Does music influence the multisensory tasting experience?
Open accessAbstract
Abstract All of the senses can potentially contribute to the perception and experience of food and drink. Sensory influences come both from the food or drink itself, and from the environment in which that food or drink is tasted and consumed. In this study, participants initially had to pair each of three soundtracks with one of three chocolates (varying on the bitter‐sweet dimension). In a second part of the study, the impact of the various music samples on these participants’ ratings of the taste of various chocolates was assessed. The results demonstrate that what people hear exerts a significant influence over their rating of the taste of the chocolate. Interestingly, when the results were analysed based on the participants’ individual music‐chocolate matches (rather than the average response of the whole group), more robust crossmodal effects were revealed. These results therefore provide support for the claim that ambient sound influences taste judgments, and potentially provide useful insights concerning the future design of multisensory tasting experiences. Practical Applications The approach outlined here follows the increasing demand from the field of gastronomy for greater influence over the general multisensory atmosphere surrounding eating/drinking experiences. One of the novel contributions of the present research is to show how, by considering a participant's individual response, further insight for user‐studies in gastrophysics may be provided. Increasing the personalization of such experiments in the years to come may help researchers to design individualized “sonic seasoning” experiences that are even more effective. In the future, then, the approach outlined here may help researchers and experience designers to obtain more profound effects of the auditory or multisensory atmosphere.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar sonic seasoning effects involving sweetness have been found in a range of food and beverage stimuli ranging from juice to beer, and from chocolate to wine.
“Similar sonic seasoning e ects, specifically involving sweetness, have since been found in a range of food and beverage stimuli ranging from juice to beer, and from chocolate to wine [9,24,25,27,90,91].”
From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [90]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review
Spence, C. (2011) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7 · Cited by 1,618 · see citing works
Self-citationMultisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size
Gallace, A., & Spence, C. J. (2006) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193720 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Self-citationCrisinel, A.-S., Cosser, S., King, S., Jones, R., Petrie, J., & Spence, C. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.009 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationCrossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastes
Knöferle, K., & Spence, C. J. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0321-z · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationSpence, C. J. (2015) · Flavour · doi:10.1186/2044-7248-4-3 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationEffect of background noise on food perception
Woods, A. T., Poliakoff, E., Lloyd, D. M., Kuenzel, J., Hodson, R., Gonda, H., Batchelor, J., Dijksterhuis, G. B., & Thomas, A. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.003 · Cited by 192 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…shown to affect the tasting experience, as well as to alter the perception of different food attributes, such as, e.g., sweetness (e.g., Ferber and Cabanac 1987; Woods et al. 2011; Stafford et al. 2012; see Spence 2014, for a review of the influence of noise on the perception of food and drink).”
BackgroundCrisinel, A.-S., & Spence, C. (2010) · Attention, Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.7.1994 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE INFLUENCE OF AUDITORY CUES ON THE PERCEPTION OF, AND RESPONSES TO, FOOD AND DRINK
Spence, C. J., & Shankar, M. U. (2010) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2009.00267.x · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationSpence, C., Velasco, C., & Knoeferle, K. (2014) · Flavour · doi:10.1186/2044-7248-3-8 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationMultisensory Congruency as a Mechanism for Attentional Control over Perceptual Selection
van Ee, R., van Boxtel, J. J. A., Parker, A. L., & Alais, D. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0873-09.2009 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Auditory contributions to flavour perception and feeding behaviour
Spence, C. J. (2012) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.022 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationImplicit association between basic tastes and pitch
Crisinel, A.-S., & Spence, C. (2009) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.016 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationNoise and its impact on the perception of food and drink
Spence, C. J. (2014) · Flavour · doi:10.1186/2044-7248-3-9 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of noise and distraction on alcohol perception
Stafford, L. D., Fernandes, M., & Agobiani, E. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.10.012 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The impact of pleasantness ratings on crossmodal associations between food samples and musical notes
Crisinel, A.-S., & Spence, C. J. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.10.007 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationInfluence of noise on gustatory affective ratings and preference for sweet or salt.
Ferber, C., & Cabanac, M. (1987) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(87)90022-5 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Airplane noise and the taste of umami
Spence, C. J., Michel, C., & Smith, B. (2014) · Flavour · doi:10.1186/2044-7248-3-2 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationGood acoustical quality in restaurants: a compromise between speech intelligibility and privacy
Filippi, M., & Astolfi, A. (2004) · PORTO@Iris · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Designing spaces for every listener
Heylighen, A., Rychtáriková, M., & Vermeir, G. (2009) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-009-0175-y · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- BLUMENTHAL, H. 2008. The Big Fat Duck Cookbook, Bloomsbury, London, UK.
- BRONNER, K., BRUHN, H., HIRT, R. and PIPER, D. 2012. What is the sound of citrus? Research on the correspondences between the perception of sound and flavour. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM) 2012, pp. 142-148, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Q. J., Mielby, L. A., Junge, J. Y., Bertelsen, A. S., Kidmose, U., Spence, C., & Byrne, D. V. (2019) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods8060211 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citation“Smooth operator”: Music modulates the perceived creaminess, sweetness, and bitterness of chocolate
Reinoso Carvalho, F., Wang, Q. (., van Ee, R., Persoone, D., & Spence, C. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.026 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationThe influence of soundscapes on the perception and evaluation of beers
Reinoso Carvalho, F., Wang, Q. (., Van Ee, R., & Spence, C. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.009 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Wang, Q. J., Mielby, L. A., Thybo, A. K., Bertelsen, A. S., Kidmose, U., Spence, C., & Byrne, D. V. (2019) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12492 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Rychtarikova, M., Touhafi, A., Steenhaut, K., Persoone, D., Spence, C., & Leman, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO) Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium
- Department of Experimental Psychology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Laboratory of Acoustics KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- The Chocolate Line Bruges Belgium
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Venue
- Journal of Sensory Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-26
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 404-412
- ISSN
- 0887-8250 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-459X
- OpenAlex
- W1867163199
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Sensory Studies (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- CAPES Foundation, Brazil (BEX 3488/13-6)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Culinary Culture and Tourism
- Keywords
- cross-modal correspondence, environmental sounds, taste perception, individual differences, gastronomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review