Cited by 28Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Eight-Month Follow-Up of Physical Activity and Central Adiposity: Results From an Internet-Delivered Randomized Control Trial Intervention

Open access
Carr, Lucas J., Bartee, R. Todd, Dorozynski, Chris M., Broomfield, James F., Smith, Marci L., Smith, Derek T.·2009·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

Background: Less than half of U.S. adults engage in the recommended amount of physical activity (PA). Internet-delivered PA programs increase short-term PA but long-term adherence is largely equivocal. Purpose: To determine whether increased PA following the 16-week internet-delivered Active Living Every Day (ALED-I) program is maintained 8 months later in sedentary and overweight rural adults. Methods: In our previous randomized controlled trial (N = 32; 18 intent-to-treat controls, 14 ALED-I interventions), the ALED-I group increased PA (+1384 steps/day; E.S. = 0.95) and reduced central adiposity. Nine original intervention participants and ten delayed intent-to-treat control participants completed ALED-I and an 8-month follow-up. Pedometer-measured PA, anthropometric variables, and cardiometabolic disease risk factors were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and at 8 months. Results: Control crossover participants increased PA (+1337 steps/day; P = .04). Eight months following completion of ALED-I (N = 19), PA levels relapsed (–1340 steps/day) and were similar to levels before the intervention (6850 ± 471 steps/day vs. 6755 ± 543 steps/day; P = .89). Total cholesterol and triglycerides improved, –9.9% and –18.2%, respectively, and reductions in central adiposity were maintained (97.1 ± 2.2 cm vs. 97.2 ± 2.2 cm; P = .66). Conclusions: The ALED-I intervention was efficacious in the short-term but did not produce longer-term adherence to PA. Future theory- based internet-delivered interventions that produce habituation of increased PA are warranted. Study conducted in Laramie, WY from January 2007 through November 2007.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.6.4.444

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In studies targeting physical activity or depression, the number of activities completed was not found to correlate with outcomes.

    “In studies targeting physical activity [33,34] or depression [45], the number of activities completed was not found to correlate with outcomes.”
  • Logins were found to be positively associated with outcome in studies targeting food and vegetable consumption, physical activity, and weight management.

    “Using the previously described rating system, logins were found to be positively associated with outcome in studies targeting food and vegetable consumption [32], physical activity [33-37], and weight management [38-40].”
  • Several studies categorized participants into adherent or not, or usage categories such as low, medium, and high, while others used continuous variables or a combination of these.

    “Several studies categorized participants into adherent or not [49,54,57,75], or usage categories such as low, medium, and high [60], while others used continuous variables [23,24,33-36,38-41,43-45,50-52,55,56,58,59,61,76] or a combination of these [42,46,53,64-66,77].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]USDHHS 2008 Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report to the secretary of health and human services Retrieved November 16, 2008, from http://www.health.gov/PAGuidelines/committeereport.aspx 19178654

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carr, L. J., Bartee, R. T., Dorozynski, C. M., Broomfield, J. F., Smith, M. L., & Smith, D. T.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2009-07
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
444-455
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2164550132
Cited by
28
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2p20rr016474-09)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20-RR-016474)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
physical activity, abdominal obesity, online intervention, sedentary adults, overweight adults, rural adults, pedometer-measured steps, long-term adherence, relapse, cardiometabolic risk factors, cholesterol, triglycerides, habituation
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weights and Measures, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Health Behavior, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Cross-Over Studies, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Internet, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review