The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
VLTI-PIONIER imaging of the red supergiant V602 Carinae
Climent, J. B., Wittkowski, M., Chiavassa, A., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936734 · Cited by 12
“…observed location in the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram is important in order to calibrate stellar evolutionary models for massive stars and to understand their further evolution toward WR stars and supernovae (e.g., Dessart et al. 2013; Groh et al. 2013, 2014; Smith 2014; Meynet et al. 2015).”
BackgroundSN 2014C: VLBI image shows a shell structure and decelerated expansion
Bietenholz, M. F., Bartel, N., Kamble, A., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa4003 · Cited by 12
“Fluctuations in the mass-loss rate over these timescales, short compared to the age of the star, have been seen or inferred in a number of stars (e.g. Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSN 2015bf: A fast declining type II supernova with flash-ionized signatures
Lin, H., Wang, X., Zhang, J., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1550 · Cited by 12
“Such a value is much larger than the typical mass-loss rate of 10−6–10−5 M yr−1 for red supergiants (RSGs) (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundOptical Rebrightening of Extragalactic Transients from the Zwicky Transient Facility
Soraisam, M., Matheson, T., Lee, C., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac4e99 · Cited by 12
“For example, mass loss in these stars has been plagued by uncertainties—its driving mechanisms in the early or late stages of nuclear burning are todate not well understood (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWang, L., Liu, L.-D., Lin, W., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7564 · Cited by 12
“Assuming that this eruption corresponds to the first CSM listed in Table 2, the wind velocity vwind can be derived, namely ( ) = + -v R z1 60.58 yr 42 km swind out,1 1, which is slightly higher than the observed wind velocity of Type II-P SNe (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialHistory of two mass loss processes in VY CMa
Quintana-Lacaci, G., Velilla-Prieto, L., Agúndez, M., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244396 · Cited by 12
A Flat-spectrum Radio Transient at 122 Mpc Consistent with an Emerging Pulsar Wind Nebula
Dong, D., & Hallinan, G. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc06c · Cited by 12
“This excludes the densest winds that have been observed around some supergiant stars (Smith 2014), though we note that the constraint applies only along the line of sight and dense but asymmetric gas from e.g. binary interaction is allowed (Dong et al. 2021).”
BackgroundFang, Q., & Maeda, K. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc5e7 · Cited by 12
“Several channels may be responsible for the pre-SN mass loss, including binary interaction, stellar wind, or a combination of both (Heger et al. 2003; Sana et al. 2012; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Yoon 2015; Fang et al. 2019).”
BackgroundDorn-Wallenstein, T. Z., Neugent, K. F., & Levesque, E. M. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0725 · Cited by 12
“…and theoretical evidence has revealed our lack of understanding of whether or not they explode after core collapse, what evolutionary stage they explode in, and what the resulting supernova ( SN ) explosion looks like ( e.g., Smith 2014; Smartt 2015; Sukhbold et al. 2018; Neustadt et al. 2021 ) .”
BackgroundA low-mass helium star progenitor model for the Type Ibn SN 2020nxt
Wang, Q., Goel, A., Dessart, L., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1038 · Cited by 12
Self-citationA Systematic Study of Superluminous Supernova Light-curve Models Using Clustering
Chatzopoulos, E., & Tuminello, R. M. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ae6 · Cited by 12
“Our grid selection for MCS is largely driven by published observations of nebular shells around massive, LBV–type stars indicating MCS ' 0.1–20 M (Smith & Owocki 2006; Groh et al. 2009; Wachter et al. 2010; Gvaramadze et al. 2010; Smith 2014).”
MethodInfluentialA numerical light curve model for interaction-powered supernovae
Takei, Y., & Shigeyama, T. (2020) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa050 · Cited by 12
“Massive stars are known to lose their own envelopes due to the radiation pressure throughout their lives (e.g., Castor, Abbott, & Klein 1975; Smith & Owocki 2006), leading to the formation of circumstellar matter (CSM) with a variety of density structures (see Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSNhunt151: an explosive event inside a dense cocoon
Elias-Rosa, N., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty009 · Cited by 12
“The study of these observables gives us important clues to the progenitors’ mass-loss rates, hence constraining the late evolution of massive stars (see, e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundEarly Shock Cooling Observations and Progenitor Constraints of Type IIb Supernova SN 2024uwq
Subrayan, B., Sand, D. J., Bostroem, K. A., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfe52 · Cited by 11
Zapartas, E., Fox, O. D., Su, J., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2208 · Cited by 11
Sfaradi, I., Horesh, A., Sollerman, J., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348761 · Cited by 11
The cosmic rate of pair-instability supernovae
Gabrielli, F., Lapi, A., Boco, L., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2048 · Cited by 11
Anugu, N., Gies, D. R., Roettenbacher, R. M., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad736c · Cited by 11
The diversity of strongly interacting Type IIn supernovae
Salmaso, I., Cappellaro, E., Tartaglia, L., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451764 · Cited by 11
SN 2023ixf: Interaction signatures in the spectrum at 445 days
Folatelli, G., Ferrari, L., Ertini, K., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554128 · Cited by 11
Dickinson, D., Milisavljevic, D., Garretson, B., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc108 · Cited by 11
Self-citationTinyanont, S., Fox, O. D., Shahbandeh, M., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adccc0 · Cited by 11
“Observations in the past decade provide evidence that binary interaction (Podsiadlowski et al. 1992) is the primary mechanism for producing the majority of SESN progenitors (Eldridge et al. 2013; see reviews by Smith 2014, 2017).”
Velocity evolution of broad-lined type-Ic supernovae with and without gamma-ray bursts
Finneran, G., Cotter, L., & Martin-Carrillo, A. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453047 · Cited by 11
Stochastic core spin-up in massive stars – implications of 3D simulations of oxygen shell burning
McNeill, L. O., & Müller, B. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2287 · Cited by 11
“…material (CSM) from late pre-collapse outbursts in a significant number of observed supernovae (for an overview, see Foley et al. 2011; Smith 2014; Bilinski et al. 2015; Smith 2017), although other mechanisms such as flashes from degenerate shell burning (Woosley & Heger 2015) or the…”
BackgroundSN 2014ab: an aspherical Type IIn supernova with low polarization
Bilinski, C., Smith, N., Williams, G. G., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2617 · Cited by 11
“Smith (2014) estimated that eruptive luminous blue variable (LBV) progenitors can have mass-loss rates in the range of 0.01–10 M yr −1, while even very massive red supergiant or yellow hypergiant progenitors have mass-loss rates in the range of 10−4–10−3 M yr −1.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationJencson, J. E., Adams, S. M., Bond, H. E., van Dyk, S. D., Kasliwal, M. M., Bally, J., Blagorodnova, N., De, K., Fremling, C., Yao, Y., et al. (2019) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe Infrared Echo of SN2010jl and Its Implications for Shock Breakout Characteristics
Dwek, E., Sarangi, A., Arendt, R. G., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac09ea · Cited by 11
“The natures of progenitor stars with such mass loss rates range from red supergiants to luminous blue variables (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundProperties of luminous red supergiant stars in the Magellanic Clouds
de Wit, S., Bonanos, A. Z., Tramper, F., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243394 · Cited by 11
Critical Metallicity of Cool Supergiant Formation. I. Effects on Stellar-mass Loss and Feedback
Ou, P.-S., Chen, K.-J., Chu, Y., & Tsai, S.-H. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca96e · Cited by 14
“Mass transfer is one of the essential processes in interacting binary stars that dramatically changes the post-main-sequence evolution (e.g., Iben 1991; Taam & Sandquist 2000; Yoon et al. 2010; Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialRickard, M. J., & Pauli, D. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346055 · Cited by 11
Estimating Ejecta Masses of Stripped-envelope Supernovae Using Late-time Light Curves
Haynie, A., & Piro, A. L. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf844 · Cited by 11
“…especially massive stars; however, the number of observed SESNe is too high to explain the majority with such high-mass stars ( Smith et al. 2011; Smith 2014; Sravan et al. 2019; Dessart et al. 2020 ) , and traditional stellar wind prescriptions cannot readily explain the high mass loss rates…”
BackgroundThe superluminous Type IIn supernova ASASSN-15ua: part of a continuum in extreme precursor mass-loss
Dickinson, D., Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3631 · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe metamorphosis of the Type Ib SN 2019yvr: late-time interaction
Ferrari, L., Folatelli, G., Kuncarayakti, H., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad195 · Cited by 11
Gray Radiation Hydrodynamics with the FLASH Code for Astrophysical Applications
Chatzopoulos, E., & Weide, K. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab18f9 · Cited by 11
“The density of the wind followed an ∼ r−2 profile consistent with the observed properties of RSG–type winds (see Figure 3 in Smith (2014)).”
MethodA New Luminous Blue Variable in the Outskirts of the Andromeda Galaxy
Huang, Y., Zhang, H.-W., Wang, C., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab430b · Cited by 11
“…stars and Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars (e.g. HD94; Maeder & Meynet 2000) or is an intermediate precursor of a supernova (e.g. Smith et al. 2007, 2008, 2011; Trundle et al. 2008; Gal-Yam & Leonard 2009; Groh, Meynet & Ekström 2013; Mauerhan et al. 2013; see more details in the review paper by Smith 2014).”
BackgroundPhysical parameters of red supergiants in dwarf irregular galaxies in the Local Group
Britavskiy, N., Bonanos, A. Z., Herrero, A., et al. (2019) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935212/pdf · Cited by 11
Poidevin, F., Omand, C. M. B., Pérez-Fournon, I., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac425 · Cited by 11
AN APPARENT PRECESSING HELICAL OUTFLOW FROM A MASSIVE EVOLVED STAR: EVIDENCE FOR BINARY INTERACTION
Lau, R. M., Hankins, M., Herter, T., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/117 · Cited by 11
“This mass loss will directly influence the evolution and death of massive stars since a star’s mass will dictate its power output, effective temperature, and nucleosynthetic products (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMehner, A., Steffen, W., Groh, J. H., et al. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628770 · Cited by 11
“Very massive stars with initial masses above 100 M may lose much of their mass in violent pre-supernova (SN) eruptions, which profoundly affect the appearance of spectra and lightcurves in the subsequent SN (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSupernova Remnants as Clues to Their Progenitors
Patnaude, D., & Badenes, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_98 · Cited by 11
“For CC SNRs, the argument is even stronger, as mass-loss is often the single most uncertain ingredient in stellar evolution models for SN progenitors (Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundStrong magnetic field generated by the extreme oxygen-rich red supergiant VY Canis Majoris
Shinnaga, H., Claussen, M. J., Yamamoto, S., et al. (2017) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/psx110 · Cited by 11
A Snapshot Survey of Nearby Supernovae with the Hubble Space Telescope
Baer-Way, R., deGraw, A., Zheng, W., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2175 · Cited by 10
“The sustained late-time luminosity of some SNe II can be explained by interaction of the SN shock with large amounts of CSM set up by the pre-SN wind (e.g., Fox et al. 2013; Smith 2014, 2017; Smith et al. 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Extremely Metal-poor SN 2023ufx: A Local Analog to High-redshift Type II Supernovae
Tucker, M. A., Hinkle, J. T., Angus, C. R., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8448 · Cited by 10
“Disentangling these effects remains a major difficulty in understanding massive star formation and (co-)evolution (e.g., Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
The Effect of Donor Star Rejuvenation on Common Envelope Evolution
Landri, C., Ricker, P. M., Renzo, M., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d3c · Cited by 10
“…with a separation of 1 au, the proximity of the stars generally gives rise to interactions via mass transfer, and their evolution will diverge from that of a single star ( e.g., P. Podsiadlowski et al. 1992; N. Langer 2012; H. Sana et al. 2012; N. Smith 2014; O. De Marco & R. G. Izzard 2017 ) .”
de Burgos, A., Simón‐Díaz, S., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453242 · Cited by 10
Cosentino, S. P., Pumo, M. L., & Cherubini, S. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf861 · Cited by 10
Cryoscope: A Cryogenic Infrared Survey Telescope in Antarctica
Kasliwal, M. M., Earley, N., Smith, R. M., Guillot, T., Travouillon, T. D., Fucik, J. R., Abe, L., Greffe, T., Agabi, A., Ashley, M. C. B., et al. (2025) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/adc629 · Cited by 10
“Single-star wind-driven mass loss cannot explain either the rate or the low progenitor mass observed in most SESNe, and binary-driven mass loss likely produces most of the SESN progenitors ( e.g., Smith 2014 for a review ) .”
Schneider, F. R. N., Laplace, E., & Podsiadlowski, P. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554362 · Cited by 10
Suzuki, A., & Shigeyama, T. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1603 · Cited by 10
Tsuna, D., Kashiyama, K., & Shigeyama, T. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfaf8 · Cited by 10
“The peak magnitude of average Type IIn SNe is estimated to be MV = −18.4±1.0 (Kiewe et al. 2012), with more recent estimates (Richardson et al. 2014; Nyholm et al. 2020) giving consistent results.”
MethodInfluentialIgnace, R., Fullard, A. G., Shrestha, M., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6fce · Cited by 10
“High levels of mass loss also affects the evolution of massive stars, in particular the nature of their remnants (Puls et al. 2008; Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundType IIP supernova SN2016X in radio frequencies
Ruiz-Carmona, R., Sfaradi, I., & Horesh, A. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142024 · Cited by 10
Investigating episodic mass loss in evolved massive stars
de Wit, S., Bonanos, A. Z., Antoniadis, K., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449607 · Cited by 10
Compact objects in close orbits as gravitational wave sources: Formation scenarios and properties
Li, Z., & Chen, X. (2024) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107568 · Cited by 10
HYDRODYNAMICAL INTERACTION OF MILDLY RELATIVISTIC EJECTA WITH AN AMBIENT MEDIUM
Suzuki, A., Maeda, K., & Shigeyama, T. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/32 · Cited by 10
“In fact, bright emission found in a special class of SNewith prominent hydrogen narrow lines in their spectra, SNe IIn (see, e.g., Filippenko 1997; Smith 2014, for a review), is explained by the hydrodynamical interaction.”
BackgroundInstability, finite amplitude pulsation and mass-loss in models of massive OB-type stars
Yadav, A. P., & Glatzel, W. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1808 · Cited by 10
“Accordingly, it has been the subject of a number of studies (see, e.g., the reviews on mass-loss by Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundHSC16aayt: A Slowly Evolving Interacting Transient Rising for More than 100 Days
Moriya, T. J., Tanaka, M., Morokuma, T., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f80 · Cited by 10
“…progenitors are es- Corresponding author: Takashi J. Moriya takashi.moriya@nao.ac.jp timated to be more than ∼ 10−4 M⊙ yr−1 (e.g., Kiewe et al. 2012; Taddia et al. 2013; Moriya et al. 2014; Fox et al. 2013; Ofek et al. 2014a) which is beyond the mass-loss rates of ordinary stars (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe Colliding Winds of WR 25 in High-resolution X-Rays
Pradhan, P., Huenemoerder, D. P., Ignace, R., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac02c4 · Cited by 10
“Evolutionary models show that large mass loss rates profoundly affect the ultimate state of the star, while the momentum input strongly affects the stellar environment (e.g., Langer 2012; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMehner, A., Steffen, W., Groh, J. H., et al. (2016) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 10
A Grid of Core-collapse Supernova Remnant Models. I. The Effect of Wind-driven Mass Loss
Jacovich, T., Patnaude, D., Slane, P. O., et al. (2021) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 10
Myers, C., De, K., Yan, L., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8922 · Cited by 9
“Massive stars are known to undergo intense terminal mass loss episodes which remain poorly understood (Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
Sfaradi, I., Horesh, A., Fender, R. P., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9e93 · Cited by 9
Shock-cooling Constraints via Early-time Observations of the Type IIb SN 2022hnt
Farah, J., Howell, D. A., Terreran, G., Irani, I., Morag, J., Pellegrino, C., McCully, C., Newsome, M., Gonzalez, E. P., Bostroem, K. A., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adad5a · Cited by 9
Baer-Way, R., Chandra, P., Modjaz, M., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc00a · Cited by 9
Self-citationVLTI-PIONIER imaging of the red supergiant V602 Carinae
Climent, J. B., Wittkowski, M., Chiavassa, A., et al. (2020) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936734/pdf · Cited by 9
Metallicity estimation of core-collapse Supernova H ii regions in galaxies within 30 Mpc
Ganss, R., Pledger, J. L., Sansom, A. E., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac625 · Cited by 9
文, J. 静. W., Gao, J., Yang, M., et al. (2024) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad12bf · Cited by 9
“The type of supernovae that a massive star will become is primarily determined by its initial mass, metallicity, as well as its mass-loss rate (MLR) during the RSG phase (Humphreys 2010; Ekstr¨om et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Meynet et al. 2015; Beasor & Davies 2018).”
BackgroundScience with a Small Two-Band UV-Photometry Mission II: Observations of Stars and Stellar Systems
Krtička, J., Benáček, J., Budaj, J., Korčáková, D., Pál, A., Piecka, M., Zejda, M., Bakış, V., Brož, M., Chang, H.-K., et al. (2023) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01058-1 · Cited by 7
“We are not sure (Smith 2014), and that is why we have to explore different evolutionary stages to understand when mass loss happens.”
BackgroundProspects for Time-Domain and Multi-Messenger Science with AXIS
Arcodia, R., Bauer, F. E., Cenko, S. B., et al. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10080316 · Cited by 9
“The formation of SNe is closely related to the end-of-life evolution of massive stars, which is a phase of stellar evolution that remains poorly constrained [239].”
Probing the Circumstellar Environment of the Highly Luminous Type IIn Supernova ASASSN-14il
Dukiya, N., Gangopadhyay, A., Misra, K., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7e11 · Cited by 9
“It is also much larger than the typical values of RSG and yellow hypergiants (10 − 4 − 10 − 3 M ⊙ yr − 1 ; Smith 2014), and quiescent winds of LBV (10 − 5 − 10 − 4 M ⊙ yr − 1 , Vink 2018).”
InfluentialWang, C., Patrick, L. R., Schootemeijer, A., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb61a · Cited by 9
“The evolution of massive stars into RSGs and the duration of this phase are sensitive to stellar internal mixing and wind mass loss during the RSG phase, both of which are still not well understood (Schootemeijer et al. 2019; Yoon & Cantiello 2010; Smith 2014; Zapartas et al. 2024).”
Mass transfer on a nuclear timescale in models of supergiant and ultra-luminous X-ray binaries
Quast, M., Langer, N., & Tauris, T. M. (2019) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935453/pdf · Cited by 9
Monitoring luminous yellow massive stars in M 33: new yellow hypergiant candidates
Kourniotis, M., Bonanos, A. Z., Yuan, W., et al. (2017) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629146/pdf · Cited by 9
Magnetic Archaeology of Early-type Stellar Dynamos
Jermyn, A. S., & Cantiello, M. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d2a · Cited by 9
“Massive stars play host to some of the most unusual stellar phenomena, including rapid mass loss (Smith 2014), time-varying UV emission (Ramiaramanantsoa et al. 2014), strong magnetic fields (Sundqvist et al. 2013), stochastic low-frequency variability (Bowman 2020), rotational mixing (Maeder &…”
BackgroundThe Rise and Peak of the Luminous Type IIn SN 2017hcc/ATLAS17lsn from ASAS-SN and Swift UVOT Data
Prieto, J. L., Chen, P., Dong, S., et al. (2017) · Research Notes of the AAS · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aa9c46 · Cited by 9
“…supernovae: general, supernovae: individual: SN 2017hcc INTRODUCTION Type IIn supernovae (SNe) are a heterogenous class of stellar explosions associated with the deaths of massive stars surrounded by dense circumstellar environments created by strong mass-loss episodes (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSmith, N. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00147-4 · Cited by 9
“Most other LBVs have quiescent mass-loss rates in the range 10 − 6 to 10 − 4 M ⊙ yr − 1 (Smith, 2014).”
InfluentialSelf-citationThe enigmatic double-peaked stripped-envelope SN 2023aew
Kangas, T., Kuncarayakti, H., Nagao, T., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449420 · Cited by 8
Pandey, P., Lopez, L. A., Rosen, A. L., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad83bc · Cited by 8
“Due to their high luminosities and large escape velocities, massive stars launch fast ( v w ≳ 10 3 km / s), line-driven stellar winds (e.g., see reviews by Smith 2014; Vink 2022).”
X-Shooting ULLYSES: Massive stars at low metallicity
Brands, S. A., Backs, F., de Koter, A., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452784 · Cited by 8
Bandopadhyay, A., Coughlin, E. R., & Nixon, C. J. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add9a5 · Cited by 8
“…of outbursts of astrophysical systems that eject mass in response to the deposition of energy near the stellar surface, such as classical novae (Gallagher & Star-rfield 1978), Type IIn supernova progenitors (Cheva-lier 1988; Kochanek 2011; Smith 2014), and X-ray bursts (Gottwald et al. 1986).”
Massive star population of the Virgo Cluster galaxy NGC4535
Spetsieri, Z. T., Bonanos, A. Z., Kourniotis, M., et al. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833290 · Cited by 8
“Due to complex mechanisms, such as mass loss, internal mixing and magnetic field effects (see reviews by Langer 2012; Smith 2014), predicting and understanding the evolution of stars with masses > 8 M remains a challenge.”
BackgroundIPTF15eqv: Multiwavelength Exposé of a Peculiar Calcium-rich Transient
Milisavljevic, D., Patnaude, D., RAYMOND, J. C., et al. (2017) · Civil War Book Review · Cited by 8
The contribution by luminous blue variable stars to the dust content of the Magellanic Clouds
Agliozzo, C., Phillips, N., Mehner, A., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141279 · Cited by 8
Vigna-Gómez, A., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc076 · Cited by 14
“…likely from single origin and therefore useful to explore the physics of supernovae (e.g., Fryer et al. 2012), such as fallback (e.g., Vigna-Gómez et al. 2021) and the pair-instability mass gap (e.g., Heger & Woosley 2002; Woosley 2017), as well as stellar winds (e.g., Smith 2014, for a review).”
BackgroundSN 2019nyk: A rapidly declining Type II supernova with early interaction signatures
Dastidar, R., Pignata, G., Dukiya, N., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348642 · Cited by 8
Chiotellis, A., Zapartas, E., & Meyer, D. M.-A. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae947 · Cited by 8
Eli Waxman, B., Wasserman, T., Ofek, E. O., et al. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a6b · Cited by 8
SN 2021foa: the bridge between SN IIn and Ibn
Gangopadhyay, A., Dukiya, N., Moriya, T. J., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf187 · Cited by 8
DISCOVERY OF FIVE CANDIDATE ANALOGS FOR η CARINAE IN NEARBY GALAXIES
Khan, R., Adams, S. M., Stanek, K. Z., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/815/2/l18 · Cited by 8
“The last stages of the evolution of the most massive (M30 Me) stars may be dominated by episodic large mass ejections (e.g., Humphreys & Davidson 1984; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundNear-infrared Characterization of Four Massive Stars in Transition Phases*
Cochetti, Y. R., Kraus, M., Arias, M. L., et al. (2020) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abae62 · Cited by 8
“Moreover, as the stellar evolution is sensitive to the mass loss (Smith 2014), the amount of mass lost in each stage affects the subsequent evolu- ar X iv :2 00 8.”
BackgroundInvestigating the Observational Properties of Type Ib Supernova SN 2017iro
Kumar, B., Singh, A., Sahu, D. K., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bb9 · Cited by 8
“In the case of a single massive (>20 M☉) Wolf-Rayet star, the radiationdriven stellar wind is the dominant process (see Woosley et al. 1995; Massey 2003; Crowther 2007; Smith 2014; Yoon 2015, and references therein).”
BackgroundThermal and Nonthermal Emission from Circumstellar Interaction
Chevalier, R. A., & Fransson, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_34-1 · Cited by 8
Survival of the Fittest: Numerical Modeling of SN 2014C
Vargas, F., Colle, F. D., Brethauer, D., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac649d · Cited by 8
“While mass loss is one of the key mechanisms regulating the evolution of massive stars, a complete understanding of it is still missing, specially during the final phases before the supernova (SN) explosion (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundOn the Anticorrelation between Duration and Redshift in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Lloyd-Ronning, N., Johnson, J. L., Cheng, R. M., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc795 · Cited by 8
“Assuming that the mass lost from winds is much less than the total mass in the system (Fullerton et al. 2006; Smith 2014), we can estimate the change in angular momentum due to winds as ∆Jwind loss ≈ ∆M∗R 2 ∗ω∗, and that gained from spin up as ∆Jspin up ≈ M∗R 2 ∗ω∗(∆(a)/a).”
MethodDetection of optical emission from the supernova remnant G7.7–3.7
Domček, V., Santisteban, J. V. H., Chiotellis, A., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2779 · Cited by 8
OPTICAL SYNCHROTRON PRECURSORS OF RADIO HYPERNOVAE
Nakauchi, D., Kashiyama, K., Nagakura, H., Suwa, Y., & Nakamura, T. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/164 · Cited by 8
“R stars: M M˙ 10 yrWR 4 1< − ⊙ − (Crowther 2007; Smith 2014).”
The First Candidate Colliding-wind Binary in M33
Garofali, K., Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab286e · Cited by 8
“The systematic biases in observed mass loss rates depend on choice of line diagnostic, as ρ2 diagnostics such as Hα are especially sensitive to wind “clumpiness” (Kudritzki & Puls 2000; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundUltraviolet Mg ii emission from fast neutral ejecta around Eta Carinae
Smith, N., & Morse, J. A. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1996 · Cited by 8
“Although poorly understood, episodic mass loss may play an important role in stellar evolution (Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014), at least for a subset of stars in interacting binaries (Smith & Tombleson 2015; Aghakhanloo et al. 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSPIRITS 16tn in NGC 3556: A Heavily Obscured and Low-luminosity Supernova at 8.8 Mpc
Jencson, J. E., Kasliwal, M. M., Adams, S. M., et al. (2018) · Liverpool John Moores University · doi:10.3847/1538-435/aacf8b · Cited by 8
Self-citationASASSN-14ms: The Most Energetic Known Explosion of a Type Ibn Supernova and Its Physical Origin
Wang, X., Lin, W., Zhang, J., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0c17 · Cited by 8
“CSM–Ejecta Interaction + Radioactive Decay Model (CSM+RD) An exploding star could possibly be surrounded by dense CSM formed through stellar winds, giant eruptions, binary interaction, or a pulsational pair instability (Smith 2014; Woosley 2017, and references therein).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review