The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures
Abstract
Trust plays an important role in many Information Systems (IS)-enabled situations. Most IS research employs trust as a measure of interpersonal or person-to-firm relations, such as trust in a Web vendor or a virtual team member. Although trust in other people is important, this article suggests that trust in the Information Technology (IT) itself also plays a role in shaping IT-related beliefs and behavior. To advance trust and technology research, this article presents a set of trust in technology construct definitions and measures. We also empirically examine these construct measures using tests of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. This study contributes to the literature by providing: (a) a framework that differentiates trust in technology from trust in people, (b) a theory-based set of definitions necessary for investigating different kinds of trust in technology, and (c) validated trust in technology measures useful to research and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Trustworthiness judgments in humans or technology have different characteristics, yet they both are premised on the same underlying contextual conditions: risk, uncertainty and lack of control (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision‐Making (2023) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust in technology has previously been seen in the light of the technology's functionality, ability to provide help and operational reliability and the technology provider's integrity, benevolence and competence-including privacy aspects (McKnight et al., 2011;Prakash and Das, 2020;Ta et al., 2020).”
From My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“In the canonical models of trust formation, such (Giddens, 1990; Mayer et al., 1995; McKnight et al., 2011; Misztal, 1996) trust is described to have a number of different components. First, trust depends on the personal characteristics of the trustor, such as their propensity to trust, something which I do not discuss in this article. Second, trust is a factor of the perceived or actual char”
From Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, trust is a complex concept and is built upon human users’ interaction and consequent assessment of the system from cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions [91-93].”
From Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“Individual differences of users (e.g., gender, culture, age, and personality) are closely related to the propensity for or tendency toward technology users may manifest or develop (Gefen et al., 2008; McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Proposition 6b. The greater the reliability an algorithm demonstrates, the higher the probability of building trust in AI algorithms over time.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“One important factor for initial trust is the user's propensity to trust, which, being tacit, bestows a positive impact on this starting phase and tends to remain stable over time (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in people and trust in technology not only differ in terms of the nature of the object of dependence but also on important trusting beliefs.”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Interpersonal trusting beliefs reflect judgments that the other party has suitable attributes and motives for performing as expected in a risky situation (Mayer et al. 1995), whereas technology-related trust necessarily reflects beliefs about a technology's characteristics rather than its motives (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Most IS research nowadays employs a dualistic perspective on trust (see Table 1).First, trust in a specific person or organization (a moral and volitional agent) (Lankton et al. 2015;McKnight et al. 2011), such as trust in an e-vendor (Gefen et al. 2003) or virtual team members (Robert et al. 2009).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In contrast, individuals' trust in technology commonly concerns the technology's functionality (i.e., providing features needed to complete a task), its helpfulness (i.e., help functions will provide necessary advice), and its reliability (i.e., technology will consistently operate properly) (McKnight et al. 2011;Thatcher et al. 2010).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust plays a particularly important role in almost any ISenabled situation in which either uncertainty prevails or undesirable outcomes are possible (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in persons and technology can be further positioned in a nomological net of trust, comprising general trusting beliefs and institution-based trust as antecedents and trusting intentions as consequence of specific trust in persons or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight et al. 2002; see Fig. 1).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“The trust literature suggests a causal ordering among trust constructs, such that an individual's general trusting beliefs in people or technology directly influences institutionbased trust and indirectly shapes trust in a specific person or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight and Chervany 2001).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In line with the view of institutions-based trust in technology being an antecedent to trust in a specific technology (McKnight et al. 2011), we argue, that the limited availability of large, high-quality data in certain areas, which constraints our ability to promote human well-being through AI in those areas, could lead society to perceive the entire class of AIbased systems as not beneficent (”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
Schneider, P. A., & Fukuyama, F. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251846 · Cited by 10,493
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Berscheid E., Close Relationships
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926629 · DOI · Paper page
- Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185. Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185.
- 10.5555/2017317.2017325 · DOI
- Lewicki R. J., 1996, Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
- Mcknight D. H., 2005, Trust in information technology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, Management Information Systems, G. B. Davis, Ed., Blackwell, Malden, MA, 7, 329
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926622 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 999
Balińska, A., Werenowska, A., & Jaska, E. (2024) · Journal of Modern Science · doi:10.13166/jms/188723 · Cited by 10
Innovation recipes for high use on four Fintech types: A configurational perspective
Ryu, H.-S., & Min, J. (2024) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2024.104058 · Cited by 9
Crowd-counting technology within the Smart City context: understanding, trust, and acceptance
Waclawek, T., Fiedler, A., Schütz, M., & Schütz, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423837 · Cited by 7
Development and validation of the trust in AI scale (TAIS)
Wischnewski, M., Doebler, P., & Krämer, N. C. (2026) · Journal of Psychology and AI · doi:10.1080/29974100.2026.2715475 · Cited by 16
Big brother is watching you: Examining truck drivers’ acceptance of road-facing dashcams
Gruchmann, T., & Jazairy, A. (2025) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.015 · Cited by 9
Mariñas, K. A., Saflor, C. S., Alvarado, P., Uminga, J. M., & Verde, N. A. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100435 · Cited by 18
Delfa, A. L., & Han, Z. (2025) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101102 · Cited by 8
Teychenié, T., Cloarec, J., & Meyer‐Waarden, L. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103428 · Cited by 11
Enhancing health-care service delivery through AI-integrated knowledge management systems
Mukherjee, S., Mukherjee, S., Ferraris, A., & Stehlíková, B. (2025) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-01-2025-0119 · Cited by 11
Building Trust in Decision‐Support Artificial Intelligence: A Boundary Spanning Perspective
Cui, M., Li, W., & Kamoche, K. N. (2025) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.70015 · Cited by 13
The Acceptance of Electronic Voting Machines in India: A UTAUT approach
Chauhan, S., Jaiswal, M. P., & Kar, A. K. (2018) · Electronic Government an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2018.10011841 · Cited by 9
Investigating Perceptions of Social Intelligence in Simulated Human-Chatbot Interactions
Mariacher, N., Schlögl, S., & Monz, A. (2020) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5093-5_44 · Cited by 10
Acceptability and 5G in the Medical Field: The Impact of the Level of Information
Martin, N., Ragot, M., & Savaux, V. (2021) · 2021 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC) · doi:10.1109/zinc52049.2021.9499276 · Cited by 5
Factors Influencing Trust Assessment in Technology
Sousa, S., & Beltrão, G. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_49 · Cited by 9
Meta-Trend of Trust Factors in Autonomous Vehicles
Vongvit, R., Lee, J., Itoh, M., & Lee, S. C. (2022) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3544999.3552528 · Cited by 9
Smart Streets as a Cyber-Physical Social Platform: A Conceptual Framework
Lynn, T., & Wood, C. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23031399 · Cited by 9
Liu, J., Škorić, M. M., & Li, C. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2178830 · Cited by 11
Law, E. L., van As, N., & Følstad, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42283-6_16 · Cited by 9
Zillow’s artificial intelligence failure and its impact on perceived trust in information systems
Susarla, P., Purnell, D. W., & Scott, K. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases · doi:10.1177/20438869241279865 · Cited by 9
Idemudia, E. C., Raisinghani, M. S., & Samuel-Ojo, O. (2013) · International Journal of Technology Diffusion · doi:10.4018/jtd.2013040103 · Cited by 9
The effect of explanation styles on user's trust
Larasati, R. A., Liddo, A. D., & Motta, E. (2020) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 9
Müller, L. S., Meeßen, S. M., Thielsch, M. T., Nohe, C., Riehle, D. M., & Hertel, G. (2020) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3404983.3405515 · Cited by 9
Schafheitle, S. D., Weibel, A. A., & Rickert, A. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.665 · Cited by 10
Party Cues and Trust in Remote Internet Voting: Data from Estonia 2005–2019
Ehin, P., & Solvak, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_6 · Cited by 14
Arctic attachment and experiential relationship marketing in Arctic tourism
Wu, H., & Chang, Y.-Y. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism · doi:10.1080/15022250.2020.1742785 · Cited by 9
Ala-Luopa, S., Olsson, T., Väänänen, K., Hartikainen, M., & Makkonen, J. (2024) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-024-09499-6 · Cited by 16
Nehme, A., Li, M., & Warkentin, M. E. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.103941 · Cited by 12
Heidemann, G., Schmidt, S. L., von der Gracht, H. A., & Beiderbeck, D. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123573 · Cited by 11
Gasch, C., Javanmardi, A., Khan, A., García‐Palacios, A., & Pagani, A. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15063290 · Cited by 8
Trust towards using autonomous taxis: Evidence from Germany
Müller, W., Leyer, M., & Gaugel, M. (2025) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2025.05.007 · Cited by 8
Fernández, M. A., Astobiza, A. M., & Lozano, R. O. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11306-7 · Cited by 10
Lu, X., Balakrishnan, K., Chan, T. J., & Na, M. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70887 · Cited by 17
Alshammari, M. M., & Al‐Mamary, Y. H. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13100863 · Cited by 8
Culturally responsive AI chatbots: From framework to field evidence
Naidoo, V., & CHADHA, K. K. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100224 · Cited by 13
Avoiding collision in automated driving situation
SUHIR, E., & Paul, G. E. (2020) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2020.1729895 · Cited by 8
Intentional Forgetting in Socio-Digital Work Systems
Ellwart, T., Ulfert, A., Antoni, C. H., Becker, J., Frings, C., Göbel, K., Hertel, G., Kluge, A., Meeßen, S. M., Niessen, C., et al. (2019) · AIS Transactions on Enterprise Systems · doi:10.30844/aistes.v4i1.16 · Cited by 8
Oser, P., Feger, S., Woźniak, P. W., Karolus, J., Spagnuelo, D., Gupta, A., Lüders, S., Schmidt, A., & Kargl, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3414173 · Cited by 8
Trust and Leadership: Implications of Digitization
Höddinghaus, M., & Hertel, G. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_9 · Cited by 9
Ellwart, T., Schauffel, N., Antoni, C. H., & Timm, I. J. (2022) · Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) · doi:10.1007/s11612-022-00638-5 · Cited by 13
Research on Users’ Trust in Customer Service Chatbots Based on Human-Computer Interaction
Lv, Y., Hu, S., Liu, F., & Qi, J. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-7532-5_19 · Cited by 8
Blockchain and Trust in Supply Chain Management: A Conceptual Framework
Alkhudary, R., & Féniès, P. (2022) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.068 · Cited by 9
Z Generation's Intention to Use Zakat Digital Payment: The Mediating Effect of Trust
Ferdana, A. D., Ridlwan, A. A., Canggih, C., & Fikriyah, K. (2022) · ZISWAF Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf · doi:10.21043/ziswaf.v9i2.18466 · Cited by 8
Course Evaluation in Higher Education: the Patras Pilot of ABC4Trust
Stamatiou, Y. C., Benenson, Z., Girard, A., Krontiris, I., Liagkou, V., Pyrgelis, A., & Tesfay, W. B. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14439-9_7 · Cited by 8
To Log or Not to Log? SWOT Analysis of Self-Tracking
Li, N., & Hopfgartner, F. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-13137-1_17 · Cited by 8
Trustworthiness of voice-based assistants: integrating interlocutor and intermediary predictors
Weidmüller, L., Etzrodt, K., & Engesser, S. (2022) · Publizistik · doi:10.1007/s11616-022-00763-7 · Cited by 11
Affect and information technology use: the impact of state affect on cognitions and IT use
Dinger, M., Wade, J. T., Dinger, S., Carter, M., & Thatcher, J. B. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2022-0024 · Cited by 7
Self-citationHao, H., Lee, Y. W., Sharko, M., Li, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/60862 · Cited by 7
Zhang, Y., Tian, J., & Deng, F. (2025) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwaf029 · Cited by 11
Topsakal, Y., & Yüzbaşıoğlu, N. (2025) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2025.2512391 · Cited by 8
Cao, B., Wen, C., & Zhang, R. (2025) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2025.2519730 · Cited by 8
Afifah, K., Abu–Hussin, M. F., & Zafar, M. B. (2025) · Journal of Islamic accounting and business research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-08-2024-0283 · Cited by 7
The Impact of Financial Scams on Consumer Trust in the Banking Sector: A Qualitative Analysis
Akbar, F., Hussain, J., Usman, M. B., & Afzal, J. (2025) · International Journal of Discovery in Social Sciences · doi:10.64060/ijdss.v1i1.5 · Cited by 7
Measuring Social Trust in AI: How Institutions Shape the Usage Intention of AI‐Based Technologies
Amir, S., Luk, S. C. Y., Saha, S., Tsyrulneva, I., & Teo, M. T. L. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/4084384 · Cited by 10
Riyat, M. K., Kakkar, A., Sharma, R., & Walia, S. (2025) · Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers · doi:10.1108/yc-09-2024-2255 · Cited by 7
Ghasemaghaei, M. (2026) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2602397 · Cited by 10
Towards detecting the level of trust in the skills of a virtual assistant from the user’s speech
Gauder, L., Pepino, L., Riera, P., Brussino, S., Vidal, J., Gravano, A., & Ferrer, L. (2023) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2023.101487 · Cited by 7
Koddebusch, M., Koelmann, H., Friedrich, O., & Becker, J. (2023) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3598469.3598519 · Cited by 7
Exploring the Impact of User and System Factors on Human-AI Interactions in Head-Worn Displays
Lu, F., Xu, Y. L., Xu, X., Jones, B., & Malamed, L. (2023) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar59233.2023.00025 · Cited by 8
Korkut, E. H., & Sürer, E. (2024) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-023-00905-w · Cited by 7
Valori, I., Fan, Y., Jung, M. M., & Fairhurst, M. T. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-57582-1 · Cited by 9
Gahlot, P., Suryavanshi, K., & Gandhi, A. V. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2432542 · Cited by 10
Formative Evaluation of a Tool for Managing Software Quality
Guzmán, L., Vollmer, A. M., Ciolkowski, M., & Gillmann, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2017.43 · Cited by 7
Artificially Intelligent Technology for the Margins: A Multidisciplinary Design Agenda
Tachtler, F. M., Aal, K., Ertl, T., Diethei, D., Niess, J., Khwaja, M. K., Talhouk, R., Vilaza, G. N., Lazem, S., Singh, A., et al. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3441333 · Cited by 7
Kaßens-Noor, E., Siegel, J. E., & Decaminada, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Cities · doi:10.3389/frsc.2021.723475 · Cited by 8
Committing to interdependence: Implications from game theory for human–robot trust
Razin, Y. S., & Feigh, K. M. (2021) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2021-0031 · Cited by 8
Zhang, A., & Yang, Q. (2022) · International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications · doi:10.1109/icara55094.2022.9738527 · Cited by 7
Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen, P., Niemimaa, E., Rantakari, A., & Helander, N. (2022) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12893 · Cited by 8
The Issue of Trust and Implementation of Results in Healthcare Modeling and Simulation Studies
Harper, A. L., Mustafee, N., & Yearworth, M. (2022) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc57314.2022.10015276 · Cited by 7
Evaluating a Mechanism for Explaining BDI Agent Behaviour
Winikoff, M., & Sidorenko, G. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40878-6_2 · Cited by 7
Acceptance Factors for Younger Passengers in Shared Autonomous Vehicles
Li, H., Yu, S., Zheng, J., Zhao, X., Du, P., & Tan, H. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77080-8_18 · Cited by 7
Antecedents and Impacts of Mobile Banking Transactions: A Case of Malaysian Consumers
Masrek, M. N., & Razali, M. H. (2013) · International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies · doi:10.1109/acsat.2013.85 · Cited by 7
The “Mail-Order-Bride” (MOB) Phenomenon in the Cyberworld
Sarker, S., Chakraborty, S., Tansuhaj, P. S., Mulder, M. R., & Dogerlioglu‐Demir, K. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2524263 · Cited by 7
Building Technology Trust in a Rural Agricultural e‐Marketplace: A User Requirements Perspective
Isabirye, N., Flowerday, S., Nanavati, A. A., & von Solms, R. (2015) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00504.x · Cited by 7
Transactive memory systems in superteams: the effect of an intelligent assistant in virtual teams
McWilliams, D. J., & Randolph, A. B. (2024) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-12-2022-0918 · Cited by 6
Miles, O., Pinckard, S., Gungor, M., Ridge, D., & Nadarzynski, T. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02332-8 · Cited by 6
Suryadi, N., Zulfikar, R., Prasarry, Y. V., & Islam, M. F. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2526799 · Cited by 6
McCormick, E. L., & Rider, T. R. (2025) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1155/ina/5706819 · Cited by 7
Perdana, A., Lee, W. E., Lim, C. Y., Pan, G., & Seow, P. S. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102315 · Cited by 12
Why Investors Resist: A Psychological Perspective on Adoption Resistance to Financial Robo-Advisors
Goswami, D., & Verma, B. (2025) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2025.2566660 · Cited by 8
Who uses general-purpose AI? A typology of ChatGPT early adopters
Gerling, C., Teubner, T., & Braesemann, F. (2026) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-025-00853-0 · Cited by 11
Westheimer, J. L., Smith, R. P., Iacobelli, P. A., Oh, H., Tezino, L., Khan, R., Broussard, J., Meltzer, G., Obeid, N. F., Cunningham, S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.206 · Cited by 6
Liu, Y., & Fan, J. (2025) · The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review · doi:10.22434/ifamr1125 · Cited by 13
Technology, Science, and Culture: A Global Vision
Picazo-Vela, S., & Hernández, L. R. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.83691 · Cited by 6
Same Same But Different? A Two-Foci Perspective on Trust in Information Systems
Söllner, M. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.630 · Cited by 6
Consumer protection in E-tailing computer sales: a case study of Dell
Ha, H., Loh, H. S., Gay, H. T. E., & Yeap, P. F. (2020) · International Review of Law Computers & Technology · doi:10.1080/13600869.2020.1838187 · Cited by 6
Trang, S. T.-N., Zander, S., & Kolbe, L. M. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 6
Paschalidis, E., Zhai, S., Guo, J., Wei, T., Liu, P., & Chen, H. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2212220 · Cited by 6
Rethinking Trust Repair in Human-Robot Interaction
Esterwood, C. T. (2023) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3584931.3608919 · Cited by 6
Hick, S., Biermann, H., & Ziefle, M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02575-0 · Cited by 9
Tenzin, S., McGill, T. J., & Dixon, M. W. (2024) · Journal of Global Information Technology Management · doi:10.1080/1097198x.2023.2297634 · Cited by 13
Saremi, M. L., Ziv, I., Asan, O., & Bayrak, A. E. (2024) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4065916 · Cited by 8
Revisiting Corporate Social Media: Challenges and Implications from a Long-Term Study
Krischkowsky, A., Fuchsberger, V., & Tscheligi, M. (2014) · Group · doi:10.1145/2660398.2660411 · Cited by 6
How Emotions Influence Trust in Online Transactions Using New Technology
Tislar, C., Sterkenburg, J., Zhang, W., & Jeon, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931214581319 · Cited by 6
Regions of Trust to Technological Know-how Structured for Banking Customers
Oluyinka, S. A., Shamsuddin, A., & Wahab, E. (2015) · Cited by 6
Miller, P., & Evgenieva, E. (2015) · Cited by 6
Concepts and constructs in online trust
Aris, A., Mustaffa, N., & Zabarudin, N. S. N. M. (2011) · International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems · doi:10.1109/icriis.2011.6125729 · Cited by 6
A study on the acceptance of internet banking
Oluyinka, S. A., Endozo, A. N., & Calma, R. R. (2018) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1145/3290511.3290531 · Cited by 6
Structural Effects of Trust in E-Filing Software on E-Filing Acceptance in Services Sector
Mas’ud, A., & Umar, M. A. (2019) · International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.4018/ijeis.2019040105 · Cited by 6
Seeing Potential Is More Important Than Usability: Revisiting Technology Acceptance
Pickering, B., Janian, M. N., López-Moreno, B., Micheletti, A., Sanno, A., & Surridge, M. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_18 · Cited by 6
Towards an empirically developed scale for measuring trust
Gulati, S., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2019) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3335082.3335116 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 2158-656X (ISSN-L)
- 2158-6578
- OpenAlex
- W2037881738
- Semantic Scholar
- 1581959e828d2701b72702264bca37ca7f408124
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- trust in technology, interpersonal trust, trust measurement, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, nomological network, technology adoption, information systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
