The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures
Abstract
Trust plays an important role in many Information Systems (IS)-enabled situations. Most IS research employs trust as a measure of interpersonal or person-to-firm relations, such as trust in a Web vendor or a virtual team member. Although trust in other people is important, this article suggests that trust in the Information Technology (IT) itself also plays a role in shaping IT-related beliefs and behavior. To advance trust and technology research, this article presents a set of trust in technology construct definitions and measures. We also empirically examine these construct measures using tests of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. This study contributes to the literature by providing: (a) a framework that differentiates trust in technology from trust in people, (b) a theory-based set of definitions necessary for investigating different kinds of trust in technology, and (c) validated trust in technology measures useful to research and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Trustworthiness judgments in humans or technology have different characteristics, yet they both are premised on the same underlying contextual conditions: risk, uncertainty and lack of control (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision‐Making (2023) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust in technology has previously been seen in the light of the technology's functionality, ability to provide help and operational reliability and the technology provider's integrity, benevolence and competence-including privacy aspects (McKnight et al., 2011;Prakash and Das, 2020;Ta et al., 2020).”
From My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“In the canonical models of trust formation, such (Giddens, 1990; Mayer et al., 1995; McKnight et al., 2011; Misztal, 1996) trust is described to have a number of different components. First, trust depends on the personal characteristics of the trustor, such as their propensity to trust, something which I do not discuss in this article. Second, trust is a factor of the perceived or actual char”
From Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, trust is a complex concept and is built upon human users’ interaction and consequent assessment of the system from cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions [91-93].”
From Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [93]
In the citing paper
“Individual differences of users (e.g., gender, culture, age, and personality) are closely related to the propensity for or tendency toward technology users may manifest or develop (Gefen et al., 2008; McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Proposition 6b. The greater the reliability an algorithm demonstrates, the higher the probability of building trust in AI algorithms over time.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“One important factor for initial trust is the user's propensity to trust, which, being tacit, bestows a positive impact on this starting phase and tends to remain stable over time (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in people and trust in technology not only differ in terms of the nature of the object of dependence but also on important trusting beliefs.”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Interpersonal trusting beliefs reflect judgments that the other party has suitable attributes and motives for performing as expected in a risky situation (Mayer et al. 1995), whereas technology-related trust necessarily reflects beliefs about a technology's characteristics rather than its motives (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Most IS research nowadays employs a dualistic perspective on trust (see Table 1).First, trust in a specific person or organization (a moral and volitional agent) (Lankton et al. 2015;McKnight et al. 2011), such as trust in an e-vendor (Gefen et al. 2003) or virtual team members (Robert et al. 2009).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In contrast, individuals' trust in technology commonly concerns the technology's functionality (i.e., providing features needed to complete a task), its helpfulness (i.e., help functions will provide necessary advice), and its reliability (i.e., technology will consistently operate properly) (McKnight et al. 2011;Thatcher et al. 2010).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Trust plays a particularly important role in almost any ISenabled situation in which either uncertainty prevails or undesirable outcomes are possible (McKnight et al. 2011).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“Specific trust in persons and technology can be further positioned in a nomological net of trust, comprising general trusting beliefs and institution-based trust as antecedents and trusting intentions as consequence of specific trust in persons or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight et al. 2002; see Fig. 1).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“The trust literature suggests a causal ordering among trust constructs, such that an individual's general trusting beliefs in people or technology directly influences institutionbased trust and indirectly shapes trust in a specific person or technology (McKnight et al. 2011;McKnight and Chervany 2001).”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In line with the view of institutions-based trust in technology being an antecedent to trust in a specific technology (McKnight et al. 2011), we argue, that the limited availability of large, high-quality data in certain areas, which constraints our ability to promote human well-being through AI in those areas, could lead society to perceive the entire class of AIbased systems as not beneficent (”
From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McKnight et al. 2011
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
Schneider, P. A., & Fukuyama, F. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251846 · Cited by 10,493
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Berscheid E., Close Relationships
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926629 · DOI · Paper page
- Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185. Golembiewski R. T. and Mcconkie M. 1975. The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In Theories of Group Processes G. L. Cooper Ed. John Wiley & Sons London 131--185.
- 10.5555/2017317.2017325 · DOI
- Lewicki R. J., 1996, Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
- Mcknight D. H., 2005, Trust in information technology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, Management Information Systems, G. B. Davis, Ed., Blackwell, Malden, MA, 7, 329
- 10.5465/amr.1998.926622 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 999
Modeling the adoption of cloud computing to assess South African SMEs: An integrated perspective
Ayong, K., & Naidoo, R. (2019) · Kalpa publications in computing · doi:10.29007/j2nc · Cited by 6
Riedl, R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.005 · Cited by 6
Borchert, A., & Heisel, M. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13010034 · Cited by 8
Analysis of Trust in Automation Survey Instruments Using Semantic Network Analysis
Jeong, H., Park, J., Park, J., Pham, T., & Lee, B. (2018) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94334-3_2 · Cited by 6
Mazey, N. C. H. L., & Wingreen, S. C. (2017) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1177/1550147717717388 · Cited by 6
Friend or Foe? The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Human Performance in Medical Chart CodingPreprint
Wang, W., Gao, G. G., & Agarwal, R. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3405759 · Cited by 6
Cha, Y. (2024) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-2023-011 · Cited by 5
Trustworthiness of the electronic health record in Germany: an exploratory, user-centered analysis
von Kalckreuth, N., Kopka, M., Schmid, C., Kratzer, C., Reptuschenko, A., & Feufel, M. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1473326 · Cited by 5
Tam, L., Kim, S., & Gong, Y. (2025) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.9534 · Cited by 5
Gibbard, K., Gill, H., Powell, D. M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2506664 · Cited by 7
The AI paradox in marketing: Fascination, resistance, and reinvention
Moosa, H. A. A., Sobaih, A. E. E., Zaiem, I., Alzahrani, T., Zouari, E. A., Alshebami, A. S., Edrees, H. N. E., & Al-Qutaish, A. A. N. (2025) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100629 · Cited by 5
Deductive Certainty? Exploring the Boundaries of Trust Formation in Smart Contracts on Blockchains
Obermeier, D., & Henkel, J. (2025) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/18501 · Cited by 5
Transparency Fallacy: Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Management
Mirbabaie, M., Langer, M., Rieskamp, J., & Hofeditz, L. (2026) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-025-00963-1 · Cited by 17
Arnestad, M. N., Bigman, Y., Solberg, E. A., & Gray, K. J. (2025) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.70028 · Cited by 10
Khan, F. N., Zohaib, M., & Arshad, M. U. (2025) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-03-2025-0252 · Cited by 5
Jeon, Y. E., & Park, H. S. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108871 · Cited by 5
Is AI a good fit? The impact of personality on generative AI collaboration and enjoyment
Kovbasiuk, A., Triantoro, T., Ciechanowski, L., Sowa, K., & Przegalińska, A. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103747 · Cited by 5
Meyer‐Waarden, L., Cloarec, J., & Ferreira, M. (2026) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2026.105451 · Cited by 6
Perception, Trust, and Accountability Affecting Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence
Choudhury, A., Saremi, M. L., & Urena, E. (2022) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5092-5.ch005 · Cited by 5
Poll, E. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09774-6 · Cited by 8
Determinants of Pilots’ Performance: Investigating Technology Trust and Situation Awareness
Lopes, N. M., Aparício, M., & Neves, F. T. (2024) · Journal of Aerospace Information Systems · doi:10.2514/1.i011373 · Cited by 5
Hawrysz, L., Kludacz-Alessandri, M., Zabłocka-Kluczka, A., & Żak, K. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11596-7 · Cited by 5
Omori, M., Basnayake, P., Frazer, H. M. L., Keogh, L. A., Kunicki, K., & Lippey, J. (2025) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323251351521 · Cited by 5
Richter, S.-L., & Resch, D. (2020) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48332-6_21 · Cited by 6
Yapay Zekâ Risklerinin Etik Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi
Efe, A. (2021) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 5
The model of challenges to trust in the modern Russian Federation
Zelenkov, M. Y., & Tyurikov, A. G. (2022) · Социодинамика · doi:10.25136/2409-7144.2022.2.37600 · Cited by 5
Gkinko, L., & Elbanna, A. R. (2022) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17968-6_7 · Cited by 7
A Study on Customer’s Perception of Robot Nonverbal Communication Skills in a Service Environment
Tuyen, N. T. V., Okazaki, S., & Çeliktutan, O. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309634 · Cited by 5
Szczuka, J. M., Horstmann, A. C., Szymczyk, N., Strathmann, C., Artelt, A., Mavrina, L., & Krämer, N. C. (2024) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3679318.3685351 · Cited by 6
Trust perceptions in using persuasive technologies
Ahmad, W. N. W., & Ali, N. M. (2016) · International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1109/iccoins.2016.7783187 · Cited by 5
Assessment of Factors Influencing Intent-to-Use Big Data Analytics in an Organization: Pilot Study
Madhlangobe, W., & Wang, L. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE International Conference on Smart City; IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc/smartcity/dss.2018.00277 · Cited by 5
Automated Systems and Trust: Mineworkers' Trust in Proximity Detection Systems for Mobile Machines
Swanson, L. R., Bellanca, J. L., & Helton, J. (2019) · Safety and Health at Work · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2019.09.003 · Cited by 5
SUHIR, E., Scataglini, S., & Paul, G. E. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51064-0_41 · Cited by 5
Interpersonal Trust and Technology Trust in Information Systems Research
Paravastu, N. S., & Ramanujan, S. (2021) · International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change · doi:10.4018/ijissc.287832 · Cited by 5
Questions of Trust in Norms of Zero Trust
Wylde, A. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10467-1_51 · Cited by 5
A Contextualized Acceptance Model for Proactive Smart Services
Graf‐Drasch, V., Röglinger, M., Wenninger, A., & Hosseini, S. (2022) · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1007/s41471-022-00139-7 · Cited by 7
Forced Virtuality During COVID-19
Schauffel, N., & Ellwart, T. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000366 · Cited by 5
Sondern, D., Arnholz, N., & Hertel, G. (2025) · Conflict Resolution Quarterly · doi:10.1002/crq.21472 · Cited by 5
Szymczyk, N., Szczuka, J. M., Krämer, N. C., & Wischnewski, M. (2025) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3743049.3743072 · Cited by 4
Büyükeke, A. (2025) · Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.32329/uad.1728785 · Cited by 4
Chinese consumer preferences and willingness to pay for blockchain-traceable aquatic products
He, D., Yu, Y., Xiang, Z., & Zuo, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2025.1728028 · Cited by 4
Fang, C., Zhang, M., Khiatani, P. V., Lin, H., Liu, W., & Wang, S. J. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06796-x · Cited by 9
Parray, Z. A., & Iqbal, J. (2026) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-08-2025-0719 · Cited by 5
An Empirical Examination of Formation of Trust in Blockchain
Ali, V., Norman, A. A., & Azzuhri, S. R. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3321838 · Cited by 6
Craig, K., Grover, V., & Thatcher, J. B. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2023.2265786 · Cited by 4
Self-citationAugmented Reality, Trust and Technology Malfunctions: An Initial Theory and Empirical Study
Konopka, B., Hönemann, K., & Wiesche, M. (2024) · ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR) · doi:10.1145/3632634.3655884 · Cited by 4
Balaji, D., de Bruijn, G., Bosse, T., Ischen, C., van der Goot, M. J., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2024) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3640794.3665556 · Cited by 5
Trust and distrust coexistence and change in the adoption of an emerging technology in organizations
Alejandro, C. C., & Castorena, D. G. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100503 · Cited by 7
Trust transfer in the adoption of autonomous last mile services toward digital urban system
Wang, S., & Huang, Z. (2024) · Digital engineering. · doi:10.1016/j.dte.2024.100030 · Cited by 4
Examining the effects of IT identity and trust in human-AI hybrids in virtual teams
McWilliams, D. J., Randolph, A. B., Vaezi, R., & Carter, M. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2490663 · Cited by 4
Self-citationPande, D., Khanal, S., & Taeihagh, A. (2025) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2025.2543546 · Cited by 5
Yang, J. J. (2026) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer21020063 · Cited by 5
SUHIR, E. (2020) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics · doi:10.36959/422/444 · Cited by 4
Using Toulmin's Argumentation Model to Enhance Trust in Analytics-Based Advice Giving Systems
Rubin, E., & Benbasat, I. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3580479 · Cited by 4
Sayem, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/00219096231179654 · Cited by 4
Rychkova, I., & Ghriba, M. (2023) · Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly · doi:10.7250/csimq.2023-35.03 · Cited by 4
Role of Experiential Trust in E-Shopping Behaviour: An Emerging Market Perspective
Bhattacharjee, K., Kumar, R., Raut, R. K., Ravi, R., Kumar, U., Mahadeva, R., Gupta, V., & Dixit, S. (2024) · BIO Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/bioconf/20248601116 · Cited by 4
Unlocking minds: Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of AI-powered brain–machine interfaces
Cloarec, J., Meyer‐Waarden, L., Timmler, K., Thiele, S., Weiß, M., & Wiese, M. (2024) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/20515707241283308 · Cited by 4
Widjaja, A. A., Ghapanchi, A. H., & Bingley, S. (2025) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-08-2024-0440 · Cited by 4
Zarifis, A., & Cheng, X. (2025) · Financial innovation and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83402-8_4 · Cited by 4
Jo, J., Zhang, H., Cai, J., & Goyal, N. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732077 · Cited by 7
Aslan, A. (2025) · Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute · doi:10.30794/pausbed.1559251 · Cited by 5
Perception of Risky Security Behaviour by Users: Survey of Current Approaches
Shepherd, L. A., Archibald, J., & Ferguson, I. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39345-7_19 · Cited by 4
Self-Benefit and Others’ Benefit in Cooperative Behavior in Shared Space
Matsubayashi, S., Miwa, K., Terai, H., Shimojo, A., & Ninomiya, Y. (2022) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208221121404 · Cited by 4
Sutanto, K., Widyanti, A., Pratama, G. B., & Soetisna, H. R. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11709 · Cited by 4
Addressing Trust Issues in Supply-Chain Management Systems Through Blockchain Software Patterns
Kambilo, E. K., Rychkova, I., Herbaut, N., & Souveyet, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33080-3_17 · Cited by 4
Paramonova, I., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34411-4_25 · Cited by 4
A review on antecedents of citizen's trust in government social media services
Khan, S., Ab. Rahim, N. Z., & Maarop, N. (2019) · 3C Tecnología_Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme · doi:10.17993/3ctecno.2019.specialissue.10 · Cited by 4
Implementing Smart Contracts in the Syndicated Loan Market: An Issue of Adoption
Malan, M., & Steyn, R. (2019) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2019.2929750 · Cited by 4
To Click or Not to Click? Deciding to Trust or Distrust Phishing Emails
Arduin, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46224-6_6 · Cited by 4
Zarifis, A., Cheng, X., Jayawickrama, U., & Corsi, S. (2021) · International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector · doi:10.4018/ijisss.289219 · Cited by 4
Going Cashless? How Has COVID-19 Affected the Intention to Use E-wallets?
Wong, H. W., & Kwok, A. O. J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06050-2_20 · Cited by 4
IT Security Trust Model - Securing the Human Perimeter
van Vuuren, I. E. (2016) · International Journal of Social Science and Humanity · doi:10.18178/ijssh.2016.v6.761 · Cited by 4
Balkaya, S. (2019) · Management Studies · doi:10.17265/2328-2185/2019.03.006 · Cited by 4
Althaqafi, T. A. A., Foster, S., & Rahim, M. M. (2018) · University of Technology, Sydney eBooks · doi:10.5130/acis2018.dk · Cited by 4
Trust antecedents in social networking services
Hämäläinen, A. (2015) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 4
Keil, M., Vervier, L., Brauner, P., & Ziefle, M. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2430494 · Cited by 3
Using robots in small– and medium–sized hotels and the employees’ intentions
Yang, F., Ying, T., Ye, S., & Ma, S. (2025) · Tourism Review · doi:10.1108/tr-05-2024-0441 · Cited by 3
Gupta, A. S., & Mukherjee, J. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2587728 · Cited by 3
Krzywdzinski, M., Wotschack, P., Gonnermann-Müller, J., & Gronau, N. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02761-5 · Cited by 7
Nuortimo, K., Härkönen, J., & Breznik, K. (2026) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124553 · Cited by 3
Schneider, E. J., Kyriakopoulos, V., Seo, Y., Hong, N., Lee, M. J., & Lim, J. S. (2026) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/s41299-026-00254-9 · Cited by 3
Fan, W., Shao, B., Tang, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Q. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2626746 · Cited by 3
Wang, Z., Wang, K., Park, S., & Yan, J. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08966-7 · Cited by 5
Influencing factors of continuance intention of medical applications for the elderly
Huang, T., Cai, W., Lu, T., & Huang, C. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-40494-7 · Cited by 3
Why, what, and how to use AI to assist parenting: Introducing the HEAT model
Tao, S. (2026) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1093/cdpers/aadag002 · Cited by 3
How to Demonstrate Trustworthy Use of AI in Public Services: A Case Study
Smith, N., Gillespie, N. A., Rinta-Kahila, T., Lockey, S., Pool, J. K., & Curtis, C. (2026) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.70025 · Cited by 5
Mackay, A. C. D., Zuo, L., & Kebe, I. A. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16040496 · Cited by 3
From stimuli to adoption: an S-O-R approach to blockchain use in tourism
Gálvez‐Sánchez, F. J., Prados-Castillo, J. F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., & Lara‐Rubio, J. (2026) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-10-2025-0851 · Cited by 4
Tafesse, W., & Sandhu, M. (2026) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2026.2667448 · Cited by 4
Trust in AI: scale development and validation for online distance learners
Üstün, A. G., Yavuz, M., Kayalı, B., Uçar, H., Erdoğdu, E., & Bozkurt, A. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04679-z · Cited by 3
Vijayananth, M., & Saravanabhavan, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1867266 · Cited by 8
Tiwari, V. (2026) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.70209 · Cited by 6
Evaluation Tools for Human-AI Interactions Involving Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairments
Kiyemba, D. M., Marwad, J., Carter, E. J., & Norton, A. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3637474 · Cited by 3
Mukarromah, L., & Setyono, J. (2024) · JURNAL BISNIS STRATEGI · doi:10.14710/jbs.33.2.158-172 · Cited by 3
Bodó, B., Bene, M., & Boda, Z. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2482651 · Cited by 3
Cha, Y., & Xiao, F. (2025) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2025.107908 · Cited by 3
Guazzo, G. M., Rosati, P., Troisi, O., & Lynn, T. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102099 · Cited by 5
Factors influencing the baby boomers’ intention to use domotics to live independently for longer
Westdorp, J. (2015) · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 2158-656X (ISSN-L)
- 2158-6578
- OpenAlex
- W2037881738
- Semantic Scholar
- 1581959e828d2701b72702264bca37ca7f408124
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- trust in technology, interpersonal trust, trust measurement, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, nomological network, technology adoption, information systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
