Cited by 156Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Practitioner Review: Empirical evolution of youth psychotherapy toward transdiagnostic approaches

Marchette, Lauren Krumholz, Weisz, John R.·2017·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Psychotherapy for children and adolescents (herein, ‘youths’) has grown more precise and focused over the decades, shifting toward empirically supported treatments standardized via therapist manuals. The manuals have increasingly emphasized precise targeting of single disorders or problems, or homogenous clusters. These focal treatments represent a valuable advance, with intervention benefit documented in hundreds of studies. However, relatively few of these treatments are widely used in everyday clinical practice, and their level of benefit may not be ideal, particularly in practice contexts and when compared to usual clinical care. Thesis: These limitations may be due, in part, to a mismatch between focal treatment design and the young people treated in real‐world clinical care, who are diagnostically heterogeneous, and very frequently present with comorbidity. Improved fit may be achieved via transdiagnostic treatment approaches designed to address multiple disorders and problems, if these approaches can retain the benefits of manualization and the substantive clinical strength that has generated empirical support to date. Scope: Here we review the evolution of empirically‐based youth psychotherapy from focal treatment manuals toward transdiagnostic approaches, and we describe and illustrate three transdiagnostic treatment strategies: (a) a core dysfunction approach, (b) a common elements and modular design approach, and (c) a principle‐guided approach. Clinical applications: We complement research findings with a clinical perspective based on our use of manual‐guided transdiagnostic intervention in clinical care settings, and we propose directions for research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12747

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchette, L. K., & Weisz, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Marchette, Lauren Krumholz
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-26
Volume
58
Issue
9
Pages
970-984
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2619311678
Cited by
156
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Education Sciences
  • U.S. Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
adolescent psychotherapy, transdiagnostic approach, empirically supported treatments, manualized treatment, comorbidities, common elements, clinical practice implementation, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Humans, Psychotherapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review