Cited by 190Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Low-Sodium DASH Diet Improves Diastolic Function and Ventricular–Arterial Coupling in Hypertensive Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Open access
Hummel, Scott L., Seymour, E. Mitchell, Brook, Robert D., Sheth, Samar S., Ghosh, Erina, Zhu, Simeng, Weder, Alan B., Kovács, Sándor J. +1 more·2013·Circulation: Heart Failure

Abstract

Background—: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) involves failure of cardiovascular reserve in multiple domains. In HFPEF animal models, dietary sodium restriction improves ventricular and vascular stiffness and function. We hypothesized that the sodium-restricted dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet (DASH/SRD) would improve left ventricular diastolic function, arterial elastance, and ventricular–arterial coupling in hypertensive HFPEF. Methods and Results—: Thirteen patients with treated hypertension and compensated HFPEF consumed the DASH/SRD (target sodium, 50 mmol/2100 kcal) for 21 days. We measured baseline and post-DASH/SRD brachial and central blood pressure (via radial arterial tonometry) and cardiovascular function with echocardiographic measures (all previously invasively validated). Diastolic function was quantified via the parametrized diastolic filling formalism that yields relaxation/viscoelastic ( c ) and passive/stiffness ( k ) constants through the analysis of Doppler mitral inflow velocity (E-wave) contours. Effective arterial elastance ( E a ) end-systolic elastance ( E es ) and ventricular–arterial coupling (defined as the ratio E es : E a ) were determined using previously published techniques. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests were used for pre–post comparisons. The DASH/SRD reduced clinic and 24-hour brachial systolic pressure (155±35 to 138±30 and 130±16 to 123±18 mm Hg; both P =0.02), and central end-systolic pressure trended lower (116±18 to 111±16 mm Hg; P =0.12). In conjunction, diastolic function improved ( c =24.3±5.3 to 22.7±8.1 g/s; P =0.03; k =252±115 to 170±37 g/s 2 ; P =0.03), E a decreased (2.0±0.4 to 1.7±0.4 mm Hg/mL; P =0.007), and ventricular–arterial coupling improved ( E es : E a =1.5±0.3 to 1.7±0.4; P =0.04). Conclusions—: In patients with hypertensive HFPEF, the sodium-restricted DASH diet was associated with favorable changes in ventricular diastolic function, arterial elastance, and ventricular–arterial coupling. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00939640.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.113.000481

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple observational studies suggest that a DASH diet reduces heart failure incidence.

    “Multiple observational studies suggest that a DASH diet reduces heart failure incidence214–217.”

    From Dietary metabolism, the gut microbiome, and heart failure (2019) · cites this paper as [214]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hummel, S. L., Seymour, E. M., Brook, R. D., Sheth, S. S., Ghosh, E., Zhu, S., Weder, A. B., Kovács, S. J., & Kolias, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Circulation: Heart Failure
Published
2013-11
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
1165-1171
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W2123965554
Cited by
190
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000433)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL109176)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024986)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, hypertension, sodium restriction, DASH diet, diastolic function, ventricular-arterial coupling, effective arterial elastance, end-systolic elastance, left ventricular stiffness, central blood pressure, cardiovascular reserve, mitral inflow velocity, Doppler echocardiography, arterial tonometry, blood pressure reduction
MeSH terms
Aged, Diastole, Diet, Sodium-Restricted, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Stroke Volume, Echocardiography, Doppler, Ventricular Function, Left, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Vascular Stiffness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review