Cited by 182Visual perception and processing mechanismsVestibular and auditory disordersNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Functional Architecture of an Optic Flow-Responsive Area that Drives Horizontal Eye Movements in Zebrafish

Open access
Kubo, Fumi, Hablitzel, Bastian, Dal Maschio, Marco, Driever, Wolfgang, Baier, Herwig, Arrenberg, Aristides B.·2014·Neuron

Abstract

Animals respond to whole-field visual motion with compensatory eye and body movements in order to stabilize both their gaze and position with respect to their surroundings. In zebrafish, rotational stimuli need to be distinguished from translational stimuli to drive the optokinetic and the optomotor responses, respectively. Here, we systematically characterize the neural circuits responsible for these operations using a combination of optogenetic manipulation and in vivo calcium imaging during optic flow stimulation. By recording the activity of thousands of neurons within the area pretectalis (APT), we find four bilateral pairs of clusters that process horizontal whole-field motion and functionally classify eleven prominent neuron types with highly selective response profiles. APT neurons are prevalently direction selective, either monocularly or binocularly driven, and hierarchically organized to distinguish between rotational and translational optic flow. Our data predict a wiring diagram of a neural circuit tailored to drive behavior that compensates for self-motion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.043

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pretectum has been identified as involved in whole-field motion processing in zebrafish.

    “recently identified as involved in processing whole-field motion in zebrafish (Kubo et al., 2014; Portugues et al., 2014).”

    From Neural control and modulation of swimming speed in the larval zebrafish (2014) · cites this paper as Kubo et al., 2014

  • The open-source simZFish faithfully reproduces the zebrafish OMR using experimentally observed neural activity.

    “Benefitting from detailed experimental data (25, 29–34) and recent advances in physics simulation technologies (35), our open-source simZFish faithfully reproduces the zebrafish OMR, utilizing experimentally observed neural activity (25).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kubo, F., Hablitzel, B., Dal Maschio, M., Driever, W., Baier, H., & Arrenberg, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Baier, Herwig
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
1344-1359
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067473018
Cited by
182
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC‐294‐BIOSS, SFB780, (EXC 294))
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
optical flow, horizontal eye movements, optokinetic response, optomotor response, zebrafish, direction selectivity, binocular vision, neural circuit organization, optogenetic manipulation, in vivo calcium imaging
MeSH terms
Animals, Eye Movements, Motion Perception, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways, Zebrafish, Nystagmus, Optokinetic, Optic Flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review