Cited by 832Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentPelvic floor disorders treatments

Pain from distension of the pelvic colon by inflating a balloon in the irritable colon syndrome

Open access
Ritchie, James·1973·Gut

Abstract

The effects of inflating a balloon introduced through a sigmoidoscope to 35 cm in the pelvic colon have been observed and compared in 67 patients with the irritable colon syndrome and in 16 normal and constipated subjects acting as controls. Inflation to 60 ml caused pain in 6% of the controls at a mean diameter of 3·8 cm and in 55% of patients with the irritable colon syndrome (diameter 3·4 cm). An estimate of gut wall tension at this volume of inflation showed it to be normal in patients with the irritable colon syndrome; the incidence of pain in relation to wall tension was increased nearly tenfold in the irritable colon group. Inflation of the balloon to different volumes was normally painless to a maximum acceptable diameter which remained constant for each study under constant conditions; continued inflation eventually gave rise to pain without increasing the diameter. The pain was felt in the hypogastrium in 40%, in one or both iliac fossae in 31%, and in the rectum in 21%; the other 8% felt pain in the back or elsewhere and there were no significant differences between clinical groups. Exceptionally, in 6% of the controls, and in 52% of patients with the irritable colon syndrome, pain occurred at balloon diameters that could still be increased by 10% or more with further inflation. This was probably the outcome of a low threshold for visceral pain in the section of bowel in contact with the balloon. Colonic hyperalgesia of this kind, possibly a random occurrence, may be an important contributory factor in the aetiology of the irritable colon syndrome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.14.2.125

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accumulation of different mechanisms (psychological, sensory, and motor) increases both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptom severity, as well as impairments in quality of life.

    “Accumulation of different mechanisms (psychological, sensory, and motor) increases both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptom severity, as well as impairments in quality of life. 31,32”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

    The section “Hyperalgesia in the Irritable Colon Syndrome” links a low visceral pain threshold and motor dysfunction to a greater likelihood of abdominal pain. It does not address an accumulation of psychological, sensory, and motor mechanisms, or show that such an accumulation increases non-gastrointestinal symptoms or impairs quality of life. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lim, R. K. S., and Guzman, F. (1968). Manifestations of pain in analgesic evaluation in animals and man. In Pain, edited by A. Soulairac, J. Cahn, and J. Charpentier, pp. 119-152. Aca- demic Press, London and New York.
  2. Wolff, H. G., and Wolf, S. (1958). Pain,2nd ed. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, and Blackwell, Oxford. on November 24, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://gut.bmj.com/ Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.14.2.125 on 1 February 1973. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritchie, J.
Affiliations
John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Ritchie, James
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1973-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
125-132
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2045099397
Cited by
832
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Keywords
irritable colon, irritable bowel syndrome, balloon distension, visceral pain, sigmoid colon, pain threshold
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Cineradiography, Colon, Colonic Diseases, Functional, Constipation, Humans, Hyperesthesia, Methods, Pain, Pressure, Sigmoidoscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review