Cited by 145Emotion and Mood RecognitionMental Health via WritingMental Health Research Topics

DeepMood: Modeling Mobile Phone Typing Dynamics for Mood Detection

Open access
Cao, Bokai, Zheng, Lei, Zhang, Chenwei, Yu, Philip S., Piscitello, Andrea, Zulueta, John, Ajilore, Olu, Ryan, Kelly +1 more·2017·Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Abstract

The increasing use of electronic forms of communication presents new opportunities in the study of mental health, including the ability to investigate the manifestations of psychiatric diseases unobtrusively and in the setting of patients' daily lives. A pilot study to explore the possible connections between bipolar affective disorder and mobile phone usage was conducted. In this study, participants were provided a mobile phone to use as their primary phone. This phone was loaded with a custom keyboard that collected metadata consisting of keypress entry time and accelerometer movement. Individual character data with the exceptions of the backspace key and space bar were not collected due to privacy concerns. We propose an end-to-end deep architecture based on late fusion, named DeepMood, to model the multi-view metadata for the prediction of mood scores. Experimental results show that 90.31% prediction accuracy on the depression score can be achieved based on session-level mobile phone typing dynamics which is typically less than one minute. It demonstrates the feasibility of using mobile phone metadata to infer mood disturbance and severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3097983.3098086

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [45][45] Tijmen Tieleman and Geoffrey Hinton. 2012. Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. COURSERA: Neural Networks for Machine Learning 4, 2 (2012). -
  2. [48][48] Janet BW Williams. 1988. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Archives of general psychiatry 45, 8 (1988), 742-747. -
  3. [55][55] Weinan Zhang, Tianming Du, and Jun Wang. 2016. Deep Learning over Multifield Categorical Data. In ECIR . Springer, 45-57.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, B., Zheng, L., Zhang, C., Yu, P. S., Piscitello, A., Zulueta, J., Ajilore, O., Ryan, K., & Leow, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Illinoisat Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-08-04
Pages
747-755
OpenAlex
W2744939564
Cited by
145
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17
FWCI
18.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IIS-1526499 and CNS-1626432)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61672313)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
mood prediction, mobile phone metadata, bipolar disorder, depression severity, decision fusion, multi-view fusion, mental health monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review