Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 578

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: More Facts

Benbow, Camilla Persson, Stanley, Julian C.·1983·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.6648516
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Almost 40,000 selected seventh-grade students from the Middle Atlantic region of the United States took the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test as part of the Johns Hopkins regional talent search in 1980, 1981, and 1982. A separate nationwide talent search was conducted in which any student under age 13 who was willing to take the test was eligible. The results obtained by both procedures establish that by age 13 a large sex difference in mathematical reasoning ability exists and that it is especially pronounced at the high end of the distribution: among students who scored ≥ 700, boys outnumbered girls 13 to 1. Some hypothesized explanations of such differences were not supported by the data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.6648516

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. BENBOW, C.P., CONSEQUENCES IN HIGH-SCHOOL AND COLLEGE OF SEX-DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY - A LONGITUDINAL PERSPECTIVE, AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL 19: 598 (1982). · DOI
  2. BENBOW, C.P., INTELLECTUALLY TALENTED BOYS AND GIRLS - EDUCATIONAL PROFILES, GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY 26: 82 (1982). · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.7434028 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.7195071 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.7089533 · DOI · Paper page
  6. DONLON, T, COLLEGE BOARD ADMISS: 24 (1971).
  7. 10.1126/science.7209510 · DOI · Paper page
  8. EYSENCK H INTELLIGENCE CONTROV (1981). · DOI
  9. FENNEMA, E, SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT, SPATIAL VISUALIZATION AND AFFECTIVE FACTORS, AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL 14: 51 (1977). · DOI · Paper page
  10. HIER, D.B., SPATIAL ABILITY IN ANDROGEN-DEFICIENT MEN, NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 306: 1202 (1982). · DOI · Paper page
  11. INGLIS, J, SEX-DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECTS OF UNILATERAL BRAIN-DAMAGE ON INTELLIGENCE, SCIENCE 212: 693 (1981). · DOI
  12. LEVY, J, SCIENCES 21: 20 (1981).
  13. MCGEE, M.G., HUMAN SPATIAL ABILITIES - PSYCHOMETRIC STUDIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL, GENETIC, HORMONAL, AND NEUROLOGICAL INFLUENCES, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN 86: 889 (1979). · DOI · Paper page
  14. MCGLONE, J, SEX-DIFFERENCES IN HUMAN-BRAIN ASYMMETRY - A CRITICAL SURVEY, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 3: 215 (1980). · DOI · Paper page
  15. MCGUINESS, D, HUMAN NATURE 2: 82 (1979).
  16. MEECE, J.L., SEX-DIFFERENCES IN MATH ACHIEVEMENT - TOWARD A MODEL OF ACADEMIC CHOICE, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN 91: 324 (1982). · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1126/science.7244634 · DOI
  18. MESSICK, S, TIME AND METHOD IN COACHING FOR THE SAT, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN 89: 191 (1981). · DOI
  19. NAFTOLIN, F, UNDERSTANDING THE BASES OF SEX-DIFFERENCES, SCIENCE 211: 1263 (1981). · DOI
  20. Stanley, J., Roeper Review 6: 160 (1984). · DOI
  21. TOMIZUKU, C, MATHEMATICAL ABILITY - IS SEX A FACTOR, SCIENCE 212: 114 (1981). · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.935879 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C.
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
1983-12-02
Volume
222
Issue
4627
Pages
1029-1031
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.6648516
OpenAlex
W2094354143
Cited by
578
References
0
FWCI
38.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.