Cited by 219Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurological disorders and treatments

Birdbrains could teach basal ganglia research a new song

DOUPE, A, PERKEL, D, REINER, A, STERN, E·2005·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Recent advances in anatomical, physiological and histochemical characterization of avian basal ganglia neurons and circuitry have revealed remarkable similarities to mammalian basal ganglia. A modern revision of the avian anatomical nomenclature has now provided a common language for studying the function of the cortical-basal-ganglia-cortical loop, enabling neuroscientists to take advantage of the specialization of basal ganglia areas in various avian species. For instance, songbirds, which learn their vocal motor behavior using sensory feedback, have specialized a portion of their cortical-basal ganglia circuitry for song learning and production. This discrete circuit dedicated to a specific sensorimotor task could be especially tractable for elucidating the interwoven sensory, motor and reward signals carried by basal ganglia, and the function of these signals in task learning and execution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2005.05.005

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disconnecting the bird homologue of the basal ganglia completely blocks new song learning but has little effect on the expression of well-learned songs.

    “Several studies have shown that disconnecting the bird homologue of the basal ganglia completely blocks new song learning, but has little effect on the expression of well-learned songs (see [31] for a review).”
  • Area X does not appear to have large differences in neural connectivity relative to the surrounding striatum.

    “Area X does not appear to have large differences in neural connectivity relative to the surrounding striatum (82)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DOUPE, A., PERKEL, D., REINER, A., & STERN, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
STERN, E
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
353-363
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108558899
Cited by
219
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
songbirds, song learning, phonation, basal ganglia circuitry, sensory feedback, reward signals, task learning, comparative neuroanatomy
MeSH terms
Animals, Basal Ganglia, Learning, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Vocalization, Animal, Songbirds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review