Cited by 8Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Hippocampal infusion of zeta inhibitory peptide impairs recent, but not remote, recognition memory in rats

Open access
Hales, Jena B., Ocampo, Amber C., Broadbent, Nicola J., Clark, Robert E.·2015·Neural Plasticity

Abstract

Spatial memory in rodents can be erased following the infusion of zeta inhibitory peptide (ZIP) into the dorsal hippocampus via indwelling guide cannulas. It is believed that ZIP impairs spatial memory by reversing established late-phase long-term potentiation (LTP). However, it is unclear whether other forms of hippocampus-dependent memory, such as recognition memory, are also supported by hippocampal LTP. In the current study, we tested recognition memory in rats following hippocampal ZIP infusion. In order to combat the limited targeting of infusions via cannula, we implemented a stereotaxic approach for infusing ZIP throughout the dorsal, intermediate, and ventral hippocampus. Rats infused with ZIP 3-7 days after training on the novel object recognition task exhibited impaired object recognition memory compared to control rats (those infused with aCSF). In contrast, rats infused with ZIP 1 month after training performed similar to control rats. The ability to form new memories after ZIP infusions remained intact. We suggest that enhanced recognition memory for recent events is supported by hippocampal LTP, which can be reversed by hippocampal ZIP infusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2015/847136

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hales, J. B., Ocampo, A. C., Broadbent, N. J., & Clark, R. E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Robert E.
Venue
Neural Plasticity
Published
2015
Volume
2015
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1687-5443 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-5904
OpenAlex
W1663624839
Cited by
7
References
30
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neural Plasticity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  • NSF Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
recognition memory, hippocampus, long-term potentiation, novel object recognition, spatial memory, memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Microinjections, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Stereotaxic Techniques, Long-Term Potentiation, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, Lipopeptides, Memory, Long-Term, Cell-Penetrating Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review