Cited by 4Stuttering Research and TreatmentSpeech Recognition and SynthesisVoice and Speech Disorders

Our Collective Voices: The Social and Technical Values of a Grassroots Chinese Stuttered Speech Dataset

Open access
Li, Jingjin, Li, Qisheng, Gong, Rong, Wang, Lezhi, Wu, Shaomei·2025·Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Abstract

The lack of authentic stuttered speech data has significantly limited the development of stuttering friendly automatic speech recognition (ASR) models.In previous work, we collaborated with Stam-merTalk, a grassroots community of Chinese-speaking people who stutter (PWS), to collect the first stuttered speech dataset in Mandarin Chinese, containing 50 hours of conversational and commandrecitation speech from 72 PWS.This work examines both the technical and social dimensions of the dataset.Through quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as benchmarking and fine-tuning ASR models using the dataset, we demonstrate its technical value in capturing stuttered speech at an unprecedented scale and diversity -enabling better understanding and mitigation of fluency bias in ASR -and its social value in promoting self-advocacy and structural change for PWS in China.By foregrounding lived experiences of PWS in their own voices, we also see the potential of this dataset to normalize speech disfluencies and cultivate deeper empathy for stuttering within the AI research community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3715275.3732179

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Adriana Alvarado Garcia and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2018. Quotidian Report: Grassroots Data Practices to Address Public Safety. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 17 (nov 2018), 18 pages. doi:10.1145/3274286 · DOI
  2. Rosana Ardila, Megan Branson, Kelly Davis, Michael Kohler, Josh Meyer, Michael Henretty, Reuben Morais, Lindsay Saunders, Francis Tyers, and Gregor We- ber. 2020. Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpus. In Pro- ceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Nico- letta Calzolari, Frédéric Béchet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Hélène Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, and Stelios Piperidis (Eds.). European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, 4218-4222. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.520
  3. Anna Bleakley, Daniel Rough, Abi Roper, Stephen Lindsay, Martin Porcheron, Minha Lee, Stuart Alan Nicholson, Benjamin R Cowan, and Leigh Clark. 2022. Exploring Smart Speaker User Experience for People Who Stammer. In Proceed- ings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1-10.
  4. O. Bloodstein, N.B. Ratner, and S.B. Brundage. 2021. A Handbook on Stuttering, Seventh Edition. Plural Publishing, Incorporated. https://books.google.com/ books?id=Abw0EAAAQBAJ
  5. Elaine Blumgart, Yvonne Tran, and Ashley Craig. 2010. Social anxiety disorder in adults who stutter. Depress. Anxiety 27, 7 (July 2010), 687-692. doi:10.1002/da. 20657 · DOI
  6. John Van Borsel, Marie Brepoels, and Janne De Coene. 2011. Stuttering, attrac- tiveness, and romantic relationships: The perception of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Fluency Disorders 36, 1 (2011), 41-50.
  7. Michael P. Boyle. 2018. Enacted stigma and felt stigma experienced by adults who stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders 73 (2018), 50-61. doi:10.1016/j. jcomdis.2018.03.004 · DOI
  8. Geoffrey A. Coalson, Alexus Crawford, Shanley B. Treleaven, Courtney T. Byrd, Lauren Davis, Lillian Dang, Jillian Edgerly, and Alison Turk. 2022. Microaggres- sion and the adult stuttering experience. Journal of Communication Disorders 95 (2022), 106180. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106180 · DOI
  9. Christopher Constantino, Patrick Campbell, and Sam Simpson. 2022. Stuttering and the social model. Journal of Communication Disorders 96 (2022), 106200. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106200 · DOI
  10. Christopher Dominick Constantino. 2023. Fostering Positive Stuttering Identities Using Stutter-Affirming Therapy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 54, 1 (2023), 42-62. doi:10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00038 arXiv:https://pubs.asha.org/doi/pdf/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00038 · DOI
  11. Eric Corbett, Emily Denton, and Sheena Erete. 2023. Power and Public Participa- tion in AI. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algo- rithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 13 pages. doi:10.1145/3617694.3623228 · DOI
  12. S. Davis, P. Howell, and F. Cooke. 2002. Sociodynamic relationships between chil- dren who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 43, 7 (2002), 939-947.
  13. Xianghua Ding, Patrick C Shih, and Ning Gu. 2017. Socially embedded work: A study of wheelchair users performing online crowd work in china. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 642-654.
  14. Kelechi Ezema, Chelsea Chandler, Rosy Southwell, Niranjan Cholendiran, and Sidney D'Mello. 2025. "It feels like we're not meeting the criteria": Examining and Mitigating the Cascading Effects of Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition in Spoken Language Interfaces.. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 109, 13 pages. doi:10.1145/3706598.3714059 · DOI
  15. Vinitha Gadiraju, Shaun Kane, Sunipa Dev, Alex Taylor, Ding Wang, Emily Denton, and Robin Brewer. 2023. "I Wouldn't Say Offensive but...": Disability- Centered Perspectives on Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Chicago, IL, USA) (FAccT '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205-216. doi:10.1145/3593013.3593989 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Abraham Glasser, Kesavan Kushalnagar, and Raja Kushalnagar. 2017. Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Perspectives on Using Automatic Speech Recog- nition in Conversation. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGAC- CESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (AS- SETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 427-432. doi:10.1145/3132525.3134781 · DOI
  17. Gerlach H, Totty E, Subramanian A, and Zebrowski P. 2018. Stuttering and Labor Market Outcomes in the United States. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 61, 7 (2018), 1649-1663. doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0353 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC6195060/. · DOI
  18. Seung-Eun Kim, Bronya R. Chernyak, Olga Seleznova, Joseph Keshet, Matthew Goldrick, and Ann R. Bradlow. 2024. Automatic recognition of second language speech-in-noise. JASA Express Letters 4, 2 (02 2024), 025204. doi:10.1121/10.0024877 arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jel/article- pdf/doi/10.1121/10.0024877/19669029/025204_1_10.0024877.pdf · DOI
  19. Allison Koenecke, Anna Seo Gyeong Choi, Katelyn X. Mei, Hilke Schellmann, and Mona Sloane. 2024. Careless Whisper: Speech-to-Text Hallucination Harms. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Trans- parency (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (FAccT '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1672-1681. doi:10.1145/3630106.3658996 · DOI
  20. Tedd Kourkounakis, Amirhossein Hajavi, and Ali Etemad. 2021. FluentNet: End-to-End Detection of Stuttered Speech Disfluencies With Deep Learning. IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc. 29 (sep 2021), 2986-2999. doi:10. 1109/TASLP.2021.3110146 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Tedd Kourkounakis, Amirhossein Hajavi, and Ali Etemad. 2021. Fluentnet: End- to-end detection of stuttered speech disfluencies with deep learning. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 29 (2021), 2986-2999.
  22. David Leslie, Michael Katell, Mhairi Aitken, Jatinder Singh, Morgan Briggs, Rosamund Powell, Cami Rincon, Antonella Perini, and Smera Jayadeva. 2022. Data justice in practice: A guide for impacted communities. SSRN Electron. J. (April 2022). doi:10.2139/ssrn.4080046 · DOI
  23. Jingjin Li, Shaomei Wu, and Gilly Leshed. 2024. Re-envisioning Remote Meetings: Co-designing Inclusive and Empowering Videoconferencing with People Who Stutter. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Copenhagen, Denmark) (DIS '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1926-1941. doi:10.1145/3643834.3661533 · DOI
  24. Qisheng Li and Shaomei Wu. 2024. "I Want to Publicize My Stutter": Community- led Collection and Curation of Chinese Stuttered Speech Data. Proc. ACM Hum.- Comput. Interact. 8, CSCW2, Article 475 (Nov. 2024), 27 pages. doi:10.1145/3687014 · DOI
  25. Qisheng Li and Shaomei Wu. 2024. Towards Fair and Inclusive Speech Recog- nition for Stuttering: Community-led Chinese Stuttered Speech Dataset Cre- ation and Benchmarking. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA '24). Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 331, 9 pages. doi:10.1145/3613905.3650950 · DOI
  26. Yan Ma, Judith D. Oxley, J. Scott Yaruss, and John A. Tetnowski. 2023. Stuttering experience of people in China: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Fluency Disorders 77 (2023), 105994. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105994 · DOI
  27. Valentin Mendelev, Tina Raissi, Guglielmo Camporese, and Manuel Giollo. 2021. Improved robustness to disfluencies in rnn-transducer based speech recognition. In ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 6878-6882.
  28. Vikramjit Mitra, Zifang Huang, Colin Lea, Lauren Tooley, Panayiotis Georgiou, Sachin Kajarekar, and Jefferey Bigham. 2021. Analysis and Tuning of a Voice Assistant System for Dysfluent Speech. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.11759.pdf · arXiv
  29. Joon Sung Park, Danielle Bragg, Ece Kamar, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2021. Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event, Canada) (FAccT '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 52-63. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445870 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Rida Qadri, Renee Shelby, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Remi Denton. 2023. AI's Regimes of Representation: A Community-centered Study of Text-to-Image Mod- els in South Asia. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Account- ability, and Transparency (Chicago, IL, USA) (FAccT '23). Association for Comput- ing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 506-517. doi:10.1145/3593013.3594016 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. 2023. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (ICML'23). JMLR.org, Article 1182, 27 pages.
  32. Nan Bernstein Ratner and Brian MacWhinney. 2018. Fluency Bank: A new resource for fluency research and practice. Journal of fluency disorders 56 (2018), 69-80.
  33. Olabanji Shonibare, Xiaosu Tong, and Venkatesh Ravichandran. 2022. En- hancing ASR for Stuttered Speech with Limited Data Using Detect and Pass. arXiv:2202.05396 [eess.AS] · arXiv
  34. Vivian Sisskin. 2023. Disfluency-Affirming Therapy for Young People Who Stutter: Unpacking Ableism in the Therapy Room. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 54, 1 (2023), 114-119.
  35. Joshua St. Pierre. 2012. The Construction of the Disabled Speaker: Locating Stuttering in Disability Studies. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 1, 3 (Aug. 2012), 1-21. doi:10.15353/cjds.v1i3.54 · DOI
  36. Sharifa Sultana, François Guimbretière, Phoebe Sengers, and Nicola Dell. 2018. De- sign Within a Patriarchal Society: Opportunities and Challenges in Designing for Rural Women in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. doi:10.1145/3173574.3174110 · DOI
  37. Seda Türkili, Serkan Türkili, and Zeynep Feryal Aydın. 2022. Mental well-being and related factors in individuals with stuttering. Heliyon 8, 9 (Sept. 2022), e10446. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10446 · DOI
  38. Ravichander Vipperla, Steve Renals, and Joe Frankel. 2010. Ageing Voices: The Effect of Changes in Voice Parameters on ASR Performance. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing (2010). https://asmp-eurasipjournals. springeropen.com/articles/10.1155/2010/525783 · DOI
  39. Maggie Walter and Michele Suina. 2019. Indigenous data, indigenous methodolo- gies and indigenous data sovereignty. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 22, 3 (May 2019), 233-243. doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1531228 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Kimi Wenzel, Nitya Devireddy, Cam Davison, and Geoff Kaufman. 2023. Can Voice Assistants Be Microaggressors? Cross-Race Psychological Responses to Failures of Automatic Speech Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 109, 14 pages. doi:10.1145/3544548. 3581357 · DOI
  41. Kimi Wenzel and Geoff Kaufman. 2024. Designing for Harm Reduction: Commu- nication Repair for Multicultural Users' Voice Interactions. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-17.
  42. Janis Wong. 2023. Data Practices and Data Stewardship. Interactions 30, 3 (may 2023), 60-63. doi:10.1145/3589133 · DOI
  43. Shaomei Wu, Jingjin Li, and Gilly Leshed. 2024. Finding My Voice over Zoom: An Autoethnography of Videoconferencing Experience for a Person Who Stutters. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 916, 16 pages. doi:10.1145/3613904.3642746 · DOI
  44. Megan M Young, Courtney T Byrd, Rodney Gabel, and Andrew Z White. 2022. Self-disclosure experiences of adults who stutter: An interpretative phenomeno- logical analysis. Am. J. Speech. Lang. Pathol. 31, 5 (Sept. 2022), 2045-2060. doi:10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00048 · DOI
  45. Xin Zhang, Iván Vallés-Pérez, Andreas Stolcke, Chengzhu Yu, Jasha Droppo, Olabanji Shonibare, Roberto Barra-Chicote, and Venkatesh Ravichandran. 2022. Stutter-TTS: Controlled synthesis and improved recognition of stuttered speech. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09731 (2022). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, J., Li, Q., Gong, R., Wang, L., & Wu, S.
Affiliations
  • AImpower.org, Santa Clara, California, USA
  • AImpower.org, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • StammerTalk, Vienna, Austria
  • StammerTalk, Austin, Texas, USA
  • AImpower.org, Mountain View, California, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-06-23
Pages
2768-2783
OpenAlex
W4411550047
Cited by
4
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
47.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NSF (National Science Foundation) (2427710)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
stuttered speech, stuttering, Mandarin Chinese, speech dataset, speech recognition, grassroots communities, self-advocacy, disfluency, conversational speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review