The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The art of modelling range-shifting species: The art of modelling range-shifting species
Abstract
1. Species are shifting their ranges at an unprecedented rate through human transportation and environmental change. Correlative species distribution models (SDMs) are frequently applied for predicting potential future distributions of range-shifting species, despite these models’ assumptions that species are at equilibrium with the environments used to train (fit) the models, and that the training data are representative of conditions to which the models are predicted. Here we explore modelling approaches that aim to minimize extrapolation errors and assess predictions against prior biological knowledge. Our aim was to promote methods appropriate to range-shifting species. 2. We use an invasive species, the cane toad in Australia, as an example, predicting potential distributions under both current and climate change scenarios. We use four SDM methods, and trial weighting schemes and choice of background samples appropriate for species in a state of spread. We also test two methods for including information from a mechanistic model. Throughout, we explore graphical techniques for understanding model behaviour and reliability, including the extent of extrapolation. 3. Predictions varied with modelling method and data treatment, particularly with regard to the use and treatment of absence data. Models that performed similarly under current climatic conditions deviated widely when transferred to a novel climatic scenario. 4. The results highlight problems with using SDMs for extrapolation, and demonstrate the need for methods and tools to understand models and predictions. We have made progress in this direction and have implemented exploratory techniques as new options in the free modelling software, MaxEnt. Our results also show that deliberately controlling the fit of models and integrating information from mechanistic models can enhance the reliability of correlative predictions of species in non-equilibrium and novel settings. 5. Implications. The biodiversity of many regions in the world is experiencing novel threats created by species invasions and climate change. Predictions of future species distributions are required for management, but there are acknowledged problems with many current methods, and relatively few advances in techniques for understanding or overcoming these. The methods presented in this manuscript and made accessible in MaxEnt provide a forward step.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The present habitat suitability and distribution of each species were estimated using the MaxEnt modelling technique, which employs maximum entropy methods and is particularly resilient when dealing with presence-only species records (Elith et al., 2010).”
From Projecting future climate change impacts on the distribution of the ‘Octopus vulgaris species complex’ (2022) · cites this paper as Elith et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Without clear records on survey effort across the landscape, we cannot distinguish between areas that are environmentally unsuitable and those that are under-sampled (Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010: Appendix S1).”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010
In the citing paper
“The executable Maxent software (v.3.4.4) (Phillips, Dudík & Schapire 2021) has several modifiable parameters that influence the model performance, and ultimately the effectiveness of the predictive model (e.g., Barbet-Massin et al. 2012; Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010; Fourcade et al. 2014; Merow, Smith & Silander 2013; Morales, Fernández & Baca-González 2017; Phillips et al. 2017).”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010
In the citing paper
“The executable Maxent software (v.3.4.4) (Phillips, Dudík & Schapire 2021) has several modifiable parameters that influence the model performance, and ultimately the effectiveness of the predictive model (e.g., Barbet-Massin et al. 2012; Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010; Fourcade et al. 2014; Merow, Smith & Silander 2013; Morales, Fernández & Baca-González 2017; Phillips et al. 2017).”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010
In the citing paper
“The executable Maxent software (v.3.4.4) (”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney \u0026 Phillips 2010
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · Cited by 15,396
Self-citationRegression Modeling Strategies
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,270
Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., et al. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · Cited by 9,088
Self-citationEcological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change
Parmesan, C. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 · Cited by 8,652
Brown, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532174 · Cited by 8,263
Koyak, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290538 · Cited by 7,717
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- van Beurden, 1981, Bioclimatic limits to the spread of Bufo marinus in Australia: a baseline, Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia, 11, 143
- Lockwood, 2007, Invasion Ecology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,002
Mullins, J. C., Garofolo, G., Ert, M. V., Fasanella, A., Lukhnova, L. Y., Hugh‐Jones, M., & Blackburn, J. K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072451 · Cited by 53
Chalghaf, B., Chlif, S., Mayala, B. K., Ghawar, W., Bettaieb, J., Harrabi, M., Bénié, G. B., Michael, E., & Salah, A. B. (2016) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.15-0345 · Cited by 53
Carneiro, L. R. D. A., LIMA, A. P., Machado, R. B., & Magnusson, W. E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146543 · Cited by 53
“MESS, however, PLOSONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0146543 January 19, 2016 5 / 17 uses percentiles that can include negative values that will indicate sites in which at least one variable has a value outside the observed range of values in the training set, thereby indicating a novel predicted environment [24].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJarnevich, C. S., Talbert, M. K., Morisette, J. T., Aldridge, C. L., Brown, C. S., Kumar, S., Manier, D. J., Talbert, C. B., & Holcombe, T. R. (2017) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.08.017 · Cited by 53
Ha, H., & Shilling, F. M. (2017) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.005 · Cited by 53
Iannella, M., Cerasoli, F., & Biondi, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/s12983-017-0239-4 · Cited by 53
“A multivariate environmental similarity surface (MESS) [58] was computed in order to quantify the degree of extrapolation (i.e. prediction to environmental conditions that differ from those represented within the training data [55]) that the obtained SDMs would require when projected to the considered past scenarios […”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRehnus, M., Bollmann, K., Schmatz, D. R., Hackländer, K., & Braunisch, V. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14087 · Cited by 53
“In addition, we performed a multivariate environmental similarity surface (MESS) analysis (Elith et al., 2010) to show the multivariate similarity of each point of the study area under future climate conditions to the environmental range measured under current conditions (Appendix S4).”
MethodBounding species distribution models
Stohlgren, T. J., Jarnevich, C. S., Esaias, W. E., & Morisette, J. T. (2011) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/57.5.642 · Cited by 53
Frans, V. F., Augé, A. A., Fyfe, J., Zhang, Y., McNally, N., Edelhoff, H., Balkenhol, N., & Engler, J. O. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13736 · Cited by 60
“…range requires understanding and proper handling of predictive model limitations, for example, how much extrapolation to allow into new regions (Elith et al., 2010) or a model's inability to account for environmental conditions that are non-existent in a species' current range but be - come…”
do Amaral, K. B., Alvares, D. J., Heinzelmann, L. S., Martins, M. B., Siciliano, S. J., & Moreno, I. B. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2015.07.013 · Cited by 52
Urbani, F., D’Alessandro, P., Frasca, R., & Biondi, M. (2015) · Zoologischer Anzeiger · doi:10.1016/j.jcz.2015.08.002 · Cited by 52
Niche conservatism and the potential for the crayfish P rocambarus clarkiito invade S outh A merica
Palaoro, A. V., Dalosto, M. M., Costa, G. C., & Santos, S. (2013) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.12134 · Cited by 52
Gallagher, R. V., Duursma, D. E., O’Donnell, J., Wilson, P. D., Downey, P. O., Hughes, L., & Leishman, M. R. (2012) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0342-6 · Cited by 52
Modeling the distribution of odonates: a review
Collins, S. D., & McIntyre, N. E. (2015) · Freshwater Science · doi:10.1086/682688 · Cited by 52
Hortal, J., Lobo, J. M., & Jiménez‐Valverde, A. (2012) · Natureza & Conservação · doi:10.4322/natcon.2012.029 · Cited by 52
Idohou, R., Assogbadjo, A. E., Kakaï, R. G., & Peterson, A. T. (2016) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-016-9955-6 · Cited by 52
“Hence, we included only a subset of variables with Pearson correlation coefficients below 0.80 (Elith et al. 2010).”
MethodInfluentialPredicting the Potential Distribution of Polygala tenuifolia Willd. under Climate Change in China
Jiang, H., Liu, T., Lin, L., Zhao, Y., Pei, L., & Zhao, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163718 · Cited by 52
Where winter rules: Modeling wild boar distribution in its north-eastern range
Markov, N., Pankova, N. L., & Мorelle, К. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.157 · Cited by 53
Arslan, E. S., & Örücü, Ö. K. (2020) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00692-3 · Cited by 52
“MaxEnt identifies the maximum entropy of observable points such as species, plants and environmental factors and uses machine learning predicting future times and locations) in many ecological, evolutionary, conservation and bio-security applications (Elith et al. 2010).”
Feldmeier, S., Schmidt, B. R., Zimmermann, N. E., Veith, M., Ficetola, G. F., & Lötters, S. (2020) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.13146 · Cited by 51
Spatial quantification of the world population potentially exposed to Zika virus
Alaniz, A. J., Bacigalupo, A., & Cattan, P. E. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw366 · Cited by 49
Embracing Ensemble Species Distribution Models to Inform At-Risk Species Status Assessments
Ramirez‐Reyes, C., Nazeri, M., Street, G. M., Jones‐Farrand, D. T., Vilella, F. J., & Evans, K. O. (2021) · Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management · doi:10.3996/jfwm-20-072 · Cited by 51
Climate change threatens native potential agroforestry plant species in Brazil
Lima, V. P., de Lima, R. A. F., Joner, F., Siddique, I., Raes, N., & ter Steege, H. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06234-3 · Cited by 58
Santos, H., Javier Juste, B., Ibáñez, C., Palmeirim, J. M., Godinho, R., Amorim, F., Alves, P. J., Costa, H., de Paz, Ó., Pérez‐Suárez, G., et al. (2014) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12247 · Cited by 51
Ecological niche models of invasive seaweeds
Marcelino, V. R., & Verbruggen, H. (2015) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/jpy.12322 · Cited by 51
Stiels, D., Schidelko, K., Engler, J. O., van den Elzen, R., & Rödder, D. (2011) · Journal für Ornithologie · doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0662-9 · Cited by 51
Ježková, T., Riddle, B. R., Card, D. C., Schield, D. R., Eckstut, M. E., & Castoe, T. A. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13012 · Cited by 51
Hierarchical genetic structure shaped by topography in a narrow-endemic montane grasshopper
Noguerales, V., Cordero, P. J., & Ortego, J. (2016) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0663-7 · Cited by 52
“We used this approach to identify and discard climate layers with areas where the predictions should be treated with caution, due to the variables are outside the range present in the training data (for more details see [68]).”
Methodvan Riemsdijk, I., Arntzen, J. W., Bogaerts, S., Franzen, M., Litvinchuk, S. N., Olgun, K., & Wielstra, B. (2017) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.05.028 · Cited by 50
“Feature type was restricted to hinge features for a smoother model fit, emphasising trends rather than idiosyncrasies of the data (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundModeling the response of an endangered flagship predator to climate change in Iran
Ashrafzadeh, M. R., Naghipour, A. A., Haidarian, M., & Khorozyan, I. (2018) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/s13364-018-0384-y · Cited by 51
“As based on presence-only modeling (Elith et al. 2006; Elith et al. 2010; Barbet-Massin et al. 2012), these six models require simulated pseudo-absence data on locations where leopards are absent.”
MethodSubba, B., Sen, S., Ravikanth, G., & Nobis, M. P. (2018) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.035 · Cited by 51
Vasconcellos, M. M., Colli, G. R., Weber, J. N., Ortiz, E. M., Rodrigues, M. T., & Cannatella, D. C. (2019) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15045 · Cited by 57
Srivastava, V., Griess, V. C., & Keena, M. A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57020-7 · Cited by 51
Stephenson, F., Rowden, A. A., Anderson, O. F., Pitcher, C. R., Pinkerton, M. H., Petersen, G. L., & Bowden, D. A. (2021) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsab162 · Cited by 50
Radha, K. O., & Khwarahm, N. R. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142114621 · Cited by 50
Assessing the exposure of lion tamarins ( Leontopithecus spp.) to future climate change
Meyer, A. L. S., Pie, M. R., & Passos, F. C. (2013) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22247 · Cited by 50
Geographical distribution, climatic variability and thermo‐tolerance of Chagas disease vectors
de la Vega, G., Medone, P., Ceccarelli, S., Rabinovich, J., & Schilman, P. E. (2014) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.01028 · Cited by 49
Cardador, L., Carrete, M., Gallardo, B., & Tella, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12694 · Cited by 50
Zhu, G., Gariépy, T. D., Haye, T., & Bu, W. (2016) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-016-0786-z · Cited by 50
“Novel environments are problematic for correlative ENMs parameterized on a species’ native range, because they require ENMs to extrapolate into unsampled environmental space (Elith et al. 2010).”
InfluentialRetractedRodríguez, L., García, J. J., Carreño, F., & Martínez, B. D. ‐. (2019) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12883 · Cited by 53
“Then, the areas where the projections fell outside the range of the training data were inspected using the most dissimilar variable (MoD) map provided by MaxEnt, thereby indicating the variable furthest outside its training range (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBattini, N., Farias, N. E., Giachetti, C. B., Schwindt, E., & Bortolus, A. (2019) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12878 · Cited by 50
“To restrict model projections, we performed multivariate environmental similarity surface (MESS) analyses during each run of the models (Elith et al. 2010), and restricted the projections to areas with positive MESS values.”
MethodBiber, M. F., Voskamp, A., Niamir, A., Hickler, T., & Hof, C. (2019) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.13696 · Cited by 51
Zingore, K. M., Sithole, G., Abdel-Rahman, E. M., Mohamed, S. A., Ekesi, S., Tanga, C. M., & Mahmoud, M. E. E. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243047 · Cited by 55
“Thereafter, a regularization coefficient of 2 was employed as a penalty to the model to prevent overfitting by limiting the strength of the feature classes selected [75].”
MethodChampion, C., Brodie, S. J., & Coleman, M. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.622299 · Cited by 53
“…of habitat suitability do not reflect species realised distributions directly due to their reliance on correlative relationships between species and available environmental conditions (Elith et al., 2010), which also do not incorporate the effects of biotic interactions on species distributions.”
BackgroundHeming, N. M., Schroth, G., Talora, D. C., & de Faria, D. M. (2022) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-022-00780-w · Cited by 49
“These analyses are typically used during model transference (past/future climate or new geographic areas) to find variables responsible for novel climatic conditions in comparison with the calibration area (Elith et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZengeya, T. A., Booth, A. J., & Chimimba, C. T. (2015) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e17074959 · Cited by 49
Taxonomic uncertainty and decision making for biosecurity: spatial models for myrtle/guava rust
Elith, J., Simpson, J., Hirsch, M., & Burgman, M. A. (2012) · Australasian Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/s13313-012-0178-7 · Cited by 49
Self-citationSmith, A. B., Santos, M. J., Koo, M. S., Rowe, K. M. C., Rowe, K. C., Patton, J. L., Perrine, J. D., Beissinger, S. R., & Moritz, C. C. (2013) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00107.x · Cited by 49
Gritti, E. S., Duputié, A., Massol, F., & Chuine, I. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12032 · Cited by 49
Next-Generation Invaders? Hotspots for Naturalised Sleeper Weeds in Australia under Future Climates
Duursma, D. E., Gallagher, R. V., Roger, E., Hughes, L., Downey, P. O., & Leishman, M. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084222 · Cited by 49
Adams‐Hosking, C., McAlpine, C., Rhodes, J. R., Grantham, H. S., & Moss, P. (2012) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00881.x · Cited by 49
Predicting distribution changes of a mire ecosystem under future climates
Keith, D. A., Elith, J., & Simpson, C. C. (2014) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12173 · Cited by 49
Self-citationNew hope for the survival of the Amur leopard in China
Jiang, G., Qi, J., Wang, G., Shi, Q., Darman, Y. A., Hebblewhite, M., Miquelle, D. G., Li, Z., Zhang, X., Gu, J., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep15475 · Cited by 50
“…after our survey efforts, we felt we could not discriminate between areas that where unsuitable patches from those that where under-sampled and so we used weighted presence data and background samples from current and potential distribution areas as described in the paper of Elith et al. (2010)13.”
MethodMartínez‐Freiría, F., Crochet, P., Soumia Fahd, D., Géniez, P., Brito, J. C., & Velo‐Antón, G. (2017) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blx038 · Cited by 48
Kongsfjorden as Harbinger of the Future Arctic: Knowns, Unknowns and Research Priorities
Bischof, K., Convey, P., Duarte, P., Gattuso, J., Granberg, M., Hop, H., Hoppe, C. J. M., Jiménez, C., Lisitsyn, L., Martínez, B. D. ‐., et al. (2019) · Advances in polar ecology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46425-1_14 · Cited by 49
Roy‐Dufresne, E., Saltré, F., Cooke, B. D., Mellin, C., MUTZE, G. J., Cox, T. E., & Fordham, D. A. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5609 · Cited by 49
“Robust predictions from SDMs require the models to be trained using data (i.e., presence/absence field observations) obtained from the entire range of environmental conditions suitable for the per‐ sistence of the species (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodLiu, B., Gao, X., Zheng, K., Ma, J., Jiao, Z., Xiao, J., & Wang, H. (2020) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.5861 · Cited by 49
Valencia‐Rodríguez, D., Jiménez-Segura, L. F., Rogéliz, C. A., & Parra, J. L. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247876 · Cited by 51
“This algorithm was chosen because it only requires occurrence records and its application in previous studies has given good results [30, 31].”
MethodBaquero, R. A., Barbosa, A. M., Ayllón, D., Guerra, C. A., Sánchez, E., Araújo, M. B., & Nicola, G. G. (2021) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.13401 · Cited by 52
How well do species distribution models predict occurrences in exotic ranges?
Nguyen, D. T., & Leung, B. (2022) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13482 · Cited by 52
Ecological Niche Modelling Approaches: Challenges and Applications in Vector-Borne Diseases
Cuervo, P., Artigas, P., Lorenzo‐Morales, J., Bargues, M. D., & Mas‐Coma, S. (2023) · Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease · doi:10.3390/tropicalmed8040187 · Cited by 48
“(i) the Multivariate Environmental Similarity Surface (MESS) readily incorporated in the Maxent software [169].”
MethodWagner, T., Schliep, E. M., North, J. S., Kundel, H., Custer, C. A., Ruzich, J. K., & Hansen, G. J. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2214199120 · Cited by 49
Ejaz, M. R., Jaoua, S., Ahmadi, M., & Shabani, F. (2023) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2023.103177 · Cited by 48
Species distribution models and island biogeography: Challenges and prospects
Benavides, E., Sadler, J., Graham, L., & Matthews, T. J. (2024) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02943 · Cited by 48
Guisan, A., Chevalier, M., Adde, A., Zarzo‐Arias, A., Goicolea, T., Broennimann, O., Petitpierre, B., Scherrer, D., Rey, P., Collart, F., et al. (2025) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70063 · Cited by 55
“…and (ii) a larger proportion of non-analog conditions is likely to occur in the future leading to prediction errors also in loca - tions that are included within the training area but where no prediction errors are expected under current conditions (Elith et al., 2010 ; Velazco et al., 2024 ).”
Callen, S. T., & Miller, A. J. (2015) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12341 · Cited by 48
Petersen, M. J. (2012) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0337-3 · Cited by 48
Gould, S. F., Beeton, N. J., Harris, R. M. B., Hutchinson, M. F., Lechner, A. M., Porfirio, L. L., & Mackey, B. (2014) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1319 · Cited by 48
Nauman, T., Duniway, M. C., Villarreal, M. L., & Poitras, T. B. (2017) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.034 · Cited by 47
“, 2003) andpredictive ecological modeling (PEM) (Chee et al., 2016; Elith et al., 2010; Guisan and Zimmermann, 2000; MacMillan et al., 2007) offer a wide range of geographic tools for creating both a spatial and thematic linkage between field sites for reference identification and critical zone assessment (Bui, 2016).”
BackgroundModelling the Risk Posed by the Zebra Mussel Dreissena polymorpha: Italy as a Case Study
Bosso, L., Conno, C. D., & Russo, D. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0882-8 · Cited by 48
“To decrease the number of variables for the final distribution models, we first eliminated the highly correlated predictors and retained those with a Pearson’s |r| < 0.80 (Elith et al. 2010).”
MethodResultInfluentialNavarro, M. Á. P., Sapes, G., Batllori, E., Serra-Diaz, J., Esteve, M. A., & Lloret, F. (2018) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-018-0254-0 · Cited by 32
Risk of biodiversity collapse under climate change in the Afro-Arabian region
Soultan, A., Wikelski, M. C., & Safi, K. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37851-6 · Cited by 51
Caetano, G. H. D. O., Santos, J. C., Godinho, L. B., Cavalcante, V. H. G. L., Diele‐Viegas, L. M., Campelo, P. H., Martins, L. F., Oliveira, A. F. S., Alvarenga, J. M., Wiederhecker, H. C., et al. (2020) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.07123 · Cited by 51
Cong, M., Xu, Y., Tang, L., Yang, W., & Jian, M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230969 · Cited by 48
“SDMs identify relationships between the known occurrence of a species (presence or presence/absence data) and environmental data, and use these relationships to make predictions for all unsampled areas in the study region [14,15].”
MethodSharma, A., Dubey, V. K., Johnson, J. A., Rawal, Y. K., & Sivakumar, K. (2020) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106900 · Cited by 48
Heshmati, I., Khorasani, N., Shams-Esfandabad, B., & Riazi, B. (2019) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-018-7154-9 · Cited by 48
A framework to integrate innovations in invasion science for proactive management
van Rees, C. B., Hand, B. K., Carter, S. C., Bargeron, C. T., Cline, T. J., Daniel, W. M., Ferrante, J. A., Gaddis, K. D., Hunter, M. E., Jarnevich, C. S., et al. (2022) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12859 · Cited by 55
Finding what you don’t know: Testing SDM methods for poorly known species
Radomski, T., Beamer, D. A., Babineau, A. M., Wilson, C., Pechmann, J., & Kozak, K. (2022) · Diversity and Distributions: A journal of biological invasions and biodiversity · doi:10.1111/ddi.13536 · Cited by 44
“Negative values of MESS indicate extrapolation outside the range of predictors during model calibration, which could have negative consequences on model performance (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodCunze, S., & Klimpel, S. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.9141 · Cited by 47
Moura, M. R., do Nascimento, F. A. O., Paolucci, L. N., Silva, D. P., & Santos, B. A. (2023) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.14139 · Cited by 52
Caplat, P., Cheptou, P., Diez, J. M., Guisan, A., Larson, B. M. H., MacDougall, A. S., Peltzer, D. A., Richardson, D. M., Shea, K., van Kleunen, M., et al. (2013) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00430.x · Cited by 47
Ecosystem risk assessment of G eorgina gidgee woodlands in central Australia
Wardle, G. M., Greenville, A. C., Frank, A. S. K., Tischler, M., Emery, N. J., & Dickman, C. R. (2015) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/aec.12265 · Cited by 47
Souissi, J. B., Rifi, M., Ghanem, R., Ghozzi, L., Boughedir, W., & Azzurro, E. (2014) · Management of Biological Invasions · doi:10.3391/mbi.2014.5.4.06 · Cited by 47
Gassert, F., Schulte, U., Husemann, M., Ulrich, W., Rödder, D., Hochkirch, A., Engel, E., Meyer, J., & Habel, J. C. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12109 · Cited by 47
Greenspan, E., Nielsen, C. K., & Cassel, K. W. (2018) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-018-0778-2 · Cited by 47
Engelhardt, E. K., Neuschulz, E. L., & Hof, C. (2019) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.13699 · Cited by 47
“…models of direct climate change effects, presumably as an effect of combined factors decreasing each model's performance, all indi‐ ces are above the threshold for good model performance (AUC > 0.8, Elith et al., 2010; Pearce & Ferrier, 2000; TSS > 0.5, Allouche et al., 2006; Herkt et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialImproving estimates of species distribution change by incorporating local trends
Barnett, L. A. K., Ward, E. J., & Anderson, S. C. (2020) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05176 · Cited by 47
“However, the way distribution shifts are quantified has changed relatively little (Elith et al. 2010).”
BackgroundHenderson, E. B., Ohmann, J. L., Gregory, M. J., Roberts, H. M., & Zald, H. S. J. (2014) · Applied Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/avsc.12085 · Cited by 49
Fourcade, Y. (2021) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109686 · Cited by 46
Potts, A., Hedderson, T. A. J., Franklin, J., & Cowling, R. M. (2012) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02788.x · Cited by 46
On the present and potential distribution of Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) in South Africa
Tererai, F., & Wood, A. R. (2014) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2014.09.001 · Cited by 46
Mellin, C., Lurgi, M., Matthews, S. A., MacNeil, M. A., Caley, M. J., Bax, N. J., Przeslawski, R., & Fordham, D. A. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.008 · Cited by 52
Sage, K. M., Johnson, T. L., Teglas, M., Nieto, N., & Schwan, T. (2017) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006047 · Cited by 47
Predicting ecological responses in a changing ocean: the effects of future climate uncertainty
Freer, J. J., Partridge, J. C., Tarling, G. A., Collins, M. A., & Genner, M. J. (2017) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-017-3239-1 · Cited by 47
“These issues can be somewhat ameliorated by recent developments in the wider SDM literature, where how to improve predicted distributions is now widely discussed (Araujo and Guisan 2006; Beaumont et al. 2008; Elith and Leathwick 2009; Elith et al. 2010; Beale and Lennon 2012; Porfirio et al. 2014; Jarnevich et al. 201…”
BackgroundStrategies for mammal conservation under climate change in the Amazon
Ribeiro, B. R., Sales, L. P., & Loyola, R. A. (2018) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1518-x · Cited by 49
Katz, T. S., & Zellmer, A. J. (2018) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-018-1690-7 · Cited by 46
“…AUC (Supplementary Table 1), utilizes absence data, which may be biased in the early stages of an invasion when absence points may not be true absences and may become presences as the organism spreads to fill its new niche (Václavı́k and Meentemeyer 2009; Elith et al. 2010; Robinson et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodZhang, K., Liu, H., Pan, H., Shi, W., Zhao, Y., Li, S., Liu, J., & Tao, J. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6236 · Cited by 45
“This file was generated using occurrence point by deriving a Gaussian kernel density map that was rescaled from 1 to 20 based on Elith et al. (2010).”
BackgroundMethodJing, W. A. N., Qi, G., Ma, J., Ren, Y., Rui, W. A. N. G., & McKirdy, S. (2020) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(19)62840-6 · Cited by 46
The way bioclimatic variables are calculated has impact on potential distribution models
Bede‐Fazekas, Á., & Somodi, I. (2020) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13488 · Cited by 46
“This finding provides additional support that extrapolation is a major issue of PDMs (Braunisch et al., 2013; Chakraborty et al., 2019; Elith et al., 2010).”
Resultvan Beest, F. M., Beumer, L. T., Andersen, A. S., Hansson, S. V., & Schmidt, N. M. (2021) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.13362 · Cited by 47
“Following Elith et al. (2010), we used presence locations with associated bioclimatic values under current conditions (1979– 2013) as input points and then estimated (dis)similarities in bioclimatic conditions across the study area extent (i.e. vegetated part of the Northeast Greenland National…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Elith, J., Kearney, M., & Phillips, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- AT&T (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elith, Jane
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 330-342
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100533358
- Semantic Scholar
- 57fbdc5ff136d10620ea5204db024583249f9550
- Cited by
- 2,813
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 190 · 2025: 230 · 2024: 252 · 2023: 251 · 2022: 240 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 199 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 179 · 2016: 152 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 50.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- species distribution modeling, extrapolation error, Rhinella marina, invasive species, climate change scenarios, absence data, MaxEnt, model reliability, species spread
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review