Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Drosophila embryo at single-cell transcriptome resolution

Karaiskos, Nikos, Wahle, Philipp, Alles, Jonathan, Boltengagen, Anastasiya, Ayoub, Salah, Kipar, Claudia, Kocks, Christine, Rajewsky, Nikolaus, Zinzen, Robert P.·2017·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

3D gene expression blueprint of the fly: When looking at populations of cells, features such as cell heterogeneity and localization are masked. However, single-cell sequencing reveals cellular heterogeneity and rare cell types. At the onset of gastrulation, the fly embryo consists of about 6000 cells with distinct gene expression profiles. Karaiskos et al. developed an algorithm to generate an interactive three-dimensional (3D) “virtual embryo,” with the expression of more than 8000 genes per cell measured for most cells (see the Perspective by Stadler and Eisen). The virtual embryo offers insights into developmental mechanisms—from local expression of regulators such as transcription factors and long noncoding RNAs to spatial modulation of signaling pathways. Science , this issue p. 194 ; see also p. 172

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aan3235

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.7554/eLife.02833 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1158170 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1171468 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01087-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/gr.112961.110 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gr.110098.110 · DOI
  7. 10.15252/embj.201488769 · DOI
  8. 10.15252/embj.201488117 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nprot.2012.049 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.024 · DOI
  12. 10.1101/gad.2046211 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.1247651 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/nbt.3209 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0408031102 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nature09715 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071820 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r145 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.053 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1534/genetics.116.186783 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90476-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0925-4773(03)00005-4 · DOI
  26. L. Van der Maaten, G. Hinton, Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
  27. 10.1007/BF00848247 · DOI
  28. V. Hartenstein Atlas of Drosophila Development (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1993) vol. 1.
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkw1016 · DOI
  30. 10.1101/gr.191122.115 · DOI
  31. 10.1242/dev.015255 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.007 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF00848246 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03536.x · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.012 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/1471-2105-4-57 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/35000615 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0065-2660(07)00003-X · DOI
  39. E. Davidson The Regulatory Genome. Gene Regulatory Networks In Development And Evolution (Academic Press ed. 1 2006). · DOI
  40. 10.1126/science.6289436 · DOI
  41. 10.2144/04363ST03 · DOI
  42. 10.1126/science.1099247 · DOI
  43. 10.1083/jcb.201302049 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/molbev/msu071 · DOI
  45. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0088 · DOI
  46. 10.1101/gad.1166404 · DOI
  47. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004625 · DOI
  48. 10.1091/mbc.9.8.2145 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.02.043 · DOI

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Karaiskos, N., Wahle, P., Alles, J., Boltengagen, A., Ayoub, S., Kipar, C., Kocks, C., Rajewsky, N., & Zinzen, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Systems Biology of Gene Regulatory Elements, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), 13125 Berlin, Germany.
  • Systems Biology of Neural Tissue Differentiation, BIMSB, MDC, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Venue
Science
Published
2017-10-13
Volume
358
Issue
6360
Pages
194-199
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
428
References
13
Language
en
Funders
DFG (award341230, RA 838/8-1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review