The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?
Abstract
This essay synthesizes the results of the large number of studies of late–20th-century democratization published during the last 20 years. Strong evidence supports the claims that democracy is more likely in more developed countries and that regime transitions of all kinds are more likely during economic downturns. Very few of the other arguments advanced in the transitions literature, however, appear to be generally true. This study proposes a theoretical model, rooted in characteristics of different types of authoritarian regimes, to explain many of the differences in democratization experience across cases in different regions. Evidence drawn from a data set that includes 163 authoritarian regimes offers preliminary support for the model proposed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Authoritarian governments often use repression, such as torture or killings, strategically when faced with civil unrest. 41”
From Authoritarian collaboration and repression in the digital age: balancing foreign direct investment and control in internet infrastructure (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4135 · Cited by 7,981
Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy
Lipset, S. M. (1959) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1951731 · Cited by 7,050
Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation
Linz, J. J. (1996) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801851575 · Cited by 3,592
Coller, X., Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.2307/40184001 · Cited by 3,026
Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies
O'Donnell, G. A., & Schmitter, P. C. (2013) · Cited by 2,961
Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World.
Ness, G. D., & Moore, B. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092029 · Cited by 2,272
Modernization: Theories and Facts
Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0004 · Cited by 1,983
Democratic Experiments in Africa
Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174657 · Cited by 1,838
Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective
Gerhart, G. M., Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1998) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20049111 · Cited by 1,413
4. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions
Haggard, S. M., & Kaufman, R. R. (1999) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/ande11590-006 · Cited by 1,277
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Agüero F. 1992. The military and the limits to democratization in South America. In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective , ed. S Mainwaring, G O'Donnell, JS Valenzuela, pp. 153–98. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. Notre Dame Press
- Barros ASC. 1978. The Brazilian military: professional socialization, political performance and state building . PhD thesis. Univ. Chicago. 439 pp.
- de Oliveira ER, 1978, As Forças Armadas: Política e Ideologia no Brasil (1964–1969).
- Karl TL. 1986. Petroleum and political pacts: the transition to democracy in Venezuela. SeeO'Donnell et al 1986, 3:196–219
- Linz JJ, 1998, Sultanistic Regimes.
- Maxwell K. 1986. Regime overthrow and the prospects for democratic transition in Portugal. SeeO'Donnell et al 1986, 2:109–37
- Nordlinger E, 1977, Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments.
- O'Donnell G, 1986, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. 4 vols.
- Snyder R. 1998. Paths out of sultanistic regimes: combining structural and voluntarist perspectives. SeeLinz & Chehabi 1998, pp. 49–81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
The Patrimonial Logic of the Police in Eastern Europe
Hensell, S. (2012) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2012.681244 · Cited by 12
“Thus the logic of neo-patrimonial rule is determined by the person of the president who uses various strategies for retaining power and who personalises the system from above (Bratton & van de Walle 1997, pp. 61–65; Chehabi & Linz 1998a, pp. 7–10, 13–17; Geddes 1999, pp. 121–22).”
BackgroundComing to terms with neopatrimonialism: Soviet and American nation-building projects in Afghanistan
Hess, S. (2010) · Central Asian Survey · doi:10.1080/02634937.2010.490677 · Cited by 12
“As noted by Barbara Geddes (1999) , regimes of this type, which she identified as ‘personalist’ have an important defence against internal fragmentation in that rulers can both reward loyalty and punish unsuccessful defectors.”
BackgroundInfluentialPartisan legitimacy across generations
Anderson, C. J., & Just, A. (2011) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2011.11.003 · Cited by 13
“While studies of democratic stability have frequently assigned an important role to political parties and the actions of political elites in shaping the stability and legitimacy of democracies (e.g., Bunce, 2003; Geddes, 1999; Przeworski, 2005; Weingast, 1997), research on political behavior has paid relatively less a…”
BackgroundInternational Organizations and Democratization: Testing the Effect of GATT/WTO Membership
Cooper, M. C. (2003) · Shorenstein APARC · Cited by 12
Contracting on Violence: Authoritarian Repression and Military Intervention in PoliticsPreprint
Svolik, M. W. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1526640 · Cited by 13
The Autocratic Welfare State Resource Distribution, Credible Commitments and Political SurvivalPreprint
Knutsen, C. H., & Rasmussen, M. B. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2482593 · Cited by 12
Loxton, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560566.002 · Cited by 12
Coding competitive authoritarianism
Bardall, G. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s12286-015-0259-4 · Cited by 11
Leon, D. S. (2022) · International Area Studies Review · doi:10.1177/22338659221120976 · Cited by 13
“Such politico-economic inclusion of marginalized social sectors allows the building of a majoritarian electoral coalition that provides political legitimacy to the ruling party, even if the government enacts illiberal policies (De Mesquita and Smith, 2010; Geddes, 1999; Levitsky and Way, 2002; Lipset, 1955).”
BackgroundLev‐On, A. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02302-9 · Cited by 12
Schlumberger, O. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935307.013.18 · Cited by 13
Privatization and elite defection in de facto states: The case of Transnistria, 1991–2012
Balmaceda, M. M. (2013) · Communist and Post-Communist Studies · doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.08.001 · Cited by 11
Fukuoka, Y. (2015) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2015.1011212 · Cited by 11
“…stable authoritarian regime: the stable circulation of patronage could lengthen actors’ time horizons through the provision of future opportunities for career advancement; in this way ruling parties create incentives for longterm loyalty (Brownlee, 2007, p. 13; see also Geddes, 1999; Svolik, 2012).”
BackgroundLegitimationsstrategien von Autokratien
Kailitz, S., & Wurster, S. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s12286-017-0338-9 · Cited by 13
Abortive regime transition in Egypt: pro-democracy alliance and demand-making framework
Hatab, S. (2017) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2017.1404577 · Cited by 12
Religious Politics in Turkey : From the Birth of the Republic to the AKP
Lord, C. (2020) · Cited by 11
Kjær, A. M., Engberg‐Pedersen, L., & Buur, L. (2015) · Cited by 11
Lawson, G. (2019) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soz171 · Cited by 11
The state-in-society approach to the study of democratization with examples from Japan
Haddad, M. A. (2010) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2010.501182 · Cited by 11
A Modest Transformation: Political Change in the Arab World after the “Arab Spring”
Bellin, E. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137344045_3 · Cited by 11
Urban Protests, Coups d’état and Post-Coup Regime Change
Gerling, L. (2017) · Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1515/peps-2017-0033 · Cited by 13
“As control variables we include economic growth as well as a dummy variable indicating whether the coup was staged in a military regime, reflecting the notion that military regimes are characterized by specific political transition dynamics (Geddes, 1999).”
MethodProtests, Parties, and Presidential Succession
Hess, S. (2010) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.2753/ppc1075-8216570103 · Cited by 11
Alternation through Death: Is Gerontocracy an Equilibrium?
Magni-Berton, R., & Panel, S. (2018) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912918775251 · Cited by 11
“…however, where the selectorate is not clearly defined: these cases include, for example, highly personalized autocracies, which rarely survive after the leader’s death (Geddes 1999), but also systems in which the dictator relies on several organizations that compete for influence (see Haber 2006).”
BackgroundMatovski, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009047500 · Cited by 73
Decentralised Governance: Crafting Effective Democracies Around the World
Faguet, J.-P., & Pal, S. (2022) · LSE Press eBooks · doi:10.31389/lsepress.dlg · Cited by 17
Economic Crises, Military Rebellions, and Democratic Survival
Mainwaring, S. P., & Simison, E. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197598757.003.0007 · Cited by 10
La supervivencia de la democracia en América Latina (1945-2005)
Pérez‐Liñán, A., & Mainwaring, S. P. (2015) · AMÉRICA LATINA HOY · doi:10.14201/alh201468139168 · Cited by 10
Klimovich, S. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41358-023-00345-7 · Cited by 14
Comparative Leadership in Non-democracies
Frantz, E., & Stein, E. A. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137264916_14 · Cited by 10
“‖ The concentration of power in personalist regimes leaves regime actors outside the elite support coalition politically impotent (Geddes 1999, 2003).”
BackgroundGlobal democracy and domestic analogies
Koenig‐Archibugi, M. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977992.009 · Cited by 10
Do Development and Democracy Positively Affect Gender Equality in Cabinets?
Högström, J. (2015) · Japanese Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s1468109915000225 · Cited by 10
Dictators and Death: Casualty Sensitivity of Autocracies in Militarized Interstate Disputes
Şirin, Ç. V., & Koch, M. T. (2015) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12207 · Cited by 10
Ambition, personalist regimes, and control of authoritarian leaders
Kosterina, S. (2016) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629816630434 · Cited by 10
Press, R. M. (2004) · Cited by 10
Brummer, K., & Oppermann, K. (2019) · German Politics · doi:10.1080/09644008.2019.1568992 · Cited by 10
Are post-Soviet leaders doomed to be populist? A comparative analysis of Putin and Nazarbayev
Busygina, I. M. (2019) · European Politics and Society · doi:10.1080/23745118.2019.1569345 · Cited by 10
“Geddes labels regime personalist when one individual wins initial struggle for power, success- fully continuing to draw support from the organization that brought him to power but limiting his supporters’ influence on policy and personnel decisions (Geddes, 1999, p. 122).”
BackgroundLi, Y. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108557054 · Cited by 25
Assessing party structures: why some regimes are more authoritarian than others
Abdullah, W. J. (2016) · Australian Journal Of International Affairs · doi:10.1080/10357718.2016.1151859 · Cited by 10
Authoritarian Regimes and Their Permitted Oppositions: Election Day Outcomes in Cuba
Domínguez, J. I., Galvis, Á. F., & Superti, C. (2017) · Latin American Politics and Society · doi:10.1111/laps.12017 · Cited by 10
Torikai, M. (2019) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.1080/1060586x.2019.1589683 · Cited by 10
“Personal and particularistic patronage distribution often undermines regime stability due to the defection of elites (Geddes 1999).”
BackgroundHirt, N. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2353803 · Cited by 10
Sticks, Stones and Molotov Cocktails: Unarmed Collective Violence and DemocratizationPreprint
Kadivar, M. A., & Ketchley, N. (2017) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/tdcae · Cited by 12
What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies
Cianetti, L., Panta, G. D., & Owen, C. (2025) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418 · Cited by 13
Political consequences of natural disasters: accidental democratization?
Povitkina, M., Jagers, S. C., Rydén, O., & Sjöstedt, M. (2025) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2025.2494740 · Cited by 6
“24 Hence, existing empirical studies vary in how they view the potential for democratization in the face of external shocks.”
Ibañez, D., & Bello-Gómez, R. A. (2025) · Policy studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2025.2580389 · Cited by 7
“In the context of backsliding, participation tends to reinforce regime stability rather than promote democratic change (Brownlee 2007; Geddes 1999).”
Brooks, R. A., & Pion-Berlin, D. (2022) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogac026 · Cited by 9
Demmelhuber, T., & Thies, A. (2023) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2023.2171392 · Cited by 9
“…scholarly debate is rich and diverse in differentiating distinct modes of autocratic durability such as repression, cooptation and legitimation (Gerschewski 2013), but it is also crystal clear that these ‘pillars’ interact and are interwoven and dependent on the subtype of the regime (Geddes 1999).”
BackgroundEconomic theories of dictatorship
Debs, A. (2010) · The Economics of Peace and Security Journal · doi:10.15355/epsj.5.1.20 · Cited by 9
“Geddes (1999).”
Democratization Without Westernisation? Embedding Democracy in Local African Cultures
Haang’andu, P., & Béland, D. (2019) · Politikon · doi:10.1080/02589346.2019.1612179 · Cited by 9
“Political scientists have long grappled with the question of why democratisation succeeds in some countries and fails in others (Freund and Jaud 2013; Geddes 1999; Kucera and Mares 2015).”
BackgroundTolstrup, J., & Souleimanov, E. (2021) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2021.13 · Cited by 9
“…autocracies.2 Secondly, as the emergence of powerful rival factions constitute the greatest threat to the survival of a personalist dictator (Geddes 1999: 130; Geddes et al. 2018), the ruler will be particularly attentive to both disloyal provincial leaders and to those who appear loyal…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Failure of Presidentialism in Central Asia
Abdukadirov, S. (2009) · Asian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/02185370903403509 · Cited by 9
“Personalist regimes normally evolve out of military or one-party regimes as a result of struggle among rival leaders (Geddes, 1999).”
BackgroundIqbal, J. M. (2009) · South Asian Survey · doi:10.1177/097152310801600108 · Cited by 9
Party Adaptation and the Prospects for Democratization in Authoritarian China
Xie, Y. (2008) · Issues & Studies · Cited by 9
Minority Languages in Dictatorships: A New Measure of Group Recognition
Liu, A. H., Gandhi, J., & Bell, C. (2016) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2016.1 · Cited by 8
Bellinger, N. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65391-4_2 · Cited by 9
Doyon, J. (2022) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.12291596 · Cited by 11
From Competition to Dominance: Political Determinants of Federal Transfers in the Russian FederationPreprint
Yakovlev, A. A., Marques, I., & Nazrullaeva, E. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2005710 · Cited by 9
“…have argued that the degree to which elites, on the one hand, and the populace, on the other, threaten the autocrat shifts over time, most studies have tended to focus on describing autocratic stability at specific moments in the life cycle of a regime (Geddes 1999; Smith 2005; Blaydes 2010).”
BackgroundBalancing the three pillars of stability in Armenia and Georgia
Shubladze, R., & Khundadze, T. (2017) · Caucasus Survey · doi:10.1080/23761199.2017.1377037 · Cited by 9
“the coercive nature of these regimes, information gaps persist where government actors cannot reliably know the extent of their popularity with the population (Geddes 1999).”
BackgroundNarratives and International Reconciliation
Lind, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz072 · Cited by 8
Personal Power in Africa: Legislative Networks and Executive Appointments in Ghana, Togo and Gabon
Osei, A., & Wigmore-Shepherd, D. S. (2022) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2022.42 · Cited by 8
“Barbara Geddes (1999) sees per-sonalism as a distinct type of authoritarian rule, while Michael Wahman et al. (2013) argue that it can be present in any given regime – albeit to varying degrees.”
BackgroundRobi, S. (2024) · International Development Planning Review · doi:10.3828/idpr.2024.5 · Cited by 8
In the Army We Trust: Public Confidence in Global South Militaries
Lotito, N. J., & Joyce, R. M. (2024) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/00220027241267839 · Cited by 9
“Military regimes are the least durable regime type (Geddes 1999; Magaloni 2008), and military rulers are more likely to repress human rights and spark civil war (Geddes, Wright, and Frantz 2014, 149).”
Wang, F. Y. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197757505.001.0001 · Cited by 9
Democracy, Autocracy, and the Design of International Organizations
Tallberg, J., & Vikberg, C. (2025) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqaf034 · Cited by 8
Wong, S. H., & Zeng, Y. (2016) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.11.002 · Cited by 8
The new authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union
Way, L. A. (2010) · Communist and Post-Communist Studies · doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.10.010 · Cited by 8
“However, much of this literature (Geddes, 1999; Gandhi and Przeworski, 2007; Magaloni, 2008) has operated at a high level of abstraction and generality – based on formalizedmodels of elite interaction; or analyses of large-n country datasets.”
BackgroundElectoral Spending Cycles in Dictatorships
Wright, J. (2011) · Cited by 8
Who Wins, Who Loses, Who Negotiates Peace in Civil Wars: Does Regime Type Matter?
Phayal, A., Mason, T. D., & Gurses, M. (2019) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz011 · Cited by 8
Term Limits and Succession in Dictatorships
Ezrow, N. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198837404.003.0014 · Cited by 8
Schaaf, S. D. (2021) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/lasr.12527 · Cited by 10
“By contrast, a “regime” more broadly indicates sets of “formal and informal rules and procedures for selecting leaders and policies” in a polity (Geddes 1999: 116).”
BackgroundState and Social Protests in China
Cai, Y., & Chen, C.-J. J. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108982924 · Cited by 8
Human Rights and Corruption in Settling the Accounts of the Past
Suh, J. (2023) · Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia · doi:10.1163/22134379-bja10049 · Cited by 8
Determinants of Positive Attitudes towards an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Belarus
Klymenko, L., & Gherghina, S. (2012) · The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review · doi:10.1163/18763324-03902006 · Cited by 8
Thies, C. G., Chyzh, O. V., & Nieman, M. D. (2015) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.27 · Cited by 8
EAST ASIAN PATHWAYS TOWARD DEMOCRACY: A QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF “THE THIRD WAVE”
Hao, S., & Gao, Q. (2016) · Journal of East Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/jea.2016.2 · Cited by 8
Bridoux, J. (2019) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2018.1557148 · Cited by 8
EU Democracy Promotion in the Mediterranean - Cooperation against All Odds?Preprint
van Hüllen, V. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 8
Vietnam Through Chinese Eyes: Divergent Accountability in Single-Party RegimesPreprint
Abrami, R. M., Malesky, E. J., & Zheng, Y. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1669712 · Cited by 8
International Sanctions against Iran under President Ahmadinejad: Explaining Regime PersistencePreprint
Borszik, O. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 8
The Political Economics of Non-democracyPreprint
Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3706331 · Cited by 53
“2Early analysis of dictatorships includes Olson (1965), Roemer (1985), Tullock (1987), Kuran (1989), Grossman and Noh (1990), Tilly (1993), Przeworski and Limongi (1993), Lohmann (1994), McGuire and Olson (1996), Wintrobe (1990, 1998), and Geddes (1999).”
Revenue Extraction Is Not Enough: The Ambiguous Effectiveness of the Rwandan Revenue AuthorityPreprint
Chemouni, B. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3716821 · Cited by 8
“At a higher level, the RRA performance resulted from the commitment of a vulnerable elite to shelter it from political interference (cf. Geddes 1999).”
BackgroundPopulist civil society, the Wagner Group, and post-coup politics in Mali
Elischer, S. (2022) · The West African papers · doi:10.1787/b6249de6-en · Cited by 8
Teorell, J., & Lindberg, S. I. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2613827 · Cited by 8
Way, L. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197598757.003.0005 · Cited by 7
Wiebrecht, F. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231205296 · Cited by 11
“Yet, Geddes (1999, p. 121) famously held that “ different kinds of authoritarianism [signi fi cantly] differ from each other ” and the same applies to authoritarian regimes ’ parliaments.”
BackgroundParty Origins, Party Infrastructural Strength, and Governance Outcomes
Zeng, Q. (2024) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123423000455 · Cited by 8
“Both large-N studies and case analyses have found that party-based regimes are more resilient than those without parties (Geddes 1999; Svolik 2012; Wright and Escribà-Folch 2012) and that regimes with strong parties are more resilient than those with weak parties (Brownlee 2007; Kavasoglu 2022;…”
BackgroundThree Levels of Authoritarian Legitimacy
Silvan, K. (2024) · Communist and Post-Communist Studies · doi:10.1525/cpcs.2024.1996171 · Cited by 7
Cambodia’s Perceptions of China
Watanabe, S., & Samreth, S. (2024) · Asian Survey · doi:10.1525/as.2024.2325932 · Cited by 7
Why do autocracies enfranchise their citizens abroad? A large-N event history analysis, 1990–2010
Fliess, N., Kiani, A., & Østergaard‐Nielsen, E. (2024) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2024.2383795 · Cited by 7
Hot Water after the Cold War – Water Policy Dynamics in (Semi-)Authoritarian States
Mollinga, P. P. (2010) · Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) · Cited by 7
Do Political Regimes Matter for Technology Diffusion?
Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2023) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-023-01266-0 · Cited by 7
It’s the state, indeed! How state capacity facilitates social equality in authoritarian regimes
Vaccaro, A., & Panaro, A. V. (2024) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569775.2024.2310745 · Cited by 12
“A conventional view in the literature on authoritarian regimes is that autocrats do not live in isolation and do not govern with the mere use of repressive strategies (Gandhi, 2015; Geddes, 1999).”
Development and Underdevelopment in the Middle East and North Africa
Cammett, M. C. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199845156.013.25 · Cited by 7
“( ) Multiple other sources point to the disproportionate presence of authoritarian regimes in the Middle East and North Africa (Diamond 2010; Geddes 1999).”
A Note on the Determinants of the Regulation of Religion
Schleutker, E. (2016) · Politics and Religion · doi:10.1017/s1755048316000109 · Cited by 7
Les jeunes Chinois dans différents espaces nationaux : expressions et engagements politiques
Frenkiel, É., & Wang, S. (2017) · Participations · doi:10.3917/parti.017.0007 · Cited by 7
“Entre les régimes les plus forts, faibles, durs ou modérés, efficaces ou non, les différences peuvent être encore plus grandes qu’avec les régimes démocratiques (Geddes, 1999).”
BackgroundDemocratic Resilience in South Korea and Taiwan
Wong, J. (2018) · Challenges to democracy in the 21st century · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89453-9_8 · Cited by 7
Chow, J. T., & Easley, L. (2019) · Contemporary Security Policy · doi:10.1080/13523260.2019.1660483 · Cited by 7
“Unlike military juntas, where power is diffused throughout the upper echelons of leadership, personalist regimes are defined by a single leader’s ability to control access to office and its perquisites (Geddes, 1999, pp. 121–122).”
BackgroundRepresentation in a context across political orders and the Chinese case
Heberer, T. (2019) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2019.1672363 · Cited by 7
All Power to the Party! The Sources of Ruling Party Strength in Authoritarian Regimes
Zeng, Q. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423920000839 · Cited by 8
Grünewald, A. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1961129 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Geddes, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Geddes, Barbara
- ORCID
- Geddes, Barbara
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-144
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2166749687
- Cited by
- 2,025
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 84
- FWCI
- 21.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- democratization, tipping points, authoritarian regimes, political regimes, economic downturn, economic development and democracy, late 20th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review