The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA
Open accessAbstract
Drawing from Marks, Mathieu, and Zaccaro (2001), we proposed that narrowly focused teamwork processes load onto 3 higher‐order teamwork process dimensions, which in turn load onto a general teamwork process factor. Results of model testing using meta‐analyses of relationships among narrow teamwork processes provided support for the structure of this multidimensional theory of teamwork process. Meta‐analytic results also indicated that teamwork processes have positive relationships with team performance and member satisfaction, and that the relationships are similar across the teamwork dimensions and levels of process specificity. Supplemental analyses revealed that the 3 intermediate‐level teamwork processes are positively and strongly related to cohesion and potency. Results of moderator analyses suggested that relationships among teamwork processes and team performance are somewhat dependent on task interdependence and team size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Self-citationWhat Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF CONFLICT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF INTRAGROUP CONFLICT AND GROUP PERFORMANCE.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069453 · Cited by 2,487
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
Cited by
Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.
Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A. S., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000298 · Cited by 1,283
Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0022777 · Cited by 897
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness
Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034531 · Cited by 731
A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000128 · Cited by 593
Self-citationvan Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.003 · Cited by 514
Bartsch, S., Weber, E., Büttgen, M., & Huber, A. (2020) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2020-0160 · Cited by 475
Mindfulness in organizations: a cross-level review
Sutcliffe, K. M., Vogus, T. J., & Dane, E. (2016) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062531 · Cited by 428
Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving
Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618808244 · Cited by 390
Zajac, S., Woods, A., Tannenbaum, S., Salas, E., & Holladay, C. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.606445 · Cited by 235
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
Self-citationCredé, M., & Harms, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2008 · Cited by 181
Interactive Effects of Team Virtuality and Work Design on Team Functioning
Handke, L., Klonek, F. E., Parker, S. K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419863490 · Cited by 88
A longitudinal examination of the relationship between team leadership and performance
Gupta, V. K., Huang, R., & Niranjan, S. (2010) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051809359184 · Cited by 82
Cross-Disciplinary Care: A Systematic Review on Teamwork Processes in Health Care
Dinh, J. V., Traylor, A. M., Kilcullen, M. P., Perez, J. A., Schweissing, E. J., Venkatesh, A., & Salas, E. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419872002 · Cited by 73
Team Decision Making in Virtual and Face-to-Face Environments
O’Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., & Law, S. J. (2016) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9465-3 · Cited by 54
Artificial Intelligence and Groups: Effects of Attitudes and Discretion on Collaboration
Bezrukova, K., Griffith, T. L., Spell, C., Rice, V., & Yang, H. E. (2023) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011231160574 · Cited by 51
McGrath, M. J., Duenser, A., Lacey, J., & Paris, C. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100200 · Cited by 51
Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback
Deneen, C. C., & Hoo, H.-T. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284 · Cited by 48
McGuier, E. A., Kolko, D. J., Stadnick, N. A., Brookman-Frazee, L., Wolk, C. B., Yuan, C. T., Burke, C. S., & Aarons, G. A. (2023) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/26334895231190855 · Cited by 34
Criteria Issues and Team Effectiveness
Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0027 · Cited by 34
Self-citationRosen, M. A., & Dietz, A. S. (2017) · The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Team Working and Collaborative Processes · doi:10.1002/9781118909997.ch21 · Cited by 26
What Matters for Team Cohesion Measurement? A Synthesis
Grossman, R., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2015) · Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017007 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- LePINE, J. A., PICCOLO, R. F., JACKSON, C. L., MATHIEU, J. E., & SAUL, J. R.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-307
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2056481601
- Cited by
- 940
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 43.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
