CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 163Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why panpsychism doesn’t help us explain consciousness

Goff, Philip·2009·dialectica
DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01196.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper starts from the assumption that panpsychism is counterintuitive and metaphysically demanding. A number of philosophers, whilst not denying these negative aspects of the view, think that panpsychism has in its favour that it offers a good explanation of consciousness. In opposition to this, the paper argues that panpsychism cannot help us to explain consciousness, at least not the kind of consciousness we have pre-theoretical reason to believe in.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01196.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chalmers, 1996, The Conscious Mind: Towards a Fundamental Theory
  2. Lewis, 1988, Proceedings of the Russellian Society
  3. Rey, 1995, Conscious Experience
  4. Strawson, 2002, Towards a Science of Consciousness III

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Goff, P.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Goff, Philip
ORCID
Goff, Philip
Venue
dialectica
Publisher
Verein philosophie.ch
Published
2009
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
289-311
ISSN
0012-2017 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01196.x
OpenAlex
W2109455157
Cited by
163
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2434 d)
Locations
  • dialectica (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
panpsychism, consciousness, metaphysics of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review