadrado MJ, Mujic F, Taub NA, Hunt BJ, Hughes GRV. The management of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syn- drome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 993-7.
  2. 9 GISSI Prevenzione Investigators. n-3 PUFA and vitamin E in 11,324 post-MI patients: Results of the GISSI Prevenzione trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 447-55.
  3. Brandt JT, Triplett DA, Alving B, Scharrer I. Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74: 1185- 90.
  4. Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Patel SP, Hughes GRV. Evaluation of the anticardiolipin antibody test: report of a standardization workshop, held April 4th, 1986. Clin Exp Immunol 1987; 68: 215-222.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FINAZZI, G., MARCHIOLI, R., BRANCACCIO, V., SCHINCO, P., WISLOFF, F., MUSIAL, J., BAUDO, F., BERRETTINI, M., Testa, S., D'ANGELO, A., TOGNONI, G., & BARBUI, T.
Affiliations
  • Mario Negri Sud Foundation (IT)
  • Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona (IT)
Corresponding author
MARCHIOLI, R.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
848-853
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027467473
Cited by
585
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 36
FWCI
21.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, oral anticoagulation, recurrent thrombosis, thromboprophylaxis, aspirin, bleeding risk, international normalized ratio, antithrombotic therapy, venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, stroke prevention, pregnancy complications, antiphospholipid antibodies
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Algorithms, Anticoagulants, Aspirin, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Risk, Statistics as Topic, Thromboembolism, Thrombosis, Time Factors, Warfarin, Odds Ratio, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, International Normalized Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review