Cited by 21Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Measuring Moderate-Intensity Exercise with the Apple Watch: Validation Study

Open access
Abt, Grant, Bray, James, Benson, Amanda Clare·2018·JMIR Cardio

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND Moderate fitness levels and habitual exercise have a protective effect for cardiovascular disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality. The Apple Watch displays exercise completed at an intensity of a brisk walk or above using a green “exercise” ring. However, it is unknown if the exercise ring accurately represents an exercise intensity comparable to that defined as moderate-intensity. In order for health professionals to prescribe exercise intensity with confidence, consumer wearable devices need to be accurate and precise if they are to be used as part of a personalized medicine approach to disease management. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Apple Watch for measuring moderate-intensity exercise, as defined as 40-59% oxygen consumption reserve (VO2R). METHODS Twenty recreationally active participants completed resting oxygen consumption (VO2rest) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) tests prior to a series of 5-minute bouts of treadmill walking at increasing speed while wearing an Apple Watch on both wrists, and with oxygen consumption measured continuously. Five-minute exercise bouts were added until the Apple Watch advanced the green “exercise” ring by 5 minutes (defined as the treadmill inflection speed). Validity was examined using a one-sample t-test, with interdevice and intradevice reliability reported as the standardized typical error and intraclass correlation. RESULTS The mean %VO2R at the treadmill inflection speed was 30% (SD 7) for both Apple Watches. There was a large underestimation of moderate-intensity exercise (left hand: mean difference = -10% [95% CI -14 to -7], d=-1.4; right hand: mean difference = -10% [95% CI -13 to -7], d=-1.5) when compared to the criterion of 40% VO2R. Standardized typical errors for %VO2R at the treadmill inflection speed were small to moderate, with intraclass correlations higher within trials compared to between trials. CONCLUSIONS The Apple Watch threshold for moderate-intensity exercise was lower than the criterion, which would lead to an overestimation of moderate-intensity exercise minutes completed throughout the day.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/cardio.8574

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent studies involving predominantly steady-state aerobic activities, wrist-worn activity monitors have been shown to have reasonable accuracy in heart rate estimation (approximately 5% error) but a poor estimate of energy expenditure, where the error was found to be closer to approximately 30% with a negative bias.

    “In recent studies involving predominantly steady-state aerobic activities, wrist-worn activity monitors have been shown to have reasonable accuracy in HR estimation (approximately 5% error) but a poor estimate of EE, where the error was found to be closer to approximately 30% with a negative bias [16,17].”

    From Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Activity Monitors During Common Daily Physical Activities and Types of Structured Exercise: Evaluation Study (2018) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion (Principal Findings; page not available) says the Apple Watch does not substantially overestimate or underestimate heart rate, supporting the qualitative heart-rate point. It gives no approximately 5% heart-rate error or approximately 30% negatively biased energy-expenditure error. The Results report a 10-percentage-point underestimation of the moderate-intensity exercise threshold, which is a different measure. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Pescatello LS American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9th edition 2014 Philadelphia, PA Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abt, G., Bray, J., & Benson, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Abt, Grant
Venue
JMIR Cardio
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
e6
ISSN
2561-1011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789999811
Cited by
21
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Cardio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
Apple Watch, moderate-intensity exercise, exercise intensity monitoring, wearable devices, VO2max, treadmill walking, device validation, reliability statistics, exercise prescription, personalized medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review