CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and Health

Differences in adaptations to 1 year of aerobic endurance training: individual patterns of nonresponse.

Scharhag‐Rosenberger, F., Walitzek, S., Kindermann, W., Meyer, T.·2012·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01139.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Lacking responses to endurance training (ET) have been observed for several variables. However, detailed analyses of individuals' responses are scarce. To learn more about the variability of ET adaptations, patterns of response were analyzed for each subject in a 1‐year ET study. Eighteen participants [42±5 years, body mass index: 24±3 kg/m 2, maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max): 38±5 mL/min/kg] completed a 1‐year jogging/walking program on 3 days/week, 45 min/session at 60% heart rate (HR) reserve. VO 2max, resting HR (rHR), exercise HR (eHR) and individual anaerobic threshold (IAT) were determined by treadmill and cycling ergometry respectively. Intraindividual coefficients of variation were extracted from the literature to distinguish random changes from training responses. Eight participants showed improvements in all variables. In 10 participants, one or two variables did not improve (VO 2max, rHR, eHR and IAT remained unchanged in four, four, three and one cases, respectively). At least one variable improved in each subject. Data indicate that ET adaptations might be detected in each individual using multiple variables of different adaptation levels and intensity domains. Nonresponse seems to occur frequently and might affect all variables. Further studies should investigate whether nonresponders improve with altered training. Furthermore, associations between patterns of nonresponse and health benefits from ET are worth considering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01139.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement errors are inevitable in repeated measurements and are caused by random biological fluctuations that do not represent a meaningful change in the outcome variable.

    “(ii) measurement errors are inevitable in repeated measurements and are caused, for instance, by random biological fluctuations that do not represent a meaningful change in the outcome variable (Atkinson and Nevill, 1998; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2012; Atkinson and Batterham, 2015; Williamson et al., 2017; Pickering and Kiely, 2019a)”

    From Dose-Response Matters! - A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise-Cognition Research (2019) · cites this paper as Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Scharhag‐Rosenberger, F., Walitzek, S., Kindermann, W., & Meyer, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Saarland University (DE)
Corresponding author
Scharhag‐Rosenberger, F.
ORCID
Meyer, T.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-11
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
113-118
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01139.x
OpenAlex
W2159091122
Cited by
118
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
aerobic endurance training, VO2max, resting heart rate, heart rate response to exercise, individual anaerobic threshold, within-person variability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Exercise Test, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Jogging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Anaerobic Threshold, Exercise, Linear Models, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review