Cited by 84Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Self-reported head injury and risk of late-life impairment and AD pathology in an AD center cohort

Open access
Abner, Erin L., Nelson, Peter T., Schmitt, Frederick A., Browning, Steven R., Fardo, David W., Wan, Lijie, Jicha, Gregory A., Cooper, Gregory E. +4 more·2014·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the relationship between self-reported head injury and cognitive impairment, dementia, mortality, and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-type pathological changes. Methods: Clinical and neuropathological data from participants enrolled in a longitudinal study of aging and cognition (n = 649) were analyzed to assess the chronic effects of self-reported head injury. Results: The effect of self-reported head injury on the clinical state depended on the age at assessment: for a 1-year increase in age, the OR for the transition to clinical mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at the next visit for participants with a history of head injury was 1.21 and 1.34 for the transition from MCI to dementia. Without respect to age, head injury increased the odds of mortality (OR = 1.54). Moreover, it increased the odds of a pathological diagnosis of AD for men (OR = 1.47) but not women (OR = 1.18). Men with a head injury had higher mean amyloid plaque counts in the neocortex and entorhinal cortex than men without. Conclusions: Self-reported head injury is associated with earlier onset, increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, increased risk of mortality, and AD-type pathological changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000355478

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This might explain why family carer proxies show only low-to-moderate agreement with stated end-of-life treatment preferences of people with dementia.

    “This might explain why family carer proxies show only low-to-moderate agreement with stated end-of-life treatment preferences of people with dementia.309”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [309]

    The Methods (Statistical Analysis; page not provided) and Results (Clinical Data; page not provided) examine head injury and transitions to cognitive impairment or dementia. Searches for family-carer proxies, surrogate decisions, and agreement about end-of-life treatment preferences found no passage addressing the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abner, E. L., Nelson, P. T., Schmitt, F. A., Browning, S. R., Fardo, D. W., Wan, L., Jicha, G. A., Cooper, G. E., Smith, C. D., Caban-Holt, A. M., Van Eldik, L. J., & Kryscio, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Central Baptist Hospital (US)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013-12-31
Volume
37
Issue
5-6
Pages
294-306
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2044868747
Cited by
84
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Kentucky (P30 AG028383, AG028383, UL1 TR000117)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000117, 5r01ag038651-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-028383, R01AG019241, R01‐AG038651, P30AG028383, K25AG043546)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, mortality, amyloid plaques, entorhinal cortex, sex differences, cognitive aging, neuropathology, late-life cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Brain Concussion, Educational Status, Female, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Unconsciousness, Cohort Studies, Linear Models, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review