CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 196Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

Anterior cingulate cortex and the medial pain system,

Vogt, Brent A., Sikes, Robert W., Vogt, Leslie J.·1993·Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-6704-6_11
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The processing of sensory afferents in the cerebral cortex involves divergent processing of components of each sensory space. In the visual system, for example, there are separate and sequential, corticocortical projections for the analysis of form, color, movement, and depth (DeYoe and Van Essen, 1988; Livingstone and Hubel, 1988; Zeki and Shipp, 1988). A divergence of functional processing of different features of noci-ceptor-evoked activity may also occur in the cerebral cortex. Thus, there is a long history for dividing the pain system into two theoretical components: one involved in localization and sensory discrimination and the other involved in affective responses to noxious stimuli (e.g., Melzack and Casey, 1968; Melzack, 1975; Kenshalo and Willis, 1991). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-6704-6_11

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some parts of cACC are highly involved in emotional processes including negative valence such as pain unpleasantness, social exclusion, and fear potentiation/appraisal.

    “In fact, some parts of cACC are highly involved in emotional processes that include negative valence such as pain unpleasantness (Vogt et al., 1993), social exclusion (Eisenberger, 2012) and fear potentiation and appraisal (Etkin et al., 2011; Milad and Quirk, 2012).”

    From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Vogt et al., 1993

  • High concentration of opioid receptors in rACC relates to attentional mechanisms that can suppress pain processing.

    “The high concentration of opioid receptors expressed in rACC (Vogt et al., 1993; Fields, 2004) has been hypothesized to relate to attentional mechanisms that can suppress pain processing (Petrovic et al., 2002), a suggestion that has received experimental support (Zubieta et al., 2005; Wager et al., 2007; Eippert et al., 2009).”

    From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Vogt et al., 1993

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vogt, B. A., Sikes, R. W., & Vogt, L. J.
Affiliations
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
ORCID
Vogt, Brent A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus
Publisher
Birkhäuser Boston
Published
1993
Pages
313-344
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4899-6704-6_11
OpenAlex
W1856451775
Cited by
196
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Birkhäuser Boston eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
anterior cingulate cortex, pain processing, sensory discrimination, nociception, corticocortical connections, pain localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review