Cited by 111Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning

Open access
Sommerhalder, Jörg, Oueghlani, Evelyne, Bagnoud, Marc, Leonards, Ute, Safran, Avinoam B, Pelizzone, Marco·2003·Vision Research

Abstract

Simulations of artificial vision were performed to assess "minimum requirements for useful artificial vision". Retinal prostheses will be implanted at a fixed (and probably eccentric) location of the retina. To mimic this condition on normal observers, we projected stimuli of various sizes and content on a defined stabilised area of the visual field. In experiment 1, we asked subjects to read isolated 4-letter words presented at various degrees of pixelisation and at various eccentricities. Reading performance dropped abruptly when the number of pixels was reduced below a certain threshold. For central reading, a viewing area containing about 300 pixels was necessary for close to perfect reading (>90% correctly read words). At eccentricities beyond 10 degrees, close to perfect reading was never achieved even if more than 300 pixels were used. A control experiment using isolated letter recognition in the same conditions suggested that lower reading performance at high eccentricity was in part due to the "crowding effect". In experiment 2, we investigated whether the task of eccentric reading under such specific conditions could be improved by training. Two subjects, naive to this task, were trained to read pixelised 4-letter words presented at 15 degrees eccentricity. Reading performance of both subjects increased impressively throughout the experiment. Low initial reading scores (range 6%-23% correct) improved impressively (range 64%-85% correct) after about one month of training (about 1 h/day). Control tests demonstrated that the learning process consisted essentially in an adaptation to use an eccentric area of the retina for reading. These results indicate that functional retinal implants consisting of more than 300 stimulation contacts will be needed. They might successfully restore some reading abilities in blind patients, even if they have to be placed outside the foveal area. Reaching optimal performance may, however, require a significant adaptation process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00481-9

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research using simulated prosthetic vision suggests that obtaining a wide field of view (FOV) is important for both mobility and object recognition tasks.

    “Research using simulated prosthetic vision suggests that obtaining a wide field of view (FOV) is important for both mobility and object recognition tasks.61–64”

    From Visual Prostheses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Technology (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Results (§§3.2–3.3; page unavailable) show better recognition of isolated four-letter words with the larger viewing area at high eccentricities. But the study tested reading, not mobility or general object recognition; the Conclusion (§6) identifies mobility as a task for future research. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tychsen, L. (1992). Binocular vision. In W. Hart (Ed.), AdlerÕs physiology of the eye (p. 832). St. Louis: Mosby.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommerhalder, J., Oueghlani, E., Bagnoud, M., Leonards, U., Safran, A. B., & Pelizzone, M.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Sommerhalder, Jörg
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
269-283
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008479197
Cited by
111
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, isolated words, perceptual learning, crowding effects, retinal eccentricity, visual adaptation
MeSH terms
Adult, Blindness, Humans, Learning, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Prosthesis Design, Reading, Retina, Visual Fields, Vision, Binocular, Vision, Monocular, Prostheses and Implants, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review