Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 663

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media

Bode, Leticia, Vraga, Emily K.·2015·Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1111/jcom.12166
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research on social media and research on correcting misinformation are both growing areas in communication, but for the most part they have not found common ground. This study seeks to bridge these two areas, considering the role that social media may play in correcting misinformation. To do so, we test a new function of Facebook, which provides related links when people click on a link within Facebook. We show users a post containing misinformation, and then manipulate the related stories to either confirm, correct, or both confirm and correct the misinformation. Findings suggest that when related stories correct a post that includes misinformation, misperceptions are significantly reduced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcom.12166

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Aiello, 2012, Friendship prediction and homophily in social media, ACM Transactions on the Web, 6, 9, 10.1145/2180861.2180866 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bakshy , E. Rosenn , I. Marlow , C. Adamic , L. 2012 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on WWW New York, NY ACM
  3. Betsch, 2012, Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? (How) the internet influences vaccination decisions: Recent evidence and tentative guidelines for online vaccine communication, Vaccine, 30, 3723, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.078 · DOI
  4. Bode, 2012, Facebooking it to the polls: A study in online social networking and political behavior, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 352, 10.1080/19331681.2012.709045 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Briñol, 2006, Fundamental processes leading to attitude change: Implications for cancer prevention communications, Journal of Communication, 56, S81, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00284.x · DOI
  6. Buhrmester, 2011, Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3, 10.1177/1745691610393980 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cavazos-Rehg, 2014, Characterizing the followers and tweets of a marijuana-focused Twitter handle, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e157, 10.2196/jmir.3247 · DOI
  8. Clarke, 2007, Conspiracy theories and the Internet: Controlled demolition and arrested development, Episteme, 4, 167, 10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167 · DOI
  9. Cooper, 1984, A new look at dissonance theory, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60121-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dixon, 2013, The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions, Health Education Research, 28, 352, 10.1093/her/cys110 · DOI
  11. Ecker, 2011, Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 570, 10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ennals , R. Byler , D. Agosta , J. M. Rosario , B. 2010 Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility New York, NY ACM 10.1145/1772938.1772952 · DOI
  13. Festinger, 1956, When prophecy fails, 10.1037/10030-000 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fowler, 2013, The political consequences of uninformed voters, Electoral Studies, 30, 1
  15. Gershkoff, 2005, Shaping public opinion: The 9/11-Iraq connection in the Bush administration's rhetoric, Perspectives on Politics, 3, 525, 10.1017/S1537592705050334 · DOI
  16. Gillespie, 2014, Media technologies, 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jerit, 2012, Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment, The Journal of Politics, 74, 672, 10.1017/S0022381612000187 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Keim, 2010, Emergent use of social media: A new age of opportunity for disaster resilience, American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 6, 47, 10.5055/ajdm.2011.0044 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2013, Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2607, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kraft, 2015, Why people “don't trust the evidence”: Motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 121, 10.1177/0002716214554758 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kuklinski, 2000, Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship, Journal of Politics, 62, 790, 10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kull, 2003, Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war, Political Science Quarterly, 118, 569-, 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00406.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Nahon, 2013, Going viral
  24. Nisbet, 2013, Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change, Journal of Communication, 63, 766, 10.1111/jcom.12040 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Nyhan, 2010, When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions, Political Behavior, 32, 303, 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nyhan, 2014, Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial, Pediatrics, 133, e835, 10.1542/peds.2013-2365 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Nyhan, 2013, The hazards of correcting myths about health care reform, Medical Care, 51, 127, 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318279486b · DOI · Paper page
  28. Pariser, 2011, The Filter Bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think
  29. Qazvinian , V. Rosengren , E. Radev , D. R. Mei , Q. 2011 Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  30. Redlawsk, 2010, The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever “get it?”, Political Psychology, 31, 563, 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Reedy, 2014, How voters become misinformed: An investigation of the emergence and consequences of false factual beliefs, Social Science Quarterly, 95, 1399, 10.1111/ssqu.12102 · DOI
  32. Ruiz, 2014, Understanding vaccination resistance: Vaccine search term selection bias and the valence of retrieved information, Vaccine, 32, 5776, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.042 · DOI
  33. Southwell, 2013, Social networks and popular understanding of science and health, 10.1353/book.72103 · DOI
  34. Taber, 2006, Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs, American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755, 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tafuri, 2013, Addressing the anti-vaccination movement and the role of HCWs, Vaccine, 32, 4860, 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.006 · DOI
  36. Tavris, 2008, Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts
  37. Uscinski, 2014, American conspiracy theories, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Vishwanath, 2014, Habitual Facebook use and its impact on getting deceived on social media, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 83, 10.1111/jcc4.12100 · DOI
  39. Vraga, 2011, Dealing with dissonance: Responding to an incongruent test result in a new media environment, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 689, 10.1089/cyber.2010.0479 · DOI
  40. Vraga, 2015, How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025 · DOI
  41. Weeks, 2010, The symbiosis of news coverage and aggregate online search behavior: Obama, rumors, and presidential politics, Mass Communication and Society, 13, 341, 10.1080/15205430903470532 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K.
Venue
Journal of Communication
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2015-06-23
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
619-638
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/jcom.12166
OpenAlex
W1613353461
Cited by
663
References
11
FWCI
86.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 70 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.