The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures
Abstract
Trust plays an important role in many Information Systems (IS)-enabled situations. Most IS research employs trust as a measure of interpersonal or person-to-firm relations, such as trust in a Web vendor or a virtual team member. Although trust in other people is important, this article suggests that trust in the Information Technology (IT) itself also plays a role in shaping IT-related beliefs and behavior. To advance trust and technology research, this article presents a set of trust in technology construct definitions and measures. We also empirically examine these construct measures using tests of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. This study contributes to the literature by providing: (a) a framework that differentiates trust in technology from trust in people, (b) a theory-based set of definitions necessary for investigating different kinds of trust in technology, and (c) validated trust in technology measures useful to research and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Trustworthiness judgments in humans or technology have different characteristics, yet they both are premised on the same underlying contextual conditions: risk, uncertainty and lack of control (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision‐Making (2023) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust in technology has previously been seen in the light of the technology's functionality, ability to provide help and operational reliability and the technology provider's integrity, benevolence and competence-including privacy aspects (McKnight et al., 2011;Prakash and Das, 2020;Ta et al., 2020).”
From My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“In the canonical models of trust formation, such (Giddens, 1990; Mayer et al., 1995; McKnight et al., 2011; Misztal, 1996) trust is described to have a number of different components. First, trust depends on the personal characteristics of the trustor, such as their propensity to trust, something which I do not discuss in this article. Second, trust is a factor of the perceived or actual char”
From Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, trust is a complex concept and is built upon human users’ interaction and consequent assessment of the system from cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions [91-93].”
From Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“Individual differences of users (e.g., gender, culture, age, and personality) are closely related to the propensity for or tendency toward technology users may manifest or develop (Gefen et al., 2008; McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Proposition 6b. The greater the reliability an algorithm demonstrates, the higher the probability of building trust in AI algorithms over time.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“One important factor for initial trust is the user's propensity to trust, which, being tacit, bestows a positive impact on this starting phase and tends to remain stable over time (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in people and trust in technology not only differ in terms of the nature of the object of dependence but also on important trusting beliefs.”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Interpersonal trusting beliefs reflect judgments that the other party has suitable attributes and motives for performing as expected in a risky situation (Mayer et al. 1995), whereas technology-related trust necessarily reflects beliefs about a technology's characteristics rather than its motives (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Most IS research nowadays employs a dualistic perspective on trust (see Table 1).First, trust in a specific person or organization (a moral and volitional agent) (Lankton et al. 2015;McKnight et al. 2011), such as trust in an e-vendor (Gefen et al. 2003) or virtual team members (Robert et al. 2009).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In contrast, individuals' trust in technology commonly concerns the technology's functionality (i.e., providing features needed to complete a task), its helpfulness (i.e., help functions will provide necessary advice), and its reliability (i.e., technology will consistently operate properly) (McKnight et al. 2011;Thatcher et al. 2010).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust plays a particularly important role in almost any ISenabled situation in which either uncertainty prevails or undesirable outcomes are possible (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in persons and technology can be further positioned in a nomological net of trust, comprising general trusting beliefs and institution-based trust as antecedents and trusting intentions as consequence of specific trust in persons or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight et al. 2002; see Fig. 1).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“The trust literature suggests a causal ordering among trust constructs, such that an individual's general trusting beliefs in people or technology directly influences institutionbased trust and indirectly shapes trust in a specific person or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight and Chervany 2001).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In line with the view of institutions-based trust in technology being an antecedent to trust in a specific technology (McKnight et al. 2011), we argue, that the limited availability of large, high-quality data in certain areas, which constraints our ability to promote human well-being through AI in those areas, could lead society to perceive the entire class of AIbased systems as not beneficent (”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
Schneider, P. A., & Fukuyama, F. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251846 · Cited by 10,493
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Berscheid E., Close Relationships
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926629 · DOI · Paper page
- Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185. Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185.
- 10.5555/2017317.2017325 · DOI
- Lewicki R. J., 1996, Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
- Mcknight D. H., 2005, Trust in information technology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, Management Information Systems, G. B. Davis, Ed., Blackwell, Malden, MA, 7, 329
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926622 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Trust in Virtual Online Environments
Järvenpää, S. L., Cantú, C., & Lim, S. Y. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119256151.ch6 · Cited by 17
Judgmental Bot: Conversational Agents in Online Mental Health Screening
Raimi, R., Kim, A., Ayabakan, S., & Dennis, A. R. (2025) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/18555 · Cited by 16
Role of Design Attributes to Determine the Intention to Use Online Learning via Cognitive Beliefs
Younas, A., Faisal, C. M. N., Habib, M. A., Ashraf, R., & Ahmad, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3093348 · Cited by 15
Designing for trust: a set of design principles to increase trust in chatbot
Guo, Y., Wang, J., Wu, R., Li, Z., & Sun, L. (2022) · CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction · doi:10.1007/s42486-022-00106-5 · Cited by 15
Risk as a driver for AI framework development on manufacturing
Vyhmeister, E., González-Castañé, G., & Östbergy, P.-O. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00159-3 · Cited by 15
Tams, S., & Dulipovici, A. M. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2137064 · Cited by 23
Wu, M., & Yuen, K. F. (2023) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2023.103704 · Cited by 17
Voinescu, A., Morgan, P. L., Alford, C., & Caleb-Solly, P. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92037-5_32 · Cited by 15
Trust and Human Factors in the Design of Healthcare Technology
Borsci, S., Buckle, P., Walne, S., & Salanitri, D. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_21 · Cited by 13
I Trained this robot: The impact of pre-experience and execution behavior on robot teachers
Stadler, S., Weiss, A., & Tscheligi, M. (2014) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2014.6926388 · Cited by 15
HEC Montréal, C., Tams, S., Dulipovici, A. M., HEC Montréal, C., Thatcher, J. B., Craig, K., & Srite, M. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00597 · Cited by 17
Self-citationAI in Companies' Production Processes
Maldonado-Canca, L.-A., Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., Molina, A. M. C., & González, G. J. B. (2025) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.366653 · Cited by 19
Individual Trust and the Internet
van der Werff, L., Real, C., & Lynn, T. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315745572-27 · Cited by 16
Meeßen, S. M., Thielsch, M. T., Riehle, D. M., & Hertel, G. (2020) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1758797 · Cited by 16
Faulhaber, A. K., Ni, I., & Schmidt, L. (2021) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3473856.3473886 · Cited by 16
Challenges and Trends in User Trust Discourse in AI Popularity
Sousa, S., Cravino, J., & Martins, P. (2023) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti7020013 · Cited by 21
Schmitt, V., Csomor, B. P., Meyer, J., Villa-Arenas, L. F., Jakob, C., Polzehl, T., & Möller, S. (2024) · ACM International Workshop on Multimedia AI against Disinformation (MAD) · doi:10.1145/3643491.3660283 · Cited by 15
Schwing, M., Reit, V., Selinka, S., Kuhn, M. M., & Meyer‐Waarden, L. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2471 · Cited by 14
Jiang, J., Liu, R., Zhou, H., Shi, L., & Xu, L. (2025) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-05-2024-0293 · Cited by 15
Exploring Trust In Cloud Computing: A Multi-Method Approach
Walterbusch, M., Martens, B., & Teuteberg, F. (2013) · European Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 14
What Makes an Automated Vehicle a Good Driver?
Kauffmann, N., Winkler, F., & Vollrath, M. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173742 · Cited by 15
Trusting a Humanoid Robot : Exploring Personality and Trusting Effects in a Human-Robot Partnership
Elson, J. S., Derrick, D. C., & Ligon, G. S. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.067 · Cited by 14
Quick Assessment of Web Content Perceptions
Thielsch, M. T., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1805877 · Cited by 16
Schneider, T., Hois, J., Rosenstein, A., Metzl, S., Gerlicher, A. R. S., Ghellal, S., & Love, S. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584085 · Cited by 14
Trust in mHealth: How do Maternal Health Clients Accept and Use mHealth Interventions?
Sowon, K., & Chigona, W. (2020) · South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists · doi:10.1145/3410886.3410895 · Cited by 16
Julsrud, T. E., & Uteng, T. P. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084170 · Cited by 16
Fox, G., van der Werff, L., Rosati, P., & Lynn, T. (2024) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/48700 · Cited by 13
Blockchain technology adoption in healthcare: an integrated model
Bazel, M. A., Mohammed, F., Ahmad, M. B., Baarimah, A. O., & Maskari, T. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95253-x · Cited by 27
Assessing the Measurement Invariance of the Human–Computer Trust Scale
Beltrão, G., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14091806 · Cited by 15
Driver Confidence and Level of Automation Influencing Trust in Automated Driving Features
Miele, D., Ferraro, J. C., & Mouloua, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181321651300 · Cited by 14
Sousa, S., & Kalju, T. (2022) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/33951 · Cited by 13
Ebrahimi, S., & Matt, C. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962231181148 · Cited by 14
Linking Personality and Trust in Intelligent Virtual Assistants
Schadelbauer, L., Schlögl, S., & Groth, A. (2023) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti7060054 · Cited by 13
Sharma, V., Kapse, M., Poulose, J., & Mahajan, Y. (2023) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2023.2281053 · Cited by 21
Aalberg, A. L., Holen, S. M., Kongsvik, T., & Wahl, A. M. (2024) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106426 · Cited by 17
Ju, B., & Stewart, B. J. (2024) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1018 · Cited by 13
The Impact of Learning About AI Advancements on Trust
Nikolova, M., & Angrisani, M. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102958 · Cited by 14
Exploring User Acceptance Determinants of COVID-19-Tracing Apps to Manage the Pandemic
Krüger, N., Behne, A., Beinke, J. H., Stibe, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2021) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.293197 · Cited by 13
Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks
Distel, B., Koelmann, H., Plattfaut, R., & Becker, J. (2022) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-022-00573-4 · Cited by 20
Pathania, A., Dixit, S., & Rasool, G. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2022.2140183 · Cited by 18
Morgan, P. L., Voinescu, A., Alford, C., & Caleb-Solly, P. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_54 · Cited by 12
Building a Trustworthy Explainable AI in Healthcare
Larasati, R. A., & Liddo, A. D. (2020) · IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT) · doi:10.18573/book3.ab · Cited by 12
Dis/Trust and data-driven technologies
Dueñas-Cid, D., & Calzati, S. (2023) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2023.4.1727 · Cited by 18
You jump, I jump? Herding behavior in blockchain application platforms
Cai, J., Luo, X. R., Lai, F., Ai, P., & Zhao, X. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114179 · Cited by 12
Designing for Trust: How Human-Machine Interface Can Shape the Future of Urban Air Mobility
Kim, Y. W., & Ji, Y. G. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2313289 · Cited by 13
Malarvizhi, C. A., Manzoor, S. R., & Haque, R. (2024) · International Journal of Service Science Management Engineering and Technology · doi:10.4018/ijssmet.349911 · Cited by 19
The second extended model of consumer trust in cryptocurrency payments, CRYPTOTRUST 2
Zarifis, A., & Fu, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2024.1220031 · Cited by 11
Usage Intention of ChatGPT for Health in Turkey: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model
Argan, M., Gürbüz, B., Dursun, M. T., Dinç, H., & Argan, M. T. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2426045 · Cited by 12
Kaur, H., Mehta, K., & Mago, M. (2025) · NMIMS Management Review · doi:10.1177/09711023251339858 · Cited by 12
Virtue Ethics as a Solution to the Privacy Paradox and Trust in Emerging Technologies
Bilal, A., Wingreen, S. C., & Sharma, R. (2020) · International Conference on Information Science and Systems (ICISS) · doi:10.1145/3388176.3388196 · Cited by 12
Modliński, A. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01534-8 · Cited by 12
Suh, A. (2023) · Telematics and informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2023.101997 · Cited by 13
Levy, M., Pauzner, M., Rosenblum, S., & Peleg, M. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104414 · Cited by 11
Neyazi, T. A., Ee, T. K., Nadaf, A. H., & Schroeder, R. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231212804 · Cited by 12
Haas, E. J. (2018) · Occupational Health Science · doi:10.1007/s41542-018-0011-y · Cited by 12
The Role of Psychology in Understanding Online Trust
Jones, H. S., & Moncur, W. (2018) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-4053-3.ch007 · Cited by 12
Zimmermann, M., & Jucks, R. (2018) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/10282 · Cited by 14
Zhang, Y., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Li, S., Yang, Q., Zhang, J., & Lu, Z. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13100855 · Cited by 16
Factors Affecting Human-Generated AI Collaboration: Trust and Perceived Usefulness as Mediators
Chae, H.-S., & Yoon, C. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16100856 · Cited by 12
AI Hallucinations in Tourism: How Errors Impact Consumer Trust and Recommendation Acceptance
Rejón‐Guardia, F., Molinillo, S., & Anaya‐Sánchez, R. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.70105 · Cited by 14
Dynamic calibration of trust and trustworthiness in AI-enabled systems
Liebherr, M., Enkel, E., Law, E. L., Mousavi, M. R., Sammartino, M., & Sieberg, P. M. (2026) · International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10009-026-00840-6 · Cited by 13
Protecting Privacy on Mobile Apps: A Principal–Agent Perspective
Liu, Z., Wang, X., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3475797 · Cited by 18
The Importance of an Ethical Framework for Trust Calibration in AI
Schmid, A., & Wiesche, M. (2023) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2023.3320443 · Cited by 13
Is it all about fun? Self-service technology acceptance in Germany
Reid, S. A., Vetter, G., Lackes, R., & Siepermann, M. (2024) · The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research · doi:10.1080/09593969.2024.2342795 · Cited by 11
Human-AI interaction: Augmenting decision-making for IT leader's project selection
Judkins, J. T., Hwang, Y., & Kim, S. (2024) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669241249744 · Cited by 13
Modeling New Technology Readiness and Acceptance in the Case of B2B Marketing Employees
Fam, K., Liu, Y., Wei, S., Edu, T., Zaharia, R., & Negricea, C. I. (2024) · Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing · doi:10.1080/1051712x.2024.2364699 · Cited by 13
Cheng, X., Xiao-ping, Z., & Luo, X. R. (2024) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12553 · Cited by 11
Lu, X., & Kim, J. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2483788 · Cited by 11
Freel, A., Pias, S. B. H., Šabanović, S., & Kapadia, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732187 · Cited by 11
Artificial intelligence (AI) powered chatbots: factors in uptake among early adopters
Ju, B., Stewart, B. J., Park, S., & Walker, J. J. (2025) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-12-2024-0994 · Cited by 11
Mirowska, A., & Arsenyan, J. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.70009 · Cited by 18
Assessing students’ intention to adopt generative artificial intelligence
Bouebdallah, N., & Youssef, W. A. B. (2025) · Journal of Accounting Education · doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100984 · Cited by 16
Why Do Not We Use Password Managers? A Study on the Intention to Use Password Managers
Ayyagari, R., Lim, J., & Hoxha, O. (2019) · Contemporary Management Research · doi:10.7903/cmr.19394 · Cited by 11
Giakoumis, D., Mavridou, E., Votis, K., Giannoutakis, K. M., Tzovaras, D. K., & Hassapis, G. D. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1061794 · Cited by 11
Trust in the Information Systems Discipline
Öksüz, A., Walter, N., Distel, B., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2016) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_12 · Cited by 14
Privacy-ABCs as a Case for Studying the Adoption of PETs by Users and Service Providers
Krontiris, I., Benenson, Z., Girard, A., Sabouri, A., Rannenberg, K., & Schoo, P. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31456-3_6 · Cited by 11
Seeing is Believing: Improving the Perceived Trust in Visually Embodied Alexa in Augmented Reality
Haesler, S., Kim, K., Bruder, G., & Welch, G. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct) · doi:10.1109/ismar-adjunct.2018.00067 · Cited by 11
M-health infusion by healthcare practitioners in the national health services (NHS)
O’Connor, Y., O’Reilly, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2013) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.12.002 · Cited by 11
The Diagnosis of Communication and Trust in Aviation Maintenance (DiCTAM) Model
Chatzi, A. V. (2019) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace6110120 · Cited by 12
Salem, S. S., & Ali, N. B. (2019) · Open International Journal of Informatics · Cited by 11
All risks ain't the same – A risk facets perspective on AI-based decision support systems
Strunk, J., Nissen, A., & Smolnik, S. (2025) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2025.114557 · Cited by 10
Jiang, N., & Meng, N. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251396497 · Cited by 12
Trust and Perceived Control in Burnout Support Chatbots
Degachi, C., Tielman, M. L., & Owayyed, M. A. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585780 · Cited by 14
Rodriguez, S. D., Chatterjee, P., Phuong, A. D., Alt, F., & Marky, K. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642863 · Cited by 10
Doing versus saying: responsible AI among large firms
Bughin, J. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02014-x · Cited by 16
Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Lee, K.-D. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16188258 · Cited by 10
Jakku, E., Fleming, A., Fielke, S., Snow, S., Malakar, Y., Cornish, G., Hay, R., & Williams, L. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1455581 · Cited by 10
Hernández-Tamurejo, Á., Fernández-Fernández, M., & González-Padilla, P. (2025) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-07-2024-0811 · Cited by 14
Sun, X., Liu, Y., Bosch, J. A., & Li, Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711014 · Cited by 14
Seyfi, S., Gorji, A. S., Vo‐Thanh, T., & Zaman, M. (2025) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.70082 · Cited by 14
Goswami, D., Verma, B., Sinha, S. K., & Mittal, A. (2025) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2025.2546494 · Cited by 13
The Alchemy of Trust: The Creative Act of Designing Trustworthy Socio-Technical Systems
Thornton, L., Knowles, B., & Blair, G. S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533196 · Cited by 15
A Unified Measurement Solution of Software Trustworthiness Based on Social-to-Software Framework
Yang, X., Jabeen, G., Luo, P., Zhu, X., & Liu, M. (2018) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s11390-018-1843-2 · Cited by 10
Misinformation in the Chinese Weibo
Xiao, L., & Chen, S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_28 · Cited by 10
Methodological and Practical Challenges of Interdisciplinary Trust Research
Hendriks, F., Distel, B., Engelke, K. M., Westmattelmann, D., & Wintterlin, F. (2021) · Trust and Communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_2 · Cited by 7
Hasan, Z., Krischkowsky, A., & Tscheligi, M. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30921-2_6 · Cited by 10
Stollnberger, G., Weiss, A., & Tscheligi, M. (2013) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2013.6628457 · Cited by 10
Influence of Media Capabilities on Trust in the Sharing Economy
Harrison, A., Mirsadikov, A., & Luu, T. (. (2023) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2023.2229118 · Cited by 10
Müller, L. S., & Hertel, G. (2023) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2023.2286910 · Cited by 9
Aalberg, A. L. (2024) · WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs · doi:10.1007/s13437-024-00329-6 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 2158-656X (ISSN-L)
- 2158-6578
- OpenAlex
- W2037881738
- Semantic Scholar
- 1581959e828d2701b72702264bca37ca7f408124
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- trust in technology, interpersonal trust, trust measurement, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, nomological network, technology adoption, information systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
