Cited by 101Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

A Randomized Trial of Internet-Delivered Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder in High School Students

Tillfors, Maria, Andersson, Gerhard, Ekselius, Lisa, Furmark, Tomas, Lewenhaupt, Susanne, Karlsson, Anders, Carlbring, Per·2011·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown effective for university students with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and public speaking fears. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the promising results can be transferred to high school students suffering from this condition. A total of 19 speech-anxious high school students with SAD were randomized either into 9 weeks of Internet-delivered CBT or to a wait-list control group. Significant improvements were found on measures of social anxiety, general anxiety, and depression. Effects were maintained at 1-year follow-up. The average within- and between-group effect sizes (Cohen's d) for the primary social anxiety scales at posttest were 0.98 and 1.38, respectively. However, the average number of completed modules in the CBT program was low. Although compliance can be improved, the results suggest that Internet-based guided self-help is effective in the treatment of high school students with SAD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2011.555486

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tillfors, M., Andersson, G., Ekselius, L., Furmark, T., Lewenhaupt, S., Karlsson, A., & Carlbring, P.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Tillfors, Maria
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2011-06
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
147-157
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W1987974754
Cited by
101
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, high school students, speaking anxiety, guided self-help, medication adherence, general anxiety, depression, maintenance therapy, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Students, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review