Cited by 300Ethics in Business and EducationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEthics in medical practice

Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior

Open access
Kuenzi, Maribeth, Mayer, David M., Greenbaum, Rebecca L.·2020·Personnel Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to provide a richer lens on the ethical organizational environment by examining the relationship between ethical leadership and unit‐level unethical behavior through ethical organizational climate (EOC), with collective moral identity as a boundary condition. In testing our theoretical model, we first develop and validate a measure of EOC to address concerns with existing measures of ethical climate. Second, we examine the role of collective moral identity as a moderator of the relationship between EOC and unit unethical behavior. We discuss implications regarding the importance of developing a more comprehensive conceptualization of EOC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/peps.12356

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethical leadership is positively related to work attitudes and performance, as well as ethical and altruistic behaviors at both the individual and group levels.

    “It is positively related to work attitudes and performance, as well as ethical and altruistic behaviors at both the individual level and group level (Bedi et al., 2016; Kuenzi et al., 2020; Walumbwa et al., 2017).”

    From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Kuenzi et al., 2020

    The Additional information section reports an indirect association between ethical leadership and lower unit unethical behavior, supporting the group-level ethical-behavior aspect. The Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions section says the study focused on unethical behavior, identifies performance and prosocial behavior as outcomes for future research, and calls for individual-level outcomes to be examined. It therefore does not support the attributed claims about work attitudes, performance, altruistic behavior, or findings at both levels. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2007). Ethical work climate: A weather report and forecast. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Managing social and ethical issues in organizations (Vol. 5, pp. 181-227). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  3. Kiesler, C. A., & Kiesler, S. B. (1969). Conformity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  4. Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus users guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
  6. Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A., & Muhammad, R. S. (2013). Organizational culture and climate. In Weiner, I. B., Schmitt, N. W., & Highhouse, S. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 643-676). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
  8. Schriesheim, C., & Eisenbach, R. (1990). Item wording effects on exploratory factor-analytic results: An experimental investigation. Proceedings of the 1990 Southern Management Association annual meetings, 396-398.
  9. Smith, H. J., Thompson, R. L., & Iacovou, C. L. (2009). The impact of organizational climate on reporting behaviors in information systems projects. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 577-591.
  10. Stebbins, S. & Comen, E. (2017). Bad reputation: America's top 20 most hated companies. 24/7 Wall Street Journal.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuenzi, M., Mayer, D. M., & Greenbaum, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Kuenzi, Maribeth
Venue
Personnel Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-18
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
43-71
ISSN
  • 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6570
OpenAlex
W2970679351
Cited by
300
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2
FWCI
23.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
ethical leadership, unethical behavior, boundary conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review