The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity
Yang, M., Bonanos, A. Z., Jiang, B., Gao, J., Gavras, P., Maravelias, G., Ren, Y., Wang, S., Xue, M., Tramper, F., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935916 · Cited by 51
Grassitelli, L., Langer, N., Mackey, J., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038298 · Cited by 50
“…stars are close to their Eddington limit, i.e. the limit on the hydrostatic stability of stars given by the balance between the inward-directed gravitational force and the outward-directed radiative force (Lamers & Fitzpatrick 1988; Maeder 1992; Humphreys & Davidson 1994; Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundLight-curve Model for Luminous Red Novae and Inferences about the Ejecta of Stellar Mergers
Matsumoto, T., & Metzger, B. D. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6269 · Cited by 49
“…stars in a binary system is a common occurrence (e.g., Sana et al. 2012), with implications for a number of topics in stellar evolution (e.g., Podsiadlowski et al. 2004; de Mink et al. 2014; De Marco & Izzard 2017) and energetic transients (e.g., Soker & Tylenda 2006; Chevalier 2012; Smith 2014).”
Evidence for past interaction with an asymmetric circumstellar shell in the young SNR Cassiopeia A
Orlando, S., Wongwathanarat, A., Janka, H., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243258 · Cited by 49
Statistical Properties of the Nebular Spectra of 103 Stripped-envelope Core-collapse Supernovae*
Fang, Q., Maeda, K., Kuncarayakti, H., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4f60 · Cited by 48
“Before an SN explodes, the massive star progenitor may suffer from certain degree of envelope stripping either by binary evolution or stellar wind, or the combination of both (Heger et al. 2003; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Yoon 2015; Fang et al. 2019).”
BackgroundOrigins of Type Ibn SNe 2006jc/2015G in interacting binaries and implications for pre-SN eruptions
Sun, N.-C., Maund, J. R., Hirai, R., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3431 · Cited by 48
“During the giant eruptions, they increase their bolometric luminosities for months to years accompanied by extreme mass-loss (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSundqvist, J. O., Björklund, R., Puls, J., et al. (2019) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936580/pdf · Cited by 48
Weak Mass Loss from the Red Supergiant Progenitor of the Type II SN 2021yja
Hosseinzadeh, G., Kilpatrick, C. D., Dong, Y., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75f0 · Cited by 47
“Mass loss in massive stars (MZAMS & 8M ) is among the most poorly understood aspects of stellar evolution (Smith 2014), and core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) provide a complementary window into studying massloss processes that the stars of the Milky Way and its satellites cannot provide.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe galactic dust-up: modelling dust evolution in FIRE
Choban, C. R., Kereš, D., Hopkins, P. F., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1542 · Cited by 47
Gomez, S., Berger, E., Nicholl, M., Blanchard, P., & Hosseinzadeh, G. (2022) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9842 · Cited by 27
“Some of these massive stars lose their hydrogen and/or helium envelopes before explosion, either through winds or interaction with a binary companion (e.g., Heger et al. 2003; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundPROBING FINAL STAGES OF STELLAR EVOLUTION WITH X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF SN 2013ej
Chakraborti, S., Ray, A., Smith, R., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/817/1/22 · Cited by 47
“However, we need to address gaps in our understanding of mass loss from massive stars (Smith 2014) before we can quantify systematic errors and rely on the accuracy of such a measurement.”
BackgroundChun, S.-H., Yoon, S.-C., Jung, M.-K., Kim, D. U., & Kim, J. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9a37 · Cited by 38
“…stars in numerical simulations depends on many different physical parameters that are related to the efficiency of convective energy transport, convective overshoot, semiconvection, rotation, mass loss, binarity, and metallicity, among others (e.g., Maeder & Meynet 2000; Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundCommon envelope jets supernova (CEJSN) impostors resulting from a neutron star companion
Gilkis, A., Soker, N., & Kashi, A. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3008 · Cited by 47
“…to Vink, de Koter & Lamers (2001) for the MS phase, and according to de Jager, Nieuwenhuijzen & van der Hucht (1988) during the evolved supergiant phase, and we apply a multiplicative factor η to the mass loss at all times (see, e.g., Smith 2014; Renzo et al. 2017, on mass loss in massive stars).”
MethodThe physics of flash (supernova) spectroscopy
Kochanek, C. S. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3363 · Cited by 47
The peculiar mass-loss history of SN 2014C as revealed through AMI radio observations
Anderson, G. E., Horesh, A., Mooley, K. P., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3310 · Cited by 46
“The majority of core-collapse SNe are Type II, which exhibit Hydrogen (H) emission lines in their optical spectra and in most cases are likely the last evolutionary stage of red supergiants (RSG; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundA potential progenitor for the Type Ic supernova 2017ein
Kilpatrick, C. D., Takaro, T., Foley, R. J., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2022 · Cited by 46
“…mass loss at rates exceeding 105 M⊙ yr −1 (although exact mass-loss rates are highly uncertain; Maeder & Meynet 1987; Hamann et al. 1995; Smith 2014), and so observational and theoretical evidence suggest that some pre-SN WR stars ought to be hydrogen- and helium-deficient…”
BackgroundXiang, D., Wang, X.-F., Mo, J., Wang, L.-J., Smartt, S., Fraser, M., Ehgamberdiev, S., Mirzaqulov, D., Zhang, J., Zhang, T.-M., et al. (2018) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf8b0 · Cited by 32
“The mass loss of massive stars dominates their evolution and determines their fate (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSafarzadeh, M., Hamers, A. S., Loeb, A., & Berger, E. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab5dc8 · Cited by 46
“First, the most massive ZAMS star (∼ 100 M ) evolves and loses a fraction of its mass due to winds (see Smith 2014, for a comprehensive review), and then explodes to form a ∼ 50 M BH.”
Two stripped envelope supernovae with circumstellar interaction
Sollerman, J., Fransson, C., Barbarino, C., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038960 · Cited by 45
“The composition and distribution of this material contain information about the mass-loss process, as many of the binary stripping scenarios couple the phases of mass-transfer to the original binary separation (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Explosion Mechanism and Explosive Nucleosynthesis
Boccioli, L., & Roberti, L. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10030148 · Cited by 39
“The mechanisms responsible for mass-loss, such as radiation-driven winds and eruptions, are not fully understood and they can have a critical impact on the evolution, the nucleosynthesis, and on the final fate of massive stars (e.g., [50,51]).”
BackgroundShedding Light on the Isolation of Luminous Blue Variables
Aadland, E., Massey, P., Neugent, K. F., et al. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaeb96 · Cited by 45
“…a class of supernova (“Type IIn”) whose progenitors undergo eruptions (ejecting 0.01–1Me of material) in the years immediately preceding core-collapse (Smith 2014, and references therein) plus the identification in nearby galaxies of relatively lowluminosity transients (“supernova impostors”),…”
BackgroundInfluentialSpectropolarimetry of the 2012 outburst of SN 2009ip: a bi-polar explosion in a dense, disc-like CSM
Reilly, E., Maund, J. R., Baade, D., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1228 · Cited by 45
“They are thought to originate from the deaths of very massive stars that have lost a considerable amount of their envelope through episodic mass-loss (GalYam et al. 2007; Taddia et al. 2013, see also Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSupernovae and transients with circumstellar interaction
Fraser, M. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.200467 · Cited by 44
“While it is generally accepted that this process will scale with both the luminosity of the star and its metallicity (as UV absorption lines are required to absorb photons), many of the details remain uncertain (see [9] for a comprehensive review).”
BackgroundX-Shooting ULLYSES: Massive stars at low metallicity
Hawcroft, C., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245588 · Cited by 44
Bimodal Black Hole Mass Distribution and Chirp Masses of Binary Black Hole Mergers
Schneider, F., Podsiadlowski, P., & Laplace, E. (2023) · Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd77a · Cited by 31
“Wind mass-loss rates M are still considerably uncertain and could in reality be lower or higher compared to what is assumed in our models (Smith 2014).”
ResultDUST IN THE WIND: THE ROLE OF RECENT MASS LOSS IN LONG GAMMA-RAY BURSTS
Margutti, R., Guidorzi, C., Lazzati, D., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/159 · Cited by 44
“INTRODUCTION The effects of binarity and the role of mass loss in the decades to years preceding the terminal explosion are among the least understood aspects of massive stellar evolution (e.g. Langer 2012, Smith 2014 for recent reviews).”
THE POSSIBLE DETECTION OF A BINARY COMPANION TO A TYPE IBN SUPERNOVA PROGENITOR
Maund, J. R., Pastorello, A., Mattila, S., Itagaki, K., & Boles, T. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/128 · Cited by 44
“Outbursts of this sort are usually associated with Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs) for which eruptions are considered a natural part of their evolution, despite the exact physics responsible for them is poorly known (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe nearby Type Ibn supernova 2015G: signatures of asymmetry and progenitor constraints
Shivvers, I., Zheng, W., Dyk, S. D. V., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1885 · Cited by 44
“…is mounting from observations of interacting (Type IIn) SNe that their progenitors undergo extreme episodes of mass-loss shortly before core collapse, creating dense circumstellar material (CSM; see review by Smith 2014), but exactly what mechanism is powering these death throes remains unclear.”
BackgroundSelf-citationNGC 300 ULX1: A test case for accretion torque theory
Vasilopoulos, G., Haberl, F., Carpano, S., et al. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833442 · Cited by 44
“Supergiant systems and luminous blue variables (LBV) can also exhibit mass loss rates in excess of 10−6 M yr−1 (Smith 2014), and therefore for a binary system in a moderately close orbit the compact object can capture enough matter to sustain super-Eddington accretion.”
BackgroundNeustadt, J. M. M., Kochanek, C. S., & Smith, M. R. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3073 · Cited by 43
SN Hunt 248: a super-Eddington outburst from a massive cool hypergiant
Mauerhan, J. C., Dyk, S. D. V., Graham, M. L., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2541 · Cited by 43
“…physical processes that trigger and drive the large outbursts remain unexplained, yet are undoubtedly a critical component of the post-main-sequence evolution of massive stars, providing a potential pathway to the Wolf–Rayet phase (see Smith 2014 for a review; but also see Smith & Tombleson 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFields, C., Timmes, F., Farmer, R., Petermann, I., Wolf, W. M., & Couch, S. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa29b · Cited by 36
“For progenitors experiencing mass loss, stellar winds may strip the H-rich envelope, and possibly some of the He-rich envelope, prior to core-collapse (e.g., Smith 2014; Renzo et al. 2017).”
BackgroundOn the Gaia DR2 distances for Galactic luminous blue variables
Smith, N., Aghakhanloo, M., Murphy, J. W., Drout, M. R., Stassun, K. G., & Groh, J. H. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1712 · Cited by 43
“They can achieve the highest mass-loss rates of any known types of stars, and they exhibit a wide diversity of irregular and eruptive variability (Conti 1984; Humphreys & Davidson 1994; van Genderen 2001; Clark et al. 2005a; Smith et al. 2004; Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith et al. 2011; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPajkos, M. A., Couch, S. M., Pan, K.-C., & O’Connor, E. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1de2 · Cited by 43
“While Woosley & Heger (2006) observe that only 1% of massive stars may reach the rapid rotation regime, there are high uncertainties in the stellar mass loss and magnetic braking calculations (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundZTF18aalrxas: A Type IIb Supernova from a Very Extended Low-mass Progenitor
Fremling, C., Ko, H., Dugas, A., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab218f · Cited by 43
“In binary model systems for SE SNe, the mass-loss rate (and the potential for the presence of a dense CSM) is driven by the binary interactions (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSteinle, N., & Kesden, M. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.063032 · Cited by 43
Brethauer, D., Margutti, R., Milisavljevic, D., Bietenholz, M., Chornock, R., Coppejans, D., Colle, F. D., Hajela, A., Terreran, G., Vargas, F., et al. (2022) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b14 · Cited by 37
“Several explanations have been proposed to explain these observations, ranging from Luminous Blue Variable-like eruptions (e.g., Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014), to stellar H-envelope ejection as a result of binary interaction (e.g., Podsiadlowski et al. 1992), to internal gravity wave driven mass…”
BackgroundNucleosynthesis of Binary-stripped Stars
Farmer, R., Laplace, E., Ma, J.-Z., de Mink, S. E., & Justham, S. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc315 · Cited by 42
“Massive stars play a role in the formation of the elements through their ejection of processed material in their winds (Kudritzki & Puls 2000; Vink et al. 2001; Crowther 2007; Smith 2014) and the ejecta from core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe; Maeder 1992; Rauscher et al. 2002; Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundA Model for Eruptive Mass Loss in Massive Stars
Cheng, S. J., Goldberg, J. A., Cantiello, M., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad701e · Cited by 42
“Alternative explanations other than eruptive mass loss for the lack of RSGs above 20 − 30 M ⊙ include envelope inflation (e.g., Sanyal et al. 2015, 2017) and binary interactions (e.g., Smith 2014; Morozova et al. 2015; Margutti et al. 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialSuzuki, A., Moriya, T. J., & Takiwaki, T. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5a83 · Cited by 42
“…extreme case of SN 2006gy requires a mass-loss rate of the order of ∼1 Me yr−1, which is obviously beyond the normal rates inferred from Galactic massive stars (e.g., Hamann et al. 2006; Sander et al. 2012; Smith 2014) and cannot be explained by the current standard theory of steady stellar winds.”
BackgroundThe bumpy light curve of Type IIn supernova iPTF13z over 3 years
Nyholm, A., Sollerman, J., Taddia, F., Fremling, C., Moriya, T. J., Ofek, E. O., Gal‐Yam, A., Cia, A. D., Roy, R., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. (2017) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629906/pdf · Cited by 42
The Peculiar Transient AT2018cow: A Possible Origin of a Type Ibn/IIn Supernova
Xiang, D., Wang, X., Lin, W., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdeba · Cited by 42
“The average mass-loss rate is∼0.15Me yr −1, or even higher if the wind velocity is higher, lying well in the range of LBV eruptions (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMillimeter Observations of the Type II SN 2023ixf: Constraints on the Proximate Circumstellar Medium
Berger, E., Keating, G. K., Margutti, R., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace0c4 · Cited by 41
“Over the past few decades observations of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) ranging from radio to X-rays have revealed that massive stars may undergo enhanced or eruptive mass loss in the final years and decades prior to core collapse (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundConvective-core overshooting and the final fate of massive stars
Temaj, D., Schneider, F. R. N., Laplace, E., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347434 · Cited by 41
Modelling luminous-blue-variable isolation
Aghakhanloo, M., Murphy, J. W., Smith, N., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2050 · Cited by 41
“However, the mass-loss rates of red supergiants (RSGs) and the role of eruptive mass-loss remain unclear, and the influence on stellar evolution remains uncertain (Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationiPTF15eqv: Multiwavelength Exposé of a Peculiar Calcium-rich Transient
Milisavljevic, D., Patnaude, D. J., Raymond, J. C., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7d9f · Cited by 41
“Mass loss environment Mass loss is a key process in stellar evolution, and thus is a powerful probe of the progenitor systems of SNe (Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundHydrodynamical simulations and similarity relations for eruptive mass-loss from massive stars
Owocki, S. P., Hirai, R., Podsiadlowski, P., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz461 · Cited by 41
“…/m nras/article-abstract/485/1/988/5333346 by U niversity of O xford - Bodleian Library user on 15 M arch 2019 eLBV’s (see review by Smith 2014, and references therein), the explosive mass-loss likely interacts with a more prolonged, quasisteady, enhanced wind outflow prior to…”
BackgroundOuchi, R., & Maeda, K. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1a37 · Cited by 41
“Recently, evidence has been accumulating that some massive stars experience the enhanced mass loss (M M10 yr4 1 - -˙ ) just prior (∼year—decades) to their demise (see Smith 2014, and references therein).”
BackgroundRevisiting the Impact of Dust Production from Carbon-rich Wolf–Rayet Binaries
Lau, R. M., Eldridge, J. J., Hankins, M. J., Lamberts, A., Sakon, I., & Williams, P. M. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9cb5 · Cited by 41
“This corresponds to a DPR of ∼ 10−7−10−5 M yr−1 for an LBV assuming a lifetime of ∼ 104 yr (Smith 2014), which is comparable to the upper DPR range of WC dustars.”
BackgroundRevisiting the explodability of single massive star progenitors of stripped-envelope supernovae
Zapartas, E., Renzo, M., Fragos, T., Dotter, A., Andrews, J. J., Bavera, S. S., Coughlin, S., Misra, D., Kovlakas, K., Román-Garza, J., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141506 · Cited by 41
G11.2−0.3: THE YOUNG REMNANT OF A STRIPPED-ENVELOPE SUPERNOVA
Borkowski, K. J., Reynolds, S. P., & Roberts, M. S. E. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/819/2/160 · Cited by 41
“Most Type cIIb/Ibc SNe arise from explosions of tidally-stripped binary progenitors with main-sequence masses less than ∼ 25M rather than from explosions of the classical Wolf-Rayet stars originating in more massive stars (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundKounkel, M., Megeath, S. T., Poteet, C. A., Fischer, W. J., & Hartmann, L. W. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/52 · Cited by 41
Optical and IR observations of SN 2013L, a Type IIn Supernova surrounded by asymmetric CSM
Andrews, J. E., Smith, N., McCully, C., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1844 · Cited by 40
“The progenitors for IIn showing signs of slower wind velocities (40–100 km s−1) and smaller mass-loss rates (10−4–10−3 M yr−1) are likely extreme red supergiant (RSG) or yellow hypergiant (YHG) progenitors (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSuper-Eddington stellar winds: unifying radiative-enthalpy versus flux-driven models
Owocki, S. P., Townsend, R. H. D., & Quataert, E. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2251 · Cited by 40
“…that precede SNe (Foley et al. 2007; Pastorello et al. 2007; Fraser et al. 2013, 2015; Humphreys et al. 2012; Mauerhan et al. 2013; Ofek et al. 2013) and mass-loss rates ∼ 0.001− 1M yr−1 inferred from observations of circumstellar interaction in Type IIn SNe (e.g., Kiewe et al. 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialCatching a star before explosion: the luminous blue variable progenitor of SN 2015bh
Boian, I., & Groh, J. H. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731794 · Cited by 40
“LBVs have a large range of possible mass-loss rates stemming from quiescent stellar winds or eruptions, from 10−5 M yr−1 to 1 M yr−1 (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMass transfer on a nuclear timescale in models of supergiant and ultra-luminous X-ray binaries
Quast, M., Langer, N., & Tauris, T. M. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935453 · Cited by 40
“Based on the massive star models in the literature (Smith 2014; A19, page 13 of 22 Brott et al. 2011; Vink et al. 2001) and considering that the wind mass-loss rates for these very massive stars cannot be predicted to better than within a factor of ∼2 (with some of this coming from the metallicity…”
MethodProgenitors of early-time interacting supernovae
Boian, I., & Groh, J. H. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1540 · Cited by 40
“It is known that massive stars lose large amounts of material during their life-times through strong winds or eruptive events ( ÛM > 10−6 M yr−1; Smith 2014; Mauron & Josselin 2011; Vink et al. 2001; Crowther 2007; Groh 2014a).”
BackgroundSN 2009ip after a decade: the luminous blue variable progenitor is now gone
Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., Filippenko, A. V., Fox, O. D., Mauerhan, J. C., & Dyk, S. D. V. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1669 · Cited by 40
Self-citationStroh, M. C., Terreran, G., Coppejans, D. L., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac375e · Cited by 39
“…of faster Wolf-Rayet winds with the slower winds of the red supergiant phase coupled with a shorter-than expected Wolf-Rayet phase; envelope ejection due to binary interaction; or mass shedding due to gravity-wave powered mass loss (e.g., Smith 2014, Zhao & Fuller 2020, Wu & Fuller 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Landscape of Thermal Transients from Supernovae Interacting with a Circumstellar Medium
Khatami, D., & Kasen, D. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad60c0 · Cited by 39
“Super-nova progenitor stars typically lose significant mass to stellar winds over their lifetime (Vink et al. 2001; Langer 2012; Smith 2014; Woosley et al. 2021).”
BackgroundDeng, Y., Li, H., Liu, B., Kannan, R., Smith, A., & Bryan, G. L. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450699 · Cited by 39
X-ray and radio emission from the luminous supernova 2005kd
Dwarkadas, V. V., Romero-Cañizales, C., Reddy, R., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1717 · Cited by 39
“LBVs undergoing a giant eruption (Smith 2014) would be needed to satisfy the required massloss rates, which would exceed 1 × 10−3M⊙ yr −1 for LBV wind velocities at 4.0 × 1016 cm.”
BackgroundInfluentialOxygen and helium in stripped-envelope supernovae
Fremling, C., Sollerman, J., Kasliwal, M. M., Kulkarni, S. R., Barbarino, C., Ergon, M., Karamehmetoglu, E., Taddia, F., Arcavi, I., Cenko, S. B., et al. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731701 · Cited by 39
“There are two main mechanisms that can give rise to significant envelope stripping: line-driven winds from isolated massive stars (e.g., Conti 1976; Smith 2014) or binary mass transfer (e.g., Iben & Tutukov 1985; Yoon et al. 2010; Claeys et al. 2011; Yoon 2015).”
BackgroundA transient radio source consistent with a merger-triggered core collapse supernova
Dong, D., Hallinan, G., Ehud Nakar, A., Ho, A. Y. Q., Hughes, A. K., Hotokezaka, K., Myers, S. T., De, K., Mooley, K. P., Ravi, V., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg6037 · Cited by 39
A Systematic Study of Ia-CSM Supernovae from the ZTF Bright Transient Survey
Sharma, Y., Sollerman, J., Fremling, C., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbc16 · Cited by 38
“SN IIn progenitors are generally thought to be massive stars (like luminous blue variables, LBVs) that lose their hydrogen envelopes to wind- driven mass loss and outbursts (Gal-Yam et al. 2007; Gal-Yam & Leonard 2009; Kiewe et al. 2012; Taddia et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundCircumstellar material ejected violently by a massive star immediately before its death
Zhang, J., Lin, H., Wang, X., et al. (2023) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2023.09.015 · Cited by 38
“The colored regions correspond to values for various evolved massive stars from [1, 30], including the AGB, super-AGB, RSG, extreme RSG (eRSG), yellow supergiants (YSG), YHG, luminous blue variable (LBV) winds, LBV giant eruptions, and binary Roche-lobe overflow (RLOF).”
BackgroundInfluentialCoppejans, D. L., Margutti, R., Guidorzi, C., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab36e · Cited by 38
“…radiative properties of the shock front are directly dependent on the circumstellar density, radio/X-ray observations also probe the mass-loss history of the progenitor star in the years prior to explosion, a phase in stellar evolution that is poorly understood (see Smith 2014 for a recent review).”
BackgroundBinary Comb Models for FRB 121102
Wada, T., Ioka, K., & Zhang, B. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac127a · Cited by 38
“The lower limit corresponds to a weak wind for a late O-type or an early B-type star (Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMolecular Line Observations in Two Dusty Star-forming Galaxies at z = 6.9
Jarugula, S., Vieira, J., Weiss, A., Spilker, J., Aravena, M., Archipley, M., B'ethermin, M., Chapman, S., Dong, C., Greve, T., et al. (2021) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac21db · Cited by 19
“Using an O-type stellar wind luminosity of ∼ 1049−51 ergs in a lifetime of 5 Myr (Leitherer et al. 1999; Smith 2014; Ramachandran et al. 2019) and assuming O-type stars comprise 0.2% of the total number of stars formed (Kroupa initial mass function), we can calculate the total energy output over…”
MethodInfluentialStripped-envelope core-collapse supernova 56Ni masses
Meza, N., & Anderson, J. P. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937113 · Cited by 38
Constraints on Type IIn supernova progenitor outbursts from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search
Bilinski, C., Smith, N., Li, W., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv566 · Cited by 37
“Because these lines appear soon after the SN explosion, it is expected that the shell of circumstellar matter (CSM) was ejected by the star within a few years before the SN explosion itself (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHigh-cadence, early-time observations of core-collapse supernovae from the TESS prime mission
Vallely, P. J., Kochanek, C. S., Stanek, K. Z., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3675 · Cited by 37
“This prescription is argued to over-estimate the mass-loss rate (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe Carnegie Supernova Project II
Taddia, F., Stritzinger, M. D., Fransson, C., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936654 · Cited by 37
NGC 300 ULX1: A test case for accretion torque theory
Vasilopoulos, G., Haberl, F., Carpano, S., et al. (2018) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833442/pdf · Cited by 37
Type II supernovae from the Carnegie Supernova Project-I
Martínez, L., Anderson, J. P., Bersten, M. C., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142555 · Cited by 37
Terreran, G., Margutti, R., Bersier, D., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e37 · Cited by 37
“…naturally accounts for the discrepancy between the large inferred rate of SESNe compared to massive WR stars (Georgy et al. 2009; Smith et al. 2011; Eldridge et al. 2013; Smith 2014), and for the low ejecta masses inferred from the modeling of the bolometric light-curves of type Ibc SNe (Mej .”
BackgroundMethodMassive Stellar Mergers as Precursors of Hydrogen-rich Pulsational Pair Instability Supernovae
Vigna-Gómez, A., Justham, S., Mandel, I., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1bdf · Cited by 36
“For wind mass loss, we use the “Dutch” wind scheme in MESA (Glebbeek et al. 2009), reduced by multiplication with a factor of 0.3 (Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
MethodInfluentialZhu, J.-P., Yang, Y.-P., Zhang, B., Liu, L.-D., Yu, Y.-W., & Gao, H. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abff5a · Cited by 36
“Such an effect could provide an additional energy source that makes the explosions brighter and cause the early spectra of the transients to look like SNe IIn (e.g., Chatzopoulos et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Liu et al. 2018).”
BackgroundSupernova Precursor Emission and the Origin of Pre-explosion Stellar Mass Loss
Matsumoto, T., & Metzger, B. D. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac892c · Cited by 36
“A fraction of massive stars undergo strongly enhanced mass loss near the very ends of their lives, forming a dense circumstellar medium (CSM) around themselves (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe formation of merging black holes with masses beyond 30 M⊙ at solar metallicity
Bavera, S. S., Fragos, T., Zapartas, E., et al. (2023) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02018-5 · Cited by 36
Guidry, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108181914 · Cited by 35
Channels of Stellar-mass Black Hole Formation
Burrows, A. S., Wang, T., & Vartanyan, D. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addd04 · Cited by 35
“M ⊙ (Smartt et al. 2009; Smith 2014; Smartt 2015; Smith 2017) and not at these lower masses (however, see Beasor et al. (2024b)) .”
Massive stars dying alone: the extremely remote environment of SN 2009ip
Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., & Mauerhan, J. C. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2190 · Cited by 35
“The repeating brief luminosity spikes in 2009-2011 we also attributed to binary close encouters (Mauerhan et al. 2013, 2014; Smith 2014), either through direct stellar collisions at periaston in an eccentric system as in the η Car system (Smith 2011) or potentially due to periastron accretion…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationLiu, L.-D., Wang, L.-J., Wang, S.-Q., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab157 · Cited by 35
“…(Piro 2015) 7 p r=˙ ( )M r r v4 2 w, where ρ(r) is the average density at a radius r, and vw≈ 100–1000 km s−1 is the terminal velocity of stellar wind of a hydrogen-poor star (He star; Smith 2014). and energy injection from a magnetar or an ejecta-CSM interaction to fit the LC of iPTF13dcc.”
BackgroundMass discrepancy analysis for a select sample of Type II-Plateau supernovae
Martinez, L., & Bersten, M. C. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834818 · Cited by 35
“Particularly, Puls et al. (2008) and Smith (2014) suggest that the algorithms are overestimated by a factor of three (see also Renzo et al. 2017, for details).”
BackgroundKuriyama, N., & Shigeyama, T. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937226 · Cited by 35
“Smith (2014) classified eruptive mass loss into super-Eddington winds and non-terminal explosions.”
BackgroundSupernova Interaction with a Dense Detached Shell in SN 2001em
Chandra, P., Chevalier, R. A., Чугай, Н. Н., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb460 · Cited by 35
“…are poorly understood, winds (Puls et al. 2008), episodic ejections (Smith & Owocki 2006; Pastorello et al. 2007; Shiode & Quataert 2014), binary interactions (Smith 2014), and common-envelope formation and ejection (Chugai & Chevalier 2006; Chevalier 2012) are some of the favored scenarios.”
BackgroundAn Early-time Optical and Ultraviolet Excess in the Type-Ic SN 2020oi
Gagliano, A. T., Izzo, L., Kilpatrick, C., Mockler, B., Jacobson-Galán, W., Terreran, G., Dimitriadis, G., Zenati, Y., Auchettl, K., Drout, M., et al. (2021) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac35ec · Cited by 28
“Both channels result in a Wolf−Rayet star that loses its remaining envelope through line-driven winds (Smith 2014; Yoon 2017), but their relative roles in driving type-Ic and type-Ib (in which only hydrogen has been stripped) explosions remain unknown.”
BackgroundThe Final Months of Massive Star Evolution from the Circumstellar Environment around SN Ic 2020oi
Maeda, K., Chandra, P., Matsuoka, T., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0dbc · Cited by 35
“If the mass-loss velocity is vw∼ 10 km s −1 for the extended progenitors of SNe II (mainly red supergiants; RSGs; Smith 2014; Moriya et al. 2017), this confined CSM must have been created by the pre-SN activity in the last ∼30 yr, with a corresponding mass-loss rate of∼10−3Me yr −1 (Groh 2014;…”
BackgroundInfluentialExplaining the differences in massive star models from various simulations
Agrawal, P., Szécsi, D., Stevenson, S., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac930 · Cited by 35
SN 2023ixf in Messier 101: The Twilight Years of the Progenitor as Seen by Pan-STARRS
Ransome, C. L., Villar, V. A., Tartaglia, A., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2df7 · Cited by 34
“We vary the ejecta mass uniformly and randomly between 0.01 – 1.00 M ⊙ , typical of pre-SN outbursts in the time frame that the CSM around SN 2023ixf was formed (e.g., Smith 2014).”
MethodInfluentialThe Persistent Eruption of UGC 2773-OT: finally, a decade-long extragalactic Eta Carinae analogue
Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., Mauerhan, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2507 · Cited by 34
“In particular, the important conjecture that S Dor variations are caused by optically thick winds at constant LBol may be wrong, and steady super-Eddington winds may not be the correct or dominant driving mechanism in many giant LBV eruptions (see review by Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA Complete Census of Luminous Stellar Variability on Day to Decade Timescales
Conroy, C., Strader, J., van Dokkum, P., Dolphin, A. E., Weisz, D. R., Murphy, J. W., Dotter, A., Johnson, B. D., & Cargile, P. A. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad460 · Cited by 35
“On the other hand, large amplitude variability, such as occurs in RSGs and LBVs can alter and/or hasten the subsequent evolution of the star (Heger et al. 1997; Yoon & Cantiello 2010; Owocki 2015; Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundCritical angular velocity and anisotropic mass loss of rotating stars with radiation-driven winds
Gagnier, D., Rieutord, M., Charbonnel, C., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834599 · Cited by 34
“…as well as on the radiative and mechanical mass loss (e.g. Krtička et al. 2011), which all significantly affect the different predictions and outputs of the 1D stellar evolution models (e.g. Meynet & Maeder 2000; Maeder & Meynet 2000, 2010; Smith 2014; Meynet et al. 2015; Renzo et al. 2017).”
BackgroundSmith, N., & Andrews, J. E. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3047 · Cited by 34
“Throughout their lives, massive stars shed mass through steady winds, but these winds can be punctuated by episodic mass loss events (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationGrassitelli, L., Langer, N., Mackey, J., et al. (2021) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038298/pdf · Cited by 34
The Peculiar Transient AT2018cow: A Possible Origin of A Type Ibn/IIn Supernova
Xiang, D., Wang, X., Lin, W., et al. (2021) · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · Cited by 34
SN2012ab: a peculiar Type IIn supernova with aspherical circumstellar material
Bilinski, C., Smith, N., Williams, G. G., Smith, P. S., Zheng, W., Graham, M. L., Mauerhan, J. C., Andrews, J. E., Filippenko, A. V., Akerlof, C. W., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3214 · Cited by 33
“These prominent lines likely originate in dense circumstellar material (CSM) that was ejected shortly before the SN explosion itself (see Smith 2014 for a review of pre-SN mass loss).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKobulnicky, H. A., Chick, W. T., & Povich, M. S. (2019) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab2716 · Cited by 33
“Kudritzki & Puls (2000), Puls et al. (2008), and Smith (2014) provide comprehensive reviews of massive star winds and mass loss.”
BackgroundComparison of Theoretical Starburst Photoionization Models for Optical Diagnostics
D'Agostino, J., Kewley, L. J., Groves, B. A., Byler, N., Sutherland, R. S., Nicholls, D. C., Leitherer, C., & Stanway, E. R. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d5e · Cited by 33
“Note that envelope removal will typically lead to lowluminosity W-R stars of high-Z and/or high-luminosity (and subsequently high mass) owing to a thin hydrogen layer remaining, which requires removal from sufficiently high stellar winds (Smith 2014; Trani et al. 2014, and references therein).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review