Cited by 160Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neuroimaging of love: FMRI meta-analysis evidence toward new perspectives in sexual medicine

Open access
Ortigue, Stephanie, Bianchi-Demicheli, Francesco, Patel, Nisa, Frum, Chris, Lewis, James W.·2010·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Brain imaging is becoming a powerful tool in the study of human cerebral functions related to close personal relationships. Outside of subcortical structures traditionally thought to be involved in reward-related systems, a wide range of neuroimaging studies in relationship science indicate a prominent role for different cortical networks and cognitive factors. Thus, the field needs a better anatomical/network/whole-brain model to help translate scientific knowledge from lab bench to clinical models and ultimately to the patients suffering from disorders associated with love and couple relationships. AIM: The aim of the present review is to provide a review across wide range of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies to critically identify the cortical networks associated with passionate love, and to compare and contrast it with other types of love (such as maternal love and unconditional love for persons with intellectual disabilities). METHODS: Retrospective review of pertinent neuroimaging literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Review of published literature on fMRI studies of love illustrating brain regions associated with different forms of love. RESULTS: Although all fMRI studies of love point to the subcortical dopaminergic reward-related brain systems (involving dopamine and oxytocin receptors) for motivating individuals in pair-bonding, the present meta-analysis newly demonstrated that different types of love involve distinct cerebral networks, including those for higher cognitive functions such as social cognition and bodily self-representation. CONCLUSIONS: These metaresults provide the first stages of a global neuroanatomical model of cortical networks involved in emotions related to different aspects of love. Developing this model in future studies should be helpful for advancing clinical approaches helpful in sexual medicine and couple therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01999.x

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The co-release of dopamine and oxytocin associated with repeated interactions with a specific partner contributes to additional reward-driven learning about romantic behaviors.

    “The co-release of dopamine and oxytocin associated with repeated interactions with a specific partner contributes to additional reward-driven learning about romantic behaviors.”
  • Romantic love involves increased activation in dopamine-rich subcortical regions associated with processing emotion, rewards, and motivation; in higher-order cortical brain regions associated with social cognition and self-representation; and decreased activation in the amygdala.

    “Romantic love involves increased activation in dopamine-rich subcortical regions associated with processing emotion, rewards, and motivation; in the higher-order cortical brain regions associated with social cognition and self-representation; and decreased activation in the amygdala (Ortigue et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ortigue, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Patel, N., Frum, C., & Lewis, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Syracuse University , Syracuse, NY , USA
  • Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
3541-3552
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2097132987
Cited by
160
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • West Virginia University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
love, passionate love, cortical networks, dopaminergic reward system, oxytocin, pair bonding, social cognition, maternal love, unconditional love, intellectual disability, couple therapy, sexual medicine
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Dopamine, Emotions, Hemodynamics, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Reward, Sexual Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review