The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Lü, J., Barker, B. L., Goldberg, J. A., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada26d · Cited by 3
“We note that the mass loss rate adopted in Sukhbold et al. (2016) is stronger than the common prescription in recent studies (e.g., Nugis & Lamers 2000; Smith 2014; Antoniadis et al. 2024).”
SN 2017ckj: A linearly declining type IIb supernova with a relatively massive hydrogen envelope
Li, L.-H., Benetti, S., Cai, Y., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556873 · Cited by 3
Baer-Way, R., Nayana, A. J., Jacobson-Galán, W. V., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1cb8 · Cited by 3
“…that this profile assumes that the mass loss starts directly at 4 years before the explosion (for our assumed CSM speed). in type Ibn supernovae (Smith 2014), and the merger scenario does provide a clear explanation in this case for why the mass-loss would only occur at an elevated rate for…”
A phoenix rises from the ashes: WOH G64 is still a red supergiant, for now
van Loon, J. T., & Ohnaka, K. (2026) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stag012 · Cited by 3
Presupernova Multiple Giant Eruptions in Massive Stars
Mukhija, B., & Kashi, A. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2013 · Cited by 3
“…role in the overall mass-loss evolution of massive stars (e.g., Humphreys & Davidson 1994; David-son & Humphreys 1997, 2012a; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Kashi et al. 2016; Davidson 2016; Jiang et al. 2018; Rizzo et al. 2023; Deman & Oey 2024; Cheng et al. 2024; Spejcher et al. 2025;…”
The winds of OBA hypergiants and luminous blue variables
Bernini-Peron, M., Sander, A. A. C., Sabhahit, G. N., et al. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558762 · Cited by 3
Blowouts of Nascent Wind Bubbles in Pulsar-driven Supernovae
Chen, M., Kashiyama, K., & Sato, M. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4c58 · Cited by 3
Ignace, R., Bjorkman, K. S., Chené, A.-N., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2878 · Cited by 3
SN 2014C: A Metamorphic Supernova Exploded in the Intricate and Hydrogen-rich Surroundings
Zhai, Q., Zhang, J., Lin, W., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9c76 · Cited by 3
“…IIn SNe (Ofek et al. ∗ E-mail:jujia@ynao.ac.cn 2014; Fraser et al. 2013; Mauerhan et al. 2013a,b, 2014; Pastorello et al. 2013; Prieto et al. 2013; Smith 2014) as well as progenitors of Type IIp SNe that experience short-lived interactions with CSM (Dessart et al. 2017; Yaron et al. 2017;…”
Improving 1D stellar atmosphere models with insights from multidimensional simulations
González-Torà, G., Sander, A. A. C., Moens, N., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554125 · Cited by 3
Chandra X-ray measurement of heavy element abundances of Wolf–Rayet stars in the Galactic Centre
Hua, Z., & Li, Z. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf957 · Cited by 5
Ragosta, F., Illiano, G., Simongini, A., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1054 · Cited by 3
Hydrodynamic modelling of early peaks in Type Ibc supernovae with circumstellar interaction
Chiba, R., & Moriya, T. J. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1382 · Cited by 3
The bright long-lived Type II SN 2021irp powered by aspherical circumstellar material interaction
Reynolds, T. M., Nagao, T., Maeda, K., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553793 · Cited by 3
Active Galactic Nucleus Star Dynamics Under the Influence of Outflow–Ambient Interactions
Liu, M., Wang, L., & Peng, P. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfc66 · Cited by 3
Souropanis, D., Zapartas, E., Pessi, T., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2163 · Cited by 3
Summary of the Conference “The Physics of Evolved Stars”
Marco, O. D. (2015) · EAS Publications Series · doi:10.1051/eas/1571085 · Cited by 3
An Optical and Infrared Time-domain Study of the Supergiant Fast X-Ray Transient Candidate IC 10 X-2
Kwan, S., Lau, R. M., Jencson, J. E., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf73 · Cited by 3
“LBVs are massive evolved stars that exhibit extreme luminosities (∼105–106 L ), strong spectral variability ( ~Teff –7000 20,000 K), and eruptive mass loss as high as ∼1Me yr−1 on decade-long timescales(Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSpetsieri, Z. T., Bonanos, A. Z., Yang, M., et al. (2019) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936074/pdf · Cited by 3
Supernova Remnants as Clues to Their Progenitors
Patnaude, D., & Badenes, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_98-1 · Cited by 3
Lim, B., Nazé, Y., Chang, S.-J., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad12c4 · Cited by 3
“In particular, mass loss is a crucial parameter to understand the evolution of massive stars (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundA multi-frequency, multi-epoch radio continuum study of the Arches cluster with the Very Large Array
Cano-González, M., Schödel, R., Alberdi, A., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451771 · Cited by 3
Multidimensional Radiation Hydrodynamics Simulations of SN 1987A Shock Breakout
Chen, W.-Y., Chen, K.-J., & Ono, M. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7de3 · Cited by 3
Investigating the Electron-capture Supernova Candidate AT 2019abn with JWST Spectroscopy
Rose, S., Lau, R. M., Jencson, J. E., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adad61 · Cited by 3
“For the less extreme cases (Eddington ratios of order a few) the eruptions may be explained by super-Eddington winds however it is unclear where the energy needed to drive the luminosity super-Eddington originates (Smith 2014).”
InfluentialThe wind properties of O-type stars at sub-SMC metallicity
Furey, C., Telford, O. G., de Koter, A., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453128 · Cited by 3
Keszthelyi, Z., Brands, S. A., de Koter, A., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554758 · Cited by 3
High-Cadence TESS and Ground-based Data of SN 2019esa, the Less Energetic Sibling of SN 2006gy ∗
Andrews, J. E., Pearson, J., Lundquist, M., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8ea7 · Cited by 3
“The progenitors of these SNe IIn are likely special cases of evolved massive stars with pre-SN outbursts, and could include extreme red supergiants (RSGs), yellow hypergiants (YHGs), or luminous blue variables (LBVs; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe rotational shear in pre-collapse cores of massive stars
Zilberman, N., Gilkis, A., & Soker, N. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2878 · Cited by 3
“(2) Formation of clumps in stellar winds can lead to the overestimation of the mass-loss by a factor of 3 to 10 (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundScicluna, P., Kemper, F., Siebenmorgen, R., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa471 · Cited by 3
Where to Find Overmassive Brown Dwarfs: New Benchmark Systems for Binary Evolution
Majidi, D., Forbes, J. C., & Loeb, A. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6501 · Cited by 3
“…mass loss rate, but also the subsequent evolution of the donor star, determining how much mass it loses in different phases of its evolution, and how much it inflates during the AGB phase (see Willson (2000), and Smith (2014) for a review of uncertainties in the mass loss phase of AGB stars.”
BackgroundWhite Dwarfs and Neutron Stars
Guidry, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108181914.019 · Cited by 3
Hydrogen-Poor Core-Collapse Supernovae
Pian, E., & Mazzali, P. A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_40-1 · Cited by 3
Radio and γ-ray Evidence for the Supernova Origin of High-velocity Cloud Complex M
Schmelz, J. T., & Verschuur, G. L. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acae82 · Cited by 3
“The presupernova mass loss from the star at position S was almost certainly clumpy (Hamann et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundKauffmann, G. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1750 · Cited by 3
“In practice, models of massive star evolution have many uncertain aspects, such as the effect of rotation, treatment of binary stars and their evolution, mass loss, and so on (see for sample Smith (2014) for a review).”
BackgroundO’Grady, A. J. G., Moriya, T. J., Renzo, M., et al. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00093-6 · Cited by 3
“…T˙ZOs can be driven by the change in composition (and thus opacity) in the envelope due to the nuclear burning, the (notoriously uncertain, Smith 2014; Renzo et al. 2017; Beasor et al. 2020; Decin et al. 2024) mass-loss from the envelope, or the onset of dynamical instabilities (e.g.,…”
Fornasini, F. M., Antoniou, V., & Dubus, G. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_95 · Cited by 2
Red Supergiants in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Bonanos, A. Z. (2025) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies13030066 · Cited by 2
“…given the uncertainties in the mass-loss relations used by stellar evolution models in both the hot star phase and the RSG phase (see, e.g., [91,138]), the amount of stripping predicted for various mass-loss rate relations [129], the effect of binary interactions for RSGs with companions, and…”
Near-Eddington mass loss of hydrogen-rich Wolf-Rayet stars
Lefever, R. R., Sander, A. A. C., Bernini-Peron, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554505 · Cited by 2
Effect of Matter Accretion on Lithium Enhancement of Giants
Li, X.-F., Shi, J., Li, Y., Yan, H.-L., Zhang, J., & Guo, F. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf6b3 · Cited by 2
“Considering the mass loss rate for O-type stars is approximately 10 − 7 − 10 − 4 M ⊙ yr − 1 (Fullerton et al. 2006) and ˙ M ∝ r 2 ¯ ρ v ∞ (see Smith (2014)), the resultant density range is forecast to be between 10 − 11 and 10 − 6 g cm − 3 .”
SN 2022ngb: A faint, slowly evolving Type IIb supernova with a low-mass envelope
Zhao, J., Benetti, S., Cai, Y., et al. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557619 · Cited by 2
Pyykkinen, N., Nagao, T., Kuncarayakti, H., Stritzinger, M. D., Kangas, T., Maeda, K., Chen, P., Sollerman, J., Burns, C. R., Bose, S., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557292 · Cited by 2
Late-time infrared cooling in magnetar-driven supernovae
Omand, C. M. B. (2026) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stag112 · Cited by 2
Ahlvind, J., Larsson, J., & Alp, D. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d7c · Cited by 2
“Such extreme mass loss is common for luminous blue variables, which are known to be the progenitors of Type IIn SNe ( N. Smith 2014 ) .”
When IIb Ceases To Be: Bridging the Gap between IIb and Short-plateau Supernovae
Farah, J., Howell, D. A., Hiramatsu, D., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3a71 · Cited by 2
“1 M ⊙ of H-rich material (Smith 2014; Sravan et al. 2019; Bersten et al. 2018).”
TransFit-CSM: A Fast, Physically Consistent Framework for Interaction-powered Transients
Zhang, Y.-H., Liu, L.-D., Du, Z.-X., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae434a · Cited by 2
Vasylyev, S. S., Dessart, L., Yang, Y., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae323f · Cited by 2
“…include steady-state wind-driven mass loss ( N. Mauron & E. Josselin 2011 ) , enhanced mass loss through pulsational instabilities ( S.-C. Yoon & M. Cantiello 2010 ) , and eruptive mass-loss episodes ( N. Smith 2014 ) , each of which leaves a distinct imprint on the structure of the resulting CSM.”
SN 2024iss: A double-peaked Type IIb supernova with evidence of circumstellar interaction
Chen, L., Wang, X., Wu, Q., et al. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557843 · Cited by 2
Self-citationDiscovery of a Likely Type II Supernova at z = 3.6 with JWST
Coulter, D. A., Pierel, J. D. R., DeCoursey, C., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae595d · Cited by 2
“…setting the initial conditions for both their stellar structure and circumstellar environments prior to collapse and resulting in a similarly broad range of explosion energies, ejecta compositions, and observed luminosities ( A. Gal-Yam et al. 2014; N. Smith 2014; S. Wu & J. Fuller 2021 ) .”
An Infrared Echo from a Circumstellar Disk in the Hydrogen- and Helium-poor SN 2024aecx
Tinyanont, S., Wangnok, K., Andrews, J. E., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae623e · Cited by 2
“…responsible for removing hydrogen and/or helium from the progenitor to these stripped-envelope supernovae (SESNe) remains debated (see e.g., N. Smith 2014, for a review), but binary interaction is likely the main culprit (e.g., J. J. Eldridge et al. 2013; S.-C. Yoon et al. 2017; E. Za-partas…”
Self-citationNugent, A. E., Villar, V. A., Metzger, B. D., Fryer, C. L., Burns, E., Gordon, A. C., Frostig, D., & 董, Y. 雨. D. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae7e77 · Cited by 2
“For one, we show in Section 4.3 that LFBOTs occur in more metal-poor environments than SNe Ibc and SNe II, whose progenitors are thought to be stripped-envelope WR stars and red supergiants (RSGs), respectively (Smartt et al. 2009; Smith et al. 2011; Smith 2014; Smartt 2015).”
InfluentialBridging the gap: from massive stars to supernovae
Maund, J. R., Crowther, P. A., Janka, H., et al. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0025 · Cited by 2
“The story of the lives of these stars will be influenced by their interactions with binary companions and how they lose mass through strong but steady winds or violent, but short-lived, eruptive episodes [2].”
Interacting Supernovae: Spectra and Light Curves
Blinnikov, S. I. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_31-1 · Cited by 2
Supernovae from Rotating Stars
Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_122-1 · Cited by 2
Variations in the intermediate wind region of the blue supergiant 55 Cygni
Cidale, L. S., Haucke, M., Arias, M. L., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245296 · Cited by 2
Anugu, N., Baron, F., Monnier, J. D., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b2b · Cited by 2
“The main mechanisms that contribute to mass loss are pulsational-driven and radiation pressure line-driven stellar winds (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe LAMOST Spectroscopic Survey of Supergiants in M31 and M33
Wu, H., Huang, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2024) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ad9197 · Cited by 2
Nabizadeh, A., Zackrisson, E., Lundqvist, E., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451153 · Cited by 2
Challenges in Forming Millisecond Pulsar–Black Holes from Isolated Binaries
Liotine, C., Kalogera, V., Andrews, J. J., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb84a · Cited by 2
An environmental analysis of supernova iPTF13bvn with HST and MUSE
Singleton, A. J., Maund, J. R., & Sun, N.-C. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf927 · Cited by 2
Pérez, A. I. P., Smith, G. P., Nicholl, M., Arendse, N., Ryczanowski, D., & Dhawan, S. (2026) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stag009 · Cited by 2
Where Do Stars Explode in the ISM?—The Distribution of Dense Gas around Evolved Massive Stars in M33
Sarbadhicary, S. K., Wagner, J., Koch, E. W., Chen, N. M., Leroy, A. K., Lahén, N., Rosolowsky, E. W., Neugent, K. F., Kim, C., Chomiuk, L. B., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3f33 · Cited by 2
“It is also possible that the cavity was produced by strong stellar winds, given the typical mass-loss rates in O-stars being in the range of 10 − 7 –10 − 5 M ⊙ yr − 1 at velocities > 10 3 km s − 1 , and around 10 − 5 –10 − 4 M ⊙ yr − 1 for W-Rs ( N. Smith 2014 ) .”
Massive stars: stellar models and stellar yields, impact on Galactic Archaeology
Meynet, G., Choplin, A., Ekström, S., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union · doi:10.1017/s1743921317010808 · Cited by 2
“Mass loss can occur through various processes during the evolution of massive stars (see the review by Smith 2014): by line driven winds that operate mainly for hot massive stars at near solar metallicity, through the radiative acceleration due to the continuum radiation when the star luminosity is…”
BackgroundEnhanced Mass Loss Rates in Red Supergiants and Their Impact on the Circumstellar Medium
Hernández–Cervantes, L., Pérez-Rendón, B., Santillán, A., et al. (2019) · Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica · doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.04 · Cited by 2
“The measurements of mass loss rates for RSG stars using multiwavelength observations are still very uncertain (Smith 2014).”
MethodPTF12os and iPTF13bvn. Two stripped-envelope supernovae from low-mass progenitors in NGC 5806
Fremling, C., Sollerman, J., Taddia, F., et al. (2016) · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03074 · Cited by 2
“Two main mechanisms have been suggested to produce SE SNe: either binary mass transfer (e.g., Iben & Tutukov 1985; Yoon et al. 2010; Claeys et al. 2011; Dessart et al. 2012; Yoon 2015) or strong line-driven winds from massive Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars (e.g., Conti 1976; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundVariability in X-ray line ratios in helium-like ions of massive stars: the wind-driven case
Ignace, R., Damrau, Z., & Hole, K. T. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834752 · Cited by 2
Cosmic Ray Production in Supernovae
Bykov, A. M., Ellison, D. C., Marcowith, A., et al. (2018) · Space sciences series of ISSI · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1581-0_15 · Cited by 2
Jet-driven AGN feedback in galaxy formation before black hole formation
Bear, E., & Soker, N. (2020) · New Astronomy · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2020.101438 · Cited by 2
“Thorough studies of using mesa exist up to stellar masses of 1000M (e.g., Paxton et al. 2011; Smith 2014), but only scarce numerical evolution, mostly with other numerical codes, exist for more massive stars.”
MethodWray 15-906: a candidate luminous blue variable discovered with WISE, Herschel, and SALT
Maryeva, O., Gvaramadze, V. V., Kniazev, A. Y., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2659 · Cited by 2
“Also, the driving mechanism(s) of the LBV activity, the role of this activity in the evolution of massive stars, and the initial masses of stars susceptible to this activity are still poorly understood and remain debated (e.g. Smith, Vink & de Koter 2004; Vink 2012; Smith 2014; Davidson 2020).”
BackgroundThe final months of massive star evolution from the circumstellar environment around SN Ic 2020oi
Maeda, K., Chandra, P., Matsuoka, T., et al. (2021) · El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata) · Cited by 2
Discovery of an optical cocoon tail behind the runaway HD 185806
Spetsieri, Z. T., Boumis, P., Chiotellis, A., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1859 · Cited by 2
Non-stoichiometric amorphous magnesium-iron silicates in circumstellar dust shells
Gail, H. P., Tamanai, A., Pucci, A., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038090 · Cited by 1
“…with initial masses M & 40 M⊙ do not arrive at the RGB – they remain too hot for dust formation in a stellar wind – but they probably all eject large amounts of mass in short outburst events with accompanying intense dust formation as they become luminous blue variables (LBV) (Smith 2014, 2017).”
BackgroundBerzin, E., Secunda, A., Cen, R., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0af6 · Cited by 1
“…the hard HeII-ionizing regime of the SEDs because the ionizing emission rate of HeII-ionizing photons is very sensitive to the treatment of stellar winds, which is uncertain for hot stars (see Smith 2014, Sander et al. 2020, and in particular Götberg et al. 2017 for the effect for stripped stars).”
BackgroundTamborra, I., & Murase, K. (2018) · Space sciences series of ISSI · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1581-0_6 · Cited by 1
Spectroscopy of AT 2016blu’s recurring supernova impostor outbursts
Aghakhanloo, M., Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf568 · Cited by 1
Self-citationWhisnant, A. S., Povich, M. S., Patten, N., et al. (2025) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adcd72 · Cited by 1
“These mass-loss rates significantly impact the evolution and end states (e.g., neutron stars versus black hole remnants) of massive O-and early B-type stars (Smith 2014).”
ASASSN-13dn: A luminous and double-peaked type II supernova
Hueichapan, E. D., Prieto, J. L., Cartier, R., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554429 · Cited by 1
Zenati, Y., Wang, Q., Bobrick, A., DeMarchi, L. M., Glanz, H., Rozner, M., Jencson, J. E., Rest, A., Metzger, B. D., Margutti, R., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf6b1 · Cited by 1
Self-citationEruptive mass loss less than a year before the explosion of superluminous supernovae
Gkini, A., Fransson, C., Lunnan, R., et al. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557673 · Cited by 1
Interacting supernovae and where to find them
Brose, R., Sushch, I., Mackey, J., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555671 · Cited by 1
Circumbinary Disks in Post Common Envelope Binary Systems with Compact Objects
Unger, L., Grichener, A., & Soker, N. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3241 · Cited by 1
“Mass loss through stellar winds significantly influences stellar evolution and the compact objects that massive stars form (e.g., Smith 2014).”
SN 2023zcu: A Type IIP SN with Early Flash Features
Dubey, M., Misra, K., Csörnyei, G., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3c7e · Cited by 1
“…2006ai, 2016egz, D. Hiramatsu et al. 2021; 2018gj, R. S. Teja et al. 2023; During the latest evolutionary stage, massive stars ( ≥ 8 M ⊙ ) undergo enhanced mass loss (10 − 2 –10 − 6 M ⊙ yr − 1 , N. Smith 2014), producing circumstellar material (CSM; A. Gal-Yam et al. 2014; V. Morozova et al. 2017).”
Self-citationGiant outbursts of clumpy material preceding Type II supernova 2024qiw
Nagao, T., Kuncarayakti, H., Maeda, K., et al. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558402 · Cited by 1
VLBI Observations of SN 2012AU Reveal a Compact Radio Source a Decade Post Explosion
Lazda, M., Nimmo, K., Drout, M. R., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae517f · Cited by 1
“The proposed mechanisms leading to H-envelope removal often involve a binary companion, stellar winds or eruptions, although the exact mechanism is an area of active research (see Smith 2014 for a review).”
Hillenkamp, E., Baer-Way, R., Chandra, P., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4e22 · Cited by 1
“…stars, such as superasymptotic giant branch stars ( 8–10 M ⊙ ) , red supergiants ( RSGs; ∼ 17–40 M ⊙ ) , and yellow hypergiants, are only expected to produce enhanced winds up to 10 − 4 ∼ 10 − 3 M ⊙ yr − 1 , which is not as high as the majority of measured SN IIn mass-loss rates ( N. Smith 2014 ) .”
InfluentialSelf-citationGrasso, A. C., Zoppo, V. D., Mezzina, A., Cataldo, M., Puglisi, G., Spampinato, F., Cosentino, S. P., Pumo, M. L., & Naso, L. (2026) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101116 · Cited by 1
SN 2024abvb: A Type Icn Supernova in the Outskirts of Its Host Galaxy
Hu, M., Yan, S., Wang, X., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae510c · Cited by 1
“Such enhanced mass loss toward the orbital plane of the binary sys-tem would take place when the Roche lobe is filled, and is suggested to be capable of efficiently stripping the H envelope (N. Smith 2014).”
JWST spectroscopy of SN 2010da/NGC 300 ULX-1: a surviving star hidden by dust
Beasor, E. R., Lau, R. M., Smith, N., et al. (2026) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stag1077 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBranch, D., & Wheeler, J. C. (2017) · Astronomy and astrophysics library · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55054-0_8 · Cited by 1
A turbulent stellar atmosphere in full view
Schaefer, G. H. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/548288a · Cited by 1
Observing the mass-loss of nearby red supergiants through high-contrast imaging
Scicluna, P., Siebenmorgen, R., Blommaert, J. A. D. L., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union · doi:10.1017/s1743921318007421 · Cited by 1
“This mass loss is a key factor in determining the further evolution of the stars (Georgy et al. 2013, Smith 2014, Meynet et al. 2015, Georgy & Ekström 2015).”
BackgroundA New Candidate Luminous Blue Variable
Figer, D. F., Najarro, F., Messineo, M., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abb704 · Cited by 1
“The widths from the Fe II 1.974 and 2.089 µm emission lines which are formed in the mid-outer wind and hence provide a reliable estimate of v∞ are ≈350 km s−1, suggesting a wind speed (∼ 175 km s−1) that is typical for LBVs (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialGRB160203A: an exploration of lumpy space
Crisp, H., Gendre, B., Howell, E. J., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab916 · Cited by 1
“This creates a complex non-uniform density profile (Smith 2014), which could appear to an observer as clumpy.”
BackgroundSrinivasaragavan, G. P., Sfaradi, I., Jencson, J. E., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142158 · Cited by 1
Discovery of a 310 Day Period from the Enshrouded Massive System NaSt1 (WR 122)
Lau, R. M., Tinyanont, S., Hankins, M., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2237 · Cited by 1
“Binary interaction can influence mass loss and enable additional massive-star evolutionary pathways beyond the single-star evolution framework (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGuidry, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108181914.005 · Cited by 1
The Core-Collapse Supernova-Black Hole Connection
O’connor, E. P. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_129-1 · Cited by 1
WR 63: a multiple system (O+O) + WR?
Chené, A.-N., Mahy, L., Gosset, E., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1762 · Cited by 1
“…single-star evolution (classified as main-sequence WR stars, or classical WRs which have evolved off the main-sequence through self stripping; Conti 1975; Smith 2014) or through binary interaction (through mass transfer or merging in binary or multiple systems; Paczynski 1967; Shenar et al. 2020).”
BackgroundOrozco-Duarte, R., Garcı́a-Segura, G., Wofford, A., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3039 · Cited by 1
Morse, J. A., & Smith, N. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3790 · Cited by 1
Self-citationDetection of Metal Enrichment by SN 2011jm in NGC 4809
Gao, Y., Gu, Q., Zhou, P., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad23e3 · Cited by 1
“This can occur either through strong stellar winds from an evolved single massive ( M ≥ 25 − 30 M ⊙ ) Wolf -– Rayet (WR) star (e.g., Crowther 2007; Smith 2014) or through a less massive star in a close binary system losing outer envelopes to a companion through accretion (e.g., Yoon et al. 2010; Dessart et al. 2011).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review