Cited by 69Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Oxytocin and neurophysin in plasma and CSF during suckling in the guinea-pig

Robinson, I.C.A.F., Jones, P.M.·2008·Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained from the cisterna magna of conscious unrestrained guinea-pigs was assayed for oxytocin (OT), vasopressin (AVP) and neurophysin (NP). Basal levels of OT and AVP were approximately 5 and 15 fmol/ml, respectively, whereas NP levels were considerably higher (around 1 pmol/ml); there was no significant differences between males, females and lactating females. In lactating females, simultaneous samples of blood and CSF were obtained during suckling episodes. Despite large increases in plasma OT and NP at milk ejection, CSF levels remained unchanged throughout. Intracerebroventricular injection of 100 fmol OT produced an 8-fold rise in the concentration of this peptide in cisternal fluid within 10 min. Since CSF levels of OT and NP do not change when these peptides are released from the pituitary, we conclude that the presence of these peptides in CSF reflects activity of extrapituitary terminals and that these terminals are not activated during suckling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000123278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In lactating rats, hypothalamic oxytocin release in response to suckling precedes peripheral secretion, but in guinea pigs simultaneous measurements showed a large plasma increase during suckling with no change in CSF, leading the authors to conclude that CSF oxytocin reflects secretion from centrally projecting neurons that are functionally independent of magnocellular neurosecretory neurons.

    “In lactating rats, oxytocin is released in the hypothalamus in response to suckling before any peripheral secretion (84), but in guinea pigs, simultaneous measurements revealed a large increase in plasma during suckling but no change in CSF (85), leading the authors to conclude that CSF levels reflect secretion from centrally projecting neurons that are functionally independent of the magno”

    From Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions (2016) · cites this paper as [85]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, I. C. A. F., & Jones, P. M.
Corresponding author
Robinson, I.C.A.F.
Venue
Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-03-26
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
59-63
ISSN
  • 0028-3835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0194
OpenAlex
W1995617239
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
oxytocin, neurophysin, vasopressin, cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, suckling, lactation, milk ejection, guinea pig
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Guinea Pigs, Lactation, Male, Neurophysins, Oxytocin, Pituitary Gland, Posterior, Pregnancy, Vasopressins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review