The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Who goes first? Influences of human-AI workflow on decision making in clinical imaging,”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This pattern has been previously observed and referred to as the”
From Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Fogliato et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“This approach has been identified as the”
From Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Fogliato et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“An article found that participants in this”
From Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Fogliato et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Cognitive costs of reexamination, when new information becomes available, can be viewed as analogous to interruption and recovery on the initial task with new information (Fogliato et al., 2022).”
From Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Fogliato et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810 · cited 1×
“A critical aspect of how AI can influence decision making revolves around the bias of anchoring [85].”
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72 · Cited by 5,051
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., Back, T., Chesus, M., Corrado, G. S., Darzi, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 · Cited by 3,287
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4 · Cited by 2,573 · cited 1×
“it is difficult for humans to revise or reverse their decisions due to psychological phenomena of sunk cost effects [2, 23], cognitive dissonance [26], and confirmation bias [51, 65].”
BackgroundAdaptive strategy selection in decision making.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534 · Cited by 1,955
Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0020198 · Cited by 1,141
Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.09692 · Cited by 1,124
Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., & Bellamy, R. K. E. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372852 · Cited by 895
Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: evaluating claims and practices
Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372828 · Cited by 845
Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
Bansal, G., Wu, T., Zhou, J., Fok, R., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Ribeiro, M. T., & Weld, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445717 · Cited by 757 · cited 4×
“The adoption of these tools has fostered a scholarly effort on designing human-AI collaborations for optimal team decision making [4, 41, 59, 89].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDoes the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
Bansal, G., Wu, T., Zhou, J., Fok, R., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Ribeiro, M. T., & Weld, D. S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14779 · Cited by 754
Self-citationBien, N., Rajpurkar, P., Ball, R. L., Irvin, J., Park, A., Jones, E., Bereket, M., Patel, B. N., Yeom, K. W., Shpanskaya, K., et al. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002699 · Cited by 734
Self-citationManipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability
Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Goldstein, D. G., Hofman, J. M., Wortman Vaughan, J. W., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445315 · Cited by 728
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
Lehman, C. D., Wellman, R. D., Buist, D. S. M., Kerlikowske, K., Tosteson, A. N. A., & Miglioretti, D. L. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231 · Cited by 678
Beede, E., Baylor, E., Hersch, F., Iurchenko, A., Wilcox, L., Ruamviboonsuk, P., & Vardoulakis, L. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376718 · Cited by 614
Tschandl, P., Codella, N., Akay, B. N., Argenziano, G., Braun, R. P., Cabo, H., Gutman, D., Halpern, A., Helba, B., Hofmann-Wellenhof, R., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30333-x · Cited by 555
Understanding the Effect of Accuracy on Trust in Machine Learning Models
Yin, M., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300509 · Cited by 527 · cited 1×
“Past studies in this space analyze how user performance and trust are affected by the presence of AI explanations [4, 54, 69, 93], the perceived and communicated AI accuracy [54, 91], and model updates [3], among others.”
BackgroundHuman-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms During Medical Decision-Making
Cai, C. J., Reif, E., Hegde, N., Hipp, J., Kim, B., Smilkov, D., Wattenberg, M., Viegas, F., Corrado, G. S., Stumpe, M. C., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300234 · Cited by 405
The Principles and Limits of Algorithm-in-the-Loop Decision Making
Green, B., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359152 · Cited by 392 · cited 1×
“Green and Chen [34] find that requiring participants to register provisional predictions before AI recommendations are revealed results in marginal gains in overall predictive performance.”
BackgroundLai, V., & Tan, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287590 · Cited by 377
Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions
Iqbal, S. T., & Horvitz, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240730 · Cited by 300
Self-citationHekler, A., Utikal, J. S., Enk, A. H., Solass, W., Schmitt, M., Klode, J., Schadendorf, D., Sondermann, W., Franklin, C., Bestvater, F., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.012 · Cited by 285
Updates in Human-AI Teams: Understanding and Addressing the Performance/Compatibility Tradeoff
Bansal, G., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Weld, D. S., Lasecki, W. S., & Horvitz, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012429 · Cited by 284 · cited 1×
“Past studies in this space analyze how user performance and trust are affected by the presence of AI explanations [4, 54, 69, 93], the perceived and communicated AI accuracy [54, 91], and model updates [3], among others.”
BackgroundSelf-citationHan, S. S., Park, I., Eun Chang, S., Lim, W., Kim, M. S., Park, G. H., Chae, J. B., Huh, C. H., & Na, J.-I. (2020) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2020.01.019 · Cited by 248
A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scores
De-Arteaga, M., Fogliato, R., & Chouldechova, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376638 · Cited by 221
Self-citationAssessing Risk Assessment in Action
Stevenson, M. (2018) · Minnesota Law Review · doi:10.24926/265535.958 · Cited by 193
BusyBody: creating and fielding personalized models of the cost of interruption
Horvitz, E., Koch, P., & Apacible, J. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/1031607.1031690 · Cited by 150
Self-citationBayati, M., Braverman, M., Gillam, M., Mack, K. M., Ruiz, G., Smith, M. S., & Horvitz, E. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109264 · Cited by 122
Self-citationPredictive Validity of Pretrial Risk Assessments: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Desmarais, S. L., Zottola, S. A., Duhart Clarke, S. E., & Lowder, E. M. (2021) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854820932959 · Cited by 79
A Slow Algorithm Improves Users' Assessments of the Algorithm's Accuracy
Park, J. S., Barber, R., Kirlik, A., & Karahalios, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359204 · Cited by 65
Heterogeneity in Algorithm-Assisted Decision-Making: A Case Study in Child Abuse Hotline Screening
Cheng, L., & Chouldechova, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05478 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- Joshua D Angrist and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2008. Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton university press.
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Arndt Bröder and Stefanie Schiffer. 2003. Take The Best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of reprensentation format.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132, 2 (2003), 277.
- 10.1145/3449287 · doi:10.1145/3449287 · Paper page
- 10.1002/bdm.2155 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3359206 · DOI · Paper page
- Mary Czerwinski, Edward Cutrell, and Eric Horvitz. 2000. Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. In OZCHI 2000 conference proceedings, Vol. 356. 361–367.
- Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly (1989), 319–340.
- Anthony Christopher Davison and David Victor Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Number 1. Cambridge university press.
- Alex J DeGrave, Joseph D Janizek, and Su-In Lee. 2020. AI for radiographic COVID-19 detection selects shortcuts over signal. medRxiv (2020).
- Berkeley J Dietvorst, Joseph P Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015. Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144, 1 (2015), 114.
- 10.1093/jamia/ocz229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00815 · DOI
- Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh Murali Sambasivan Naresh Kumar and Hossein Nezakati. 2015. Adoption of clinical decision support systems in a developing country: Antecedents and outcomes of physician’s threat to perceived professional autonomy. International journal of medical informatics 84 8(2015) 548–560. · DOI
- Andre Esteva, Brett Kuprel, Roberto A Novoa, Justin Ko, Susan M Swetter, Helen M Blau, and Sebastian Thrun. 2017. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. nature 542, 7639 (2017), 115–118.
- 10.2307/1420234 · DOI
- Michael Fitzke Conrad Stack Andre Dourson Rodrigo Santana Diane Wilson Lisa Ziemer Arjun Soin Matthew P Lungren Paul Fisher and Mark Parkinson. 2021. RapidRead: Global Deployment of State-of-the-art Radiology AI for a Large Veterinary Teleradiology Practice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08165(2021). · arXiv
- Joseph L Fleiss. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological bulletin 76, 5 (1971), 378.
- 10.1145/3479572 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/089533005775196732 · DOI · Paper page
- Joseph Futoma, Sanjay Hariharan, and Katherine Heller. 2017. Learning to detect sepsis with a multitask Gaussian process RNN classifier. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1174–1182.
- Krzysztof Z Gajos and Lena Mamykina. 2022. Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learning. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 794–806.
- Susanne Gaube, Harini Suresh, Martina Raue, Alexander Merritt, Seth J Berkowitz, Eva Lermer, Joseph F Coughlin, John V Guttag, Errol Colak, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2021. Do as AI say: susceptibility in deployment of clinical decision-aids. NPJ digital medicine 4, 1 (2021), 1–8.
- 10.1093/annonc/mdy166 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100297 · DOI · Paper page
- Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139–183.
- 10.1086/209225 · DOI · Paper page
- Sophie Hilgard, Nir Rosenfeld, Mahzarin R Banaji, Jack Cao, and David Parkes. 2021. Learning representations by humans, for humans. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 4227–4238.
- Eric Horvitz and J. Apacible. 2003. Learning and Reasoning about Interruption,. In International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 20–27.
- 10.1145/636772.636798 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1198/000313006X118430 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3411764.3445385 · DOI · Paper page
- Ayush Jain, David Way, Vishakha Gupta, Yi Gao, Guilherme de Oliveira Marinho, Jay Hartford, Rory Sayres, Kimberly Kanada, Clara Eng, Kunal Nagpal, 2021. Development and Assessment of an Artificial Intelligence–Based Tool for Skin Condition Diagnosis by Primary Care Physicians and Nurse Practitioners in Teledermatology Practices. JAMA network open 4, 4 (2021), e217249–e217249.
- Saif Khairat, David Marc, William Crosby, and Ali Al Sanousi. 2018. Reasons for physicians not adopting clinical decision support systems: critical analysis. JMIR medical informatics 6, 2 (2018), e24.
- 10.1002/bdm.756 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60315-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Jon Kleinberg, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Jure Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2018. Human decisions and machine predictions. The quarterly journal of economics 133, 1 (2018), 237–293.
- 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103425 · DOI
- Geert Litjens, Clara I Sánchez, Nadya Timofeeva, Meyke Hermsen, Iris Nagtegaal, Iringo Kovacs, Christina Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa, Peter Bult, Bram Van Ginneken, and Jeroen Van Der Laak. 2016. Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis. Scientific reports 6, 1 (2016), 1–11.
- Marjolein Lugtenberg, Jan-Willem Weenink, Trudy van der Weijden, Gert P Westert, and Rudolf B Kool. 2015. Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers. BMC medical informatics and decision making 15, 1 (2015), 1–11.
- David Madras, Toni Pitassi, and Richard Zemel. 2018. Predict responsibly: Improving fairness and accuracy by learning to defer. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018).
- 10.1148/radiol.2019191293 · DOI · Paper page
- Hisaki Makimoto, Moritz Höckmann, Tina Lin, David Glöckner, Shqipe Gerguri, Lukas Clasen, Jan Schmidt, Athena Assadi-Schmidt, Alexandru Bejinariu, Patrick Müller, 2020. Performance of a convolutional neural network derived from an ECG database in recognizing myocardial infarction. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–9.
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Mary L McHugh. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica 22, 3 (2012), 276–282.
- 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · DOI · Paper page
- Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing. 2014. Part VIII. Criminal Sentencing. Chapter 303. Sentencing guidelines. https://perma.cc/KR6G-94L7
- Maithra Raghu Katy Blumer Greg Corrado Jon Kleinberg Ziad Obermeyer and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. The algorithmic automation problem: Prediction triage and human effort. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.12220(2019). · arXiv
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Jeremy Irvin, Kaylie Zhu, Brandon Yang, Hershel Mehta, Tony Duan, Daisy Ding, Aarti Bagul, Curtis Langlotz, Katie Shpanskaya, 2017. Chexnet: Radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest x-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05225(2017). · arXiv
- Charvi Rastogi Yunfeng Zhang Dennis Wei Kush R Varshney Amit Dhurandhar and Richard Tomsett. 2020. Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-making. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07938(2020). · arXiv
- Dezső Ribli, Anna Horváth, Zsuzsa Unger, Péter Pollner, and István Csabai. 2018. Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with deep learning. Scientific reports 8, 1 (2018), 1–7.
- Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Jonathan Krause, Peranut Chotcomwongse, Rory Sayres, Rajiv Raman, Kasumi Widner, Bilson JL Campana, Sonia Phene, Kornwipa Hemarat, Mongkol Tadarati, 2019. Deep learning versus human graders for classifying diabetic retinopathy severity in a nationwide screening program. NPJ digital medicine 2, 1 (2019), 1–9.
- 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3351095.3372827 · DOI · Paper page
- Jennifer Skeem, Nicholas Scurich, and John Monahan. 2020. Impact of risk assessment on judges’ fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants.Law and human behavior 44, 1 (2020), 51.
- David F Steiner, Robert MacDonald, Yun Liu, Peter Truszkowski, Jason D Hipp, Christopher Gammage, Florence Thng, Lily Peng, and Martin C Stumpe. 2018. Impact of deep learning assistance on the histopathologic review of lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer. The American journal of surgical pathology 42, 12 (2018), 1636.
- 10.1148/radiol.2461070190 · DOI
- Eric J Topol. 2019. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature medicine 25, 1 (2019), 44–56.
- 10.1038/s41591-020-0942-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3290605.3300831 · DOI · Paper page
- Guangyu Wang Xiaohong Liu Jun Shen Chengdi Wang Zhihuan Li Linsen Ye Xingwang Wu Ting Chen Kai Wang Xuan Zhang 2021. A deep-learning pipeline for the diagnosis and discrimination of viral non-viral and COVID-19 pneumonia from chest X-ray images. Nature Biomedical Engineering(2021) 1–13. · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00787-w
- Jenna Wiens, John Guttag, and Eric Horvitz. 2016. Patient Risk Stratification with Time-Varying Parameters: A Multitask Learning Approach. Journal of Machine Learning Research 17, 79 (2016), 1–23.
- 10.5555/3491440.3491652 · doi:10.5555/3491440.3491652
- Nan Wu, Jason Phang, Jungkyu Park, Yiqiu Shen, Zhe Huang, Masha Zorin, Stanisław Jastrzebski, Thibault Févry, Joe Katsnelson, Eric Kim, 2019. Deep neural networks improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 39, 4 (2019), 1184–1194.
- 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3 · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3
Cited by
Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction
Kim, S. S. Y., Watkins, E. A., Russakovsky, O., Fong, R., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581001 · Cited by 233
Gomez, C., Cho, S. M., Ke, S., Huang, C.-M., & Unberath, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2024.1521066 · Cited by 209
Heterogeneity and predictors of the effects of AI assistance on radiologists
Yu, F., Moehring, A., Banerjee, O., Salz, T., Agarwal, N., & Rajpurkar, P. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02850-w · Cited by 200
Combining Human Expertise with Artificial Intelligence: Experimental Evidence from Radiology
Agarwal, N., Moehring, A., Rajpurkar, P., & Salz, T. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4505053 · Cited by 161
Combining Human Expertise with Artificial Intelligence: Experimental Evidence from Radiology
Agarwal, N., Moehring, A., Rajpurkar, P., & Salz, T. (2023) · doi:10.3386/w31422 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Fogliato, R., Chappidi, S., Lungren, M., Fisher, P., Wilson, D., Fitzke, M., Parkinson, M., Horvitz, E., Inkpen, K., & Nushi, B.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- University of Virginia, USA
- Stanford, USA
- Antech Imaging Services, USA
- Mars Digital Technologies, Germany
- Mars Digital Technologies, USA
- Microsoft Research, USA
- Venue
- 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2022-06-20
- Pages
- 1362-1374
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 31
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
