Cited by 47Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningStudent Assessment and Feedback

Impact of learning analytics feedback on self-regulated learning: Triangulating behavioural logs with students’ recall

Lim, Lisa-Angelique, Gasevic, Dragan, Matcha, Wannisa, Ahmad Uzir, Nora'Ayu, Dawson, Shane·2021·LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference

Abstract

Learning analytics (LA) has been presented as a viable solution for scaling timely and personalised feedback to support students’ self-regulated learning (SRL). Research is emerging that shows some positive associations between personalised feedback with students’ learning tactics and strategies as well as time management strategies, both important aspects of SRL. However, the definitive role of feedback on students’ SRL adaptations is under-researched; this requires an examination of students’ recalled experiences with their personalised feedback. Furthermore, an important consideration in feedback impact is the course context, comprised of the learning design and delivery modality. This mixed-methods study triangulates learner trace data from two different course contexts, with students’ qualitative data collected from focus group discussions, to more fully understand the impact of their personalised feedback and to explicate the role of this feedback on students’ SRL adaptations. The quantitative analysis showed the contextualised impact of the feedback on students’ learning and time management strategies in the different courses, while the qualitative analysis highlighted specific ways in which students used their feedback to adjust these and other SRL processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3448139.3448174

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, L.-A., Gasevic, D., Matcha, W., Ahmad Uzir, N., & Dawson, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Monash University, Australia
  • Prince of Songkla University (TH)
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
Venue
LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-04-12
Pages
364-374
OpenAlex
W3148673861
Cited by
47
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11
FWCI
9.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
learning analytics, personalized feedback, student self-regulation, time management strategies, learning strategies, learning design, delivery modality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review