Cited by 231Multisensory perception and integrationSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsTactile and Sensory Interactions

A bittersweet symphony: Systematically modulating the taste of food by changing the sonic properties of the soundtrack playing in the background

Crisinel, Anne-Sylvie, Cosser, Stefan, King, Scott, Jones, Russ, Petrie, James, Spence, Charles·2012·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

We report an experiment designed to investigate the consequences of manipulating the pitch of the background auditory stimulation on the taste of food. The participants in the present study evaluated four pieces of cinder toffee while listening to two auditory soundtracks, presented in a random order. One soundtrack was designed to be more crossmodally (or “synaesthetically”) congruent with a bitter-tasting food whereas the other soundtrack was designed to be more congruent with a sweet-tasting food instead. The participants rated each sample using three computer based line scales: One scale was anchored with the words bitter and sweet. The second scale required participants to localize the taste/flavour percept elicited by the food (at the front vs. back of their mouth). The third scale involved participants giving a hedonic evaluation of the foodstuff. As expected, the cinder toffee samples tasted while listening to the presumptively ‘bitter’ soundtrack were rated as tasting significantly more bitter than when exactly the same foodstuff was evaluated while listening to the ‘sweet’ soundtrack instead. These results provide the first convincing empirical demonstration that the crossmodal congruency of a background soundtrack can be used to modify the taste (and presumably also flavour) of a foodstuff.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.009

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crisinel, A.-S., Cosser, S., King, S., Jones, R., Petrie, J., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Japan Food Research Laboratories (JP)
Corresponding author
Crisinel, Anne-Sylvie
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
201-204
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009400438
Cited by
231
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
Funders
Berrow Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
cross-modal correspondence, taste perception, synesthesia, hedonic evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review