The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The art of modelling range-shifting species: The art of modelling range-shifting species
Abstract
1. Species are shifting their ranges at an unprecedented rate through human transportation and environmental change. Correlative species distribution models (SDMs) are frequently applied for predicting potential future distributions of range-shifting species, despite these models’ assumptions that species are at equilibrium with the environments used to train (fit) the models, and that the training data are representative of conditions to which the models are predicted. Here we explore modelling approaches that aim to minimize extrapolation errors and assess predictions against prior biological knowledge. Our aim was to promote methods appropriate to range-shifting species. 2. We use an invasive species, the cane toad in Australia, as an example, predicting potential distributions under both current and climate change scenarios. We use four SDM methods, and trial weighting schemes and choice of background samples appropriate for species in a state of spread. We also test two methods for including information from a mechanistic model. Throughout, we explore graphical techniques for understanding model behaviour and reliability, including the extent of extrapolation. 3. Predictions varied with modelling method and data treatment, particularly with regard to the use and treatment of absence data. Models that performed similarly under current climatic conditions deviated widely when transferred to a novel climatic scenario. 4. The results highlight problems with using SDMs for extrapolation, and demonstrate the need for methods and tools to understand models and predictions. We have made progress in this direction and have implemented exploratory techniques as new options in the free modelling software, MaxEnt. Our results also show that deliberately controlling the fit of models and integrating information from mechanistic models can enhance the reliability of correlative predictions of species in non-equilibrium and novel settings. 5. Implications. The biodiversity of many regions in the world is experiencing novel threats created by species invasions and climate change. Predictions of future species distributions are required for management, but there are acknowledged problems with many current methods, and relatively few advances in techniques for understanding or overcoming these. The methods presented in this manuscript and made accessible in MaxEnt provide a forward step.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The present habitat suitability and distribution of each species were estimated using the MaxEnt modelling technique, which employs maximum entropy methods and is particularly resilient when dealing with presence-only species records (Elith et al., 2010).”
From Projecting future climate change impacts on the distribution of the ‘Octopus vulgaris species complex’ (2022) · cites this paper as Elith et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Without clear records on survey effort across the landscape, we cannot distinguish between areas that are environmentally unsuitable and those that are under-sampled (Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010: Appendix S1).”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010
In the citing paper
“The executable Maxent software (v.3.4.4) (Phillips, Dudík & Schapire 2021) has several modifiable parameters that influence the model performance, and ultimately the effectiveness of the predictive model (e.g., Barbet-Massin et al. 2012; Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010; Fourcade et al. 2014; Merow, Smith & Silander 2013; Morales, Fernández & Baca-González 2017; Phillips et al. 2017).”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010
In the citing paper
“The executable Maxent software (v.3.4.4) (Phillips, Dudík & Schapire 2021) has several modifiable parameters that influence the model performance, and ultimately the effectiveness of the predictive model (e.g., Barbet-Massin et al. 2012; Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010; Fourcade et al. 2014; Merow, Smith & Silander 2013; Morales, Fernández & Baca-González 2017; Phillips et al. 2017).”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010
In the citing paper
“The executable Maxent software (v.3.4.4) (”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Elith, Kearney \u0026 Phillips 2010
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · Cited by 15,396
Self-citationRegression Modeling Strategies
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,270
Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., et al. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · Cited by 9,088
Self-citationEcological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change
Parmesan, C. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 · Cited by 8,652
Brown, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532174 · Cited by 8,263
Koyak, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290538 · Cited by 7,717
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- van Beurden, 1981, Bioclimatic limits to the spread of Bufo marinus in Australia: a baseline, Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia, 11, 143
- Lockwood, 2007, Invasion Ecology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,002
Rodhouse, T. J., Ormsbee, P. C., Irvine, K. M., Vierling, L. A., Szewczak, J. M., & Vierling, K. T. (2012) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/11-1662.1 · Cited by 47
Climate change and freshwater fisheries
Harrod, C. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118394380.ch50 · Cited by 47
Feldmeier, S., Schefczyk, L., Wagner, N., Heinemann, G., Veith, M., & Lötters, S. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165682 · Cited by 45
“We decided for an approach similar to Elith et al. (2010) [61] who compared a continent-wide background with a background restricted to a polygon in reachable distance around early invasion records.”
MethodZhang, Q., Shen, X., Jiang, X., Fan, T., Liang, X., & Yan, W. (2023) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f14020394 · Cited by 45
Evaluating sampling bias correction methods for invasive species distribution modeling in Maxent
Sorbe, F., Gränzig, T., & Förster, M. (2023) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102124 · Cited by 50
Heterogeneous changes of soil microclimate in high mountains and glacier forelands
Marta, S., Zimmer, A., Caccianiga, M. S., Gobbi, M., Ambrosini, R., Azzoni, R. S., Gili, F., Pittino, F., Thuiller, W., Provenzale, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41063-6 · Cited by 45
Feng, X., Peterson, A. T., Aguirre‐López, L. J., Burger, J. R., Chen, X., & Papeş, M. (2024) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13077 · Cited by 48
“Such dissimilarity can be calculated as distances to the reference data set (Elith, Kearney & Phillips, 2010) or in re fi ned ecological settings (the relative novelty of a set of conditions in the context of the reference data cloud; Owens et al ., 2013).”
BackgroundChanges in community composition and functional diversity of European bats under climate change
Fialas, P. C., Santini, L., Russo, D., Amorim, F., Rebelo, H., Novella‐Fernandez, R., Marqués, F., Domer, A., Vella, A., Martinoli, A., et al. (2025) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70025 · Cited by 52
“We ran a multivariate environmental similarity surfaces (MESS) analysis, as recommended by Elith et al. (2010), across the whole of Europe and North Africa to determine whether our study area was predicted to be in nonanalog condition.”
Li, G., Du, S., & Guo, K. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131659 · Cited by 45
Álvarez‐Martínez, J. M., Suárez‐Seoane, S., Stoorvogel, J. J., & Calabuig, E. D. L. (2014) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12257 · Cited by 44
Ancillotto, L., Strubbe, D., Menchetti, M., & Mori, E. (2015) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-015-1032-y · Cited by 45
“This map indicates areas where climatic variables occur outside the range of values contained in model training regions (here defined as the biomes in which the species naturally occurs, see above), and predictions of invasion risk in these areas should be treated cautiously (Elith et al. 2010).”
BackgroundPotential global distribution of Diabrotica species and the risks for agricultural production
Marchioro, C. A., & Krechemer, F. D. S. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4906 · Cited by 47
Frajman, B., Záveská, E., Gamisch, A., Moser, T., & Schönswetter, P. (2018) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2018.10.046 · Cited by 45
Silva, B. P. C., Silva, M. L. N., Avalos, F. A. P., de Menezes, M. D., & Curi, N. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50376-w · Cited by 45
Ancillotto, L., Bosso, L., Smeraldo, S., Mori, E., Mazza, G., Herkt, K. M. B., Galimberti, A., Ramazzotti, F., & Russo, D. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6317 · Cited by 45
Geographical bias in physiological data limits predictions of global change impacts
White, C. R., Marshall, D. J., Chown, S. L., Clusella‐Trullas, S., Portugal, S. J., Franklin, C. E., & Seebacher, F. (2021) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13807 · Cited by 45
“Physiological information therefore has considerable predictive power for forecasting how climate change will affect species (Diamond, Nichols, et al., 2012; Elith et al., 2010; Humphries et al., 2002; Kearney & Porter, 2009; Mathewson et al., 2017).”
BackgroundModeling potential hotspots of invasive Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC in India
Singh, M., Rajasekaran, A., & Kumar, L. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101386 · Cited by 45
Ngarega, B. K., Masocha, V. F., & Schneider, H. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101419 · Cited by 45
Yan, H., He, J., Xu, X., Yao, X., Wang, G., Tang, L., Feng, L., Zou, L., Gu, X., Qu, Y., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.773396 · Cited by 45
“…reduced (Phillips and Dudík, 2008), many studies have shown that it is necessary to select an individual regularization multiplier according to different species and their data structures (Elith et al., 2010, 2011; Anderson and Gonzalez, 2011; Muscarella et al., 2014; MorenoAmat et al., 2015).”
BackgroundHosner, P. A., Sánchez‐González, L. A., Peterson, A. T., & Moyle, R. G. (2014) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12459 · Cited by 45
Predicting extinctions with species distribution models
Zurell, D., Fritz, S. A., Rönnfeldt, A., & Steinbauer, M. J. (2023) · Cambridge Prisms Extinction · doi:10.1017/ext.2023.5 · Cited by 59
“Different algorithms will exhibit different extrapolation behaviour and it is thus advisable to explicitly assess environmental novelty (Elith et al., 2010; Zurell et al., 2012).”
Regional uniqueness of tree species composition and response to forest loss and climate change
van Tiel, N., Fopp, F., Brun, P., van den Hoogen, J., Karger, D. N., Casadei, C. M., Lyu, L., Tuia, D., Zimmermann, N. E., Crowther, T. W., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48276-3 · Cited by 44
Hill, M. P., Axford, J. K., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2013) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/aec.12105 · Cited by 45
Zuliani, A., Massolo, A., Lysyk, T. J., Johnson, G. D., Marshall, S. J., Berger, K. A., & Cork, S. C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130294 · Cited by 44
Dianat, M., Darvish, J., Cornette, R., Aliabadian, M., & Nicolas, V. (2016) · Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research · doi:10.1111/jzs.12145 · Cited by 44
“The present-day models were then projected on the climatic reconstructions of the LGM under the assumption that the climatic niche of each species remained conserved between the LGM and present (Elith et al. 2010).”
MethodHuang, J., Li, G., Li, J., Zhang, X., Yan, M.-J., & Du, S. (2017) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f9010009 · Cited by 44
“Generally, the extrapolated habitat is less reliable than the interpolation habitat, which is the shortcoming of most species distribution models [44].”
BackgroundCurrent and future effects of global change on a hotspot's freshwater diversity
Gallardo, B., Bogan, A. E., Harun, S., Jainih, L., Lopes‐Lima, M., Pizarro, M., Rahim, K. A. A., Sousa, R., Virdis, S., & Zieritz, A. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.056 · Cited by 44
“Distribution models are often forced to extrapolate into areas outside the training range with no clear indication of uncertainty (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSchield, D. R., Adams, R. H. J., Card, D. C., Corbin, A. B., Ježková, T., Hales, N. R., Meik, J. M., Perry, B. W., Spencer, C., Smith, L. L., et al. (2018) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2018.06.013 · Cited by 46
“scutulatus has not changed between the LGM and present day (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundExtrapolation in species distribution modelling. Application to Southern Ocean marine species
Guillaumot, C., Moreau, C. V. E., Danis, B., & Saucède, T. (2020) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102438 · Cited by 44
“The Multivariate Environmental Similarity Surface (MESS) approach analyses spatial extrapolation by extracting environmental values covered by presence-only records and estimates areas where environmental conditions are outside the range of conditions contained in the calibration area (Elith et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodPurse, B. V., Comont, R., Butler, A., BROWN, P. M. J., Kessel, C., & Roy, H. E. (2014) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12423 · Cited by 43
Pike, D. A. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12282 · Cited by 43
Wogan, G. O. U. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151024 · Cited by 42
“On the other hand, species that are undergoing a population decline or expansion are potentially out of equilibrium and may present a different challenge for modeling [5, 18].”
BackgroundMethodSpecies Distribution Modeling for Conservation Purposes
Ferraz, K. M. P. M. D. B., Ferraz, S. F. D. B., de Paula, R. C., Beisiegel, B. D. M., & Breitenmoser‐Würsten, C. (2012) · Natureza & Conservação · doi:10.4322/natcon.2012.032 · Cited by 43
Chucholl, C. (2016) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1141-2 · Cited by 43
“However, previous studies suggest little climate niche conservatism between native and invasive ranges of IAS, including crayfish (Larson et al. 2010; Feria and Faulkes 2011), and model projections from distant geographic areas may face the problem of non-analogues climates (cf. Elith et al. 2010).”
BackgroundZhao, J., Gugger, P. F., Xia, Y., & Li, Q. (2016) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12809 · Cited by 43
“, 2007; Shcheglovitova & Anderson, 2013) and tuning of the regularization coefficient (Elith et al., 2010; Anderson & Gonzalez, 2011; Radosavljevic et al., 2014) in Maxent to decrease the impact of bias on modelling with small sample sizes.”
BackgroundModeling nonbreeding distributions of shorebirds and waterfowl in response to climate change
Reese, G. C., & Skagen, S. K. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2755 · Cited by 43
Romero-Álvarez, D., Escobar, L. E., Varela, S., Larkin, D. J., & Phelps, N. B. D. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180930 · Cited by 43
Lei, J., Chen, L., & Hong, L. (2017) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-017-6124-y · Cited by 43
Impacts of climate change on high priority fruit fly species in Australia
Sultana, S., Baumgartner, J. B., Dominiak, B. C., Royer, J. E., & Beaumont, L. J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213820 · Cited by 43
“By revealing areas with novel environmental conditions, MESS maps can be used as a projection mask, highlighting regions for which less confidence can be placed in projections, or as a quantitative measure of prediction uncertainty [53].”
BackgroundMethodde Paula, A. S., Barreto, C., Telmo, M. C. M., Diotaiuti, L., & Galvão, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.660151 · Cited by 42
“The hematophagous habit seen in Rhodniini is associated with major morphological, physiological and behavioral adaptations that have accumulated throughout the evolutionary history of the various lineages of bloodsucking arthropods (Lazzari et al., 2013). Hwang and Weirauch (2012) showed that the generalist predatory…”
BackgroundMethodDistribution of Testudo graeca in the western Mediterranean according to climatic factors
Anadón, J. D., Giménez, A., Graciá, E., Pérez, I., Ferrández, M., Soumia Fahd, D., Mouden, E. H. E., Kalboussi, M., Jdeidi, T. B., Larbes, S., et al. (2012) · Amphibia-Reptilia · doi:10.1163/156853812x643710 · Cited by 42
Modelling the climatic niche of turtles: a deep-time perspective
Waterson, A., Schmidt, D. N., Valdes, P. J., Holroyd, P. A., Nicholson, D. B., Farnsworth, A., & Barrett, P. M. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1408 · Cited by 42
“A five-fold cross 167 validation procedure (51) was used to create global models for the modern and calculate area 168 under the curve (AUC) statistics (predictive performance measure).”
MethodExpert-based versus habitat-suitability models to develop resistance surfaces in landscape genetics
Milanesi, P., Holderegger, R., Caniglia, R., Fabbri, E., Galaverni, M., & Randi, E. (2016) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3751-x · Cited by 42
Lira‐Noriega, A., Soberón, J. M., & Equihua, J. A. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28517-4 · Cited by 42
Rodríguez‐Merino, A., Murillo, P. G., Cirujano, S., & Fernández‐Zamudio, R. (2018) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2018.08.007 · Cited by 46
Coulin, C., de la Vega, G., Chifflet, L., Calcaterra, L. A., & Schilman, P. E. (2019) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-019-02063-0 · Cited by 42
Kumar, D., Rawat, S., & Joshi, R. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants · doi:10.1016/j.jarmap.2021.100309 · Cited by 42
Diversity and distribution of amphibians in Romania
Rozyłowicz, L., Cogălniceanu, D., Székely, P., Samoilă, C., Iosif, R., Tudor, M., Plăiaş̧u, R., & Stănescu, F. (2013) · ZooKeys · doi:10.3897/zookeys.296.4872 · Cited by 42
Li, H., Fujisaki, I., & Su, N. (2013) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec12309 · Cited by 42
HamadAmin, B. A., & Khwarahm, N. R. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065469 · Cited by 43
More than 10,000 pre-Columbian earthworks are still hidden throughout Amazonia
Peripato, V., Levis, C., Moreira, G. A., Gamerman, D., ter Steege, H., Pitman, N. C. A., de Souza, J. G., Iriarte, J., Robinson, M. E., Junqueira, A. B., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade2541 · Cited by 49
Improving effectiveness of systematic conservation planning with density data
Veloz, S., Salas, L. A., Altman, B., Alexander, J. D., Jongsomjit, D., Elliott, N. K., & Ballard, G. (2015) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12499 · Cited by 41
The effect of spatially marginal localities in modelling species niches and distributions
Soley‐Guardia, M., Radosavljević, A., Rivera, J. L., & Anderson, R. P. (2014) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12297 · Cited by 41
Barnes, M. A., Jerde, C. L., Wittmann, M. E., Chadderton, W. L., Ding, J., Zhang, J., Purcell, M. F., Budhathoki, M., & Lodge, D. M. (2014) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1120 · Cited by 41
Lima‐Ribeiro, M. S., Nogués‐Bravo, D., Terribile, L. C., Batra, P., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. (2013) · Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.10.008 · Cited by 41
Nemésio, A., Silva, D. P., Nabout, J. C., & Varela, S. (2016) · Insect Conservation and Diversity · doi:10.1111/icad.12154 · Cited by 41
“Techniques for generating ENMs range from very simple bioclimatic envelopes up to complex machine learning-based methods (Elith & Leathwick, 2009; Franklin, 2009).”
MethodInfluentialModelling fire probability in the Brazilian Amazon using the maximum entropy method
Fonseca, M. G., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Lima, A. L. D., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Arai, E., & Anderson, L. O. (2016) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf15216 · Cited by 41
Allen, J. L., & Lendemer, J. C. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.031 · Cited by 41
Projected avifaunal responses to climate change across the U.S. National Park System
Wu, J. X., Wilsey, C. B., Taylor, L., & Schuurman, G. W. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190557 · Cited by 43
Mothes, C. C., Stroud, J. T., Clements, S. L., & Searcy, C. A. (2019) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.13511 · Cited by 41
Pant, G. B., Maraseni, T., Apan, A., & Allen, B. L. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8421 · Cited by 41
“The SDM has the potential to achieve conservation planning goals by helping to widen our knowledge of species distribution (Franklin, 2010; Jetz et al., 2012; Raymond et al., 2020) and predicting the impacts of climate change on species (Araújo et al., 2005; Berry et al., 2002; Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundClimate change should drive mammal defaunation in tropical dry forests
Moura, M. R., da Silva, G. A. O., Paglia, A. P., Pires, M. M., & Santos, B. A. (2023) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16979 · Cited by 40
“202 When projecting ENMs to new regions or time periods, it is possible to project habitat 203 suitability for conditions outside the range represented by the training data (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThinning occurrence points does not improve species distribution model performance
Caten, C. T., & Dallas, T. (2023) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4703 · Cited by 40
Graham, M. R., Jaeger, J. R., Prendini, L., & Riddle, B. R. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12079 · Cited by 40
Burbidge, A. A., Byrne, M. M., Coates, D., Garnett, S. T., Harris, S., Hatward, M. W., Martin, T. G., McDonald‐Madden, E., Mitchell, N. J., Nally, S., et al. (2011) · Pacific Conservation Biology · doi:10.1071/pc110259 · Cited by 40
Capinha, C., Anastácio, P., & Tenedório, J. A. (2012) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0187-z · Cited by 40
Veloz, S., Nur, N., Salas, L. A., Jongsomjit, D., Wood, J., Stralberg, D., & Ballard, G. (2013) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es12-00341.1 · Cited by 40
Phytogeography of New Guinean orchids: patterns of species richness and turnover
Vollering, J., Schuiteman, A., de Vogel, E., van Vugt, R., & Raes, N. (2015) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12612 · Cited by 40
“This analysis identifies areas of non-analogue conditions, where SDM results become unreliable due to extrapolation (Elith et al., 2010).”
BackgroundTracking the distribution and impacts of diseases with biological records and distribution modelling
Purse, B. V., & Golding, N. (2015) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12567 · Cited by 40
Amplified plant turnover in response to climate change forecast by Late Quaternary records
Nogués‐Bravo, D., Veloz, S., Holt, B. G., Singarayer, J. S., Valdes, P. J., Davis, B., Brewer, S., Williams, J. W., & Rahbek, C. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3146 · Cited by 40
Does dispersal capacity matter for freshwater biodiversity under climate change?
Bush, A., & Hoskins, A. J. (2016) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.12874 · Cited by 40
Swinnen, K. R., Strubbe, D., Matthysen, E., & Leirs, H. (2017) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1333-9 · Cited by 40
“SDMs are applied to a wide range of questions in conservation biology, such as providing information for managing threatened species, to determine the effects of climate change on species distributions and to assess the potential of invasive species (Guisan and Thuiller 2005; Elith et al. 2011; Guillera-Arroita et al.…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMorales‐Barbero, J., Martínez, P. A., Ferrer‐Castán, D., & Olalla‐Tárraga, M. Á. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02647 · Cited by 38
Rocca, F. D., Bogliani, G., Breiner, F. T., & Milanesi, P. (2018) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1670-3 · Cited by 40
Back to the future: conserving functional and phylogenetic diversity in amphibian-climate refuges
Lourenço‐de‐Moraes, R., Campos, F. S., Ferreira, R. B., Solé, M., Beard, K. H., & Bastos, R. P. (2019) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01706-x · Cited by 42
Yu, W., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., & Qian, Y. T. (2019) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz051 · Cited by 40
Bowen, A. K. M., & Stevens, M. H. H. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6735 · Cited by 40
“…the area from which background points were selected using a buffer indicating how far WLBG could have reached if conditions were suitable (Elith et al., 2010) using the distance between the earliest record of WLBG (K. Kyde, pers. communication) and the maximum distance from that record…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPrieto-Torres, D. A., Nori, J., Rojas‐Soto, O., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2021) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109083 · Cited by 42
Tonini, J. F. R., Costa, L. P., & Carnaval, A. C. (2013) · Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research · doi:10.1111/jzs.12014 · Cited by 40
Mapping from heterogeneous biodiversity monitoring data sources
Sardà‐Palomera, F., Brotons, L., Villero, D., Sierdsema, H., Newson, S. E., & Jiguet, F. (2012) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0347-6 · Cited by 40
Davis, M. A., Douglas, M. R., Webb, C. T., Collyer, M. L., Holycross, A. T., Painter, C. W., Kamees, L. K., & Douglas, M. E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131067 · Cited by 40
Gámez, N., Escalante, T., Espinosa, D., Eguiarte, L. E., & Morrone, J. J. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12249 · Cited by 39
Wielstra, B., Babik, W., & Arntzen, J. W. (2015) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12446 · Cited by 39
Assessing the Risk of Invasion by Tephritid Fruit Flies: Intraspecific Divergence Matters
Godefroid, M., Cruaud, A., Rossi, J., & Rasplus, J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135209 · Cited by 39
Habitat preferences of baleen whales in a mid-latitude habitat
Prieto, R., Tobeña, M., & Silva, M. A. (2016) · Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.07.015 · Cited by 42
“We used the multivariate similarity surface (MESS) function in MaxEnt (Elith et al., 2010) to test the similarity among environmental conditions found during model fitting and the prediction area.”
MethodSteen, V. A., Sofaer, H. R., Skagen, S. K., Ray, A. J., & Noon, B. R. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3403 · Cited by 39
Becerra-López, J. L., Esparza‐Estrada, C. E., Romero-Méndez, U., Sigala‐Rodríguez, J. J., Goyenechea, I., & Castillo-Cerón, J. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185086 · Cited by 39
de la Vega, G., & Corley, J. C. (2019) · International Journal of Pest Management · doi:10.1080/09670874.2018.1547460 · Cited by 39
“A MESS analysis (multivariate environmental similarity surface) and the limiting factor mapping technique was performed to determine limiting factors that affect the distribution boundary of SWD populations (Elith et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEndangered species management and climate change: When habitat conservation becomes a moving target
Wilkening, J. L., Pearson‐Prestera, W., Mungi, N. A., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2019) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.1002/wsb.944 · Cited by 39
Henríquez, W. A., Urbina-Cardona, N., & Armenteras, D. (2019) · Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2019.11.002 · Cited by 44
“All SDM created for the selected species showed high values for the partial ROC test (1.30 – 1.87; P < 0.05), with a mean omission rate of only 10 %, indicating that the models of potential distribution were satisfactory.”
InfluentialPréau, C., Grandjean, F., Sellier, Y., Gailledrat, M., Bertrand, R., & Isselin‐Nondedeu, F. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60479-4 · Cited by 39
Briscoe, N. J., Zurell, D., Elith, J., König, C., Fandós, G., Malchow, A., Kéry, M., Schmid, H., & Guillera‐Arroita, G. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15723 · Cited by 39
“Correlative (static) SDMs describe the likely occurrence or abundance of a species as a function of environmental covariates (Elith & Leathwick, 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTournebize, R., Borner, L., Manel, S., Meynard, C. N., Vigouroux, Y., Crouzillat, D., Fournier, C., Kassam, M., Descombes, P., Tranchant‐Dubreuil, C., et al. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16191 · Cited by 39
Where wolves were: setting historical baselines for wolf recovery in Spain
Clavero, M., García-Reyes, A., Fernández‐Gil, A., Revilla, E., & Fernández, N. (2022) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12814 · Cited by 45
Modelling of the potential distribution of Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857) on a global scale
Campos, M. D. C. S., de Andrade, A. F. A., & Kunzmann, B. (2014) · Aquatic Invasions · doi:10.3391/ai.2014.9.3.03 · Cited by 39
Lim, J. Y., Huang, H., Farnsworth, A., Lunt, D. J., Baker, W. J., Morley, R. J., Kissling, W. D., & Hoorn, C. (2021) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13436 · Cited by 38
“For example, the Eocene occurrences of Mauritiinae-like pollen in North America and Europe (Figure 2 (3) issues with projecting niche models to non-analogue climates (Elith et al., 2010; Yates et al., 2018); and (4) inherent uncertain - ties in the palaeoclimatic models used.”
BackgroundForecasting species’ responses to climate change using space-for-time substitution
Kharouba, H. M., & Williams, J. L. (2024) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.03.009 · Cited by 38
Future trends of marine fish biomass distributions from the North Sea to the Barents Sea
Gordó−Vilaseca, C., Costello, M. J., Marta Coll, M., Jüterbock, A. O., Reiss, H., & Stephenson, F. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49911-9 · Cited by 42
Cross‐validation matters in species distribution models: a case study with goatfish species
Huang, H., Zhang, Z., Bede‐Fazekas, Á., Mammola, S., Gu, J., Zhou, J., Qu, J., & Lin, Q. (2024) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.07354 · Cited by 41
Wachter, G. A., Papadopoulou, A., Muster, C., Arthofer, W., Knowles, L. L., Steiner, F. M., & Schlick-Steiner, B. C. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13634 · Cited by 41
“…were performed in MAXENT using the clamping option (i.e. restricting the extrapolation to the range of values encountered during training), and variables outside their training range were identified using multivariate environmental similarity surfaces (‘MESS maps’; Elith et al. 2010, 2011).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Elith, J., Kearney, M., & Phillips, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- AT&T (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elith, Jane
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 330-342
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100533358
- Semantic Scholar
- 57fbdc5ff136d10620ea5204db024583249f9550
- Cited by
- 2,813
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 190 · 2025: 230 · 2024: 252 · 2023: 251 · 2022: 240 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 199 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 179 · 2016: 152 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 100
- FWCI
- 50.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- species distribution modeling, extrapolation error, Rhinella marina, invasive species, climate change scenarios, absence data, MaxEnt, model reliability, species spread
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review