The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 246 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of massive star evolution is in flux due to recent upheavals in our view of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars. Mass-loss rates for standard metallicity-dependent winds of hot stars are lower by a factor of 2–3 compared with rates adopted in modern stellar evolution codes, due to the influence of clumping on observed diagnostics. Weaker hot star winds shift the burden of H-envelope removal to the winds, pulsations, and eruptions of evolved supergiants, as well as binary mass transfer. Studies of stripped-envelope supernovae, in particular, require binary mass transfer. Dramatic examples of eruptive mass loss are seen in Type IIn supernovae, which have massive shells ejected just a few years earlier. These eruptions are a prelude to core collapse, and may signify severe instabilities in the latest nuclear burning phases. We encounter the predicament that the most important modes of mass loss are also the most uncertain, undermining the predictive power of single-star evolution models. Moreover, the influence of winds and rotation has been evaluated by testing single-star models against observed statistics that, it turns out, are heavily influenced by binary evolution. Altogether, this may alter our view about the most basic outcomes of massive-star mass loss—are Wolf-Rayet stars and Type Ibc supernovae the products of winds, or are they mostly the result of binary evolution and eruptive mass loss? This is not fully settled, but mounting evidence points toward the latter. This paradigm shift impacts other areas of astronomy, because it changes predictions for ionizing radiation and wind feedback from stellar populations, it may alter conclusions about star-formation rates and initial mass functions, it affects the origin of compact stellar remnants, and it influences how we use supernovae as probes of stellar evolution across cosmic time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We will also constrain the rates of individual eruption subclasses ( Smith 2014 ) by detecting them in galaxies out to tens of megaparsecs.”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Smith 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. X. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,317 · cited 1×
“Perhaps new open-source codes like MESA (Paxton et al. 2011) will facilitate this.”
BackgroundStarburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“This single-star paradigm then permitted one to extend even further, to compute models for the collective radiative output of entire stellar populations as a function of age (e.g., codes like starburst99; Leitherer et al. 1999).”
MethodDynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
PARKER, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,667 · cited 1×
“Later, estimates for the solar wind (Parker 1958) powered by hot gas pressure had such low mass-loss rates that winds would not matter much in stellar evolution.”
BackgroundStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“Since massive stars have short lifetimes, their ultraviolet (UV) radiation (reprocessed in various forms) is the most observable tracer of star formation and is used to calculate the star formation rates (Kennicutt 1998, Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries
Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 · Cited by 2,419 · cited 1×
“They leave behind exotic corpses such as black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, magnetars, and all the bizarre high-energy phenomena that occur when compact objects remain bound in a binary system (e.g., Remillard & McClintock 2006).”
BackgroundCollapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“The fact that GRB progenitors have shed most of their envelopes while still retaining a great deal of angular momentum (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999) would seem to strongly favor their origin in binary evolution with mass transfer to spin up the star, or even a merger.”
BackgroundThe evolution and explosion of massive stars
Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., & Weaver, T. A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 · Cited by 2,251
How Massive Single Stars End Their Life
Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375341 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 9×
“…very massive, and they made the first SNe, the first stellar mass black holes, the first dust, ejected the first metals back into the ISM, enhanced or dominated reionization, and probably triggered the formation of the earliest generations of low-mass stars (Bromm & Larson 2004, Heger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBinary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223344 · Cited by 2,121 · cited 7×
“…from several young clusters suggest that, when corrected for obervational bias, the fraction of massive stars in binary systems whose orbital period is so short that the stars must exhange mass or merge is something like 3/4 (Kiminki & Kobulnicky 2012, Kobulnicky & Fryer 2007, Sana et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bennett PD. 2010. In Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution , ed. C Leitherer, P Bennett, P Morris, J van Loon. ASP Conf. Ser. 425:181. San Francisco: ASP
- Cohen DH, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2391
- Conti PS, 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Lie'ge, 9, 193
- de Jager C, 1988, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 72, 259
- de Koter A, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 501
- Dessart L, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2113
- Feldmeier A, 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 299, 523
- Fullerton AW, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 699
- Gvaramadze VV, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 520
- Hamann W-R, 2008, Clumping in Hot-Star Winds
- Heger A, 1997, Astron. Astrophys., 327, 224
- Hillier DJ, 1991, Astron. Astrophys., 247, 455
- Langer N, 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 329, 551
- Mason BD, 2009, Astron. J., 110, 2715
- Meynet G, 1994, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 103, 97
- Najarro F, 1996, Astron. Astrophys., 306, 892
- Nieuwenhuijzen H, 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 231, 134
- Nugis T, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 227
- Paczynski B, 1966, Acta Astron., 16, 231
- Paczynski B, 1967, Acta Astron., 17, 355
- Podsiadlowski P, 2010, MNRAS, 406, 840
- Sana H, Evans CJ. 2011. In Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, IAU Symp. 272 , ed. C Neiner, G Wade, G Meynet, G Peters, pp. 474–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Wolf CJE, 1867, Comptes Rendus, 65, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Supernova 2014C: Ongoing Interaction with Extended Circumstellar Material with Silicate Dust
Tinyanont, S., Lau, R. M., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab521b · Cited by 33
“This scenario is also in line with the growing consensus that most stripped-envelope SNe are created via binary interaction, as opposed to single star mass loss (e.g. Smith 2014; De Marco & Izzard 2017).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationIs Betelgeuse the Outcome of a Past Merger?
Chatzopoulos, E., Frank, J., Marcello, D. C., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab91bb · Cited by 33
“We also run a subset of models for the q = 0.18 case (M1 = 17 M ) using the “van Loon” formula (van Loon et al. 2005) suggesting stronger winds during the RSG phase (Smith 2014) in order to investigate the effect of mass–loss on the final surface rotation rate.”
MethodInfluentialLaw, C. J., Milisavljevic, D., Patnaude, D. J., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab873a · Cited by 33
“…evolution (Arnett & Meakin 2011; Smith & Arnett 2014), and revisions to our understanding of mass loss and observations of a high binary fraction among O-type stars (Smith 2014) suggest circumstellar environments that are not spherically symmetric (Schwarz & Pringle 1996; Ryder et al. 2004).”
BackgroundA Non-equipartition Shock Wave Traveling in a Dense Circumstellar Environment around SN 2020oi
Horesh, A., Sfaradi, I., Ergon, M., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd38 · Cited by 33
“The mass-loss rate we deduce including the deviation from equipartition is on the higher end of the mass-loss rate in stripped envelope SN, but not in any extreme way (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMass Ejection in Failed Supernovae: Equation of State and Neutrino Loss Dependence
Ivanov, M., & Fernández, R. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe59e · Cited by 33
“Theoretically, enhanced mass loss (above steady line-driven winds) is expected from binary interactions (e.g. Smith 2014) or from additional energy injection such was wave energy dissipation (Quataert & Shiode 2012; Quataert et al. 2016; Fuller 2017; Fuller & Ro 2018).”
BackgroundPrieto, J. L., Rest, A., Bianco, F. B., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/787/1/l8 · Cited by 33
“14 Carnegie-Princeton Fellow. standard reference for understanding episodic mass-loss in very massive stars (e.g., Smith 2014), LBVs (e.g., Humphreys & Davidson 1994), supernova (SN) impostors (e.g., Humphreys et al. 1999; Van Dyk et al. 2002; Maund et al. 2006; Smith et al. 2011; Kochanek et al.…”
BackgroundSelf-citationBeasor, E. R., & Smith, N. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6dcf · Cited by 32
“For stars in the mass range 8–30M⊙, OB star winds on the main sequence are weak (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationDiversity of supernovae and impostors shortly after explosion
Boian, I., & Groh, J. H. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833779 · Cited by 32
“This lower limit is higher than the typical Ṁ of almost all massive stars in the local Universe, except for selected LBVs such as Eta Car (Groh et al. 2012) and others during S-Dor type outbursts (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundTwo stripped envelope supernovae with circumstellar interaction
Sollerman, J., Fransson, C., Barbarino, C., et al. (2020) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038960/pdf · Cited by 32
Pearson, J., Hosseinzadeh, G., Sand, D. J., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb8a9 · Cited by 32
“All massive stars are expected to lose mass, however the properties of mass loss (e.g. density, radial extent, physical location) vary for different progenitors (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationvan Son, L. A. C., de Mink, S. E., Chruślińska, M., Conroy, C., Pakmor, R., & Hernquist, L. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbf51 · Cited by 32
“Furthermore, all stellar winds’ mass loss from massive stars, binary interactions, and their ionizing effects are ignored (e.g., Dray et al. 2003; Smith 2014; Götberg et al. 2020; Doughty & Finlator 2021; Farmer et al. 2021; Goswami et al. 2022).”
BackgroundExceptionally fast ejecta seen in light echoes of Eta Carinae’s Great Eruption
Smith, N., Rest, A., Andrews, J. E., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1479 · Cited by 32
“Similar speeds are seen in the CSM of Type IIn supernovae (see Smith 2014).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe isolation of luminous blue variables: on subdividing the sample
Smith, N. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1533 · Cited by 31
“…mass loss exhibited by luminous blue variables (LBVs) is thought to be an important ingredient in stellar evolution (see, e.g., Smith & Owocki 2006; Smith 2014), but the way LBVs actually figure in this evolution and the physical mechanisms of their outbursts remains challenging to understand.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSafarzadeh, M., Hamers, A., Loeb, A., & Berger, E. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 31
High energy particles from young supernovae: gamma-ray and neutrino connections
Sarmah, P., Chakraborty, S., Tamborra, I., et al. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/011 · Cited by 31
Rosen, A. L. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9f3d · Cited by 31
“…nebulae of evolved massive stars, such as fast-rotating luminous blue variables, typically have a bipolar morphology because equatorial gravity darkening will lead to a higher mass-loss rate and faster wind speed along the poles of the star (Dwarkadas & Owocki 2002; Lobel et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe photometric variability of massive stars due to gravity waves excited by core convection
Anders, E. H., Lecoanet, D., Cantiello, M., Burns, K., Hyatt, B., Kaufman, E., Townsend, R., Brown, B., Vasil, G., Oishi, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02040-7 · Cited by 19
“Predictions of the elemental yield of a massive star and the nature of its remnant are sensitive to many processes including convection [5], winds [6], nuclear reaction rates [7], and numerical algorithms [8].”
BackgroundA Luminous Transient Event in a Sample of WISE-selected Variable AGNs
Assef, R. J., Prieto, J. L., Stern, D. K., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaddf7 · Cited by 31
“For type II (hydrogen rich) SLSN the leading mechanism for its radiated energy, instead, is thought to come from the interaction of a SN explosion ejecta with a dense circumstellar medium (CSM; e.g., see Smith et al. 2007; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundJencson, J. E., Adams, S. M., Bond, H. E., van Dyk, S. D., Kasliwal, M. M., Bally, J., Blagorodnova, N., De, K., Fremling, C., Yao, Y., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2c05 · Cited by 30
“For example, while some LBV eruptions show bluer continua and H lines with strong P Cygni profiles (e.g., NGC 3432 OT; Pastorello et al. 2010), others are indistinguishable from ILRTs (Smith et al. 2010, 2011; Rest et al. 2012; Prieto et al. 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKatsuda, S., Maeda, K., Bamba, A., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/194 · Cited by 30
“Therefore, it has been actively investigated from both observational and theoretical points of view (e.g., Smith 2014).”
BackgroundShock Dynamics in Stellar Outbursts. I. Shock Formation
Ro, S., & Matzner, C. D. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d5c · Cited by 30
“A few percent of core-collapse SNe exhibit narrow lines from dense circumstellar interaction, indicating intense phases of pre-SN mass loss (Smith et al. 2011; Kiewe et al. 2012; Smith 2014; Moriya et al. 2014).”
BackgroundObservational and Physical Classification of Supernovae
Gal‐Yam, A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_35-1 · Cited by 30
van Son, L. A. C., Roy, S., Mandel, I., Farr, W. M., Lam, A., Merritt, J., Broekgaarden, F. S., Sander, A. A. C., & Andrews, J. J. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada14a · Cited by 29
SN 2012aa: A transient between Type Ibc core-collapse and superluminous supernovae
Roy, R., Sollerman, J., Silverman, J. M., et al. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527947 · Cited by 29
“The SN can be powered either entirely by radioactive 56Ni → 56Co decay or by CSM interaction (or both).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe dusty aftermath of SN Hunt 248: merger-burst remnant?
Mauerhan, J. C., Dyk, S. D. V., Johansson, J., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2500 · Cited by 29
The luminous and rapidly evolving SN 2018bcc
Karamehmetoglu, E., Fransson, C., Sollerman, J., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936308 · Cited by 29
“Even without this, we find that both spectra and LC-based estimates of the mass-loss rate are very high, in the region associated with eruptive mass-loss in massive stars (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundProgenitors of Type IIb Supernovae. II. Observable Properties
Sravan, N., Marchant, P., Kalogera, V., Milisavljevic, D., & Margutti, R. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb8d5 · Cited by 29
“However, it is likely that this group also exists at solar metallicity given evidence that winds are weaker than previously assumed (Smith 2014; Yoon et al. 2017, see also discussion in Section 6.2 in paper I).”
BackgroundInfluentialA UV census of the environments of stripped-envelope supernovae
Sun, N.-C., Maund, J. R., & Crowther, P. A. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad690 · Cited by 29
The main evolutionary pathways of massive hierarchical triple stars
Kummer, F., Toonen, S., & de Koter, A. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347179 · Cited by 29
Sun, N.-C., Maund, J. R., & Crowther, P. A. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2277 · Cited by 29
“Thus, the shell corresponds to a high mass-loss rate of the progenitor system of (3– 5) × 10−2 M⊙ yr −1, which is much higher than those of linedriven winds (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialPartial stellar explosions – ejected mass and minimal energy
Linial, I., Fuller, J., & Sari, R. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3969 · Cited by 29
“In many cases, episodic eruptions, rather than continuous line-driven winds, are the dominant source of massloss from these stars (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundExploring the Red Supergiant wind kink
Vink, J. S., & Sabhahit, G. N. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347801 · Cited by 28
Discovery and Rapid Follow-up Observations of the Unusual Type II SN 2018ivc in NGC 1068
Bostroem, K. A., Valenti, S., Sand, D. J., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8945 · Cited by 28
“Once the star explodes, the radiation, shock wave, and (at later times) ejecta can interact with the material lost prior to explosion, producing observational signatures such as narrow emission lines, enhanced luminosity, and blue colors (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStromlo Stellar Tracks: Non-solar-scaled Abundances for Massive Stars
Grasha, K., Roy, A., Sutherland, R. S., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd6bf · Cited by 28
“Mass loss Mass loss is one of the dominant uncertainties in evolutionary models of massive stars (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe Impact of Realistic Red Supergiant Mass Loss on Stellar Evolution
Beasor, E. R., Davies, B., & Smith, N. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2574 · Cited by 28
“While there is ample evidence for strong pre-SN episodic mass loss from SNe IIn (for a review, see Smith 2014), there is currently no prescription for including that mass loss in evolutionary models.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPhotometric and spectroscopic evolution of the interacting transient AT 2016jbu(Gaia16cfr)
Brennan, S., Fraser, M., Johansson, J., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1243 · Cited by 28
A Search for Relativistic Ejecta in a Sample of ZTF Broad-lined Type Ic Supernovae
Corsi, A., Ho, A. Y. Q., Cenko, S. B., Kulkarni, S. R., Anand, S., Yang, S., Sollerman, J., Srinivasaragavan, G. P., Omand, C. M. B., Balasubramanian, A., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd3f2 · Cited by 28
Importance of stable mass transfer and stellar winds for the formation of gravitational wave sources
Dorozsmai, A., & Toonen, S. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae152 · Cited by 28
Expansion of Kes 73, A Shell Supernova Remnant Containing a Magnetar
Borkowski, K. J., & Reynolds, S. P. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa830f · Cited by 28
“…as a dwarf (i.e., luminosity class V) and its luminosity L is less than logL/L ≈ 5.2, since below this luminosity threshold observations show much weaker than expected winds for OB dwarfs (this is known as the weak wind problem; for a recent review of mass loss in massive stars, see Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialInteracting Supernovae: Types IIn and Ibn
Smith, N. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20794-0_38-1 · Cited by 28
Self-citationThe Double-peaked Radio Light Curve of Supernova PTF11qcj
Palliyaguru, N. T., Corsi, A., Frail, D. A., Vinkó, J., Wheeler, J. C., Gal-Yam, A., Cenko, S. B., Kulkarni, S. R., & Kasliwal, M. M. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf64d · Cited by 27
Kokubo, M., Mitsuda, K., Morokuma, T., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaff6b · Cited by 27
“Eruptions of LBVs produce M>−16 mag optical transients with similar optical spectra to SNe IIn, referred to as SN impostors (e.g., Van Dyk et al. 2000; Maund et al. 2006; Smith et al. 2011b; Smith 2014; de Jaeger et al. 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCG X-1: An Eclipsing Wolf–Rayet ULX in the Circinus Galaxy
Qiu, Y., Soria, R., Wang, S., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab16e7 · Cited by 27
“The most likely mechanism for such shrinking is a common envelope phase after the formation of the compact object (e.g., Dominik et al. 2012; Bogomazov 2014; Belczynski et al. 2016; van den Heuvel et al. 2017; Bogomazov et al. 2018; Giacobbo et al. 2018).”
BackgroundInteraction of SN Ib 2004dk with a Previously Expelled Envelope
Pooley, D. A., Wheeler, J. C., Vinkó, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e36 · Cited by 27
“Extensive mass loss has been associated with both Wolf-Rayet stars and luminous blue variables (LBVs; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundPropulsion of Spacecraft to Relativistic Speeds Using Natural Astrophysical Sources
Lingam, M., & Loeb, A. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7dc7 · Cited by 27
“It is, however, necessary to appreciate that the ambient gas density and the mass-loss rate associated with massive stars (or AGNs) are not spherically symmetric because they exhibit a strong angular dependence relative to the rotation axis of the central object (Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014).”
Backgroundsnapshot: connections between internal and surface properties of massive stars
Farrell, E., Groh, J. H., Meynet, G., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1360 · Cited by 27
“…and explosive mass-loss events during the late nuclear burning stages before core-collapse (e.g., Kotak & Vink 2006; Smith et al. 2007; Pastorello et al. 2007; Gal-Yam & Leonard 2009; Fraser et al. 2013; Gal-Yam et al. 2014; Smith 2014; Groh 2014; Fuller 2017; Yaron et al. 2017; Boian & Groh 2018).”
BackgroundCharacterizing dynamical states of Galactic open clusters with Gaia DR2
Angelo, M. S., Corradi, W. J. B., Santos, J. F. C., Jr., Maia, F. F. S., & Ferreira, F. A. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3192 · Cited by 27
“The OCs that survive the initial gas expulsion phase end up suffering mass loss due to: (a) stellar evolution (e.g., Vink et al. 2001; Smith 2014), (b) internal interactions, which ?”
BackgroundA systematic reclassification of Type IIn supernovae
Ransome, C. L., Habergham, S. M., Darnley, M. J., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1938 · Cited by 27
“It has been proposed that the progenitor systems of SNe IIn undergo massloss episodes preceding their terminal SN explosion (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundKangas, T., Portinari, L., Mattila, S., et al. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628705 · Cited by 27
“The YSG and LBV phases last on the order of 104 or 105 yr in single star evolution models (Neugent et al. 2012; Smith 2014), while the WR phase lasts a few times 105 yr (Crowther 2007).”
BackgroundWittkowski, M., Arroyo-Torres, B., Marcaide, J. M., et al. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629349 · Cited by 27
“…and location in the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram are of importance to calibrate stellar evolutionary models for massivetars and to understand their further evolution toward WR stars and SNe, a topic that has seen an increased interest (e.g., Dessart et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Meynet et al. 2015).”
BackgroundBroad-lined type Ic supernova iPTF16asu: A challenge to all popular models
Wang, L., Wang, X., Cano, Z., Wang, S. Q., Liu, L.-D., Dai, Z. G., Deng, J. S., Yu, H., Li, B., Song, L. M., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2184 · Cited by 27
“This is inconsistent with the properties of SNe Ic-BL, which have typical mass-loss rate ∼ 10−6M yr−1 (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundResultHow common is LBV S Doradus variability at low metallicity?
Kalari, V. M., Vink, J. S., Dufton, P. L., et al. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833484 · Cited by 27
“…S Doradus LBVs have traditionally been suggested to be transitional objects (Humphreys & Davidson 1994; Lamers et al. 1998), in the last decade, they have been proposed as direct core-collapse supernovae SNe progenitors (Kotak & Vink 2006; Gal-Yam & Leonard 2009; Groh et al. 2013; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe Origin of the Late-time Luminosity of Supernova 2011dh
Maund, J. R. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2386 · Cited by 27
“The evolution of such SNe is indicative of the progenitor stars having been stripped of all but a minute amount of hydrogen ( 0.1M⊙) and, as such, these SNe and their progenitors provide exquisite probes of the mass loss processes that massive stars may undergo (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSchultz, W. C., Bildsten, L., & Jiang, Y.-F. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb405 · Cited by 27
“This radiation, along with strong winds produced by massive stars, are important feedback mechanisms that regulate star formation and the structure of the interstellar medium in galaxies (Kennicutt 2005; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSN 2018gjx reveals that some SNe Ibn are SNe IIb exploding in dense circumstellar material
Prentice, S., Maguire, K., Boian, I., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2947 · Cited by 27
Evolved massive stars at low metallicity
Yang, M., Bonanos, A. Z., Jiang, B., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937168 · Cited by 27
Expanding CO Shells in the Orion A Molecular Cloud
Feddersen, J. R., Arce, H. G., Kong, S., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacaf2 · Cited by 26
“As noted by Offner & Arce (2015), these mass-loss rates are 2–3 orders of magnitudes larger than predicted by theoretical models of linedriven winds from main-sequence B stars (e.g., Smith 2014, Figure 3).”
BackgroundApplication of Convolutional Neural Networks to Identify Stellar Feedback Bubbles in CO Emission
Xu, D., Offner, S. S. R., Gutermuth, R., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6607 · Cited by 26
“However, these mass-loss rates are orders of magnitude higher than those that can be explained by stellar winds, outflows (considering outflows are collimated; Bally 2016), or ionization or radiation pressure from the stars observed in Taurus (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundThe universal acceleration scale from stellar feedback
Grudić, M. Y., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Faucher‐Giguère, C., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa103 · Cited by 26
“Lastly, in standard stellar mass-loss models (which likely overestimate the effects of winds; Smith 2014), the momentum from stellar winds is at most comparable to that of photons.”
BackgroundPitik, T., Tamborra, I., Angus, C. R., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5ab1 · Cited by 26
“Hydrogen-rich SLSNe exhibit strong narrow Balmer emission lines within their spectra, but are more luminous than standard type IIn supernovae (SNe IIn), achieving luminosities typically with M −20 at peak brightness (Gal-Yam 2012; Smith 2014; Gal-Yam 2019).”
BackgroundKangas, T., Yan, L., Schulze, S., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2218 · Cited by 26
Davis, K. W., Taggart, K., Tinyanont, S., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1433 · Cited by 26
Clumping and X-rays in cooler B supergiant stars
Bernini-Peron, M., Marcolino, W. L. F., Sander, A. A. C., et al. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346469 · Cited by 26
A generalized semi-analytic model for magnetar-driven supernovae
Omand, C. M. B., & Sarin, N. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3645 · Cited by 26
The slow demise of the long-lived SN 2005ip
Fox, O. D., Fransson, C., Smith, N., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2324 · Cited by 26
“Type IIn supernovae (SNe IIn; see Filippenko 1997 and Smith 2017 for reviews) are characterised by relatively narrow emission lines (Schlegel 1990) which are not associated with the SN explosion itself, but rather with dense circumstellar material (CSM) produced by pre-SN mass loss (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKatsuda, S., Maeda, K., Bamba, A., et al. (2016) · JAXA Repository (JAXA) · Cited by 26
Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity
Yang, M., Bonanos, A. Z., Jiang, B., Gao, J., Gavras, P., Maravelias, G., Wang, S., Chen, X., Lam, M. I., Ren, Y., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039475 · Cited by 26
Evidence of Weak Circumstellar Medium Interaction in the Type II SN 2023axu
Shrestha, M., Pearson, J., Wyatt, S., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad11e1 · Cited by 25
“However, the circumstellar material (CSM) created by this mass loss can have an impact on both the light curve and spectra of SNe II at very early times (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationInteracting supernovae as high-energy multimessenger transients
Murase, K. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.103020 · Cited by 25
“1 − 100 yr before the explosion [3, 30, 31].”
BackgroundThe Expansion of the Forward Shock of 1E 0102.2–7219 in X-Rays
Long, X., Gaetz, T. J., Plucinsky, P. P., Hughes, J. P., & Patnaude, D. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab09ea · Cited by 23
“Smith (2014) notes that for both red supergiants and Wolf-Rayet stars with solar metallicity, the massloss rates do not extend much past 10−5 M☉ yr −1, and the mass loss from line-driven winds scales as (Z/Z☉) 0.5, so maximum mass-loss rates will be further reduced in the low-metallicity…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRed supergiants in M31: the Humphreys–Davidson limit at high metallicity
McDonald, S. L. E., Davies, B., & Beasor, E. R. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3453 · Cited by 25
SN 2009ip: CONSTRAINING THE LATEST EXPLOSION PROPERTIES BY ITS LATE-PHASE LIGHT CURVE
Moriya, T. J. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/803/2/l26 · Cited by 25
“Type IIn SNe and SN impostors are related to the unsolved problems in stellar mass loss, and it is important to understand their origins (e.g., Smith 2014; Langer 2012).”
BackgroundA Spectroscopic Study of the Rich Supernova Remnant Population in M83∗
Winkler, P. F., Blair, W. P., & Long, K. S. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa683d · Cited by 25
“It has long been known that abundances affect both the momentum transfer and mass loss in the stellar winds of massive stars (e.g., Vink et al. 2001; Kudritzki 2002), though the situation is complicated (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundCollective non-thermal emission from an extragalactic jet interacting with stars
Vieyro, F. L., Torres-Albà, N., & Bosch-Ramon, V. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630333 · Cited by 25
“1, where a quantity ∝ m × dLNT/dm is shown, stars with masses significantly below 40M⊙ do not contribute significantly to the non-thermal luminosity; and the weak-wind problem would start to be significant for stars of spectral type O7O8, which have masses of ∼ 25 − 28M⊙ (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundResultShort-term Variability of Evolved Massive Stars with TESS
Dorn-Wallenstein, T. Z., Levesque, E. M., & Davenport, J. R. A. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab223f · Cited by 26
“During and shortly after the main sequence phase, mass loss rates are at their lowest (Puls et al. 2008; Smith 2014), and the geometries of their circumstellar media (CSM) are at their simplest (e.g., Garcia-Segura et al. 1996; Gvaramadze et al. 2018).”
BackgroundOn the observational behaviour of the highly polarized Type IIn supernova SN 2017hcc
Kumar, B., Eswaraiah, C., Singh, A., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1914 · Cited by 25
“The typical mass-loss rates in RSGs, yellow hypergiants and luminous blue variables (LBVs) are found to have a range of 10−6 – 10−4 M yr−1, 10−4 – 10−3 M yr−1 and 0.1 – 10 M yr−1, respectively (see Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialKurfürst, P., Pejcha, O., & Krtička, J. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039073 · Cited by 25
“Since the most radiatively efficient collisions occur with CSM located near the progenitor, the interacting SNe reveal the mass-loss history of massive stars shortly before the collapse of the core (e.g., Smith & McCray 2007; Smith 2014; Stritzinger et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSupernova 2018cuf: A Type IIP Supernova with a Slow Fall from Plateau
董一, Y. 泽. D., Valenti, S., Bostroem, K. A., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc417 · Cited by 25
Self-citationMass discrepancy analysis for a select sample of Type II-Plateau supernovae
Martinez, L., & Bersten, M. C. (2019) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834818/pdf · Cited by 25
The effect of mass loss in models of red supergiants in the Small Magellanic Cloud
Zapartas, E., de Wit, S., Antoniadis, K., et al. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452401 · Cited by 24
GRB 090510: A GENUINE SHORT GRB FROM A BINARY NEUTRON STAR COALESCING INTO A KERR–NEWMAN BLACK HOLE
RUFFINI, R. J., Muccino, M., Aimuratov, Y., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/178 · Cited by 24
“However, in spite of the fact that most massive stars are found in binary systems (Smith 2014), that most Type Ib/c SNe occur in binary systems (Smith et al. 2011), and that SNe associated with long GRBs are indeed of Type Ib/c (Della Valle 2011), the effects of binarity on long GRBs have been for…”
BackgroundThe Candidate Progenitor of the Type IIn SN 2010jl Is Not an Optically Luminous Star
Fox, O. D., Dyk, S. D. V., Dwek, E., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/222 · Cited by 24
“Galactic analogs with such mass-loss rates include anything from extreme self-obscured red supergiants (RSGs) to luminous blue variables (LBVs), each of which present further questions of their own (see Smith 2014 for a review).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Impact of Progenitor Mass Loss on the Dynamical and Spectral Evolution of Supernova Remnants
Patnaude, D. J., Lee, S.-H., Slane, P. O., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9189 · Cited by 24
“The exact details of the mass loss mechanism remain poorly understood (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialRUFFINI, R. J., Becerra, L., Bianco, C. L., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaee68 · Cited by 24
“Such a collapsar model does not address some observational facts: 1) most massive stars are found in binary systems (Smith 2014), 2) most type Ib/c SNe occur in binary systems (Smith et al. 2011) and 3) the SNe associated to long GRBs are indeed of type Ib/c (Della Valle 2011).”
BackgroundZapartas, E., de Mink, S. E., Dyk, S. D. V., et al. (2017) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.16654 · Cited by 24
Self-citationExplaining the differences in massive star models from various simulations
Agrawal, P., Szécsi, D., Stevenson, S. P., et al. (2022) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 24
Stellar triples with chemically homogeneously evolving inner binaries
Dorozsmai, A., Toonen, S., Vigna-Gómez, A., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3819 · Cited by 24
Ma, J.-Z., Chiavassa, A., de Mink, S. E., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad24fd · Cited by 24
“…down as a result of angular momentum conservation and may be further reduced by, e.g. mass loss due to stellar winds (e.g. Maeder & Meynet 2000; Smith 2014), possibly inward convective transport of angular momentum (e.g. Brun & Toomre 2002; Brun & Palacios 2009), and magnetic braking (Mestel…”
BackgroundSmith, N., Götberg, Y., & de Mink, S. E. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3181 · Cited by 24
“Recent estimates of mass-loss rates have been revised downward, lower than mass-loss rates adopted in most models (see Smith 2014 for a recent review).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationSN 2014C: VLBI images of a supernova interacting with a circumstellar shell
Bietenholz, M. F., Kamble, A., Margutti, R., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3194 · Cited by 24
“However, recently evidence has been mounting that many massive stars experience highly variable stellar winds and eruptive mass-loss in the period before the explosion (see Smith 2014, for a review).”
BackgroundKuriyama, N., & Shigeyama, T. (2020) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937226/pdf · Cited by 24
Evolving into a remnant: optical observations of SN 1978K at three decades
Kuncarayakti, H., Maeda, K., Anderson, J. P., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw430 · Cited by 23
“This implies that the progenitor of SN 1978K suffered heavy mass loss, with rate at least comparable to type-IIn SN progenitors with the highest mass loss rates (Kiewe et al. 2012) and the averaged mass loss rate in the events of LBV giant eruptions (Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMassive Black Holes Regulated by Luminous Blue Variable Mass Loss and Magnetic Fields
Groh, J. H., Farrell, E., Meynet, G., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba2c8 · Cited by 23
“MS stars at these luminosities are predominantly observed with emission-line spectra of the WNh sub-type, typically with Ṁ & 5 × 10−6M yr−1 derived using detailed spectroscopic modelling (Martins et al. 2008; Martins & Palacios 2013; Crowther et al. 2010; Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMethodResultSelf-citationMenon, S. H., Federrath, C., Krumholz, M. R., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac485 · Cited by 23
The Candidate Progenitor Companion Star of the Type Ib/c SN 2013ge
Fox, O. D., Dyk, S. D. V., Williams, B. F., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5890 · Cited by 23
“Drout et al. (2011) show that SNe Ib/c have relatively low ejecta masses; stellar winds are generally too weak to remove the entire outer envelope on their own (Smith 2014), except perhaps in the most massive (and rare) stars.”
BackgroundSelf-citationA machine-learning photometric classifier for massive stars in nearby galaxies
Maravelias, G., Bonanos, A. Z., Tramper, F., de Wit, S., Yang, M., & Bonfini, P. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141397 · Cited by 27
Pustilnik, S. A., Makarova, L. N., Perepelitsyna, Y. A., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3049 · Cited by 23
Demonstration of a Novel Method for Measuring Mass-loss Rates for Massive Stars
Kobulnicky, H. A., Chick, W. T., & Povich, M. S. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab3e0 · Cited by 23
“Reviews of massive star winds and mass loss include Kudritzki & Puls (2000), Puls et al. (2008), and Smith (2014).”
BackgroundClark, P., Maguire, K., Inserra, C., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3598 · Cited by 23
Time evolution of gamma rays from supernova remnants
Gaggero, D., Zandanel, F., Cristofari, P., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty140 · Cited by 22
“…times, for values of ÛM lower than ∼ 10−5M⊙/yr (being 2 × 10−5M⊙/yr our benchmark value), while for higher values it safely attains the PeVatron phase up to ∼ 100 yr MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2017) (see Smith 2014 for a comprehensive review on the mass loss rates in different types of progenitor stars).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Nathan
- ORCID
- Smith, Nathan
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-528
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2151213110
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 246
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- massive star evolution, stellar mass loss, hot star winds, Wolf-Rayet stars, Type Ib/c supernovae, stripped-envelope supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, eruptive mass loss, binary mass transfer, binary star evolution, O-type stars, stellar rotation, stellar feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review