Cited by 87Physical Activity and HealthPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Functional high-intensity training improves pancreatic β-cell function in adults with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Nieuwoudt, Stephan, Fealy, Ciarán E., Foucher, Julie A., Scelsi, Amanda R., Malin, Steven K., Pagadala, Mangesh, Rocco, Michael, Burguera, Bartolome +1 more·2017·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by reductions in β-cell function and insulin secretion on the background of elevated insulin resistance. Aerobic exercise has been shown to improve β-cell function, despite a subset of T2D patients displaying “exercise resistance.” Further investigations into the effectiveness of alternate forms of exercise on β-cell function in the T2D patient population are needed. We examined the effect of a novel, 6-wk CrossFit functional high-intensity training (F-HIT) intervention on β-cell function in 12 sedentary adults with clinically diagnosed T2D (54 ± 2 yr, 166 ± 16 mg/dl fasting glucose). Supervised training was completed 3 days/wk, comprising functional movements performed at a high intensity in a variety of 10- to 20-min sessions. All subjects completed an oral glucose tolerance test and anthropometric measures at baseline and following the intervention. The mean disposition index, a validated measure of β-cell function, was significantly increased (PRE: 8.4 ± 3.1, POST: 11.5 ± 3.5, P = 0.02) after the intervention. Insulin processing inefficiency in the β-cell, expressed as the fasting proinsulin-to-insulin ratio, was also reduced (PRE: 2.40 ± 0.37, POST: 1.78 ± 0.30, P = 0.04). Increased β-cell function during the early-phase response to glucose correlated significantly with reductions in abdominal body fat ( R 2= 0.56, P = 0.005) and fasting plasma alkaline phosphatase ( R 2= 0.55, P = 0.006). Mean total body-fat percentage decreased significantly (Δ: −1.17 0.30%, P = 0.003), whereas lean body mass was preserved (Δ: +0.05 ± 0.68 kg, P = 0.94). We conclude that F-HIT is an effective exercise strategy for improving β-cell function in adults with T2D.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.00407.2016

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-intensity interval training reduced total body-fat percentage and protected lean body mass.

    “The total body-fat percentage was reduced, whereas lean body mass was protected.”
  • High-intensity interval training is strongly associated with improvement of β-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    “Another study also has confirmed that high-intensity interval training is strongly associated with the improvement of β-cell function in patients with T2D.”
  • High-intensity interval training was not able to regulate fasting plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, proinsulin, and free fatty acids, nor first-phase and late-phase plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin.

    “Noteworthy, high-intensity interval training was not able to regulate the levels of fasting plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, pro- insulin, and free fatty acids, nor did the levels of first-phase (0–30 min) and late-phase (30–180 min) plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin (174).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieuwoudt, S., Fealy, C. E., Foucher, J. A., Scelsi, A. R., Malin, S. K., Pagadala, M., Rocco, M., Burguera, B., & Kirwan, J. P.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Kirwan, John P.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
313
Issue
3
Pages
E314-E320
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2616792756
Cited by
87
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CrossFit, Inc.
  • Cleveland Clinic (RPC 2013-1010)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1RR024989)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, beta-cell function, CrossFit, exercise intervention, disposition index, proinsulin/insulin ratio, first-phase insulin secretion, alkaline phosphatase, lean body mass, sedentary adults
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Adipose Tissue, Alkaline Phosphatase, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Proinsulin, Abdominal Fat, Insulin-Secreting Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review