Cited by 744Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex

Open access
Nitsche, Michael A., Seeber, Antje, Frommann, Kai, Klein, Cornelia Carmen, Rochford, Christian, Nitsche, Maren S., Fricke, Kristina, Liebetanz, David +4 more·2005·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human motor cortex results in excitability shifts which occur during and after stimulation. These excitability shifts are polarity-specific with anodal tDCS enhancing excitability, and cathodal reducing it. To explore the origin of this excitability modulation in more detail, we measured the input-output curve and motor thresholds as global parameters of cortico-spinal excitability, and determined intracortical inhibition and facilitation, as well as facilitatory indirect wave (I-wave) interactions. Measurements were performed during short-term tDCS, which elicits no after-effects, and during other tDCS protocols which do elicit short- and long-lasting after-effects. Resting and active motor thresholds remained stable during and after tDCS. The slope of the input-output curve was increased by anodal tDCS and decreased by cathodal tDCS. Anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex reduced intracortical inhibition and enhanced facilitation after tDCS but not during tDCS. Cathodal tDCS reduced facilitation during, and additionally increased inhibition after its administration. During tDCS, I-wave facilitation was not influenced but, for the after-effects, anodal tDCS increased I-wave facilitation, while cathodal tDCS had only minor effects. These results suggest that the effect of tDCS on cortico-spinal excitability during a short period of stimulation (which does not induce after-effects) primarily depends on subthreshold re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nitsche, M. A., Seeber, A., Frommann, K., Klein, C. C., Rochford, C., Nitsche, M. S., Fricke, K., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., & Tergau, F.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-28
Volume
568
Issue
1
Pages
291-303
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2154074499
Cited by
744
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 41
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, motor cortex excitability, corticospinal excitability, input-output curves, motor threshold, intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, resting membrane potential, synaptic activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Neural Conduction, Neural Inhibition, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review