The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Guarini, E., Tamborra, I., Margutti, R., et al. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.083035 · Cited by 7
Kołaczek-Szymański, P. A., Łojko, P., Pigulski, A., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348104 · Cited by 7
How Population III Supernovae Determined the Properties of the First Galaxies
Chen, K.-J., Tang, C.-Y., Whalen, D. J., Ho, M.-Y., Tsai, S.-H., Ou, P.-S., & Ono, M. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2684 · Cited by 11
“1 − 1 for metallicities down to 0.01 Z ⊙ (Vink et al. 2001; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialFate of supernova progenitors in massive binary systems
Kinugawa, T., Horiuchi, S., Takiwaki, T., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1681 · Cited by 7
Double “acct”: A Distinct Double-peaked Supernova Matching Pulsational Pair Instability Models
Angus, C. R., Woosley, S. E., Foley, R. J., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9264 · Cited by 7
“Episodic eruptive mass-loss in massive stars has been shown to produce luminous precursory peaks within SN light curves (Smith et al. 2010; Fraser et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Bilinski et al. 2015; Elias-Rosa et al. 2016).”
Low-frequency radio observations of SN 2011dh and the evolution of its post-shock plasma properties
Yadav, N., Ray, A. K., & Chakraborti, S. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw594 · Cited by 7
“Most models for the prototypical IIb SN 1993J were binary based (Nomoto et al. 1996, ⋆ naveen.phys@gmail.com † akr@tifr.res.in ‡ schakraborti@fas.harvard.edu 1993; Ray et al. 1993; Podsiadlowski et al. 1993; Utrobin 1994; Woosley et al. 1994; Smith 2014).”
MethodMarongiu, M., Guidorzi, C., Margutti, R., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab25ef · Cited by 7
“We use a grid of Ṁ and E values to compare our VLA upper limits (Table 1) with the flux densities derived from (10).”
BackgroundInfluentialNear-infrared Characterization of Four Massive Stars in Transition Phases
Cochetti, Y. R., Kraus, M., Arias, M. L., et al. (2020) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 7
Brethauer, D., Margutti, R., Milisavljevic, D., et al. (2020) · Research Notes of the AAS · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abd252 · Cited by 7
Shara, M. M., Howell, S. B., Furlan, E., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2666 · Cited by 7
The Origin and Distance of the High-velocity Cloud MI
Schmelz, J. T., & Verschuur, G. L. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9412 · Cited by 7
“The expelled gas from the companion that predates the supernova was almost certainly clumpy (Hamann et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundHe Abundance of Dense Circumstellar Clumps in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant
Koo, B., Kim, D., Yoon, S.-C., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb7e7 · Cited by 7
“…which depends on various mass-loss processes from massive stars including radiation-driven winds, episodic mass eruptions, and/or binary interactions (e.g., Smith 2014; Yoon et al. 2017; Davies & Dessart 2019; Vink 2022), so it can be used to infer the mass history of the SN progenitor star.”
BackgroundInverse-Compton cooling of thermal plasma in colliding-wind binaries
Mackey, J., Jones, T. A. K., Brose, R., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2839 · Cited by 7
Qin, K., Xu, K., Liu, D., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad12d3 · Cited by 7
“Therefore, BH+He star systems can be observed in the detached stage, and provide more evolutionary details such as the mass-transfer efficiency (Packet 1981; de Mink et al. 2007), and the stellar wind (Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014; Vink 2017).”
BackgroundMultiple giant eruptions and X-ray emission in the recoiling AGN/LBV candidate SDSS1133
Kokubo, M. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1685 · Cited by 7
Origin of Spectral Hardening of Secondary Cosmic-Ray Nuclei
Kawanaka, N., & Lee, S.-H. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0a71 · Cited by 7
“…possible scenarios for an enhanced mass loss rate during a certain period prior to core-collapse, such as giant eruptions at the envelope, envelope stripping in a binary system by Roche-lobe overflow (RLOF) to a companion star and a possible common envelope phase, and so on (see, e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundOn the Origin of the Asymmetry of the Ejecta Structure and Explosion of G350.1–0.3
Tsuchioka, T., Uchiyama, Y., Higurashi, R., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf2bd · Cited by 7
“We assumed a red supergiant as a progenitor and used a range of possible parameters of stellar wind mass loss and wind speed from Smith (2014).”
On the origin of the asymmetry of the ejecta structure and explosion of G350.1−0.3
Tsuchioka, T., Uchiyama, Y., Higurashi, R., et al. (2021) · Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) · doi:10.13016/m2fhp0-ffsx · Cited by 7
Ibik, A. L., Drout, M. R., Margutti, R., Matthews, D., Villar, V. A., Berger, E., Chornock, R., Alexander, K. D., Eftekhari, T., Laskar, T., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9336 · Cited by 6
“The colored regions in Figure 15 correspond to parameter spaces for mass loss from evolved massive stars taken from Smith (2014).”
InfluentialProgenitor insights of Type IIP SN 2018pq: a comprehensive photometric and spectroscopic study
Dubey, M., Misra, K., Dastidar, R., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1014 · Cited by 6
Fang, Q., Moriya, T. J., Maeda, K., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf218 · Cited by 6
“…strip the hydrogen envelope to varying degrees (Heger et al. 2003; Eldridge et al. 2008; Yoon et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2011; Sana et al. 2012; Smith 2014; Yoon 2015; Yoon et al. 2017; Ouchi & Maeda 2017; Eldridge et al. 2018; Fang et al. 2019; Zapartas et al. 2019; Laplace et al. 2020; Renzo…”
The bright long-lived Type II SN 2021irp powered by aspherical circumstellar material interaction
Reynolds, T. M., Nagao, T., Gottumukkala, R., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553792 · Cited by 6
How to turn a supernova into a PeVatron
Brose, R., Sushch, I., & Mackey, J. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453334 · Cited by 6
A long-lasting eruption heralds SN 2023ldh, a clone of SN 2009ip
Pastorello, A., Reguitti, A., Tartaglia, L., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554858 · Cited by 6
Yamamoto, Y., & Yamada, S. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/165 · Cited by 6
Zuo, Z.-Y., Song, H.-T., & Xue, H.-C. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140792 · Cited by 6
“…is vital in our simulations; however, it is still highly uncertain (Puls et al. 2008; Sander & Vink 2020), in particular due to the effects of clumping, other unsteady modes of mass loss, and the effects caused by a binary among massive stars (Smith 2014), about which our knowledge is still poor.”
BackgroundAmbrosi, E., Zampieri, L., Pintore, F., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3240 · Cited by 6
Is FRB 191001 embedded in a supernova remnant?
Kundu, E. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac003 · Cited by 6
Escape of cosmic rays from perpendicular shocks in the circumstellar magnetic field
Kamijima, S. F., & Ohira, Y. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.123025 · Cited by 6
Sahai, R., & Stenger, B. (2023) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acccf2 · Cited by 6
“For example, for low-mass main-sequence (MS) stars like the Sun, the massloss rate is ∼10−14 Me yr −1, whereas for high-mass MS stars, e.g., OB stars, the mass-loss rates are ∼10−6–10−5 Me yr −1 (O stars: e.g., Smith 2014) and ∼10−9 Me yr −1 (B stars: e.g., Krtička 2014).”
BackgroundDiscovering New B[e] Supergiants and Candidate Luminous Blue Variables in Nearby Galaxies
Maravelias, G., de Wit, S., Bonanos, A. Z., et al. (2023) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies11030079 · Cited by 6
Monte Carlo Radiation Transport for Astrophysical Transients Powered by Circumstellar Interaction
Wagle, G. A., Chatzopoulos, E., Wollaeger, R. T., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acda23 · Cited by 6
Gamma rays and neutrinos from supernovae of type Ib and Ic with late time emission
Sarmah, P., Chakraborty, S., Tamborra, I., et al. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.103033 · Cited by 6
Considering the Single and Binary Origins of the Type IIP SN 2017eaw
Bostroem, K. A., Zapartas, E., Koplitz, B., Williams, B. F., Tran, D., & Dolphin, A. E. (2023) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acffc7 · Cited by 6
“Note that for stellar models, the uncertainty of the wind mass loss rate, especially during the RSG phase (e.g., Smith 2014b; Beasor et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2023) limits the accuracy of the predicted final envelope (and thus ejecta) masses.”
BackgroundBrinkman, H. E., Roberti, L., Kemp, A. J., Michielsen, M., Tkachenko, A., & Aerts, C. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449634 · Cited by 6
Late-time spectroscopy of SN 2002hh: a continued visible light echo with no shock interaction yet
Andrews, J. E., Smith, N., & Mauerhan, J. C. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1094 · Cited by 6
“…onvarious factors, such as progenitor mass, wind velocity and density, and the time between mass-loss events and explosion, a wide rangof luminosities and spectral features can be observed as the SNb gins to interact with the surrounding environment (for a comprehensive overview, see Smith (2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSmith, N., Groh, J. H., France, K. C., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx648 · Cited by 6
“Although accounting for clumping has been argued to require a reduction to mass-loss rate recipies by factors of 3-5 (see Smith 2014 for a review), the deficits for SN 1987A and SBW1 are greater than this (and again, we did not include a clumping correction for SBW1).”
BackgroundSelf-citationInferring properties of the ISM from supernova remnant size distributions
Elwood, B. D., Murphy, J. W., & Díaz-Rodríguez, M. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3355 · Cited by 6
“For some time, it has been known that wind-driven mass-loss plays a significant role in the evolution of stars, particularly for massive stars whose end fates result in corecollapse supernovae (Chiosi & Maeder 1986; Maeder & Meynet 2000; Woosley et al. 2002; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMassive stars, successes and challenges
Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Georgy, C., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union · doi:10.1017/s1743921317003283 · Cited by 6
“Mass loss has also an impact on the nature of the supernova event (if any) and on the properties of the stellar remnant (if any) (see e.g. the review by Smith 2014).”
BackgroundContinuum and Spectral Line Radiation from a Random Clumpy Medium
Conway, J. E., Elitzur, M., & Parra, R. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadcf9 · Cited by 6
“It is now thought that mass loss from such massive stellar progenitors is clumped (Smith 2014); indeed, observations of radio supernovae show evolving radio spectra which are not always compatible with a smooth progenitor wind (van Dyk et al. 1994; Weiler et al. 2002).”
BackgroundSpetsieri, Z. T., Bonanos, A. Z., Yang, M., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936074 · Cited by 6
“These sources are among the SN type IIn progenitors (Smith 2014), which makes their identification and observational follow-up valuable.”
BackgroundRadio view of a broad-line Type Ic supernova ASASSN-16fp
Nayana, A. J., & Chandra, P. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa700 · Cited by 6
“This could be due to small scale clumping within the stellar wind (Moffat 2008; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundNew Blue and Red Variable Stars in NGC 247
Davidge, T. J. (2021) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac09e6 · Cited by 6
“Bona fide LBVs form a diverse group of objects (reviews by Humphreys & Davidson 1994 and Smith 2014) and are just one type of intrinsically bright blue variable star.”
BackgroundOrigin of Spectral Hardening of Secondary Cosmic-Ray Nuclei
Kawanaka, N., & Lee, S.-H. (2021) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 6
The origins of low-luminosity supernovae: the case of SN 2016bkv
Deckers, M., Groh, J. H., Boian, I., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2423 · Cited by 6
“Massive stars generally suffer substantial mass loss during their evolution, and sometimes also near core collapse (e.g. Smith 2014).”
BackgroundTheoretical X-Ray Light Curves of Young SNe. II. The Example of SN 2013ej
Morozova, V. S., & Stone, J. M. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae2b3 · Cited by 6
“Observational estimates on the steady mass loss rates from the stars generally depend on the method used to measure them (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMethodThe nebular phase of SN 2024ggi: A low-mass progenitor with no signs of interaction
Ferrari, L., Folatelli, G., Ertini, K., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556652 · Cited by 5
Schootemeijer, A., Götberg, Y., Langer, N., Bortolini, G., Hirschauer, A. S., & Patrick, L. R. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557675 · Cited by 5
Dance to Demise—How Massive Stars May Form Dense Circumstellar Shells before Explosion
Sengupta, S., Sujit, D., & Sarangi, A. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae129c · Cited by 5
“These “dynamical ejections” are thought to be responsible for the formation of dense, compact shells detected in SN progenitors such as SN 2009ip ( J. C. Mauerhan et al. 2013; N. Smith 2014 ) .”
Nugent, A. E., Villar, V. A., Gagliano, A. T., Jones, D. O., Horowicz, A., de Soto, K., Wang, B., & Margalit, B. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae247b · Cited by 5
“There are two main progenitor theories for SNe Ib/c: either, they are solitaire Wolf-Rayet stars ( M ZAMS ≈ 20 − 25 M ⊙ ; Smith et al. 2011; Smith 2014; Smartt 2015) that became stripped due to strong winds (Conti 1975), or they originate in a close-binary system (Smartt et al. 2009; Eldridge et al. 2013; Yoon 2015; S…”
InfluentialSN 2024aecx: A Double-peaked Rapidly Evolving Type IIb Supernova at 11 Mpc
Zou, X., Kumar, B., Teja, R. S., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae21dd · Cited by 5
“…envelope (Crowther 2007; Georgy 2012; Yoon 2015) in single massive star models and mass transfer via a binary companion is a preferred path in the binary stellar evolution models (Podsiad-lowski 1992; Nomoto et al. 1995; Claeys et al. 2011; Smith 2014; Sravan et al. 2020; Dessart et al. 2024).”
The drastic impact of Eddington-limit induced mass ejections on massive star populations
Pauli, D., Langer, N., Schootemeijer, A., et al. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557766 · Cited by 5
Park, S. H., Yoon, S.-C., & Blinnikov, S. I. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad08b5 · Cited by 5
“…star can occur in various ways, including stellar winds, episodic mass eruptions, and binary interactions ( e.g., Podsiadlowski et al. 1992, 1993; Stancliffe & Eldridge 2009; Yoon & Cantiello 2010; Claeys et al. 2011; Smith 2014; Meynet et al. 2015; Yoon et al. 2017; Eldridge et al. 2018 ) .”
BackgroundAxen, M. F., Offner, S. S. R., Hopkins, P. F., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad675a · Cited by 5
Mass-loss Rate of Highly Evolved Stars in the Magellanic Clouds
文, J. 静. W., Yang, M., Gao, J., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad7b33 · Cited by 5
“The precise mechanism driving mass loss is still unclear, and it may involve a combination of radiation pressure and radial pulsation (Wilson et al. 2000; Verhoelst et al. 2009; Smith 2014; H¨ofner & Olofsson 2018).”
Eruptive mass loss less than a year before the explosion of superluminous supernovae
Gkini, A., Fransson, C., Lunnan, R., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452357 · Cited by 5
Dall’Amico, M., Mapelli, M., Iorio, G., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453543 · Cited by 5
Inoue, Y., & Maeda, K. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9de6 · Cited by 5
“The narrow lines are believed to form in the dense circumstellar medium with the velocity of ∼ 10 2 km s − 1 (e.g., Smith 2014, 2017).”
The bright, dusty aftermath of giant eruptions and H-rich supernovae
Serrano-Hernández, D. B., Martínez-González, S., Jiménez, S., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449717 · Cited by 5
Li, Y., Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcab4 · Cited by 5
“…ionizing emission from massive stars is difficult to model as their evolutionary path and properties depend on the details of mass loss ( e.g., N. Smith 2014; C. C. Steidel et al. 2016; P. Senchyna et al. 2021 ) , and factors like rotation and multiplicity can affect how long they live, how many…”
Shepherd, K. G., Costa, G., Ugolini, C., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555467 · Cited by 5
Xi, Q., Sun, N.-C., Zhao, Y.-H., Maund, J. R., Niu, Z., Singleton, A. J., & Liu, J. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1275 · Cited by 5
Goto, S., Yamanaka, M., Nagayama, T., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf4d4 · Cited by 5
“These precursor events are believed to reflect a variable mass-loss history of the progenitor star (e.g., Smith 2014).”
InfluentialThe Core-Collapse Supernova-Black Hole Connection
O’connor, E. P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_129 · Cited by 5
A newly identified emission-line region around P Cygni
Mizumoto, M., Kobayashi, N., Hamano, S., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2239 · Cited by 5
“Luminous blue variable (LBV) stars are believed to have evolved from high-mass main-sequence stars and to become eventually Wolf-Rayet stars after various magnitudes of mass-loss (e.g., Langer et al. 1994; Meynet et al. 2011; Smith 2014 and references therein).”
BackgroundOuchi, R., & Maeda, K. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2527 · Cited by 5
“Although the physical mechanism behind this phenomenon is not yet understood, the energy deposition into the envelope just before the core collapse has been proposed as a possible cause (Dessart et al. 2010; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundTateishi, D., Katsuda, S., Terada, Y., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2c00 · Cited by 5
“Smith (2014) estimated the stellar wind velocities due to mass loss at each stage of stellar evolution to be 20–40 km s−1 and 30–100 km s−1 for YSG and YHG, respectively.”
BackgroundDynamical Evolution and Radiative Processes of Supernova Remnants
Reynolds, S. P. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_89-1 · Cited by 5
On the nature of slowly rising interaction-powered supernovae
Moriya, T. J. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2197 · Cited by 5
Record-breaking polarization from the interacting superluminous supernova 2017hcc
Mauerhan, J. C., Smith, N., Williams, G. G., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3579 · Cited by 5
Self-citationDriving asymmetric red supergiant winds with binary interactions
Landri, C., & Pejcha, O. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1379 · Cited by 5
Investigating episodic mass loss in evolved massive stars
de Wit, S., Muñoz-Sánchez, G., Maravelias, G., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453571 · Cited by 5
Hong, J., Antoniou, V., Zezas, A., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/4 · Cited by 5
“10−9.5 M yr −1 (Smith 2014).”
InfluentialThe X-ray decay of the ultraluminous supernova SN 1978K in NGC 1313
Zhao, H.-H., Weng, S., & Ng, C. ‐. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx533 · Cited by 5
“After the explosion, the SN shock waves expand into the surrounding CSM (see reviews by Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSOFIA/FORCAST Observations of the Luminous Blue Variable Candidates MN 90 and HD 168625
Arneson, R. A., Shenoy, D., Smith, N., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad559 · Cited by 5
“This type of shell can result, for example, when a post-red supergiant (post-RSG) star has developed a fast wind during an LBV phase which sweeps up gas and dust lost during the previous RSG phase or by a previously ejected LBV shell that is swept up by the post eruption wind (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHong, J., Antoniou, V, Zezas, A., et al. (2016) · Keele Research Repository (Keele University) · Cited by 5
The contribution by luminous blue variable stars to the dust content of the Magellanic Clouds
Agliozzo, C., Phillips, N. M., Mehner, A., et al. (2021) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141279/pdf · Cited by 5
Multiwavelength View of Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae
Chandra, P. (2025) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe11110363 · Cited by 4
“However, the high radiation from SN can accelerate stellar winds to much higher speeds [75].”
InfluentialSN 2024aecx: A Fast-evolving Type IIb Supernova with a Prominent Shock-cooling Peak
Xi, Q., Sun, N.-C., Aguado, D. S., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2d06 · Cited by 4
“The progressive loss of specific spectral features reflects different degrees of envelope stripping by line-driven winds and/or binary mass transfer of their progenitors (Yoon et al. 2010; Langer 2012; Smith 2014; Sun et al. 2023a).”
The fast rise of the unusual type IIL/IIb SN 2018ivc
Reguitti, A., Dastidar, R., Pignata, G., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450805 · Cited by 4
X-Shooting ULLYSES: Massive stars at low metallicity
Alkousa, T., Crowther, P. A., Bestenlehner, J. M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553799 · Cited by 4
Richardson, C. T., Wels, J., Garofali, K., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf215 · Cited by 4
“This leaves a thin hydrogen layer that requires extreme solar winds to be removed (Smith 2014; Trani et al. 2014).”
The Hawaii Infrared Supernova Study (HISS): Spectroscopic Data Release 1
Medler, K., Ashall, C., Shahbandeh, M., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae092c · Cited by 4
“Prior to exploding, the progenitors of typical SNe can undergo significant mass-loss episodes, resulting in the buildup of a dense shell of CSM surrounding the progenitor (Smith 2014).”
Corgan, A., Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., Filippenko, A. V., & Dyk, S. D. V. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2892 · Cited by 4
Self-citationThe Energy Sources, the Physical Properties, and the Mass-loss History of SN 2017dio
石, D.-W. 登. S., Wang, S.-Q., Gan, W.-P., & Liang, E. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4b13 · Cited by 4
“…via Roche-lobe overflow (RLOF) can be of order ∼ 10 − 3 M ⊙ yr − 1 or higher (Taam & Sandquist 2000; Langer 2012; Smith 2014), while the thermal (Kelvin-Helmholtz) timescale τ KH of the envelope is ∼ 10 4 yr (Smith 2014, the value of τ KH can be estimated by using Equation 10 of Paczyński 1971).”
BackgroundGagliano, A. T., Berger, E., Villar, V. A., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9748 · Cited by 4
“Sample studies of SNe IIn have reported progenitor mass-loss rates of 10 − to > 1 M ⊙ yr − (Smith 2014, 2017), far exceeding expectations for line-driven stellar winds and ostensibly supporting an eruptive origin with unclear underlying physics.”
The variability of DDO68-V1, a unique, extremely metal-poor luminous blue variable
Pustilnik, S. A., & Perepelitsyna, Y. A. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453244 · Cited by 4
Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Scenario of HD 327083
Vaidman, N. L., Мирошниченко, А. С., Zharikov, S. V., et al. (2025) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies13030047 · Cited by 4
The Structure and Evolution of a High-mass Stellar Merger in the Hertzsprung Gap
Patton, R. A., Pinsonneault, M. H., & Thompson, T. A. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addd0f · Cited by 4
Period change of massive binaries from combined photometric and spectroscopic data in Cygnus OB2
Laur, J., Tempel, E., Tuvikene, T., et al. (2015) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526520 · Cited by 4
“The uncertainties in determining the mass-losrates for massive stars are still large even in the local Universe (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSteinwandel, U. P., Kaurov, A. A., Hopkins, P. F., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2035 · Cited by 4
Ho, A. Y. Q. (2022) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15367-9_8 · Cited by 4
Probing Diversity of Type II Supernovae with the Chinese Space Station Telescope
Lin, H., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9050201 · Cited by 4
“Massive progenitors of SNe II lose mass and then produce CSM by means of stellar winds, impulsive eruptions, or mass transfer between interacting binaries[86].”
BackgroundKoo, B., Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Yoon, S.-C. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acda2d · Cited by 4
“And, considering that the East Cloud is located at the eastern outer edge of the remnant, the ejection velocity should have been much higher than 30 km s−1 or the typical wind velocity of red supergiant stars, e.g., 10–20 km s−1 (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundOrtega, M. E., Petriella, A., & Parón, S. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1697 · Cited by 4
Thermodynamics of the condensation of dust grains in Wolf–Rayet stellar winds
Gupta, A. K., & Sahijpal, S. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3468 · Cited by 4
“The mass-loss rates during the initial stages of evolution in turn strongly affect the subsequent evolutionary phase of these massive stars (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundA Population Study of the Radio Emission of Fast Blue Optical Transients
刘, J.-F. 建. L., Liu, L.-D., Yu, Y.-W., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbb04 · Cited by 4
“For a comprehensive introduction on the stellar massloss, please see the review by Smith (2014).”
BackgroundHydrogen-Poor Core-Collapse Supernovae
Pian, E., & Mazzali, P. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_40 · Cited by 4
Period change of massive binaries from combined photometric and spectroscopic data in Cygnus OB2
Laur, J., Tempel, E., Tuvikene, T., et al. (2015) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526520/pdf · Cited by 4
Afsariardchi, N., Drout, M. R., Khatami, D., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0aeb · Cited by 3
“In addition, the mass-loss rate of massive stars is still uncertain, and it is not clear whether all massive stars with ZAMS mass& 25 M¯ can strip their H envelope (Smith 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review