The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination
Abstract
This chapter reviews and critiques recent work on prejudice, discrimination, and racism, with an emphasis on evidence of continuing discrimination in the United States and efforts to understand its basis in prejudice. Three lines of research are the primary subject of the review: recent work on the measurement of discrimination, especially audit methods; theories of new prejudice and new racism following the Civil Rights movement; and research on implicit prejudicial attitudes. The most sophisticated new work on prejudice and discrimination is characterized by a multidimensional understanding of prejudice and/or the use of experimental methods. This review argues that research on implicit prejudice, largely developed by psychologists, provides an important new understanding of the basis of discrimination and should be incorporated in sociological accounts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793
Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62 · Cited by 1,567
White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9781685850272 · Cited by 897
Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do
Pager, D., & Quillian, L. (2005) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240507000301 · Cited by 640
Self-citationWhy can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002) · Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.88 · Cited by 593
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871 · Cited by 553
What We Know Now About Bias and Intergroup Conflict, the Problem of the Century
Fiske, S. T. (2002) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00183 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102651 · Cited by 823
Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States
Tilcsik, A. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/661653 · Cited by 687
Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: a meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990–2015
Zschirnt, E., & Ruedin, D. (2016) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2015.1133279 · Cited by 597
The Race Discrimination System
Reskin, B. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145508 · Cited by 558
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000022 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Quillian, L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 299-328
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2116255638
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
