The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews
Abstract
Dear editor, We read with great interest the review entitled ‘Paracetamol vs other analgesia in adult patients with minor musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review’,1 published in the Emergency Medicine Journal . Although the authors have stated that they followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, there is a methodological issue regarding the study discussed in this letter, which …
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The eligibility criteria were developed using the PICOS framework and adapted for the scoping purpose of this review [19].”
From Digital health technologies in oncology services: A scoping review of clinical implementation, organisational evidence gaps, and policy implications (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
How to formulate research recommendations
Brown, P., Brunnhuber, K., Chalkidou, K., Chalmers, I., Clarke, M., Fenton, M., Forbes, C., Glanville, J., Hicks, N. J., Moody, J., et al. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38987.492014.94 · Cited by 381
Systematic Reviews: Are They Actually Well Conducted and Reported in Accordance with PRISMA?
Gholizadeh, M., Amir‐Behghadami, M., & Janati, A. (2020) · Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma · doi:10.29252/beat-080110 · Cited by 15
Self-citationRidderikhof, M. L., Saanen, J. B., Goddijn, H., van Dieren, S., van Etten‐Jamaludin, F. S., Lirk, P. B., Goslings, J. C., & Hollmann, M. W. (2019) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2019-208439 · Cited by 11
Comment on: Systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life after total pancreatectomy
Amir‐Behghadami, M., Janati, A., & Gholizadeh, M. (2020) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.11535 · Cited by 5
Self-citationJanati, A., Amir‐Behghadami, M., & Arab‐Zozani, M. (2020) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.018 · Cited by 5
Self-citationAmir‐Behghadami, M., Gholizadeh, M., & Janati, A. (2019) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.010 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Higgins JP , Green S . Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Vol 4: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
Safargar, M., Arefhosseini, S., Tutunchi, H., Arefhosseini, S., & Ebrahimi-Mameghani, M. (2026) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-026-02420-w
“…predefined eligibility criteria, structured around the Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparator, Outcome, and Study Design (PICOS) process [23]: “ Populations , ” No restrictions were placed on population, age, or health status; “ Intervention/ Exposure , ” The status of the B vitamins,…”
Messak, M., Omar, Y. M., Mosad, N., Ahmed, O., & Makhlouf, H. A. (2026) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-026-04394-8
“Studies were selected based on the PICOS framework (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design) [ 26 ].”
Potential Benefits of E-Bikes for Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.
Xu, Z.-C., Chen, L.-X., Mei, Z.-Y., Zhu, Y.-P., Li, Y.-K., Li, X.-Y., Zhang, X., Deng, H.-Z., Zheng, W.-H., Chen, J.-F., et al. (2026) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.2026-0175
Metadata
- Authors
- Amir-Behghadami, M., & Janati, A.
- Affiliations
- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Venue
- Emergency Medicine Journal
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-04-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 387-387
- ISSN
- 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-0205
- 1472-0213
- OpenAlex
- W3015126898
- Cited by
- 1,335
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 408 · 2025: 393 · 2024: 271 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- eligibility criteria, systematic review methodology, research design, paracetamol, analgesia
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Research Design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
