The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews
Abstract
Dear editor, We read with great interest the review entitled ‘Paracetamol vs other analgesia in adult patients with minor musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review’,1 published in the Emergency Medicine Journal . Although the authors have stated that they followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, there is a methodological issue regarding the study discussed in this letter, which …
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The eligibility criteria were developed using the PICOS framework and adapted for the scoping purpose of this review [19].”
From Digital health technologies in oncology services: A scoping review of clinical implementation, organisational evidence gaps, and policy implications (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
How to formulate research recommendations
Brown, P., Brunnhuber, K., Chalkidou, K., Chalmers, I., Clarke, M., Fenton, M., Forbes, C., Glanville, J., Hicks, N. J., Moody, J., et al. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38987.492014.94 · Cited by 381
Systematic Reviews: Are They Actually Well Conducted and Reported in Accordance with PRISMA?
Gholizadeh, M., Amir‐Behghadami, M., & Janati, A. (2020) · Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma · doi:10.29252/beat-080110 · Cited by 15
Self-citationRidderikhof, M. L., Saanen, J. B., Goddijn, H., van Dieren, S., van Etten‐Jamaludin, F. S., Lirk, P. B., Goslings, J. C., & Hollmann, M. W. (2019) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2019-208439 · Cited by 11
Comment on: Systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life after total pancreatectomy
Amir‐Behghadami, M., Janati, A., & Gholizadeh, M. (2020) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.11535 · Cited by 5
Self-citationJanati, A., Amir‐Behghadami, M., & Arab‐Zozani, M. (2020) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.018 · Cited by 5
Self-citationAmir‐Behghadami, M., Gholizadeh, M., & Janati, A. (2019) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.010 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Higgins JP , Green S . Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Vol 4: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,003
Deng, N., Soh, K. G., Abdullah, B. B., & Huang, D. (2024) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.3390/bs14030207 · Cited by 23
Interventions to increase sleep duration in young people: A systematic review.
Gadam, S., Pattinson, C., Rossa, K., Soleimanloo, S., Moore, J., Begum, T., Srinivasan, A., & Smith, S. S. (2023) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101807 · Cited by 23
Zhao, Z., Zhang, W., Pang, L., Zeng, L., Liu, S., & Liu, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1166299 · Cited by 25
“Based on PICOS (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design) guidelines (9), the keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used as follows: “neoplasms”; “immune checkpoint inhibitor”, “PD-1 inhibi tors” , “PD-L1 inhibi tors” ,” CTLA4 inhibi tors” “pembrolizumab”, “nivolumab”, “ti…”
Dysfunctional decision-making in binge-eating disorder: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Colton, E., Wilson, K.-E., Chong, T. T. ‐., & Verdejo‐García, A. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105250 · Cited by 30
“Resulting articles were screened based on preregistered inclusion and exclusion criteria, defined using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS) model (Amir-Behghadami and Janati, 2020).”
MethodGroßek, A., Großek, K., & Bloch, W. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07773-9 · Cited by 23
“Further in- and exclusion criteria were defined using the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study Design) scheme [16].”
MethodStudent engagement in flipped classroom in nursing education: An integrative review
Ng, E. K. L. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103585 · Cited by 27
Efendi, F., Tonapa, S. I., Has, E. M. M., & Ho, K. H. M. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.12.002 · Cited by 22
“The inclusion criteria for articles were determined according to the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design (PICOS) [36].”
MethodSherin, K. M., Stillerman, A., Chandrasekar, L., Went, N. S., & Niebuhr, D. W. (2022) · AJPM Focus · doi:10.1016/j.focus.2022.100039 · Cited by 27
Association of FKBP5 gene variants with depression susceptibility: A comprehensive meta‐analysis
Fan, B.-F., Ma, J.-P., Zhang, H.-M., Liao, Y.-H., Wang, W.-X., Zhang, S., Lu, C.-Y., & Guo, L. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/appy.12464 · Cited by 23
“All the eligible studies were required to meet the following criteria, organized by the Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS) framework (Amir-Behghadami & Janati, 2020).”
BackgroundMert, Ü., Khasawneh, M. Y., Ghandour, M., Zuabi, A. A., Horst, K., Hildebrand, F., Bouillon, B., Mahmoud, M. A., & Kabir, K. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14093249 · Cited by 22
Ceylan, H. İ., Silva, A. F., Ramírez‐Campillo, R., & Murawska‐Ciałowicz, E. (2024) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology13050323 · Cited by 28
Ragnhildstveit, A., Tuteja, N., Seli, P., Smart, L., Uzun, N., Bass, L. C., Miranda, A. C., Ford, T. J., & Neufeld, S. (2024) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-024-00984-3 · Cited by 29
“The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) [31] framework was applied to evaluate eligibility in the qualitative synthesis (Additional file 1: Table S2).”
MethodLi, X., Dai, J., Liu, Q., Zhao, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.12.003 · Cited by 23
Abdelaal, A., Eltaras, M. M., Katamesh, B. E., Serhan, H. A. A., Farahat, R. A., Badr, H., & Abdelazeem, B. (2023) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-023-02524-w · Cited by 22
“Two groups of two reviewers each helped with the title, abstract, and full-text screening of retrieved records [BEK, HB, RAF, HAS].”
BackgroundEfficacy of Septoplasty in Patients with Nasal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Alessandri-Bonetti, M., Costantino, A., Cottone, G., Carbonaro, R., Cardone, F., Amendola, F., Virgilio, A. D., Robotti, E., Persichetti, P., & Vaienti, L. (2023) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.30684 · Cited by 22
Liu, X. J., Ge, S., Cordova, A., Yaghi, Z., Jiang, B. Y., Yue, G. H., & Yao, W. X. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1052826 · Cited by 22
“The PICOS’s (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) recommendation was adopted to determine the eligibility (Amir-Behghadami and Janati, 2020).”
MethodKazlauskaitė, R., Martinaitytė, I., Lyubovnikova, J., & Augutytė‐Kvedaravičienė, I. (2022) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12315 · Cited by 32
Effect of mindfulness meditation on depression during pregnancy: A meta-analysis
Li, Y., Chen, J., Chen, B., Wang, T., Wu, Z., Huang, X., & Li, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963133 · Cited by 26
“…(IV) The DASS, which scores depression, anxiety and stress respectively, and shows good psychometric quality in clinical samples (Parkitny and McAuley, 2010); (V) The BDI-II, a 21 item self-reported questionnaire designed to measure the severity of depressive symptoms (Beck et al., 1996); and VI.”
MethodChien, W. T., Tse, M.-K., Chan, H. Y. L., Cheng, H. Y., & Chen, L. (2022) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2022.100712 · Cited by 22
Franco, A., Ditonno, F., Manfredi, C., Bologna, E., Licari, L. C., Orecchia, L., Agrò, E. F., Antonelli, A., Arlandis, S., Riccardo Autorino, B., et al. (2025) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.004 · Cited by 19
Dhir, A. “., Singh, A., Solomon, S., & Farley, J. E. (2025) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004604 · Cited by 21
“The Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) framework guided the development of additional eligibility criteria [35].”
Cortés‐Pérez, I., Desdentado-Guillén, J. M., Camacho‐Delgado, M. S., Ibancos‐Losada, M. D. R., Obrero‐Gaitán, E., & Lomas‐Vega, R. (2024) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1002/ksa.12477 · Cited by 27
“The search strategy was developed following the PICOS system: [2] population (patients with ACL injury), intervention (VRBT), comparison (conventional therapy intervention), outcome (pain, knee function, strength, proprioception and fl ex-ion, and postural balance) and study design (randomised…”
Music therapy in hemodialysis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin, F., Chen, L., & Gao, Y. H. (2024) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103090 · Cited by 20
Yagudina, R., Kulikov, A., Serpik, V., Protsenko, M., & Kopeyka, K. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16183119 · Cited by 21
“Eligibility criteria were developed in accordance with the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) statement [13].”
MethodMobile applications for endometriosis management functionalities: Analysis and potential
Moumane, K., & Idri, A. (2023) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01833 · Cited by 22
Psychosocial modification of general self-efficacy in older adults: a restricted review
FitzGerald, J., Wells, Y. D., & Ellis, J. M. (2022) · Australasian Journal on Ageing · doi:10.1111/ajag.13052 · Cited by 20
Singh, B., Ahmed, M., Staiano, A. E., Vasiloglou, M. F., Gough, C., Petersen, J. M., Yin, Z., Vandelanotte, C., Kracht, C. L., Fiedler, J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/69065 · Cited by 26
“The inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated using the participants, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design framework, as shown in Textbox 1 [22].”
Zuo, X., Tang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2024) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/55785 · Cited by 25
Free Flap Failure and Complications in Acute Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Kasmirski, J., Alessandri-Bonetti, M., Liu, H. Y., Corcos, A., Ziembicki, J., Stofman, G. M., & Egro, F. (2023) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000005311 · Cited by 20
Byvaltsev, V., Polkin, R., Kalinin, A., Kravtsov, M., Belykh, E., Shepelev, V., Satardinova, E., Manukovsky, V., & Riew, K. (2023) · Asian Spine Journal · doi:10.31616/asj.2022.0184 · Cited by 20
“Researchers independently evaluated full reports, after which each selected article was independently evaluated by the entire author team using the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study Design) [11] inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1) [12].”
MethodChen, H.-Q., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., & Sun, M. (2022) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/02692155221097035 · Cited by 20
Saragih, I. D., Tonapa, S. I., Osingada, C., Porta, C., & Lee, B.-O. (2021) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x211070726 · Cited by 20
“33 Inclusion criteria were: studies with HIV/AIDS survivors, studies that implemented telehealth assisted interventions, RCTs, and studies published in English.”
BackgroundSaragih, I. D., Tarihoran, D. E. T. A. U., Batubara, S. O., Tzeng, H., & Lin, C. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.16142 · Cited by 23
Karo, M., Simorangkir, L., Daryanti Saragih, I., Suarilah, I., & Tzeng, H. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12941 · Cited by 20
Khan, M., Dave, A., Benton, M., Moss, N., & Kaler, M. K. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20747-8 · Cited by 21
Lee, H., Choi, B. J., & Kang, N. (2024) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-024-01505-8 · Cited by 23
Crespo, M., Martínez-Gallego, R., & Filipčič, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1406846 · Cited by 19
Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Trauma Care: A Preliminary Scoping Review
Ventura, C., Denton, E. E., & David, J. A. (2024) · Medical Devices Evidence and Research · doi:10.2147/mder.s467146 · Cited by 17
Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Chen, X., & Li, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348224 · Cited by 28
Long‐Term Outcomes of Septoplasty With or Without Turbinoplasty: A Systematic Review
Fearington, F. W., Awadallah, A. S., Hamilton, G. S., Olson, M. D., & Dey, J. K. (2023) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.31193 · Cited by 19
“The PICOS framework 19 was used to develop the search parameters: population (P) adults affected by nasal obstruction from NSD; intervention (I) septoplasty with or without any form of turbinate modi fi cation; comparison (C) none; outcome (O) any objective or subjective measure related to nasal…”
MethodA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vertebral Artery Injury After Cervical Spine Trauma
Goyal, K., Sunny, J., Gillespie, C. S., Wilby, M., Clark, S., Kaiser, R., Fehlings, M., & Srikandarajah, N. (2023) · Global Spine Journal · doi:10.1177/21925682231209631 · Cited by 19
Shang, Z., Wanyan, P., Wang, M., Zhang, B., Cui, X., & Wang, X. (2023) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.09.002 · Cited by 20
Sinzabakira, F., Brand, V., Heemsbergen, W., & Incrocci, L. (2023) · Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100612 · Cited by 19
“The selection of studies to be included was done according to inclusion criteria for the literature search (PICOS) [19] that is summarized below: (1) Population: Men with pathologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate, low-, intermediate and high-risk localized disease.”
BackgroundInfluentialZhou, S., Chen, G., Xu, X., Zhang, C., Chen, G., Chan, Y.-T., Sun, Y. X., Zhou, J., Wang, N., & Feng, Y. (2025) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.70816 · Cited by 20
“The data retrieval strategy was based on the PICOS framework [32]: (P) Population: patients diagnosed with any type of cancer; (I) Intervention: any type of exercises, Qigong, Tai Chi, or Yoga; (C) Control Group: any type of exercises, Qigong, Tai Chi, Yoga, standard care, or health education; (O)…”
Personalized nursing as the missing link of providing care: A systematic review
Jandaghian-Bidgoli, M., Jamalnia, S., Pashmforosh, M., Shaterian, N., Darabiyan, P., & Rafi, A. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-02855-x · Cited by 18
Crocin Supplementation on Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Bahari, H., Jazinaki, M. S., Aghakhani, L., Amini, M. R., Noushzadeh, Z., Khodashahi, R., & Malekahmadi, M. (2024) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.8380 · Cited by 18
“…screened by two researchers (H.B. and M.S.J.), according to the PICOS framework (Participant: adults, Intervention: crocin, Comparison: a control group receiving placebo, Outcome: inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, Study: randomized controlled trials) (Amir-Behghadami and Janati 2020).”
Bahari, H., Jazinaki, M. S., Rashidmayvan, M., Taheri, S., Amini, M. R., & Malekahmadi, M. (2024) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-023-01423-6 · Cited by 18
“A) were screened independently, considering the PICOS framework of this review (Partici-pant group: adults, Intervention: receiving silymarin, Comparison: control group, Outcome: markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, Study: randomized controlled trials) (Amir-Behghadami and Janati 2020).”
Tolera, S., Assefa, N., & Gobena, T. (2023) · International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/10803548.2023.2293390 · Cited by 18
Huang, K., You, S., Yue, X., Yan, S., Bai, L., He, R., Jiao, Y., Han, B., Momin, K., Wu, J., et al. (2023) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115333 · Cited by 24
Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Long, T., Zhang, Q., Huang, J., & Li, M. (2022) · World Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s12519-022-00666-7 · Cited by 21
“Eligibility criteria We used the PICOS (Population, Intervention/issue of interest, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design) system to frame the inclusion and exclusion criteria [39].”
MethodSaragih, I. D., Tonapa, S. I., Porta, C. M., & Lee, B.-O. (2021) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x211047762 · Cited by 18
“28 The inclusion criteria were: (a) used a randomized controlled study (randomized controlled trial (RCT)) design, (b) adolescent population (aged 13 – 24 years old), (c) implemented a telehealth intervention, (d) assessed sexual health outcomes (i.e. condom use, human immunode fi ciency virus (HIV)…”
MethodYu, H., Sun, C., Sun, B., Chen, X., & Tan, Z. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182412912 · Cited by 24
“) scanned abstracts for possibly important information and then used the population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study design (PICOS) process [51].”
Aghayan, A. H., Mohammadi, D., Atashi, A., & Jamalpoor, Z. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06712-y · Cited by 17
Motuma, A., Tolera, S., Alemu, F. K., Adare, D., Argaw, R., Birhanu, A., Shiferaw, K., Hunduma, G., Letta, S., Temesgen, S., et al. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22939-2 · Cited by 17
Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on liver fat content: A meta-analysis
Ge, Q., Zhang, F.-L., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Biomolecules & biomedicine · doi:10.17305/bb.2025.12203 · Cited by 17
“We included studies that met the following criteria, which were designated according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) principle [38].”
Liu, M., Ma, Z.-Q., Liao, R.-L., Chen, W.-M., Zhang, B.-R., Zhang, Q., Zhu, Y., Gao, S.-J., & Yan-e, C. (2025) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2025.12834 · Cited by 19
Xie, C., Zhang, Z.-Y., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Shi, P., & Wang, S. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21336-z · Cited by 17
Utilization of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Strengthening of HIV Testing: A Systematic Review
Jaiteh, M., Phalane, E., Shiferaw, Y., Voet, K. A., & Phaswana-Mafuya, R. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17080362 · Cited by 17
Li, C.-R., Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Hu, T., & Wang, C.-Y. (2024) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-024-08780-0 · Cited by 17
Colton, E., Connors, M., Mahlberg, J., & Verdejo‐García, A. (2024) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13801 · Cited by 17
“73 Studies were included if they recruited participants with higher weight (defined as body mass index [BMI] >25 or described as individuals with overweight or obesity), meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for binge eating disorder, or…”
Trần, T. B., Ambrens, M., Nguyễn, J., Coleman, E., Gilanyi, Y. L., Letton, M. E., Pandit, A., Lock, M. L., Thom, J. M., Sen, S., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082345 · Cited by 21
“The selection criteria were developed using the PICOS principle 49 and are as follows: Population: adults with CKD ( ≥ 18 years) including those receiving kidney replacement therapy, Intervention: DHIs that promoted diet, exercise, physical activity or a combination of these health behaviours,…”
MethodMace, R. A., Stauder, M. J., Hopkins, S. W., Cohen, J. E., Pietrzykowski, M. O., Philpotts, L. L., Luberto, C. M., & Vranceanu, A. (2024) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/15598276241230467 · Cited by 23
“Our fi rst aim was to investigate, following the PICOS framework, 52 the range of research methods used in the RCTs.”
InfluentialMysler, E., Burmester, G., Saffore, C., Liu, J., Wegrzyn, L., Yang, C., Betts, K. A., Wang, Y., Irvine, A. D., & Panaccione, R. (2024) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-023-02732-6 · Cited by 17
“Table 1 lists the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the SLR, which were defined according to the elements of Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study Design (PICOS) [25].”
Rosen, F., Settel, L., Irvine, F., Koselka, E. P. D., Miller, J. D., & Young, S. (2023) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.13574 · Cited by 17
“TABLE 1 PICOS criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies (Amir ‐ Behghadami & Janati, 2020). full ‐ text review.”
BackgroundImpact of exercise on markers of B cell-related immunity: A systematic review
Walzik, D., Belen, S., Wilisch, K., Kupjetz, M., Kirschke, S., Esser, T., Joisten, N., Schenk, A., Proschinger, S., & Zimmer, P. (2023) · Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2023.10.002 · Cited by 23
Tuygunov, N., Zakaria, M., Yahya, N., Aziz, A. A., & Cahyanto, A. (2023) · Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106099 · Cited by 17
Anakinra in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Mahfooz, K., Rana, A., Palagati, K., Suvarna, A. K., Perryman, C., Gaddipati, S. P., Adhnon, A., Andani, R., & Vasavada, A. (2022) · Medical Science · doi:10.3390/medsci11010004 · Cited by 17
Batubara, S. O., Tonapa, S. I., Saragih, I. D., Mulyadi, M., & Lee, B.-O. (2022) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.10.016 · Cited by 19
The effect of basketball matches on salivary markers: a systematic review
Kamarauskas, P., & Conte, D. (2021) · Biology of Sport · doi:10.5114/biolsport.2022.107481 · Cited by 16
Sikora, M., Chęciński, M., Nowak, Z., & Chlubek, D. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10102049 · Cited by 17
“Eligibility Criteria Eligibility for this systematic review was developed by using the standard PICOS framework [16].”
BackgroundMethodMa, Y., Roosli, R., Cao, Z., Zhang, X., Gai, Y., & Ma, Z. (2025) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116474 · Cited by 19
Guo, Y., Chen, C., Peng, J., Deng, L., & Yuan, T.-G. (2025) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.70140 · Cited by 16
“Studies were included based on PICOS criteria [36] (Table 1).”
Reynoso-Sánchez, L., Molgado-Sifuentes, A., Muñoz-Helú, H., López-Walle, J. M., & Soto-García, D. (2025) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports13040108 · Cited by 16
“The definition of the eligibility criteria was based on the PICOS approach, which specifies the participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and types of studies to be considered in advance [37].”
Gao, Y., Zhu, S., Li, W., & Lai, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1517274 · Cited by 13
Zhang, D., Xiong, X.-Y., Ding, H., He, X.-L., Li, H., Yao, Y., Ma, R.-S., & Liu, T. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.104997 · Cited by 16
Childhood maltreatment and the risk of eating disorders: a meta-analysis of observational studies
Amiri, S., & Sabzehparvar, M. (2024) · Neuropsychiatrie · doi:10.1007/s40211-024-00505-3 · Cited by 16
“The population, exposure, comparison, and outcome (PECO) criteria [37] were used for this research: the population comprised adolescents and adults without any restriction, exposure was any childhood mal-treatment, the comparison was a group of individuals without childhood maltreatment, and the…”
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Vertebral Maturation Assessment—A Systematic Review
Kazimierczak, W., Jedliński, M., Issa, J., Kazimierczak, N., Janiszewska‐Olszowska, J., Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, M., Różyło‐Kalinowska, I., Serafin, Z., & Orhan, K. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13144047 · Cited by 21
Effectiveness synchronous e-learning in nursing education: A meta-analysis and subgroup analysis
Jin, S., & Kim, J. H. (2024) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104029 · Cited by 22
Janoudi, G., Uzun, M., Fell, D. B., Ray, J. G., Foster, A. M., Giffen, R., Clifford, T., & Walker, M. C. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000515 · Cited by 18
Safia, A., Elhadi, U. A., Massoud, S., & Merchavy, S. (2024) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000001247 · Cited by 16
“The design of this review followed the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study) framework [11] .”
Nunes, G. S., de Oliveira, J., Iacob, G. S., Signori, L. U., Diel, A. P., Schreiner, R. A., & Solner, M. W. (2023) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11956 · Cited by 19
Mahfooz, K., Vasavada, A. M., Joshi, A., Pichuthirumalai, S., Andani, R., Rajotia, A., Hans, A., Mandalia, B., Dayama, N., Younas, Z., et al. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.34802 · Cited by 14
“Two independent reviewers were in charge of choosing and extracting data from research that met the inclusion requirements for the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework [24].”
MethodZhang, X., Feng, S., & Li, H. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11030337 · Cited by 20
“Our eligibility criteria obeyed the PICOS principle as follows [25]: –P (population): people who have RT experience/history for at least one year; –I (intervention): at least four weeks of VBT intervention that selected squat, bench press, and deadlift as their training events; –C (comparison): compared the effect of…”
MethodXu, T.-Z., Liu, Y.-S., Lu, X.-T., & Liang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039020 · Cited by 16
Ahmed, A., Tanveer, M., Shrestha, S., Khatiwada, A. P., Khanal, S., Dujaili, J. A., & Paudyal, V. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10091630 · Cited by 20
Pethick, J., Clark, N. C., & Liew, B. X. W. (2022) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2022.102696 · Cited by 18
Bulanda, S., Ilczuk-Rypuła, D., Dybek, A., Pietraszewska, D., Skucha-Nowak, M., & Postek-Stefańska, L. (2022) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings12070964 · Cited by 16
Mohamed, F. R. R., Aldubaisi, S., Akbar, A., Khan, M. I., & Yaqinuddin, A. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17182953 · Cited by 15
“The scope and objectives of the review are structured based on the PICOS framework (Participants, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study Designs), as outlined in Table 1 [55].”
Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercise for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Dong, H.-R., You, M.-J., Li, Y.-N., Wang, B., & Huang, H.-L. (2024) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000002524 · Cited by 15
“In addition, the SRS-22 questionnaire evaluates the following five dimensions: mobility, pain, self-image, psychology, and satisfaction through 22 questions, and has the advantages of being highly responsive, concise, and hierarchical.”
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Chabot, S., Calleja-Agius, J., & Horeman, T. (2024) · Surgical Techniques Development · doi:10.3390/std13010003 · Cited by 15
“The established eligibility criteria were based on the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) principle [22].”
Zhang, C., Pandya, S., Bonetti, M. A., Costantino, A., & Egro, F. (2023) · American Journal of Otolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104156 · Cited by 15
Dai, X., Chu, X., Qi, G., Yuan, P., Zhou, Y., Xiang, H., & Shi, X. (2023) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380231211950 · Cited by 19
“A comprehensive literature search strategy was built using a combination of Medical Subject Headings, Emtree, and free-text terms based on the PICOs (population, interventions, comparators, outcome, and study design) framework (Amir-Behghadami & Janati, 2020).”
MethodZhou, Z., Zhou, X., Cui, N., Huang, H., Yang, F., Yang, G., Liu, D., Liu, K., Zhang, X., & Wang, J. (2023) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2280070 · Cited by 18
García-Rodríguez, P., Pecci, J., Vázquez-González, S., & Pareja-Galeano, H. (2023) · Sports health · doi:10.1177/19417381231208636 · Cited by 15
He, J., Lin, J., Sun, W. J., Cheung, T. C. C., Cao, Y., Fu, E., Chan, S. H., & Tsang, H. W. H. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45839-0 · Cited by 21
“The selection criteria were based on the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Settings (PICOS) model 14 .”
MethodWu, C.-J., Huang, T., Ou, S., Shiea, J., & Lee, B. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10081390 · Cited by 25
“The criteria for inclusion were based on population, intervention or issue of interest, comparison, outcome, and study design (PICOS) criteria [19].”
BackgroundMaduray, K., Moneruzzaman, M., Changwe, G. J., & Zhong, J. (2022) · Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis · doi:10.1177/10760296221118480 · Cited by 15
“The PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) method was used to formulate the search strategy.(10) AF patients following a successful CA reflected population, discontinuation of OAC as intervention, continuation of OAC as a comparison, and thromboembolism and bleeding events as the outcome(s).”
MethodSacchini, F., Mancin, S., Cangelosi, G., Palomares, S. M., Caggianelli, G., Gravante, F., & Petrelli, F. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2025.109139 · Cited by 19
Khalafi, M., Maleki, A. H., Symonds, M. E., Alamdari, K. A., Ehsanifar, M., & Rosenkranz, S. K. (2025) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13954 · Cited by 18
“To be eligible for inclusion in the current study, peer-reviewed randomized control or clinical trials published in the English language that met the following Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) de-sign framework criteria were included [66].”
Zangana, T. A., Tuygunov, N., Yahya, N., & Aziz, A. A. (2025) · Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107044 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Amir-Behghadami, M., & Janati, A.
- Affiliations
- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Venue
- Emergency Medicine Journal
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-04-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 387-387
- ISSN
- 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-0205
- 1472-0213
- OpenAlex
- W3015126898
- Cited by
- 1,335
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 408 · 2025: 393 · 2024: 271 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- eligibility criteria, systematic review methodology, research design, paracetamol, analgesia
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Research Design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review