The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures
Abstract
Trust plays an important role in many Information Systems (IS)-enabled situations. Most IS research employs trust as a measure of interpersonal or person-to-firm relations, such as trust in a Web vendor or a virtual team member. Although trust in other people is important, this article suggests that trust in the Information Technology (IT) itself also plays a role in shaping IT-related beliefs and behavior. To advance trust and technology research, this article presents a set of trust in technology construct definitions and measures. We also empirically examine these construct measures using tests of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. This study contributes to the literature by providing: (a) a framework that differentiates trust in technology from trust in people, (b) a theory-based set of definitions necessary for investigating different kinds of trust in technology, and (c) validated trust in technology measures useful to research and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Trustworthiness judgments in humans or technology have different characteristics, yet they both are premised on the same underlying contextual conditions: risk, uncertainty and lack of control (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision‐Making (2023) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust in technology has previously been seen in the light of the technology's functionality, ability to provide help and operational reliability and the technology provider's integrity, benevolence and competence-including privacy aspects (McKnight et al., 2011;Prakash and Das, 2020;Ta et al., 2020).”
From My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“In the canonical models of trust formation, such (Giddens, 1990; Mayer et al., 1995; McKnight et al., 2011; Misztal, 1996) trust is described to have a number of different components. First, trust depends on the personal characteristics of the trustor, such as their propensity to trust, something which I do not discuss in this article. Second, trust is a factor of the perceived or actual char”
From Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, trust is a complex concept and is built upon human users’ interaction and consequent assessment of the system from cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions [91-93].”
From Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“Individual differences of users (e.g., gender, culture, age, and personality) are closely related to the propensity for or tendency toward technology users may manifest or develop (Gefen et al., 2008; McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Proposition 6b. The greater the reliability an algorithm demonstrates, the higher the probability of building trust in AI algorithms over time.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“One important factor for initial trust is the user's propensity to trust, which, being tacit, bestows a positive impact on this starting phase and tends to remain stable over time (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in people and trust in technology not only differ in terms of the nature of the object of dependence but also on important trusting beliefs.”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Interpersonal trusting beliefs reflect judgments that the other party has suitable attributes and motives for performing as expected in a risky situation (Mayer et al. 1995), whereas technology-related trust necessarily reflects beliefs about a technology's characteristics rather than its motives (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Most IS research nowadays employs a dualistic perspective on trust (see Table 1).First, trust in a specific person or organization (a moral and volitional agent) (Lankton et al. 2015;McKnight et al. 2011), such as trust in an e-vendor (Gefen et al. 2003) or virtual team members (Robert et al. 2009).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In contrast, individuals' trust in technology commonly concerns the technology's functionality (i.e., providing features needed to complete a task), its helpfulness (i.e., help functions will provide necessary advice), and its reliability (i.e., technology will consistently operate properly) (McKnight et al. 2011;Thatcher et al. 2010).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust plays a particularly important role in almost any ISenabled situation in which either uncertainty prevails or undesirable outcomes are possible (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in persons and technology can be further positioned in a nomological net of trust, comprising general trusting beliefs and institution-based trust as antecedents and trusting intentions as consequence of specific trust in persons or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight et al. 2002; see Fig. 1).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“The trust literature suggests a causal ordering among trust constructs, such that an individual's general trusting beliefs in people or technology directly influences institutionbased trust and indirectly shapes trust in a specific person or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight and Chervany 2001).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In line with the view of institutions-based trust in technology being an antecedent to trust in a specific technology (McKnight et al. 2011), we argue, that the limited availability of large, high-quality data in certain areas, which constraints our ability to promote human well-being through AI in those areas, could lead society to perceive the entire class of AIbased systems as not beneficent (”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
Schneider, P. A., & Fukuyama, F. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251846 · Cited by 10,493
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Berscheid E., Close Relationships
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926629 · DOI · Paper page
- Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185. Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185.
- 10.5555/2017317.2017325 · DOI
- Lewicki R. J., 1996, Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
- Mcknight D. H., 2005, Trust in information technology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, Management Information Systems, G. B. Davis, Ed., Blackwell, Malden, MA, 7, 329
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926622 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 999
Fox, G., & Lynn, T. (2020) · Palgrave studies in digital business & enabling technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41110-7_7 · Cited by 4
An Empirical Study Exploring Difference in Trust of Perceived Human and Intelligent System Partners
Elson, J. S., Derrick, D. C., & Merino, L. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.016 · Cited by 3
Polat, M., & Atalık, Ö. (2022) · Journal of Business Research - Turk · doi:10.20491/isarder.2022.1439 · Cited by 3
The Value of Trust in Encryption: Impact and Implications on Technology Law and Policy
Dizon, M. A. C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2023.3237987 · Cited by 3
Ellwart, T., & Schauffel, N. (2023) · Studies in national governance and emerging technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25296-9_18 · Cited by 3
Understanding User Experience with AI-Assisted Writing Service
Kim, G., Kim, J., & Kim, H. K. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35894-4_19 · Cited by 4
Examining the Impacts of Technology and Trust on I-Voting Acceptance in the COVID-19 Aftermath
Dečman, M., & Kozel, E. (2023) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/ijegr.327454 · Cited by 3
Singh, R. (2023) · Journal of Cultural Economy · doi:10.1080/17530350.2023.2229360 · Cited by 4
Exploring how consumer cooperatives might strategically incorporate social media to distribute wine
Pelet, J., Taieb, B., Lecat, B., Terblanché, N. S., & Alkhudary, R. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2255 · Cited by 3
An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting Intention to Use 5G Technology
(2023) · Journal of System and Management Sciences · doi:10.33168/jsms.2023.0221 · Cited by 3
An Empirical Exploration of E-Agriculture System Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Usage
Rai, S. K., Singh, J. P., Kumar, K. S. K., & Alhamzi, K. H. M. (2024) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/ijegr.344814 · Cited by 3
The impact of ChatGPT’s competencies on users’ intention to use
Zhou, P., Liang, C., Xie, Y., Yan, J., Zhao, S., & Jiang, L. (2024) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2024.2416628 · Cited by 3
Check or reject? Trust and motivation development in app-based warning systems
von der Linde, M., Göcke, M., Hirschfeld, G. H. F., & Thielsch, M. T. (2025) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106724 · Cited by 6
Khawaja, K. F. (2017) · International Conference on Advances in Business Management and Law (ICABML) · doi:10.30585/icabml-cp.v1i1.36 · Cited by 3
Trust Within the Coach–Athlete Relationship Through Digital Communication
Querfurth, S., Schücker, L., & Strauß, B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_14 · Cited by 2
Lin, C.-F., & Chang, Y.-J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91716-0_8 · Cited by 3
Understanding E-Mental Health for People with Depression: An Evaluation Study
Blankenhagel, K. J., Werner, J., Mayer, G., Schultz, J., & Zarnekow, R. (2021) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70569-5_3 · Cited by 2
Walter, N., Öksüz, A., Walterbusch, M., Teuteberg, F., & Becker, J. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 3
The Fault in Our Stars: Molecular Genetics and Information Technology Use
Brown, S. A., & Sias, R. W. (2023) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/17075 · Cited by 4
Perspectives on Information Technology Artefacts in Trust-Related Interactions
Koelmann, H. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_29 · Cited by 3
Paravastu, N. S., Ramanujan, S., & Ratnasingam, P. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9787-4.ch122 · Cited by 3
Questioning AI: How Racial Identity Shapes the Perceptions of Algorithmic BiasPreprint
Kim, S., Lee, J., & Oh, P. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/afcdn · Cited by 6
Roling, W. M., Grum, M., Gronau, N., & Kluge, A. (2024) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103669 · Cited by 4
Westin, C., & Lundberg, J. (2025) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-025-00793-x · Cited by 3
Umbaseng, J., & Kumalaningrum, M. P. (2025) · International Journal of Social Science Research and Review · doi:10.47814/ijssrr.v8i3.2645 · Cited by 9
Developing a Measure of Trust in Recycled Water
Hoang, U., Holt, J. R., Mahmoud‐Elhaj, D., Muhammad, A., Tanner, B., & Feltz, A. (2025) · Water and Environment Journal · doi:10.1111/wej.12987 · Cited by 2
Analyzing the drivers of pilots' individual performance in simulation training
Lopes, N. M., Aparício, M., & Neves, F. T. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100731 · Cited by 2
Wald, R., Piotrowski, J. T., Araujo, T., & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2025) · Journal of Children and Media · doi:10.1080/17482798.2025.2513470 · Cited by 2
Future privacy and trust challenges for AI-based healthcare systems
Rehman, F. A. U., Anwar, M., Mujtaba, A. U., & Akhtar, M. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-26476-4.00005-8 · Cited by 2
Trust in Persuasive Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review
Rahman, P., & Adaji, I. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS) · doi:10.1109/ethics65148.2025.11098408 · Cited by 2
The Relationship Between Perceived Agency and Trust in Robots
Frazier, C. R., McCurry, J. M., Zish, K., & Trafton, J. G. (2025) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01285-8 · Cited by 2
Trust in gendered voice assistants—the special case of gender ambiguity
Mooshammer, S., Etzrodt, K., & Weidmüller, L. (2025) · Publizistik · doi:10.1007/s11616-025-00907-5 · Cited by 3
Ye, L., Du, J., & He, Z. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2025.2572532 · Cited by 2
RetractedAn Extended UTAUT Model to Explain Factors Influencing Smart City Technology Adoption
Al-Haraizah, A., Jawarneh, M. M. M., Kumar, R., Khrisat, D. A., & Mrayat, O. I. A. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/3799390 · Cited by 4
Yoon, J., Zajac, P., Pococke, L., Jicol, A., Clarke, C., O'Neill, E. J., Petrini, K., Lutteroth, C., & Jicol, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3616748 · Cited by 3
Mumtaz, S., Ali, A., & Abbas, M. (2025) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.1108/apjba-02-2025-0120 · Cited by 2
Trust in AI: Evidence of Trust-Supporting Mechanisms from 17 Countries
Lockey, S., & Gillespie, N. A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01940-0_10 · Cited by 4
When citizens meet the chatbot: Evidence from a survey vignette experiment in Estonia
Alishani, A., & Homburg, V. M. F. (2025) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767251404286 · Cited by 2
Driving the shift to electric motorcycles: the role of AI trust and AI benefits
Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., Ho-Mai, N. T., Nguyen, T. T. P., Vo, N. D. Q., Luu, T. T., & Su, D. N. (2025) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2025.103484 · Cited by 2
Naveen Kumar, R., Janani, M., & Pavithra, R. (2025) · SAM Advanced Management Journal · doi:10.1108/samamj-12-2024-0100 · Cited by 6
Research on the influencing factors of human Drivers' Trust in fully autonomous vehicles
Cai, Y., Chen, Y., Tang, R., & Song, W. (2026) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2026.103509 · Cited by 4
Daud, N. M. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103213 · Cited by 2
Challenging AI Outputs: A Process Model of Distrust in Conversational AI
Dahabiyeh, L., Jdaitawi, A., & Dahabiyeh, L. A. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2609908 · Cited by 2
Empirical analysis to investigate the relationship between digital sharing economy and digital trust
Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., Alay, H. K., Deveciyan, M. T., Akhter, F., & Alzahrani, S. (2026) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-025-00720-6 · Cited by 2
Uniqueness versus superficial accuracy: The perceived accuracy of GPTs for travel decision-making
BİNGÖL, S. (2026) · Journal Of Vacation Marketing · doi:10.1177/13567667261416507 · Cited by 2
On the Need to Rethink Trust in AI Assistants for Software Development: A Critical Review
Baltes, S., Speith, T., Chiteri, B., Mohsenimofidi, S., Chakraborty, S., & Buschek, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2026.3659804 · Cited by 5
Correa, T., Luco, F., Hernández-Estrada, Y., Oyarzún-Merino, I., & López, C. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103769 · Cited by 3
Hunsicker, T., Duhl, I., Haubert, P., Onnasch, L., & Langer, M. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103775 · Cited by 3
How cultural cognition affects trust and perceived quality of AI explanations
Yuan, C. W., & Lee, Y.-H. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101021 · Cited by 2
Making informed trust judgements: the role of metacognition in ChatGPT interactions
Colville, S., & Ostern, N. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2651114 · Cited by 4
Rai, J. S., Kathuria, S., Kaur, H., Singh, A., & Itani, M. N. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100596 · Cited by 3
Alsalloum, G. A., Badr, Y., ALZAATREH, A., Shamayleh, A., Kumail, M., Ahmad, N. A., & Hadjiat, Y. (2026) · JMIR AI · doi:10.2196/80173 · Cited by 2
Somabut, A., Chaichuay, V., Chansanam, W., Detthamrong, U., Laochankham, S., Lowatcharin, G., Wannasen, T., & Li, C. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102832 · Cited by 4
Nassir-Deen, M. H., Cobblah, C., Lissillour, R., & Sahut, J. (2026) · Gestion et management public · doi:10.3917/e.gmp.142.0081 · Cited by 2
The big six model of AI trust: a unifying framework and 20-item scale for knowledge creation
Dickens, J. M., Uvet, H., Bauman, A., & Kwon, H. Y. (2026) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-02-2025-0222 · Cited by 2
Kim, J., Ahn, J., & Sung, Y. (2026) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-07-2025-0550 · Cited by 3
Walland, P., & Pickering, B. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_39 · Cited by 2
Exploring the Influence of Collision Anxiety on Player Experience in XR Games
Ring, P., & Masuch, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8248-6_17 · Cited by 2
Suleman, Z. J., & Lemieux, V. L. (2023) · Future of business and finance · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45339-7_6 · Cited by 3
Factors Influencing Perceptions of Trust in Data Infrastructures
Flicker, K., Rauber, A., Kern, B., & Ekaputra, F. J. (2024) · International Journal of Digital Curation · doi:10.2218/ijdc.v18i1.921 · Cited by 2
(2024) · Journal of System and Management Sciences · doi:10.33168/jsms.2024.1111 · Cited by 5
Health status: the pivot point in trusting smart health-care systems and providers for use
Alshare, K. A., Moqbel, M., Alam, M., & Hanna, M. (2024) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-10-2023-0197 · Cited by 2
Understanding student sentiments towards an automated awarding DApp: a mixed method approach
Ibrahim, Y. M., & Hassan, R. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-06-2024-0119 · Cited by 2
Empowering Democracy: Does Blockchain Unlock the E‐Voting Potential for Citizens?
Pereira, M., & Scott, I. J. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/6681599 · Cited by 2
Dimensions of Technology Trustworthiness and Technology Trust Modes
Paravastu, N. S. (2014) · Advances in information quality and management · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch422 · Cited by 2
Trust Transference from Brick to Click Retailers: A Conceptual Model for Impersonal Trust
Alsaif, T., & Ghoneim, A. (2015) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2015.402 · Cited by 2
Mirnig, A. G., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., & Tscheligi, M. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44811-3_10 · Cited by 2
Mitigating user concerns to maximize trust on cloud platforms
Piderit, R., & Mainoti, G. F. (2016) · IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) · doi:10.1109/istafrica.2016.7530691 · Cited by 2
Technology, Science and Culture - A Global Vision
Picazo-Vela, S., & Hernández, L. R. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.83423 · Cited by 2
DESIGNING FOR TRUST IN EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE HEALTH SECTOR
Jensen, A. D., Håkonsen, E., & Keitsch, M. M. (2021) · International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE) · doi:10.35199/epde.2021.16 · Cited by 2
Human factors in automated driving
Alessandrini, A., Domenichini, L., & Branzi, V. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822901-9.00007-5 · Cited by 2
The influence of emotional expressions of an industrial robot on human collaborative decision-making
Usui, K., Terada, K., & de Melo, C. D. (2022) · Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction · doi:10.1109/acii55700.2022.9953890 · Cited by 1
An Information Theoretic Approach to Privacy-Preserving Interpretable and Transferable Learning
Kumar, M., Moser, B., Fischer, L., & Freudenthaler, B. (2023) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a16090450 · Cited by 2
Gheidar, Y., Lessard, L., & Yao, Y. (2023) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew57809.2023.00084 · Cited by 2
Löffler, N. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2264299 · Cited by 2
Alofe, O. M., & Fatema, K. (2020) · Palgrave studies in digital business & enabling technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54660-1_7 · Cited by 2
O’Connor, Y. (2013) · Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) · Cited by 2
Influences on User Trust in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence (HAI): A Systematic Review (Preprint)Preprint
Jermutus, E., Kneale, D., Thomas, J., & Michie, S. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.35122 · Cited by 1
Healthy workplace technology use : understanding the formation and mitigation of technostress
Pflügner, K. (2023) · doi:10.20378/irb-91822 · Cited by 4
Lin, S. (2024) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/181390 · Cited by 2
Araujo, T., & Bol, N. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100178 · Cited by 2
Janzik, R., & Quandt, T. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_5 · Cited by 1
Kehl, R., Grotenhermen, J.-G., Greve, S., & Schewe, G. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-39438-7_2 · Cited by 1
Ethical Considerations of Augmented Reality in High-Tech Manufacturing
van der Hoek, S., van Steenbergen, M., & Ravesteijn, P. (2023) · Bled eConference · doi:10.18690/um.fov.6.2023.22 · Cited by 1
Examining Employee Perspectives to Embrace Voice Assistant Devices in the Workplace
Bharathi, S. V., Seth, A., & Perdana, A. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Integration and Management · doi:10.1142/s242486222450012x · Cited by 1
Neroj, H. J., & Walker, B. N. (2024) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3641308.3685029 · Cited by 1
Trust Calibration in Augmented Reality-based Decision Support Systems
Konopka, B., Hönemann, K., & Wiesche, M. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Business Informatics · doi:10.1109/cbi62504.2024.00028 · Cited by 2
Beyond trust: exploring contextual influences on embodiment technology
Lee, J., & Ching, C. C. (2025) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2024.2449466 · Cited by 1
A Proposed Study of Factors Moderating Degree of Trust in LLM and ChatGPT-like Outputs
Money, W. H., & Thanetsunthorn, N. (2025) · Journal of Information Systems Applied Research and Analytics · doi:10.62273/jrrf9742 · Cited by 1
How Embodied Conversational Agents Should Enter Your Space?
Kum, J., & Lee, M. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · doi:10.1109/vrw66409.2025.00291 · Cited by 1
Li, Y., Ding, N., Zhao, T., & Chen, M. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17146626 · Cited by 1
Training, Trust, and Terabytes: Absorptive Capacity for Data Analytics at Research Universities
Olson, T. H., Hong, S., & Renn, K. A. (2025) · NASPA Journal · doi:10.1080/19496591.2025.2505852 · Cited by 1
Co-intelligence in design: the importance of trust in artificial intelligence
Lelli, C., Chiarello, F., & Giordano, V. (2025) · Proceedings of the Design Society · doi:10.1017/pds.2025.10111 · Cited by 1
Nam, H., Sarvesh, M., Kang, S., Woo, W., & Kim, K. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3616761 · Cited by 1
Jun, J. Y., Marjerison, R. K., & Kim, J. M. (2025) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer20040261 · Cited by 1
Entering Your Space: How Agent Entrance Styles Shape Social Presence in AR
Kum, J., Kim, S., & Lee, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3616757 · Cited by 1
Trust in Trust: a Scoping Review on Trust and Conversational Agent Design
Al-Othmani, R., & de Vries, R. (2025) · Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly) · doi:10.1145/3750069.3750090 · Cited by 2
Böckle, M., Mohme, U., & Bick, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8440-0_73-1 · Cited by 1
Formosa, P., Bankins, S., Griep, Y., & Richards, D. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2579773 · Cited by 1
Berretta, S., Tausch, A., & Glogowski, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Organizational Psychology · doi:10.3389/forgp.2025.1685961 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 2158-656X (ISSN-L)
- 2158-6578
- OpenAlex
- W2037881738
- Semantic Scholar
- 1581959e828d2701b72702264bca37ca7f408124
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- trust in technology, interpersonal trust, trust measurement, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, nomological network, technology adoption, information systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
