The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
The impact of winds on the spectral appearance of red supergiants
Davies, B., & Plez, B. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2645 · Cited by 22
Neuhäuser, R., Torres, G., Mugrauer, M., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1969 · Cited by 22
Kilpatrick, C. D., Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8a4c · Cited by 22
“…ambiguous; the two most common explanations are enhanced radiative or eruptive mass loss (e.g., Langer et al. 1994; Maeder & Meynet 2000; Heger et al. 2003; Smith 2014) and interaction with and Roche lobe overflow onto a close binary companion (Woosley et al. 1994; Izzard et al. 2004; Yoon 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEarly evolution and three-dimensional structure of embedded star clusters
Cournoyer-Cloutier, C., Sills, A., Harris, W. E., Appel, S. M., Lewis, S. C., Polak, B., Tran, A., Wilhelm, M. J. C., Low, M. M., McMillan, S. L. W., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad568 · Cited by 22
Werner, N., Řípa, J., Thöne, C. C., et al. (2024) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01048-3 · Cited by 22
“Important targets for QUVIK are type IIn SNe (Schlegel 1990; Filippenko 1997; Smith 2014; Gal-Yam 2017), which show particularly strong and narrow-to-intermediate Balmer emission lines.”
BackgroundSN 2022jox: An Extraordinarily Ordinary Type II SN with Flash Spectroscopy
Andrews, J. E., Pearson, J., Hosseinzadeh, G., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a49 · Cited by 22
“Enhanced mass loss in massive stars such as lumin-ious blue variables (LBVs) or Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars occurs in the years before explosion (see Smith 2014 for a review), but was not necessarily expected in RSGs, where there is not yet a consensus on mass loss rates.”
BackgroundInfrared nebulae around bright massive stars as indicators for binary interactions
Bodensteiner, J., Baade, D., Greiner, J., et al. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832722 · Cited by 22
“LBVs show stellar outbursts and episodes of high mass loss during which the stars lose significant fractions of their initial mass (Humphreys & Davidson 1994; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInferring the parallax of Westerlund 1 from Gaia DR2
Aghakhanloo, M., Murphy, J. W., Smith, N., Parejko, J. K., Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Drout, M. R., Groh, J. H., Guzman, J., & Stassun, K. G. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3628 · Cited by 22
“However, these constraints on the distance and reddening depend sensitively on assumptions about how the strengths of winds for various classes of evolved stars depend on luminosity, which is still often debated (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA new and unusual LBV-like outburst from a Wolf–Rayet star in the outskirts of M33
Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., Moe, M., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa061 · Cited by 22
“LBVs have the highest mass-loss rates of any stars, and this can profoundly affect a massive star’s late-time evolution (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe origin of the late-time luminosity of supernova 2011dh
Maund, J. R. (2019) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 22
Critical angular velocity and anisotropic mass loss of rotating stars with radiation-driven winds
Gagnier, D., Rieutord, M., Charbonnel, C., et al. (2019) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834599/pdf · Cited by 22
How common is LBV S Doradus variability at low metallicity?
Kalari, V. M., Vink, J. S., Dufton, P. L., et al. (2018) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833484/pdf · Cited by 22
Three Dimensional Radiation Hydrodynamic Simulations of Massive Star EnvelopesPreprint
Jiang, Y.-F., Cantiello, M., Bildsten, L., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.10187 · Cited by 22
Owocki, S. P., & Shaviv, N. J. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1642 · Cited by 21
“Similar and additional arguments (Smith et al. 2010, 2011; Smith 2014) favoring an explosive scenario have also been given for the broader population of giant-eruption LBVs.”
BackgroundResultThermal and non-thermal X-ray emission from stellar clusters and superbubbles
Kavanagh, P. J. (2020) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-019-3719-5 · Cited by 21
Far-ultraviolet Spectra of Main-sequence O Stars at Extremely Low Metallicity
Telford, O. G., Chisholm, J., McQuinn, K. B. W., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ce2 · Cited by 21
“Both affect the time evolution of massive stars’ surface properties and their main-sequence lifetimes, which in turn set the total number of ionizing photons that a stellar population is predicted to produce (e.g., Levesque et al. 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundRadio Analysis of SN2004C Reveals an Unusual CSM Density Profile as a Harbinger of Core Collapse
DeMarchi, L. M., Margutti, R., Dittmann, J., Brunthaler, A., Milisavljevic, D., Bietenholz, M. F., Stauffer, C., Brethauer, D., Coppejans, D. L., Auchettl, K., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c26 · Cited by 21
“The exact nature of the underlying physical process causing this timedependent mass loss remains the subject of debate, as well as how these processes inform the evolutionary path of the progenitor (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundGap Transients Interacting with Circumstellar Medium
Cai, Y., Reguitti, A., Valerin, G., et al. (2022) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe8100493 · Cited by 21
“These lines are indicative of interaction of fast SN ejecta with slow-moving H-rich CSM ejected shortly before (tens to thousands of years [73]) the SN explosion ([74], for a review of the ejecta-CSM interaction theory).”
Kuncarayakti, H., Maeda, K., Dessart, L., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca672 · Cited by 21
“Stellar winds, binary interaction, and eruptions are among the prominent mechanisms (see, e.g., Smith 2014, for a review).”
Tsuna, D., Takei, Y., & Shigeyama, T. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbbc6 · Cited by 21
“This arises from the numerical instability caused by the large density discontinuity at the interface of the bound CSM and the star, after fallback of the bound CSM starts to dominate the emission.”
BackgroundInfluentialKilpatrick, C. D., Izzo, L., Bentley, R. O., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1954 · Cited by 21
Hiramatsu, D., Matsumoto, T., Berger, E., Ransome, C. L., Villar, V. A., Gómez, S., Cendes, Y., De, K., Bostroem, K. A., Farah, J., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2854 · Cited by 21
“Instead, LBV-like eruptions (e.g., Humphreys & Davidson 1994; Vink 2012; Smith 2014, 2017b), like those seen in Eta Carinae, may be responsible for the precursor, given their comparable luminosities.”
BackgroundDynamical Evolution and Radiative Processes of Supernova Remnants
Reynolds, S. P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_89 · Cited by 21
The Type IIn Supernova SN 2010bt: The Explosion of a Star in Outburst
Elias-Rosa, N., Dyk, S. D. V., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E., Smith, N., Kotak, R., Turatto, M., Filippenko, A. V., Pignata, G., Fox, O. D., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac510 · Cited by 21
“However, the nature of these progenitors is not fully clear, and other precursor 16 Miller Senior Fellow. channels have been proposed (see, e.g., Mauerhan & Smith (2012) in the case of the SN 1998S, or Smith (2014) for a larger review of this topic).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSupernova PTF 12glz: A Possible Shock Breakout Driven through an Aspherical Wind
Soumagnac, M. T., Ofek, E. O., Gal‐Yam, A., Eli Waxman, B., Ginzburg, S., Strotjohann, N. L., Schulze, S., Barlow, T. A., Behar, E., Chelouche, D., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafe84 · Cited by 21
“Type IIn supernovae (SNe) are characterized by prominent and narrow-to-intermediate width Balmer emission lines in their spectra (Schlegel 1990; Filippenko 1997; Smith 2014; Gal-Yam 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-consistent Solutions for Line-driven Winds of Hot Massive Stars: The m-CAK Procedure
Gormaz-Matamala, A. C., Curé, M., Cidale, L. S., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab05c4 · Cited by 21
“Moreover, it has been found that differences on a factor of two in the mass-loss rate considerably affects the final fate of a star (Meynet et al. 1994; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSmith, N. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2277 · Cited by 21
“The reliance upon the LBV phase for making WR stars from single stars is even more accute because of lowered O-star wind mass-loss rates (Fullerton et al. 2006; Bouret et al. 2005; Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLau, R. M., Hankins, M. J., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd8cd · Cited by 21
“The lack of broad hydrogen emission features also suggests SPIRITS 19q is not associated with a giant eruption from a luminous blue variable (LBV; e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKangas, T., Portinari, L., Mattila, S., et al. (2016) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · doi:10.17863/cam.5949 · Cited by 21
Discovery and Rapid Follow-up Observations of the Unusual Type II SN 2018ivc in NGC 1068
Bostroem, K. A., Valenti, S., Sand, D. J., et al. (2020) · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · Cited by 21
Nagao, T., Patat, F., Taubenberger, S., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1582 · Cited by 21
“10−5 M⊙yr −1; Smith 2014b), the polarization, in the optical bands, is higher in the shorter wavelength region.”
BackgroundSuperphot+: Real-time Fitting and Classification of Supernova Light Curves
de Soto, K., Villar, V. A., Berger, E., Gómez, S., Hosseinzadeh, G., Branton, D., Campos, S., DeLucchi, M., Kubica, J., Lynn, O., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a4f · Cited by 20
TheHerschelview of the nebula around the luminous blue variable star AG Carinae
Vamvatira-Nakou, C., Hutsemékers, D., Royer, P., et al. (2015) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425090 · Cited by 20
“It should also be stressed that the evolutionary models for massive stars are very uncertain at the post-main-sequence phases as they do not include any eruptive event, which means that the mass-loss rate recipes are poorly known (Smith 2014).”
Evolution of massive stars with new hydrodynamic wind models
Gormaz-Matamala, A. C., Curé, M., Meynet, G., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243959 · Cited by 20
The Circumstellar Material around the Type IIP SN 2021yja
Kozyreva, A., Klencki, J., Filippenko, A. V., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac835a · Cited by 20
“The CSM may be explained by an extraordinarily strong, steady wind Corresponding author: Alexandra Kozyreva sasha@mpa-garching.mpg.de that a massive star experiences during the few years prior to exploding (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundZiegler, J., Edwards, T., Suliga, A. M., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2748 · Cited by 20
SN 2020qlb: A hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with well-characterized light curve undulations
West, S. L., Lunnan, R., Omand, C. M. B., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244086 · Cited by 20
Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., Milne, P., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae726 · Cited by 20
Self-citationTHE O- AND B-TYPE STELLAR POPULATION IN W3: BEYOND THE HIGH-DENSITY LAYER
Kiminki, M. M., Kim, J. S., Bagley, M. B., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/42 · Cited by 20
“None of the stars in W3 are massive enough to have experienced significant mass loss over their lifetimes (see, e.g., Smith 2014), so the current masses are representative of the inital masses.”
BackgroundAldoretta, E. J., St‐Louis, N., Richardson, N. D., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1188 · Cited by 20
“The properties of such wind inhomogeneities have an enormous impact on derived mass-loss rates (Hamann et al. 2008), and thus on our understanding of stellar evolution (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundA JVLA survey of the high-frequency radio emission of the massive magnetic B- and O-type stars
Kurapati, S., Chandra, P., Wade, G. A., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2838 · Cited by 20
“However, the clumpiness of the medium is not expected to change the mass-loss rate by more than a factor of 3 (Smith 2014), much less than the discrepancy we note.”
BackgroundSingh, A., Kumar, B., Moriya, T. J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3050 · Cited by 20
“Assuming a wind velocity of 10 km s−1 (Smith 2014, for an RSG), the progenitor of SN2016gfy experienced an episode of enhanced mass loss 30–80 yr preceding the explosion.”
BackgroundSelf-citationJin, H., Yoon, S.-C., & Blinnikov, S. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe0b1 · Cited by 20
“Mass-loss has a great influence on the evolution of massive stars and the resultant core-collapse supernova (SN) types (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundShock-heated radiation-driven outflows as a solution to the weak-wind problem of late O-type stars
Lagae, C., Driessen, F. A., Hennicker, L., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039972 · Cited by 20
“The lives and deaths of massive stars are strongly influenced by the huge amount of mass loss they experience during their evolution in the form of radiation-driven stellar winds (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundOn the evolutionary state of massive stars in transition phases in M33
Kourniotis, M., Kraus, M., Arias, M. L., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2087 · Cited by 19
“Mass loss constitutes the most substantial property that drives massive stars throughout the diverse evolutionary channels (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundTale of GRB 171010A/SN 2017htp and GRB 171205A/SN 2017iuk: Magnetar origin?
Kumar, A., Pandey, S. B., Gupta, R., et al. (2022) · New Astronomy · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2022.101889 · Cited by 19
The luminous type IIn supernova SN 2017hcc: Infrared bright, X-ray, and radio faint
Chandra, P., Chevalier, R. A., James, N., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2915 · Cited by 19
A systematic study of super-Eddington layers in the envelopes of massive stars
Agrawal, P., Stevenson, S. P., Szécsi, D., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244044 · Cited by 19
A characterization of ASAS-SN core-collapse supernova environments with VLT+MUSE
Pessi, T., Prieto, J. L., Anderson, J. P., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346512 · Cited by 19
Detecting High-energy Neutrino Minibursts from Local Supernovae with Multiple Neutrino Observatories
Kheirandish, A., & Murase, K. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf84f · Cited by 19
“…growing observations of preexplosion mass losses or envelope in fl ation before the explosion in extra-galactic SNe ( Smith & McCray 2007; Immler et al. 2008; Miller et al. 2009; Ofek et al. 2013; Margutti et al. 2014; Smith 2014; Margutti et al. 2017; Yaron et al. 2017; Morozova et al. 2018 ) .”
BackgroundBilinski, C., Smith, N., Williams, G. G., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae380 · Cited by 19
Self-citationNewly formed dust within the circumstellar environment of SN Ia-CSM 2018evt
Wang, L., Hu, M., Wang, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02197-9 · Cited by 19
“Such primordial dust grains may have formed in the expanding matter blown from red giant stars or AGB stars 14,109 .”
BackgroundSN2023fyq: A Type Ibn Supernova with Long-standing Precursor Activity Due to Binary Interaction
Dong, Y., Tsuna, D., Valenti, S., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8de6 · Cited by 19
“Both SNe Ibn and their H-rich counterparts, SNe IIn, have CSM interaction signatures that point to pre-SN mass loss that is much stronger than normal massive-star winds (Smith 2014, 2017).”
Self-citationAfsariardchi, N., Moon, D.-S., Drout, M. R., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be6 · Cited by 19
“…range with a significant mass-loss rate have their envelopes stripped, leading to more compact progenitors and consequently nonType II SNe, such as Type Ib/c or IIb, although what fraction of the RSGs can have such substantial mass-loss rates is poorly understood (van Loon et al. 2005; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundCentrifugally driven mass-loss and outbursts of massive stars
Zhao, X., & Fuller, J. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1097 · Cited by 19
“While the physics of line-driven massloss is largely understood, the mechanisms driving the sporadic outbursts of stars like LBVs are not (see Smith 2014; Owocki 2015, for reviews).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBinarity at LOw Metallicity (BLOeM)
Bodensteiner, J., Shenar, T., Sana, H., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452623 · Cited by 18
Andrews, J., Bavera, S., Briel, M., Chattaraj, A., Dotter, A., Fragos, T., Gallegos-Garcia, M., Gossage, S., Kalogera, V., Kasdagli, E., et al. (2024) · Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adfb78 · Cited by 23
Interacting Supernovae: Spectra and Light Curves
Blinnikov, S. I. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_31 · Cited by 18
Tamborra, I., & Murase, K. (2018) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0468-7 · Cited by 18
Evolution of Helium Star–White Dwarf Binaries Leading up to Thermonuclear Supernovae
Wong, T. L. S., & Schwab, J. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b49 · Cited by 18
“Some Wolf–Rayet stars have reported momentum efficiencies 50» (Hamann et al. 1995), though inferred mass-loss rates may now be a factor of a few lower after accounting for clumping (e.g., Hamann & Koesterke 1998; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundGrant, D., Blundell, K. M., & Matthews, J. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa669 · Cited by 18
“…C T I O N The role of dynamics and mass-loss is interconnected with the evolutionary tracks of high-mass stellar binaries: during their lifetimes as stars to their eventual fate as supernovae and potential gravitational wave mergers (Belczynski, Kalogera & Bulik 2002; Sana et al. 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSuzuki, A., Nicholl, M., Moriya, T. J., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd6ce · Cited by 18
“16 1 csm csm 16 1 w 1 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞ ⎠⎟ ⎛ ⎝ ⎞ ⎠ ⎛ ⎝ ⎞ ⎠ ( ) This mass-loss rate is much higher than the typical mass-loss rate of Galactic red supergiants or Wolf–Rayet stars but is consistent with those required for luminous SNe-IIn (e.g., Kiewe et al. 2012; Taddia et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSNR G292.0+1.8: A Remnant of a Low-mass-progenitor Stripped-envelope Supernova
Temim, T., Slane, P. O., RAYMOND, J. C., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6bf4 · Cited by 18
“…indicating little mass loss, and those of Type IIL/b SNe have some of their H envelopes intact, the Ib/Ic SNe are thought to originate from stripped-envelope progenitors that experienced significant mass loss either through strong stellar winds or binary interactions (see review by Smith 2014).”
BackgroundA population of Type Ibc supernovae with massive progenitors
Karamehmetoglu, E., Sollerman, J., Taddia, F., Barbarino, C., Feindt, U., Fremling, C., Gal‐Yam, A., Kasliwal, M. M., Petrushevska, T., Schulze, S., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245231 · Cited by 18
Radiative Acceleration of Dense Circumstellar Material in Interacting Supernovae
Tsuna, D., Murase, K., & Moriya, T. J. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdb71 · Cited by 18
“This can give independent clues about the progenitor, especially for Type IIn SNe, which is under debate and possibly diverse (for reviews see Smith 2014, 2017).”
Backgroundde Burgos, A., Keszthelyi, Z., Simón‐Díaz, S., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450301 · Cited by 18
Nebrin, O., Smith, A., Lorinc, K., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf038 · Cited by 18
Spectropolarimetry of SN 2023ixf Reveals Both Circumstellar Material and an Aspherical Helium Core
Shrestha, M., DeSoto, S., Sand, D. J., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbb63 · Cited by 18
“Direct observations of mass loss during the final stages, the last months to years before the explosion, are complicated and poorly understood (Smith 2014).”
Self-citationCai, Z., Fan, X., Jiang, L., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/2/l19 · Cited by 18
“Recent observations support that mass loss in luminous blue variables (LBV) is important, and such strong LBV mass losses are seen in lowmetallicity dwarf galaxies and are relatively insensitive to metallicity (Smith 2014; Neill et al. 2011).”
BackgroundThe Wolf-Rayet binaries of the nitrogen sequence in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Shenar, T., Sablowski, D. P., Hainich, R., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935684e · Cited by 18
Wang, S.-Q., & Li, L. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba6e9 · Cited by 18
“…their CSM would power their unusual LCs; studying the 2 properties of the ejecta and CSM would provide important information, e.g., the masses of the ejecta and the CSM, the mass-loss rate and mass-loss history of the SN progenitors, and so on (see Smith 2014 for a review and references therein).”
BackgroundMassive Star Formation in the Ultraviolet Observed with the Hubble Space Telescope
Leitherer, C. (2020) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies8010013 · Cited by 18
“Pre iously, strong mass loss was invok to remove the surface layers, bu a downward revision of the empirical mass-loss rates led to the recog ition that steady stellar winds ar insufficient for the mass rem val [61].”
BackgroundDetection of the Red Supergiant Wind from the Progenitor of Cassiopeia A
Weil, K. E., Fesen, R. A., Patnaude, D., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab76bf · Cited by 18
“For massive stars, the main sequence phase is followed by the red supergiant phase, which is dominated by slow, dense winds, with velocities of ∼ 10–20 km s−1 and mass loss rates of ∼ 0.5–2.0 × 10−5 M yr−1 (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe possible disappearance of a massive star in the low-metallicity galaxy PHL 293B
Allan, A., Groh, J. H., Mehner, A., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1629 · Cited by 18
“LBVs play a key role in the mass budget of very massive stars (Smith 2014) and regulate their final compact remnant masses, which in some cases can be a massive black hole (Groh et al. 2019a).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAn Hα survey of the host environments of 77 type IIn supernovae within z < 0.02
Ransome, C. L., Habergham, S. M., Darnley, M. J., James, P. A., & Percival, S. M. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1093 · Cited by 18
Sundqvist, J. O., & Owocki, S. P. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1858 · Cited by 18
“Such mass-loss reductions have dramatic consequences for predictions of stellar evolution and feedback models (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundBritavskiy, N. E., Bonanos, A. Z., Mehner, A., et al. (2015) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526393 · Cited by 18
“The importance of investigating massive stars, especially dusty massive stars, comes from the observed phenomenon of episodic mass loss, which complicates modeling the evolution of these objects (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundTemim, T., Slane, P., Sukhbold, T., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab237c · Cited by 18
“If the SNR resulted from a the SN Ib/c, the progenitor may be a single, massive Wolf-Rayet star whose massive winds have removed the bulk of the stellar envelope, or a lower-mass star whose envelope has been stripped away by a binary companion (Smith 2014; Dessart et al. 2015; Yoon et al. 2017).”
BackgroundAbdalla, H., Aharonian, F., Benkhali, F. A., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935242 · Cited by 18
“However, some progenitors appear to exhibit mass-loss rates as high as 10−4– 10−3 M yr−1 (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfrared nebulae around bright massive stars as indicators for binary interactions
Bodensteiner, J., Baade, D., Greiner, J., et al. (2018) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832722/pdf · Cited by 18
Number of stars in the Sun’s birth cluster revisited
Arakawa, S., & Kokubo, E. (2023) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244743 · Cited by 18
Red Supergiant Problem Viewed from the Nebular Phase Spectroscopy of Type II Supernovae
Fang, Q., Moriya, T. J., & Maeda, K. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adceae · Cited by 17
“…break down in the presence of a binary companion (Heger et al. 2003; Eldridge et al. 2008; Yoon et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2011; Sana et al. 2012; Smith 2014; Yoon 2015; Yoon et al. 2017; Ouchi & Maeda 2017; Eldridge et al. 2018; Fang et al. 2019; Zapartas et al. 2019, 2021; Chen et al. 2023;…”
Bronner, V. A., Laplace, E., Schneider, F. R. N., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554642 · Cited by 17
Klencki, J., Nelemans, G., Istrate, A., et al. (2021) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038707/pdf · Cited by 17
An Exceptional Dimming Event for a Massive, Cool Supergiant in M51
Jencson, J. E., Sand, D. J., Andrews, J. E., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac626c · Cited by 17
“In particular, episodic mass loss in massive, cool supergiants remains poorly understood (e.g., Smith 2014), both in terms of the physical mechanisms that drive it and critical properties such as the frequency, possible duration, and mass-loss rates of the most extreme events; an extended massloss…”
BackgroundSelf-citationEruption of the Envelope of Massive Stars by Energy Injection with Finite Duration
Ko, T., Tsuna, D., Takei, Y., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac67e1 · Cited by 17
“10−5 M yr−1 (e.g., Vink et al. 2001; Smith 2014).”
A Panchromatic Study of Massive Stars in the Extremely Metal-poor Local Group Dwarf Galaxy Leo A*
Gull, M., Weisz, D. R., Senchyna, P., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca295 · Cited by 17
“At all redshifts, single and binary massive metal-poor stars are thought to be the progenitors to many explosive transients, including gravitational wave sources (e.g., Smartt 2009; Smith 2014; Spera et al. 2015).”
BackgroundExploring the influence of different velocity fields on Wolf–Rayet star spectra
Lefever, R. R., Sander, A. A. C., Shenar, T., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad625 · Cited by 17
SN 2020bio: A Double-peaked, H-poor Type IIb Supernova with Evidence of Circumstellar Interaction
Pellegrino, C., Hiramatsu, D., Arcavi, I., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace595 · Cited by 17
Probing the soft X-ray properties and multi-wavelength variability of SN2023ixf and its progenitor
Panjkov, S., Auchettl, K., Shappee, B. J., et al. (2024) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.66 · Cited by 17
“While historically, massive star evolution was thought to be dominated by single-star wind mass loss, there is now strong evidence that ∼ 10% of massive stars undergo substantial and even eruptive mass loss a few years prior to core collapse (see e.g., Smith 2014, and references therein).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNayana, A. J., Margutti, R., Wiston, E., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc2fb · Cited by 17
“M M 10 yr 4 1 for a stellar wind velocity of v w = 25 km s − 1 , which is at least an order of magnitude higher than typical RSG mass-loss rates ( N. Smith 2014; E. R. Beasor et al. 2020 ) .”
Extremely stripped supernova reveals a silicon and sulfur formation site
Schulze, S., Gal‐Yam, A., Dessart, L., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09375-3 · Cited by 17
“Massive stars can lose a substantial amount of their birth mass through stellar winds [135, 136], eruptions [136, 137], and interaction with a companion star [138, 139].”
Stability analysis, non-linear pulsations and mass loss of models for 55 Cygni (HD 198478)
Yadav, A. P., & Glatzel, W. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw236 · Cited by 17
Searching for the Expelled Hydrogen Envelope in Type I Supernovae via Late-Time Hα Emission
Vinkó, J., Pooley, D. A., Silverman, J. M., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa607e · Cited by 17
“…poorly understood: it could be due to winds (Heger et al. 1997; Puls et al. 2008), episodic ejection (Smith & Owocki 2006; Pastorello et al. 2007; Shiode & Quataert 2014), or binary interactions, including commonenvelope formation and ejection (see the reviews by Taam & Sandquist 2000; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSPIRITS 16tn in NGC 3556: A Heavily Obscured and Low-luminosity Supernova at 8.8 Mpc
Jencson, J. E., Kasliwal, M. M., Adams, S. M., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacf8b · Cited by 17
“Such mass-loss rate is consistent with a low-luminosity RSG (L≈ 104.5–105 Le) based on the standard observational prescriptions of de Jager et al. (1988; see, e.g., Figure 3 of Smith 2014).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationRueda, J. A., RUFFINI, R. J., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe5050110 · Cited by 17
“, [43,44], and references therein).”
Origin and impacts of the first cosmic rays
Ohira, Y., & Murase, K. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.061301 · Cited by 17
Detection of pristine circumstellar material from the Cassiopeia A supernova progenitor
Koo, B.-C., Kim, H.-J., Oh, H., et al. (2020) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0996-4 · Cited by 17
SN 2012aa: A transient between Type Ibc core-collapse and superluminous supernovae
Roy, R., Sollerman, J., Silverman, J. M., et al. (2016) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527947/pdf · Cited by 17
pion : simulating bow shocks and circumstellar nebulae
Mackey, J., Green, S., Moutzouri, M., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab781 · Cited by 17
“These late phases of evolution of massive stars are very un- ★ E-mail: jmackey@cp.dias.ie (JM) certain because some key physical processes are poorly constrained and poorly modelled, namely convection, mass loss, rotation, and interaction with a companion (for a review, see Smith 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review