Cited by 74Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

An Associational Model of Birdsong Sensorimotor Learning II. Temporal Hierarchies and the Learning of Song Sequence

Troyer, Todd W., Doupe, Allison J.·2000·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying serially ordered behavior is a fundamental problem in motor learning. We present a computational model of sensorimotor learning in songbirds that is constrained by the known functional anatomy of the song circuit. The model subsumes our companion model for learning individual song “syllables” and relies on the same underlying assumptions. The extended model addresses the problem of learning to produce syllables in the correct sequence. Central to our approach is the hypothesis that the Anterior Forebrain Pathway (AFP) produces signals related to the comparison of the bird's own vocalizations and a previously memorized “template.” This “AFP comparison hypothesis” is challenged by the lack of a direct projection from the AFP to the song nucleus HVc, a candidate site for the generator of song sequence. We propose that sequence generation in HVc results from an associative chain of motor and sensory representations (motor → sensory → next motor … ) encoded within the two known populations of HVc projection neurons. The sensory link in the chain is provided, not by auditory feedback, but by a centrally generated efference copy that serves as an internal prediction of this feedback. The use of efference copy as a substitute for the sensory signal explains the ability of adult birds to produce normal song immediately after deafening. We also predict that the AFP guides sequence learning by biasing motor activity in nucleus RA, the premotor nucleus downstream of HVc. Associative learning then remaps the output of the HVc sequence generator. By altering the motor pathway in RA, the AFP alters the correspondence between HVc motor commands and the resulting sensory feedback and triggers renewed efference copy learning in HVc. Thus, auditory feedback-mediated efference copy learning provides an indirect pathway by which the AFP can influence sequence generation in HVc. The model makes predictions concerning the role played by specific neural populations during the sensorimotor phase of song learning and demonstrates how simple rules of associational plasticity can contribute to the learning of a complex behavior on multiple time scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1224

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The feedback loops execute a delay function by increasing the distance over which corollary discharge issued from vocal centres travels before it collides with auditory feedback.

    “The feedback loops execute a delay function by increasing the distance over which CD that is issued from vocal centres travels before it collides with auditory feedback72,73.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [73]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troyer, T. W., & Doupe, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry,
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
1224-1239
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2256660470
Cited by
74
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32mh012372-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH55987, MH12372, R01MH055987)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 34835, P01NS034835)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
bird song, sensorimotor learning, anterior forebrain pathway, HVC, efference copy, auditory feedback, associative plasticity, temporal hierarchy
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Computer Simulation, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Stereotyped Behavior, Vocalization, Animal, Prosencephalon, Songbirds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review