Cited by 87Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology Research

Negative social interactions and risk of mild cognitive impairment in old age

Open access
Wilson, Robert S., Boyle, Patricia A., James, Bryan D., Leurgans, Sue E., Buchman, Aron S., Bennett, David A.·2015·Neuropsychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that negative social interaction is associated with increased risk of mild cognitive impairment and rate of cognitive decline. METHODS: Participants were 529 older people without cognitive impairment at study onset. They completed annual evaluations that included assessment of negative social interactions (e.g., unsympathetic behavior, rejection), cognitive testing, and clinical classification of mild cognitive impairment. RESULTS: During a mean of 4.8 years of follow-up (SD = 2.5), 198 individuals (37.4%) developed mild cognitive impairment. In a proportional hazards model, higher baseline frequency of negative social interactions (M = 1.51, SD = 0.43, skewness = 1.60) was associated with higher risk of developing mild cognitive impairment (hazard ratio = 1.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.13, 2.07). Results were similar after adjustment for depressive symptoms, social network size, social activity, and loneliness. This association was mainly due to neglect and rejection. There was no change in negative social interaction rate over time (estimate = -0.003, SE = 0.004, p = .508). Higher baseline level of negative social interaction was associated with lower initial level of global cognition (estimate = -0.096, SE = 0.034, p = .005) but not with cognitive decline (estimate = -0.018, SE = 0.011, p = .098). A higher mean level of negative interactions across the study period was robustly related to faster cognitive decline (estimate = -0.036, SE = 0.012, p = .002). CONCLUSION: Frequent negative social interactions may be a risk factor for mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline in old age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/neu0000154

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Benton AL Sivan AB Hamsher K de S Varney NR Spreen O 1994 Contributions to neuropsychological assessment 2 New York Oxford University Press
  2. Persson G Skoog I 1996 A prospective population study of psychosocial risk factors for late onset dementia International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 11 15 22
  3. Raven JC Court JH Raven J 1992 Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary: Standard Progressive Matrices Oxford, England Oxford Psychologists Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, R. S., Boyle, P. A., James, B. D., Leurgans, S. E., Buchman, A. S., & Bennett, D. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2015-07
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
561-570
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W2321649157
Cited by
87
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AG17917, R01AG15819, R01AG33678, R01AG34374)
  • Illinois Department of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
negative social interactions, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, older adults, social neglect, social rejection, loneliness, social networks, depressive symptoms, social activity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Depression, Empathy, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Rejection, Psychology, Risk, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review