The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA): BINARIES, PULSATIONS, AND EXPLOSIONS
Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., Bildsten, L., Cantiello, M., Dessart, L., Farmer, R., Hu, H., Langer, N., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 · Cited by 3,260
“There are many ways M & 8 M stars can end their lives 3 (e.g., Woosley et al. 2002; Smartt 2009; Meynet et al. 2010; Langer 2012; Nomoto et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cantiello, M., Paxton, B., & Johnson, B. D. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 · Cited by 2,922
“It is frequently cited as one of the most uncertain ingredients in stellar evolution, and is thought to play a crucial role in the advanced stages of stellar evolution for low-mass stars and in all phases of evolution for massive stars (see Smith 2014 for a recent review on this topic).”
BackgroundSimulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
“…the formation of the dense molecular clouds and stars (Heyer & Dame 2015); the evolution of stellar populations, their winds and energetic feedback (Smith 2014); the explosions of supernovae (Nomoto, Kobayashi & Tominaga 2013); the formation of supermassive black holes and the interaction of…”
BackgroundAbbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, N., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agarwal, D., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 · Cited by 3,333
ASTROPHYSICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGER GW150914
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/l22 · Cited by 816
“Their strengths depend on stellar properties, but cannot be derived from first principles; instead they are empirically derived and calibrated based on observations (for a review, see Smith 2014).”
Backgroundparsec evolutionary tracks of massive stars up to 350 M ⊙ at metallicities 0.0001 ≤ Z ≤ 0.04
Chen, Y., Bressan, A., Girardi, L., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1281 · Cited by 649
“…amount of their mass through line-driven stellar winds and that the mass-loss rates show a simple scaling law with the metallicity (Castor, Abbott & Klein 1975; Kudritzki & Puls 2000; Nugis & Lamers 2000; Vink, de Koter & Lamers 2000, 2001; Muijres et al. 2012b; Crowther 2007; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundPetroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T., & Lorimer, D. R. (2019) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 · Cited by 589
“The collapse of a massive star (Smith 2014), or the collision of two neutron stars (Abbott et al. 2017a), injects massive amounts of energy and material into the surrounding environment, producing heavy elements and seeding further star formation in galaxies.”
Mass loss of stars on the asymptotic giant branch
Höfner, S., & Olofsson, H. (2018) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0106-5 · Cited by 528
“…velocities of about 1000–3000 km s−1, are presumably driven by atomic line opacity, with Doppler shifts in the wind acceleration zone strongly increasing the effective line width (see, e.g., Owocki 2010; Smith 2014; Puls et al. 2015, for recent reviews on mass-loss mechanisms in massive stars).”
BackgroundThe Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems
Postnov, K., & Yungelson, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-3 · Cited by 358
“For recent studies and reviews of the evolution of massive stars and the mechanisms of corecollapse supernovae we refer to [402, 78, 316, 875, 212, 714].”
BackgroundRECONCILING THE STELLAR AND NEBULAR SPECTRA OF HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXIES*
Steidel, C. C., Strom, A. L., Pettini, M., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/159 · Cited by 437
“…main sequence lifetimes, evolutionary stages, end states, and chemical yields from massive stars all depend on the details of mass loss (e.g., Smith 2014), which itself depends on the initial chemical composition (e.g., Puls et al. 2008; Kudritzki & Puls 2000; Cantiello et al. 2007; Eldridge…”
BackgroundMind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap
Farmer, R., Renzo, M., de Mink, S. E., Marchant, P., & Justham, S. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b · Cited by 370
“We vary η between 0.1 and 1.0 (Smith 2014), with our fiducial wind being the (H) rate with η=0.1 (Yoon et al. 2010).”
InfluentialBolometric light curves and explosion parameters of 38 stripped-envelope core-collapse supernovae
Lyman, J. D., Bersier, D., James, P. A., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2983 · Cited by 329
“The current understanding of mass-loss from massive stars is encompassed in the review of Smith (2014), which includes a discussion of recent SN studies that favour the majority of SE SNe arising from binaries, with single, very massive Wolf– Rayet stars contributing a small fraction at most.”
BackgroundMargutti, R., Metzger, B. D., Chornock, R., Vurm, I., Roth, N., Grefenstette, B., Savchenko, V., Cartier, R., Steiner, J., Terreran, G., et al. (2018) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafa01 · Cited by 214
“The effective radius of a massive star could be increased just prior to its explosion by envelope inflation or enhanced mass loss timed with stellar death, as observed in a variety of SNe (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundGal-Yam, A. (2019) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051819 · Cited by 256
Khazov, D., Yaron, O., Gal‐Yam, A., Manulis, I., Rubin, A., Kulkarni, S. R., Arcavi, I., Kasliwal, M. M., Ofek, E. O., Cao, Y., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/1/3 · Cited by 247
“The physics and rates of mass loss are generally not well understood, and the rates used in stellar evolution models are quite uncertain (Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMorozova, V. S., Piro, A. L., Renzo, M., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/63 · Cited by 235
“Massive stars may lose large fractions of their hydrogenrich envelopes via steady line-driven winds, via stable or unstable binary mass transfer, or, possibly, through pulsational instabilities and eruptions (see, e.g., Smith 2014 for a recent review).”
BackgroundUnifying Type II Supernova Light Curves with Dense Circumstellar Material
Morozova, V. S., Piro, A. L., & Valenti, S. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6251 · Cited by 210
“At the same time, there has been increasing evidence of SNe interacting with dense circumstellar material (CSM) that requires strong mass loss shortly before core collapse (see Smith 2014, and references therein).”
BackgroundInteracting Supernovae: Types IIn and Ibn
Smith, N. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_38 · Cited by 205
“These are taken from the recent review by Smith (2014); see the caption for definitions.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationA Sun-like star orbiting a black hole
El-Badry, K., Rix, H., Quataert, E., Howard, A. W., Isaacson, H. T., Fuller, J., Hawkins, K., Breivik, K., Wong, K. W. K., Rodriguez, A. C., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3140 · Cited by 205
Double neutron stars: merger rates revisited
Chruślińska, M., Belczyński, K., Klencki, J., & Benacquista, M. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2923 · Cited by 202
“2 in Smith 2014, and references therein).”
Götberg, Y., de Mink, S. D., Groh, J., Kupfer, T., Crowther, P., Zapartas, E., & Renzo, M. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732274 · Cited by 139
“They are also available for the high-mass end where stripped stars are indistinguishable from Wolf-Rayet stars (Gräfener et al. 2002), which can also be formed from single stars stripped by stellar winds (Conti 1976; Smith 2014; Shenar et al. 2016).”
Backgroundde Mink, S. E., & Belczyński, K. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/58 · Cited by 199
Fremling, C., Sollerman, J., Taddia, F., Ergon, M., Fraser, M., Karamehmetoglu, E., Valenti, S., Jerkstrand, A., Arcavi, I., Bufano, F., et al. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628275 · Cited by 193
“Two main mechanisms have been suggested to produce SE SNe: either binary mass transfer (e.g., Iben & Tutukov 1985; Yoon et al. 2010; Claeys et al. 2011; Dessart et al. 2012; Yoon 2015) or strong line-driven winds from massive Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars (e.g., Conti 1976; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe Carnegie Supernova Project I
Taddia, F., Stritzinger, M. D., Bersten, M. C., et al. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730844 · Cited by 191
“…theory shows that single stars below a certain initial mass are unable to strip their outer envelopes, given that their line-driven winds are not strong enough to sustain large mass-loss rates for enough time (see e.g., Smith 2014, for a recent review on mass loss of massive stars).”
BackgroundSenchyna, P., Stark, D., Vidal-Garc'ia, A., Chevallard, J., Charlot, S., Mainali, R., Jones, T., Wofford, A., Feltre, A., & Gutkin, J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2059 · Cited by 135
“…Crowther & Hadfield 2006) The amount of EUV flux which passes through these winds to power nebular emission is decreased substantially by high-density winds and difficult to calibrate directly, especially beyond the He+ ionizing edge (e.g. Smith et al. 2002; Crowther & Hadfield 2006; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundZapartas, E., de Mink, S. E., Izzard, R. G., Yoon, S.-C., Badenes, C., Götberg, Y., de Koter, A., Neijssel, C. J., Renzo, M., Schootemeijer, A., et al. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629685 · Cited by 188
“The mass-loss rate by stellar winds as well as eruptive events is uncertain, in particular for the late phases and the most massive stars (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundEjection of the Massive Hydrogen-rich Envelope Timed with the Collapse of the Stripped SN 2014C
Margutti, R., Kamble, A., Milisavljevic, D., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/140 · Cited by 185
“• SN 2014C adds to the complex picture of mass loss in massive stars that recent observations are painting (Smith 2014) and demonstrates that the ejection of massive H-rich material is not a prerogative of very massive H-rich stars (M ∼ 60M , like the progenitor of SN 2009ip, Smith et al. 2010,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShivvers, I., Modjaz, M., Zheng, W., et al. (2017) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa54a6 · Cited by 182
“Type IIn SNe and SN Impostors Type IIn SNe are hydrogen-rich SNe that exhibit narrow lines in their spectrum — indicative of dense circumstellar material surrounding the progenitor at the time of explosion (see, e.g., Filippenko 1989; Schlegel 1990; Chugai 1991; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSTARFORGE: Towards a comprehensive numerical model of star cluster formation and feedback
Grudić, M. Y., Guszejnov, D., Hopkins, P. F., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1347 · Cited by 182
A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants
Beasor, E. R., Davies, B., Smith, N., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa255 · Cited by 175
“…not yet discussed how the envelope may be removed by a brief period of enhanced mass-loss, e.g. via binary envelope stripping or a short phase of enhanced mass-loss in the decades or centuries before explosion (e.g. Yoon & Cantiello 2010; Quataert & Shiode 2012; Smith 2014; Smith & Arnett 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDawes Review 6: The Impact of Companions on Stellar Evolution
Marco, O. D., & Izzard, R. G. (2017) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2016.52 · Cited by 173
“…have LBV-like mass-loss rates and in four cases progenitors are known, e.g., SN 1961V (Smith et al., 2011b; Kochanek, Szczygiel, & Stanek, 2011), 2005gl (GalYam & Leonard, 2009), 2010jl (Smith et al., 2011b), and 2009ip (Smith et al. 2010, Foley et al. 2011; see also Smith (2014) for a review).”
Extreme magnification of an individual star at redshift 1.5 by a galaxy-cluster lens
Kelly, P., Diego, J., Rodney, S., Kaiser, N., Broadhurst, T., Zitrin, A., Treu, T., Pérez-González, P., Morishita, T., Jauzac, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0430-3 · Cited by 125
Self-citationMassive main-sequence stars evolving at the Eddington limit
Sanyal, D., Grassitelli, L., Langer, N., et al. (2015) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525945 · Cited by 167
“…the most massive ones produce copious amounts of ionising photons (Doran et al. 2013), emit powerful stellar winds (e.g., Kudritzki & Puls 2000; Smith 2014) and in their final explosions are suspected to produce the most energetic and spectacular stellar explosions, as pairinstability…”
BackgroundObservational and Physical Classification of Supernovae
Gal‐Yam, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_35 · Cited by 165
“The narrow and intermediate-width emission lines are often assumed to result from the SN ejecta interacting with slowly-moving massive CSM (e.g., Chugai & Danziger 1994; Smith 2014).”
Bruch, R. J., Gal-Yam, A., Schulze, S., Yaron, O., Yang, Y., Soumagnac, M. T., Rigault, M., Strotjohann, N. L., Ofek, E., Sollerman, J., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abef05 · Cited by 167
“Such massive stars often experience mass loss from their outer layers, due to stellar winds, binary interaction, or eruptive mass-loss events (see, e.g., Smith 2014 and references within).”
BackgroundPTF11iqb: cool supergiant mass-loss that bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal supernovae
Smith, N., Mauerhan, J. C., Cenko, S. B., Kasliwal, M. M., Silverman, J. M., Filippenko, A. V., Gal‐Yam, A., Clubb, K. I., Graham, M. L., Leonard, D. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv354 · Cited by 162
“SNe IIn contribute a fraction of 8–9% of all core-collapse SNe (Smith et al. 2011a) in a volume-limited sample of large star-forming galaxies, and there are hints that they are as common or possibly more common at lower metallicity (see Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLOCAL RADIATION HYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATIONS OF MASSIVE STAR ENVELOPES AT THE IRON OPACITY PEAK
Jiang, Y.-F., Cantiello, M., Bildsten, L., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/74 · Cited by 161
“The radiative and mechanical energy output from massive stars are important feedback mechanisms regulating star formation and the structure of the interstellar medium in galaxies (Kennicutt 2005; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundDifferent to the core: The pre-supernova structures of massive single and binary-stripped stars
Laplace, E., Justham, S., Renzo, M., Götberg, Y., Farmer, R., Vartanyan, D., & de Mink, S. E. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140506 · Cited by 159
Rapid Stellar and Binary Population Synthesis with COMPAS
Riley, J., Agrawal, P., Barrett, J. W., Boyett, K., Broekgaarden, F., Chattopadhyay, D., Gaebel, S., Gittins, F., Hirai, R., Howitt, G., et al. (2021) · Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac416c · Cited by 110
“There is recent observational evidence that mass-loss rates may be overestimated for certain evolutionary phases (e.g., Smith 2014; Beasor & Davies 2018; Sander et al. 2020; Miller-Jones et al. 2021; Neijssel et al. 2021).”
BackgroundKlencki, J., Nelemans, G., Istrate, A. G., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038707 · Cited by 157
“Moreover, as pointed out by Yungelson et al. (2006), because mass-loss rates from massive stars are uncertain, it is possible that for a different set of mass-loss assumptions the range of CE survivors at the solar metallicity would extend to MZAMS > 20 M as well (Smith 2014; Renzo et al. 2017).”
BackgroundPOSYDON: A General-purpose Population Synthesis Code with Detailed Binary-evolution Simulations
Fragos, T., Andrews, J., Bavera, S., Berry, C., Coughlin, S., Dotter, A., Giri, P., Kalogera, V., Katsaggelos, A., Kovlakas, K., et al. (2022) · Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac90c1 · Cited by 97
“Throughout their lives, stars affect their surroundings via the immense energy radiated across the electromagnetic spectrum (e.g., Conroy 2013; Eldridge & Stanway 2022) and the nuclearprocessed material emitted as a stellar wind (e.g., Kudritzki & Puls 2000; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundLaplace, E., Götberg, Y., de Mink, S. D., Justham, S., & Farmer, R. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937300 · Cited by 86
“This is discussed further in Appendix E. Stellar wind mass loss is also an important uncertainty for the evolution of massive stars (Smith 2014; Renzo et al. 2017).”
BackgroundThe spectroscopic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram of Galactic massive stars
Castro, N., Fossati, L., Langer, N., et al. (2014) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425028 · Cited by 150
“Furthermore, uncertain mass loss rates (Smith 2014) and internal mixing processes (Bressan et al. 1981; Langer 1991; Schaller et al. 1992; Yoon et al. 2006) are more important the more massive the stars.”
BackgroundGötberg, Y., de Mink, S. E., Groh, J. H., Kupfer, T., Crowther, P. A., Zapartas, E., & Renzo, M. (2018) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03018 · Cited by 149
“They are also available for the high-mass end where stripped stars are indistinguishable from Wolf-Rayet stars (Gräfener et al. 2002), which can also be formed from single stars stripped by stellar winds (Conti 1976; Smith 2014; Shenar et al. 2016).”
BackgroundThe dynamics and outcome of star formation with jets, radiation, winds, and supernovae in concert
Grudić, M. Y., Guszejnov, D., Offner, S. S. R., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac526 · Cited by 149
Milisavljevic, D., Margutti, R., Kamble, A., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/120 · Cited by 148
“…Vink et al. 2001; Wellstein et al. 2001; Puls et al. 2008; Yoon et al. 2010), but the details behind the precise physical mechanisms that are involved and the stages that this mass loss takes place are not well constrained (see Eldridge et al. 2008; Langer 2012; Smith 2014 and references therein).”
BackgroundPre-supernova evolution, compact-object masses, and explosion properties of stripped binary stars
Schneider, F. R. N., Podsiadlowski, P., & Müller, B. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039219 · Cited by 74
“It is possible for this to be larger than what we have in our current sample, but our models do not include mass loss during LBV phases or other forms of pulsational and eruptive mass loss from massive stars (see e.g. Smith 2014), which likely limits BH masses from single stars.”
BackgroundResultThe Redshift Evolution of the Binary Black Hole Merger Rate: A Weighty Matter
van Son, L. V., de Mink, S. D., Callister, T., Justham, S., Renzo, M., Wagg, T., Broekgaarden, F., Kummer, F., Pakmor, R., & Mandel, I. (2021) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac64a3 · Cited by 112
“…driven winds is thought to be reduced at low metallicity, mass loss via LBV eruptions is likely to still be very significant also at low metallicity (e.g., Smith 2014; Sanyal et al. 2017; Kalari et al. 2018; Davies et al. 2018; Higgins & Vink 2020; Sabhahit et al. 2021; Gilkis et al. 2021).”
BackgroundRenzo, M., Ott, C. D., Shore, S. N., et al. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730698 · Cited by 146
“…do not say anything about the other possibly existing mass loss channels (e.g., binary interactions and/or impulsive phenomena, see, for example, Smith 2014; Smith & Arnett 2014; Morozova et al. 2015; Margutti et al. 2017) that are usually neglected in stellar evolution calculations, or…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Binary Comb Model for Periodic Fast Radio Bursts
Ioka, K., & Zhang, B. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab83fb · Cited by 140
“Note that the mass-loss rate of O7 and later stars is a factor of 10 to 102 lower than theoretically expected (Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundHopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A. R., Wheeler, C., Sanderson, R. E., Grudić, M. Y., Sameie, O., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Orr, M. E., Ma, X., Faucher‐Giguère, C., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3489 · Cited by 140
Björklund, R., Sundqvist, J., Puls, J., & Najarro, F. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038384 · Cited by 60
“…of massive stars, affecting their luminosities, chemical surface abundances, rotational velocities, and nuclear burning lifetimes, as well as ultimately determining which type of supernova the star explodes as and which type of remnant it leaves behind (Meynet et al. 1994; Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundStellar Evolution in AGN Disks
Cantiello, M., Jermyn, A. S., & Lin, D. N. C. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdf4f · Cited by 151
“When the stellar luminosity exceeds this limit, 5 These have densities of order ∼10−20 g cm−3 and temperatures of order ∼10 K. high mass-loss rates are expected (e.g., Owocki & Shaviv 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundDawes Review 6: The Impact of Companions on Stellar Evolution
Marco, O. D., & Izzard, R. G. (2017) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.8355 · Cited by 134
Jacobson-Galán, W. V., Dessart, L., Jones, D. O., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3f3a · Cited by 134
“However, we can probe these terminal phases of stellar evolution prior to the core-collapse of massive stars >8Me by understanding the composition and origin of the high-density, circumstellar material (CSM) surrounding these stars at the time of explosion (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundEvolutionary Models for Type Ib/c Supernova Progenitors
Yoon, S.-C. (2015) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.16 · Cited by 133
Graur, O., Bianco, F. B., Modjaz, M., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5eb7 · Cited by 133
“We refer the reader to Smith et al. (2011b) and Smith (2014) for further discussion of this diverse class of transients.”
BackgroundSelf-citationHo, A. Y. Q., Perley, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., Dong, D. Z. J., De, K., Chandra, P., Andreoni, I., Bellm, E. C., Burdge, K. B., Coughlin, M. W., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bcf · Cited by 127
“Prior to core collapse, massive stars can undergo mass loss via steady winds or eruptive episodes (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThermal and Non-thermal Emission from Circumstellar Interaction
Chevalier, R. A., & Fransson, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_34 · Cited by 122
Coppejans, D. L., Margutti, R., Terreran, G., Nayana, A. J., Coughlin, E. R., Laskar, T., Alexander, K. D., Bietenholz, M., Caprioli, D., Chandra, P., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8cc7 · Cited by 121
“Recent observations of a number of SNe show eruptions in the centuries prior to explosion (e.g., Margutti et al. 2014a, 2017a; Smith 2014; Milisavljevic et al. 2015), and AT 2018cow shows a similarly steep density profile (Margutti et al. 2019) to CSS161010.”
BackgroundResultSuper-Eddington stellar winds driven by near-surface energy deposition
Quataert, E., Fernández, R., Kasen, D., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw365 · Cited by 119
“LBVs are the most dramatic manifestation of episodic mass loss in massive stars (see, e.g., Davidson & Humphreys 2012; Smith 2014 for reviews).”
BackgroundHydrodynamic simulations of the inner accretion flow of Sagittarius A* fuelled by stellar winds
Ressler, S. M., Quataert, E., & Stone, J. M. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1146 · Cited by 119
“The agreement between our models and the Chandra data is overall quite good, particularly accounting for uncertainties in massive star mass-loss rates (e.g. Smith 2014).”
ResultA meta-analysis of core-collapse supernova56Ni masses
Anderson, J. P. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935027 · Cited by 118
“However, there is now mounting evidence (see e.g. Smith 2014 and discussion below) that a significant fraction SE-SNe arise from lower mass progenitors where the envelope stripping is achieved through interaction with a close binary companion (e.g. Podsiadlowski et al. 1992).”
BackgroundThe Science of the Einstein Telescope
Abac, A., Abramo, L. R., Albanesi, S., Albertini, A., Agapito, A., Agathos, M., Albertus, C., Andersson, N., Andrade, T., Andreoni, I., et al. (2026) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/081 · Cited by 434
Theory and Diagnostics of Hot Star Mass Loss
Vink, J. S. (2022) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094949 · Cited by 116
van Son, L. A. C., de Mink, S. E., Broekgaarden, F. S., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9809 · Cited by 115
“The main open questions concern the role of stellar wind mass loss (e.g., Smith 2014; Renzo et al. 2017), and interior mixing (e.g., Maeder & Meynet 2000), which affect the final core masses and radial evolution.”
BackgroundYan, L., Lunnan, R., Perley, D. A., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8993 · Cited by 114
“According to standard stellar evolutionary models, massive stars ( M30> ) are thought to have very little hydrogen at the time of supernova explosion (Georgy et al. 2012; Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
MethodBlack hole mass function from gravitational wave measurements
Kovetz, E. D., Cholis, I., Breysse, P. C., et al. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.103010 · Cited by 113
Jacobson-Galán, W. V., Dessart, L., Margutti, R., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf2ec · Cited by 113
A hot and fast ultra-stripped supernova that likely formed a compact neutron star binary
De, K., Kasliwal, M., Ofek, E., Moriya, T., Burke, J., Cao, Y., Cenko, S. B., Doran, G., Duggan, G., Fender, R., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas8693 · Cited by 87
The Young Supernova Experiment: Survey Goals, Overview, and Operations
Jones, D. O., Foley, R. J., Narayan, G., Hjorth, J., Huber, M. E., Aleo, P. D., Alexander, K. D., Angus, C. R., Auchettl, K., Baldassare, V. F., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f5 · Cited by 111
Shenar, T., Gilkis, A., Vink, J. S., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936948 · Cited by 111
“It was only later, with the realization that massive stars can drive significant winds, that stripping through winds or eruptions associated with single stars became a viable alternative (Conti 1976; Abbott & Conti 1987; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundOn the nature of hydrogen-rich superluminous supernovae
Inserra, C., Smartt, S. J., Gall, E. E. E., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3179 · Cited by 107
The Wolf–Rayet binaries of the nitrogen sequence in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Shenar, T., Sablowski, D. P., Hainich, R., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935684 · Cited by 105
Laplace, E., Götberg, Y., de Mink, S. E., et al. (2020) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937300/pdf · Cited by 105
Early-time spectra of supernovae and their precursor winds
Groh, J. H. (2014) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424852 · Cited by 104
“Mass loss immediately before the SN explosion has a major impact on the SN properties (see Smith 2014) and has been investigated in SN IIn using spectroscopy and photometry several days after their discoveries (e.g., Smith et al. 2007; Pastorello et al. 2007; Kiewe et al. 2012; Ofek et al. 2014;…”
MethodBaldassare, V., Reines, A. E., Gallo, E., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/57 · Cited by 101
“Though some SNe IIn have been associated with luminous blue variables (e.g., SN 2005gl; Gal-Yam & Leonard 2009, SN 2010jl; Smith et al. 2011b, and SN 2009ip; Foley et al. 2011), the exact nature of their progenitors is still debated (see Smith 2014 for a review).”
BackgroundSmith, N., Andrews, J. E., Dyk, S. D. V., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw219 · Cited by 98
“Names like SN impostors, Type V SNe, or η Carinae variables were often taken to be synonyms of LBVs (Humphreys & Davidson 1994; Humphreys, Davidson & Smith 1999; Van Dyk et al. 2000; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGrids of stellar models with rotation
Groh, J. H., Ekström, S., Georgy, C., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833720 · Cited by 97
Turbulent Gas in Lensed Planck-selected Starbursts at z ∼ 1–3.5
Harrington, K. C., Weiß, A., Yun, M. S., Magnelli, B., Sharon, C. E., Leung, T. K. D., Vishwas, A., Wang, Q. D., Frayer, D. T., Jiménez-Andrade, E. F., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcc01 · Cited by 97
Multi-epoch spectropolarimetry of SN 2009ip: direct evidence for aspherical circumstellar material
Mauerhan, J. C., Williams, G. G., Smith, N., Smith, P. S., Filippenko, A. V., Hoffman, J. L., Milne, P., Leonard, D. C., Clubb, K. I., Fox, O. D., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu730 · Cited by 96
“Various lines of evidence show that interacting SNe require eruptive pre-SN mass loss that is reminiscent of luminous blue variable (LBV) stars, like η Car, although observations indicate a wide range of mass-loss properties (e.g., see the review by Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationIRON OPACITY BUMP CHANGES THE STABILITY AND STRUCTURE OF ACCRETION DISKS IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI
Jiang(姜燕飞), Y.-F., Davis, S. W., & Stone, J. M. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/1/10 · Cited by 95
“Therefore, similar to the case of massive stars (Smith 2014), radiation acceleration via the iron opacity bump has the potential to drive significant outflow, even though the normal Eddington ratio is smaller than 1.”
BackgroundGRANDMA observations of advanced LIGO’s and advanced Virgo’s third observational campaign
Antier, S., Agayeva, S. B., Almualla, M., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1846 · Cited by 95
“…yr−1, where vCSM is the velocity of the CSM. Wolf–Rayet stars or red supergiant stars have difficulty in producing such intense ejections; while binary interaction can possibly be responsible for mass ejection of 10−3– 10−1 M yr−1 (see Smith 2014; Bhirombhakdi et al. 2019, and references therein).”
BackgroundThe Prevalence and Influence of Circumstellar Material around Hydrogen-rich Supernova Progenitors
Bruch, R., Gal‐Yam, A., Yaron, O., Chen, P., Strotjohann, N. L., Irani, I., Zimmerman, E., Schulze, S., Yang, Y., Kim, Y.-L., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd8be · Cited by 96
“These are hydrogen-rich SNe that show strong and narrow Balmer emission lines for an extended period of time and do not develop broad hydrogen features, characteristic of the high expansion velocity of the SN ejecta around peak light (Schlegel 1990; Filippenko 1997; Kiewe et al. 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundPhysical Correlations and Predictions Emerging from Modern Core-collapse Supernova Theory
Burrows, A. S., Wang, T., & Vartanyan, D. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad319e · Cited by 95
“It also experienced pronounced mass loss prior to explosion, which may not comport with the emerging understanding of stellar mass loss (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundOutbursts of luminous blue variable stars from variations in the helium opacity
Jiang, Y.-F., Cantiello, M., Bildsten, L., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0525-0 · Cited by 94
Be X-ray binaries in the SMC as indicators of mass-transfer efficiency
Vinciguerra, S., Neijssel, C. J., Vigna-Gómez, A., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2177 · Cited by 94
Drout, M. R., Milisavljevic, D., Parrent, J., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/57 · Cited by 94
Strong late-time circumstellar interaction in the peculiar supernova iPTF14hls
Andrews, J. E., & Smith, N. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty584 · Cited by 93
“However, a diverse range of observations dictate that close binary interaction (Sana et al. 2012; Moe & Di Stefano 2017) and asymmetric CSM (Smith 2014) are the norm among massive stars, not the exception.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationEarly Spectroscopy and Dense Circumstellar Medium Interaction in SN 2023ixf
Bostroem, K. A., Pearson, J., Shrestha, M., Sand, D. J., Valenti, S., Jha, S. W., Andrews, J. E., Smith, N., Terreran, G., Green, E., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf9a4 · Cited by 92
Self-citationVillar, V. A., Berger, E., Metzger, B. D., & Guillochon, J. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8fcb · Cited by 92
“In the ejecta–CSM interaction case, this separation roughly coincides with where the estimated mass-loss rate of the progenitor star roughly matches typical LBV mass-loss rates (M 10 3~ -˙ M yr−1; Smith 2014), and where many identified SNe IIn lie.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMassive donors in interacting binaries: effect of metallicity
Klencki, J., Nelemans, G., Istrate, A. G., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037694 · Cited by 89
“One key factor that significantly affects the evolution and fate of massive stars is wind mass-loss (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundType IIn supernova light-curve properties measured from an untargeted survey sample
Nyholm, A., Sollerman, J., Tartaglia, L., Taddia, F., Fremling, C., Blagorodnova, N., Filippenko, A. V., Gal-Yam, A., Howell, D. A., Karamehmetoglu, E., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936097 · Cited by 90
“The wide range of light-curve properties shown by SNe IIn indicates significant variety in both CSM and ejecta properties (e.g. Moriya & Maeda 2014), suggesting that different mechanisms and progenitor channels lead to the SNe IIn we observe (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundPerley, D., Sollerman, J., Schulze, S., Yao, Y.-H., Fremling, C., Gal-yam, A., Ho, A., Yang, Y., Kool, E., Irani, I., et al. (2021) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac478e · Cited by 58
“Given the abundance of W-R stars in the Local Group (Hainich et al. 2014; Rosslowe & Crowther 2015) and a lifetime of 106 yr in this phase (Smith 2014), the predicted W-R death rate is 3%–20% of the CCSN rate (Maoz & Badenes 2010), at least an order of magnitude in excess of what we inferred in…”
BackgroundNew prospects for detecting high-energy neutrinos from nearby supernovae
Murase, K. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.081301 · Cited by 86
Graur, O., Bianco, F. B., Huang, S., Modjaz, M., Shivvers, I., Filippenko, A. V., Li, W., & Eldridge, J. J. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5eb8 · Cited by 88
“There are theoretical reasons to expect that the fates of massive stars could be determined in part by metallicity (e.g., Langer 2012; Smith 2014; Yoon 2015) or SFR conditions (e.g., because galaxies with high sSFRs may have altered IMFs or because they may possess dense clusters with a high number…”
BackgroundMethodDead or Alive? Long-term evolution of SN 2015bh (SNhunt275)
Elias-Rosa, N., Pastorello, A., Benetti, S., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2253 · Cited by 84
“It is well known that massive stars occasionally produce giant eruptions during which they can largely increase their luminosity for months to years, and experience major mass loss (e.g. Smith 2014).”
BackgroundClarkson, O., Herwig, F., & Pignatari, M. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx190 · Cited by 86
“Towards the end of the lives of some massive stars, nonterminal, discrete mass loss events are detected as supernova type IIn or supernova imposters (see Section 4 of Smith 2014).”
BackgroundConstraints on core-collapse supernova progenitors from explosion site integral field spectroscopy
Kuncarayakti, H., Anderson, J., Galbany, L., Maeda, K., Hamuy, M., Aldering, G., Arimoto, N., Doi, M., Morokuma, T., & Usuda, T. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731923 · Cited by 60
“On the other hand, the WR star progenitors of SNe Ic lose mass through relatively steady, strong stellar winds (Crowther 2007; Smith 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review