The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Reveals That SN 2015bh Is Much Fainter than Its Progenitor
Jencson, J. E., Sand, D. J., Andrews, J. E., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac867c · Cited by 17
“This material may have been shed in violent eruptive events decades prior to the SN (see Smith 2014 for a review) or in an enhanced wind in the last ∼103 yr of the progenitor’s life (e.g., Yoon & Cantiello 2010; Smith et al. 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRoy, A., Sutherland, R. S., Krumholz, M. R., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa781 · Cited by 17
“Mass loss is, as usual, a dominant uncertainty in models for the evolution of massive stars (Smith 2014), and we explore the sensitivity of our results to the adopted prescriptions for wind mass loss in Appendix A3, and discuss the results of these experiments in Section 3.3.”
BackgroundInfluentialBritavskiy, N., Bonanos, A. Z., Mehner, A., et al. (2015) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526393/pdf · Cited by 17
Fornasini, F. M., Tomsick, J. A., Bachetti, M., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff4 · Cited by 17
“High-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) inform our understanding of the evolution of massive stars, which is still subject to significant uncertainties (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundDas, K. K., Kasliwal, M. M., Sollerman, J., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad595f · Cited by 16
“The mass loss has a great influence on the late-time evolution of massive stars and the resultant supernova (SN) (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundBrinkman, H. E., Doherty, C. L., Pignatari, M., Pols, O. R., & Lugaro, M. A. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd7ea · Cited by 16
“The stellar winds of massive stars are crucial for the evolution of these stars, but they are also very uncertain (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInvestigating episodic mass loss in evolved massive stars
Bonanos, A. Z., Tramper, F., de Wit, S., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348527 · Cited by 16
Empirical mass-loss rates and clumping properties of O-type stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Hawcroft, C., Mahy, L., Sana, H., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348478 · Cited by 16
Fang, Q., Maeda, K., Ye, H., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b19 · Cited by 16
“…mass on M ZAMS becomes invisible (Heger et al. 2003; Eldridge et al. 2008; Yoon et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2011; Sana et al. 2012; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Yoon 2015; Yoon et al. 2017; Ouchi & Maeda 2017; El-dridge et al. 2018; Fang et al. 2019; Gilkis & Arcavi 2022; Chen et al. 2023; Drout…”
InfluentialConstraints on the Progenitor System of SN 2016gkg from a Comprehensive Statistical Analysis
Sravan, N., Marchant, P., Kalogera, V., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa2f5 · Cited by 16
“Currently, stellar winds, close binary interactions, and nuclear burning instabilities are leading candidates to explain the mass loss (e.g., Claeys et al. 2011; Arnett & Meakin 2011; Quataert & Shiode 2012; Shiode et al. 2013; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Smith & Arnett 2014; Fuller 2017).”
BackgroundBhirombhakdi, K., Chornock, R., Miller, A. A., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1928 · Cited by 16
“With bipolar/disc/torus shapes, multiple shells, or clumpy structure (Andrews et al. 2010, 2016; Smith 2006; Smith et al. 2009a; Smith 2014), the mass-loss rate can be lower than that of spherical symmetry.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHo, A. Y. Q., Goldstein, D. A., Schulze, S., Khatami, D., Perley, D. A., Ergon, M., Gal‐Yam, A., Corsi, A., Andreoni, I., Barbarino, C., et al. (2019) · Civil War Book Review · Cited by 16
Sun, N.-C., Maund, J. R., Crowther, P. A., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab994 · Cited by 16
“…for Type IIb SN progenitors (e.g. Heger et al. 2003; Eldridge & Tout 2004; Georgy et al. 2009, 2012; Yoon, Woosley, & Langer 2010; Groh, Georgy, & Ekström 2013; Sravan, Marchant, & Kalogera 2019; Shenar et al. 2020); the results are very sensitive to the adopted mass-loss prescription (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundNebular Hα emission in Type Ia supernova 2016jae
Elias-Rosa, N., Chen, P., Benetti, S., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141218 · Cited by 16
The infrared massive stellar content of M 83
Williams, S. J., Bonanos, A. Z., Whitmore, B. C., et al. (2015) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525696 · Cited by 16
“The jury is still out concerning whether SN 2009ip is a true SN (Mauerhan et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Mauerhan et al. 2014; Graham et al. 2014) or an imposter (Pastorello et al. 2013; Margutti et al. 2014; Fraser et al. 2015), but poorly understood mass loss events have clearly played a vital role in…”
BackgroundInfluentialMauerhan, J. C., Smith, N., Dyk, S. D. V., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv257 · Cited by 16
“1 IN T RO D U C T I O N The physical processes by which massive stars shed their hydrogen envelopes and become Wolf–Rayet (WR) stars present an interesting challenge to the standard stellar evolutionary paradigm (see review by Smith 2014, and references therein).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMoriya, T. J., Suzuki, A., Takiwaki, T., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2060 · Cited by 16
“There are many mechanisms to remove the hydrogen-rich envelope from SN progenitors and the mass loss mechanisms themselves are a largely investigated field of research (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundX-Ray-luminous Supernovae: Threats to Terrestrial Biospheres
Brunton, I. R., O'Mahoney, C., Fields, B. D., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc728 · Cited by 15
No UV-bright Eruptions from SN 2023ixf in GALEX Imaging 15–20 yr Before Explosion
Flinner, N., Tucker, M. A., Beacom, J. F., et al. (2023) · Research Notes of the AAS · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/acefc4 · Cited by 15
Bridging between Type IIb and Ib Supernovae: SN IIb 2022crv with a Very Thin Hydrogen Envelope
Gangopadhyay, A., Maeda, K., Singh, A., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfa94 · Cited by 15
“The binary interaction is believed to play a key role for these SNe IIb (e.g., Benvenuto et al. 2013; Ouchi & Maeda 2017) and thus the mass-loss rate is highly affected by the binary interaction (e.g., Smith 2014, for a review).”
BackgroundLi, Y., Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5280 · Cited by 15
“The total number and distribution of their ionizing photons is highly sensitive to the details of stellar evolution and affected by several complex factors that are dif fi cult to model such as mass loss, rotation, and multiplicity ( e.g., Smith 2014 ) .”
BackgroundNebular nitrogen line emission in stripped-envelope supernovae – a new progenitor mass diagnostic
Barmentloo, S., Jerkstrand, A., Iwamoto, K., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1811 · Cited by 15
Late-time supernovae radio re-brightening in the VAST pilot survey
Rose, K., Horesh, A., Murphy, T., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2289 · Cited by 15
The formation of black holes in non-interacting isolated binaries
Kruckow, M. U., Andrews, J. J., Fragos, T., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452356 · Cited by 15
Gilkis, A., Laplace, E., Arcavi, I., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf884 · Cited by 15
Physical parameters of red supergiants in dwarf irregular galaxies in the Local Group
Britavskiy, N. E., Bonanos, A. Z., Herrero, A., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935212 · Cited by 15
“Another factor that significantly a ff ects the evolution of massive stars is mass loss (Smith 2014; Meynet et al. 2015; Groenewegen & Sloan 2018), which is di ffi cult to measure in the RSG phase.”
BackgroundThe radial distribution of supernovae compared to star formation tracers
Audcent-Ross, F. M., Meurer, G. R., Audcent, J. R., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3282 · Cited by 15
“See Smith (2014) for a review of mass loss in SE SN progenitors.”
BackgroundSoumagnac, M. T., Ofek, E. O., Liang, J., Gal‐Yam, A., Nugent, P., Yang, Y., Cenko, S. B., Sollerman, J., Perley, D. A., Andreoni, I., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab94be · Cited by 15
“Type IIn supernovae (SNe IIn) show prominent and narrowto-intermediate width Balmer emission lines in their spectra (Schlegel 1990; Filippenko 1997; Smith 2014; Gal-Yam 2017).”
BackgroundLi, L., Wang, S.-Q., Liu, L.-D., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab718d · Cited by 15
“Assuming that the velocity of the wind of the progenitor of an SN Ibc is (vw) is 100−1000 km s −1 (see, e.g., Table 1 of Smith 2014), the mass loss rate Ṁ = 4πvwq (q = ρCSM,in,1R 2 CSM,in,1) of the stellar wind is Ṁ ∼ 10.1− 101 M⊙ yr −1, significantly larger than the typical values for most of SN…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Impact of Progenitor Mass Loss on the Dynamical and Spectral Evolution of Supernova Remnants
Patnaude, D., Lee, S.-H., Slane, P. O., et al. (2017) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 15
Comparison between the first and second mass eruptions from progenitors of Type IIn supernovae
Kuriyama, N., & Shigeyama, T. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038637 · Cited by 15
“The progenitor mass is also ambiguous and varies with the subclass of SNe IIn (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe Center of Expansion and Age of the Oxygen-rich Supernova Remnant 1E 0102.2-7219
Banovetz, J., Milisavljevic, D., Sravan, N., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe2a7 · Cited by 15
“The mass loss could be caused by a single star progenitor through episodic eruptions (see Smith 2014, for discussion).”
BackgroundEvolved massive stars at low-metallicity
Yang, M., Bonanos, A. Z., Jiang, B., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039596 · Cited by 15
CHIPS: Complete History of Interaction-powered Supernovae
Takei, Y., Tsuna, D., Kuriyama, N., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac60fe · Cited by 15
“The indicated lower explosion energies are consistent with the small amount of 56Ni compared to that of typical SNe (e.g., Smith 2014; Elias-Rosa et al. 2018). tinj has to be selected so that trise takes a maximum for given other parameters.”
BackgroundResultDeep optical study of the mixed-morphology supernova remnant G 132.7+1.3 (HB3)
Boumis, P., Chiotellis, A., Fragkou, V., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac412 · Cited by 15
Smith, N. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1868 · Cited by 15
“…both used a method similar that used to measure proper motions of protostellar Herbig-Haro jets (Hartigan et al. 2001; Bally et al. 2006; Reiter & Smith 2014; Reiter et al. 2015), wherein small boxes are selected to encompass individual knots or groups of knots and then the cross correlation is…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationThe zenithal 4-m International Liquid Mirror Telescope: a unique facility for supernova studies
Kumar, B., Pandey, K. L., Pandey, S. B., Hickson, P., Borra, E. F., Anupama, G. C., & Surdej, J. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty298 · Cited by 15
“…role during the evolution phases of the progenitors such as stellar wind (Puls, Vink & Najarro 2008), mass transfer in a binary system (Wheeler & Levreault 1985; Podsiadlowski, Joss & Hsu 1992; Yoon, Woosley & Langer 2010; Sana et al., 2012) and mass loss (Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014), etc.”
BackgroundRo, S. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0421 · Cited by 15
“A homogeneous wind (i.e., DLMC = 1) does not resolve this discrepancy and would be inconsistent with clumped wind observations (Crowther 2007; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundPaving the way to simultaneous multi-wavelength astronomy
Middleton, M. J., Casella, P., Gandhi, P., Bozzo, E., Anderson, G. E., Degenaar, N., Donnarumma, I., Israel, G. L., Knigge, C., Lohfink, A. M., et al. (2017) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2017.07.002 · Cited by 15
“The resulting SN type, which is predominantly based on the existence or absence of H lines, is a direct result of the different amounts of mass-loss the progenitor underwent before explosion (see Smith 2014 for a review).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe La Silla Schmidt Southern Survey
Miller, A. A., Abrams, N. S., Aldering, G., Anand, S., Angus, C. R., Arcavi, I., Baltay, C., Bauer, F. E., Brethauer, D., Bloom, J. S., et al. (2025) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae02c5 · Cited by 14
“However, if these SNe indeed result from binary interactions, they should be surrounded by a significant amount of CSM, with its mass and distribution likely influenced by the binary separation (Smith 2014).”
First ALMA Light Curve Constrains Refreshed Reverse Shocks and Jet Magnetization in GRB 161219B
Laskar, T., Alexander, K., Berger, E., Guidorzi, C., Margutti, R., Fong, W., Kilpatrick, C., Milne, P., Drout, M., Mundell, C. G., et al. (2018) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 14
Chrimes, A. A., Gompertz, B. P., Kann, D. A., van Marle, A. J., Eldridge, J. J., Groot, P., Laskar, T., Levan, A. J., Nicholl, M., Stanway, E. R., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1796 · Cited by 14
Mixing of materials in magnetized core-collapse supernova remnants
Meyer, D. M.-A., Pohl, M., Petrov, M., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad906 · Cited by 14
Liu, C., Chen, X., Er, X., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0da8 · Cited by 14
“…are often observed especially in Type IIn that display narrow emission lines for extended times after the explosion (e.g. Ofek et al. 2014) as a consequence of the shock interaction between the slow-moving circumstellar medium (CSM) and the Liu et al. ejected material of the explosion (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMurai, Y., Tanaka, M., Kawabata, M., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae170 · Cited by 14
Bright Supernova Precursors by Outbursts from Massive Stars with Compact Object Companions
Tsuna, D., Matsumoto, T., Wu, S. C., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3637 · Cited by 14
“Mass loss is an important process in massive stars that characterizes their evolution and the appearances of their final supernova (SN) explosions (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundASASSN-18ap: A Dusty Tidal Disruption Event Candidate with an Early Bump in the Light Curve
Wang, Y., Wang, T., Jiang, N., Zhang, X., Zhu, J., Shu, X., Huang, S., Zhang, F., Sheng, Z., & Lin, Z. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2ae4 · Cited by 14
Investigating 39 Galactic Wolf-Rayet stars with VLTI/GRAVITY
Deshmukh, K., Sana, H., Mérand, A., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452352 · Cited by 14
Michel, P. D., Mazzali, P. A., Perley, D. A., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf443 · Cited by 14
Binarity at LOw Metallicity (BLOeM)
Villaseñor, J. I., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453166 · Cited by 14
Inferring CSM properties of Type II SNe using a magnitude-limited ZTF sample
Hinds, K.-R., Perley, D. A., Sollerman, J., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf888 · Cited by 14
Kikuchi, Y., Hashimoto, M., Ono, M., et al. (2015) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv072 · Cited by 14
Monitoring luminous yellow massive stars in M 33: new yellow hypergiant candidates
Kourniotis, M., Bonanos, A. Z., Yuan, W., et al. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629146 · Cited by 14
“Depending on metallicity and rotation, RSGs of initial mass 20− 40 M⊙ exhibit high mass-loss rates that shift them back to warm temperatures, owing to the inability of the stars o sustain a convective H-rich outer envelope (Ekström et al. 2012; Smith 2014; Meynet et al. 2015).”
BackgroundSimultaneous 183 GHz H2O maser and SiO observations towards evolved stars using APEX SEPIA Band 5
Humphreys, E. M. L., Immer, K., Gray, M. D., et al. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730718 · Cited by 14
“Understanding the mass loss mechanism of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) and red supergiant (RSG) stars is necessary to determine the formation processes of planetary nebulae and corecollapse supernovae (e.g., Herwig 2005; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundA Multiwavelength Search for Intrinsic Linear Polarization in Wolf–Rayet Winds
Fullard, A. G., St‐Louis, N., Moffat, A. F. J., et al. (2020) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab8293 · Cited by 14
“Above initial masses of ∼20Me, massive stars evolve into a classical Wolf–Rayet (cWR) stage of He-burning, with most of their outer H-rich envelopes removed by stronger winds in an intervening, relatively short, LBV stage (or possibly an RSG stage for the least massive among them; Smith 2014, 2017).”
BackgroundASASSN-18am/SN 2018gk: an overluminous Type IIb supernova from a massive progenitor
Bose, S., Dong, S., Kochanek, C. S., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab629 · Cited by 14
“10−4 M yr−1; e.g., de Jager et al. 1988; Beasor et al. 2020) but is much lower than required in interaction-powered SNe IIn ( ÛM & 10−3 M yr−1; e.g., Smith 2014, 2017).”
BackgroundA Grid of Core-collapse Supernova Remnant Models. I. The Effect of Wind-driven Mass Loss
Jacovich, T., Patnaude, D., Slane, P., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf935 · Cited by 14
“…concerning the efficiency of both steady and episodic mass loss mechanisms, the physical conditions in the progenitor required to drive mass loss, and exactly when in the stellar life cycle certain mass loss mechanisms are more prevalent (e.g., Quataert & Shiode 2012; Smith 2014; Fuller 2017).”
BackgroundPessi, T., Prieto, J. L., Monard, B., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac562d · Cited by 14
“Some massive stars can go through very unstable mass-loss phases, ejecting large amounts of matter in energetic eruptions and explosions (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialA wind-blown bubble in the Central Molecular Zone cloud G0.253+0.016
Henshaw, J. D., Krumholz, M. R., Butterfield, N., Mackey, J., Ginsburg, A. G., Haworth, T. J., Nogueras-Lara, F., Barnes, A. T., Longmore, S. N., Bally, J., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3039 · Cited by 14
SN 1961V: A Pulsational Pair-instability Supernova
Woosley, S. E., & Smith, N. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8eb3 · Cited by 14
“The restrictions on low metallicity might be relaxed somewhat, however, due to modern reductions in empirical mass-loss rates (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRevisiting the progenitor of the low-luminosity type II-plateau supernova, SN 2008bk
O’Neill, D., Kotak, R., Fraser, M., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039546 · Cited by 14
“Many previous studies have remarked upon an apparent temporal coincidence between eruptive mass loss and core-collapse, especially within the context of interacting (type IIn) SNe (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMassive stars in extremely metal-poor galaxies: a window into the past
García, M., Evans, C. J., Bestenlehner, J. M., et al. (2021) · Experimental Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s10686-021-09785-x · Cited by 14
“The uncertain metallicity dependence of RDWs adds to a hotly debated question: what is the total mass lost throughout the stellar lifetime, and what is the main driving mechanism? Besides RDWs, pulsation- and rotation-driven outflows, evolution and/or mass exchange in binary systems, and eruptions such as those experi…”
BackgroundThe Properties of Fast Yellow Pulsating Supergiants: FYPS Point the Way to Missing Red Supergiants
Dorn-Wallenstein, T. Z., Levesque, E. M., Davenport, J. R. A., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac79b2 · Cited by 13
“Figure 6 shows the locations in the HR diagram of 13 SNe II-P and II-L as well as five SNe IIb progenitors with preexplosion imaging.”
BackgroundInfluentialFornasini, F. M., Antoniou, V., & Dubus, G. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_95-1 · Cited by 13
SN 2022oqm–A Ca-rich Explosion of a Compact Progenitor Embedded in C/O Circumstellar Material
Irani, I., Chen, P., Morag, J., Schulze, S., Gal‐Yam, A., Strotjohann, N. L., Yaron, O., Zimmerman, E., Sharon, A., Perley, D. A., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad04d7 · Cited by 13
“Owing to the absence of He and H in their spectra, SN Ic progenitors have been suggested to lose their envelope prior to explosion, either due to stellar winds (Fil-ippenko 1997, and references therein) or through binary interaction (Podsiadlowski et al. 1992; Yoon et al. 2010; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMartí-Devesa, G., Cheung, C. C., Lalla, N. D., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349061 · Cited by 13
Kinematic morphology of low-mass galaxies in IllustrisTNG
Zeng, G., Wang, L., Gao, L., & Yang, H. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1651 · Cited by 13
Asymmetries and Circumstellar Interaction in the Type II SN 2024bch
Andrews, J. E., Shrestha, M., Bostroem, K. A., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada555 · Cited by 13
“…surrounding CSM. Whileeruptive mass loss in luminous blue variables (LBVs) and strong line-driven winds of Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars are well known (see Smith 2014 for a review), for RSGs there have been significant reductions in wind mass-loss prescriptions, and significant mismatch between these…”
Self-citationOrlando, S., Janka, H. ‐., Wongwathanarat, A., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553902 · Cited by 13
The mass distribution of stars stripped in binaries: The effect of metallicity
Hovis-Afflerbach, B., Götberg, Y., Schootemeijer, A., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453185 · Cited by 13
Tsuna, D., & Lu, W. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add158 · Cited by 13
“Core-collapse supernovae (SNe) have a large diversity in their photometric and spectroscopic appearances, which reflects the diversity in the progenitor’s evolution and mass loss (e.g. Smartt 2009; Smith 2014).”
Khan, R., Kochanek, C. S., Stanek, K. Z., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/187 · Cited by 13
“The physical mechanism, energetics and observed properties of these events depend on the structure and terminal mass of the evolved stars at core-collapse, which in turn are determined by stellar mass loss (see, e.g., review by Smith 2014).”
BackgroundHerschelobservations of the nebula M1-67 around the Wolf-Rayet star WR 124
Vamvatira-Nakou, C., Hutsemékers, D., Royer, P., et al. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527667 · Cited by 13
“…the help of the evolutionary models of Ekström et al. (2012), keepingin mind that the models of massive star evolution are very uncertain in the post-main-sequence evolutionary phases because they do not include any eruptive event so that the mass-loss rate recipes are not well known (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe possible existence of Pop III NS-BH binary and its detectability
Kinugawa, T., Nakamura, T., & Nakano, H. (2017) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptx003 · Cited by 13
Smith, N., & Stassun, K. G. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5d0c · Cited by 13
“The episodic mass loss of LBVs has also been a reference point for interpreting the dense circumstellar material (CSM) around Type IIn supernovae (SNe IIn), which is thought to be indicative of extreme pre-SN eruptions (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStagnant Shells in the Vicinity of the Dusty Wolf–Rayet–OB Binary WR 112
Lau, R. M., Hankins, M. J., Schödel, R., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/835/2/l31 · Cited by 13
“…is several orders of magnitude lower than the observed mass-loss rates from dust-forming LBVs during giant eruptions (& 10−3 M⊙ yr−1; Kochanek 2011; Smith 2014); however, the massloss rate and total dust mass in the nebula is consistent with values derived from circumstellar material…”
Asymmetric ejecta of cool supergiants and hypergiants in the massive cluster Westerlund 1
Andrews, H., Fenech, D. M., Prinja, R. K., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly046 · Cited by 13
“Nevertheless the handful of known examples suggest ‘quiescent’ mass-loss rates of ≥ 10 − 5 M (cid:12) , which may increase by an order of magnitude or more in eruptive events(Smith 2014, Shenoy et al. 2016).”
Collective non-thermal emission from an extragalactic jet interacting with stars
Vieyro, F. L., Torres-Albà, N., & Bosch-Ramón, V. (2017) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630333/pdf · Cited by 13
Effects of Winds on the Optical Properties of Type Ib and Ic Supernova Progenitors
Jung, M.-K., Yoon, S.-C., & Kim, H.-J. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3f33 · Cited by 13
“For more than 10 recently observed SNe Ib/Ic, no direct evidence for their progenitors has been found despite fairly deep observations using the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) or other ground-based telescopes (e.g., Eldridge et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Smartt 2015; Van Dyk 2017).”
BackgroundMechanical feedback from stellar winds with an application to galaxy formation at high redshift
Fichtner, Y. A., Grassitelli, L., Romano-Díaz, E., & Porciani, C. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac785 · Cited by 13
Yang, Y., Baade, D., Hoêflich, P., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3477 · Cited by 13
Sarmah, P. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/083 · Cited by 13
Exploring the multifaceted circumstellar environment of the luminous blue variable HR Carinae
Buemi, C. S., Trigilio, C., Leto, P., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3074 · Cited by 13
“Most proposed models are related to hydrod - namic explosions and continuum-driven super-Eddington wids, rather than line-driven stellar winds (Humphreys & Davidson 1994; Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundLong-term soft and hard X-ray investigation of the colliding wind WN+O binary WR 25
Arora, B., Pandey, J. C., & Becker, M. D. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1447 · Cited by 13
“E-mail: bharti@aries.res.in † E-mail: jeewan@aries.res.in ‡ E-mail: Michael.DeBecker@uliege.be evolution of the star itself (e.g. Smith 2014) but also has a strong impact on their surroundings (e.g. Fierlinger et al. 2016).”
BackgroundThe exceptional X-ray evolution of SN 1996cr in high resolution
Quirola-Vásquez, J., Bauer, F. E., Dwarkadas, V. V., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2858 · Cited by 13
“…University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /m nras/article/490/4/4536/5594019 by guest on 27 M arch 2022 have mass-loss rates in the range of Ṁ∼10−4 to 0.3 M yr−1 in the decades prior to explosion (e.g. Woosley et al. 2002; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe morphology of the ejecta of SN 1987A at 31 yr from 1150 to 10 000 Å
Kangas, T., Fransson, C., Larsson, J., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3683 · Cited by 13
Unveiling the Diversity of Type IIn Supernovae via Systematic Light-curve Modeling
Ransome, C. L., & Villar, V. A. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adce03 · Cited by 13
“Alternatively, the mass loss may be due to interactions in a close binary system ( A. Kashi et al. 2013; N. Soker & A. Kashi 2013; N. Smith 2014; A. Ercolino et al. 2024 ) .”
InfluentialNayana, A. J., Margutti, R., Wiston, E., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0b4d · Cited by 12
“Such dense environments can be formed during the brief evolutionary phases of intense mass loss from some massive stars (Smith 2014).”
Radio Evolution of a Type IIb Supernova SN 2016gkg
Nayana, A. J., Chandra, P., Krishna, A., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c1e · Cited by 12
“The escape velocity of a 10 Me star of radius 70 Re is ∼200 km s −1 and the range of wind velocity of a star of Teff∼ 10,800 K is vw ∼100−300 km s−1 (Drout et al. 2009; Smith 2014; Yoon et al. 2017).”
BackgroundEnvironmental dependence of Type IIn supernova properties
Moriya, T. J., Galbany, L., Jiménez-Palau, C., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346703 · Cited by 12
Tracing the evolution of short-period binaries with super-synchronous fast rotators
Britavskiy, N., Renzo, M., Nazé, Y., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348484 · Cited by 12
Santos, A. S., Kilpatrick, C. D., Bom, C. R., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae466 · Cited by 12
The maximum black hole mass at solar metallicity
Vink, J. S., Sabhahit, G. N., & Higgins, E. R. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450655 · Cited by 12
Insights from modelling magnetar-driven light curves of stripped-envelope supernovae
Kumar, A. (2024) · New Astronomy · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2024.102346 · Cited by 12
Rest, S., Rest, A., Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad973d · Cited by 12
“…of nuclear burning, wave-driven momentum transport, and neutrino-driven mass loss (e.g., Heger et al. 1997; Yoon & Cantiello 2010; Arnett & Meakin 2011; Quataert & Shiode 2012; Shiode et al. 2013; Moriya 2014; Shiode & Quataert 2014; Smith 2014; Woosley & Heger 2015; Fuller 2017; Wu & Fuller 2021).”
A Semi-analytical Model for Stellar Evolution in AGN Disks
Dittmann, A. J., & Cantiello, M. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9e92 · Cited by 12
“As stars approach the Eddington limit ( L ∗ ∼ L Edd ), they are thought to lose appreciable mass via continuum-driven winds (e.g., Cheng et al. 2024; Owocki et al. 2004; Smith 2014) as radiation pressure overcomes the pull of gravity.”
Ravi, A. P., Valenti, S., Dong, Y., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb0bb · Cited by 12
“Note that these mass-loss rates are much higher than observed mass-loss rates of massive stars (Smith 2014; Beasor et al. 2020).”
Self-citationHsu, B., Smith, N., Goldberg, J. A., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf222 · Cited by 12
“…into explosion geometry, surrounding environments, and mass loss during the final years of a massive star’s life (e.g., Baron et al. 2000; Brown et al. 2007; Smith 2014; Dessart & Hillier 2022; Jacobson-Gal´an et al. 2022, 2024; Bostroem et al. 2023a,b; Li et al. 2024; Shrestha et al. 2024a,b).”
Self-citationSupernovae from Rotating Stars
Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_122 · Cited by 12
“Actually, according to Vink and de Koter (2005, see also the review on stellar winds by Smith 2014) iron plays a key role in triggering mass loss in WR stars.”
BackgroundThe class of supernova progenitors that result from fatal common envelope evolution
Soker, N. (2019) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-019-9402-x · Cited by 12
“…and core collapse supernovae (CCSNe; for a small number of papers from the last five years see, e.g., de Mink et al. 2014; Justham et al. 2014; Smith 2014; Tauris et al. 2015; van den Heuvel et al. 2017; Eldridge et al. 2018; Vigna-Gómez et al. 2018) from binary (and triple) stellar…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review